Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Donald L. Noah is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Donald L. Noah.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 1998

Epidemiology of Human Rabies in the United States, 1980 to 1996

Donald L. Noah; Cherie L. Drenzek; Jean S. Smith; John W. Krebs; Lillian A. Orciari; John H. Shaddock; Dane W. Sanderlin; Sylvia G. Whitfield; Makonnen Fekadu; James G. Olson; Charles E. Rupprecht; James E. Childs

One of the oldest recognized zoonotic diseases, rabies continues to plague humankind and causes more than 35 000 deaths annually [1]. These potentially preventable deaths occur primarily in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where animal control, vaccination programs, and effective human postexposure prophylaxis are not widely available. In contrast, in the United States, deaths in humans caused by rabies totaled 99 in the 1950s, 15 in the 1960s, 23 in the 1970s, 10 in the 1980s, and 22 from 1990 through 1996 [2, 3]. The epidemiology of human rabies is ultimately linked to cycles of rabies virus transmission in animals. With the interruption of dog-to-dog transmission in most regions, the incidence of human rabies in the United States has reached a level that cannot be further reduced without targeting wildlife. An understanding of epidemiologic patterns of rabies virus maintenance in natural populations has emerged in the past 20 years, largely because of advances in immunology and molecular biology. Monoclonal antibody and genetic sequence analyses of rabies virus variants permit detailed descriptions of enzootic maintenance cycles of specific virus variants in the United States [4, 5]. These analyses have led to an understanding of how variants of rabies virus are maintained in natural reservoirs within geographic regions and have provided information on variability of the virus itself. Current epidemiologic patterns of rabies in the United States can be summarized as follows: The annual reports of rabies in wildlife exceed those of rabies in domestic animals [6]; rabies variants in bats are associated with a disproportionate number of infections in humans, although bats constitute only about 10% of all reported rabies cases in animals annually; most other cases of human rabies diagnosed in the United States can be attributed to infections acquired in areas of enzootic canine rabies outside of the United States; most persons with a case of rabies that originated in the United States have no history of an animal bite; and rabies is diagnosed after death in more than one third of the latter group. The last published summary of cases of human rabies in the United States covered the period from 1960 to 1979 [3]. This review discusses the clinical and epidemiologic features of cases of human rabies in the United States from 1980 to 1996. Methods Case Definition This report includes all laboratory-confirmed cases of human rabies in the United States or its territories from 1980 to 1996 [7-31]. All of the cases were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by health authorities as part of ongoing national surveillance. Variable Definitions Onset of illness was defined as either the first day of reported symptoms attributable to rabies or the date of initial presentation for medical care before confirmation of rabies. Clinical signs attributable to rabies included paresthesia, anxiety, agitation, confusion, disorientation, hydrophobia, aerophobia, hypersalivation, dysphagia, paresis, paralysis, and fluctuating levels of consciousness [32, 33]. The type of transmitting animal and the geographic location of exposure were listed if the case history included a definite animal bite. The reliability of information that linked rabies exposure to a human was assessed by subsequent laboratory typing of the rabies virus variant. All other exposures were defined as unknown. The diagnosis of rabies was considered antemortem if it was tentatively made and samples were obtained specifically for rabies testing before the patients death. Laboratory Tests The diagnosis of rabies was confirmed by using standard tests [34] conducted at the CDC or at a state laboratory. Serology Two tests were used to detect rabies antibody: the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test and the indirect immunofluorescence assay. The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test measures neutralizing antibody. An antibody titer of 1:5 or more, as defined by the reciprocal of the serum or cerebrospinal fluid dilution that reduces the challenge virus by 50%, was considered positive. An indirect immunofluorescence assay, using patient serum or cerebrospinal fluid diluted 1:4 or more, detects serum reactive with rabies antigen in infected cell cultures. The presence of antibody in serum was considered diagnostic if no vaccine or antirabies serum was given to the patient. Antibody in the cerebrospinal fluid, regardless of the rabies immunization history, was considered indicative of rabies virus infection. Virus Isolation Suspensions of brain or saliva specimens were added to mouse neuroblastoma cells and cultured for 24 and 48 hours. Culture slides were fixed and examined by direct immunofluorescence assay for antigen. Samples that were initially negative were maintained for an additional 3 to 4 days and retested. The negative result was considered definitive if it occurred both times. Antigen Detection Antigen detection was performed by direct immunofluorescence of assay serial frozen sections of nuchal skin biopsy specimens, touch impressions of corneal epithelial cells, or fresh brain matter. Paraffin-embedded fixed brain matter was sectioned and enzyme-digested before direct immunofluorescence. RNA Detection Standard extraction procedures and reagents were used to obtain nucleic acids from samples of undiluted saliva; from fresh or paraffin-embedded fixed samples of the brain; or, occasionally, from other tissues. Reverse transcription of RNA and complementary DNA amplification were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers derived from the sequence of the N protein gene. The nucleotide sequence of all PCR products was obtained by standard dideoxynucleotide sequencing methods. Rabies virus variants were identified by comparing samples of rabies virus obtained from all known reservoirs for rabies in the United States [5] with samples of rabies virus obtained from dogs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America [35]. Statistical Analysis Data analyses were performed by using EPI INFO 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia) or SPSS 6.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) [36, 37]. Specific tests are identified in the text. Some variables were dichotomized before statistical comparisons for determination of odds ratios and 95% CIs. All reported P values are for two-tailed tests of significance. Results Demographic Information Thirty-two persons died of rabies in the United States from 1980 through 1996. Patients ranged in age from 4 to 82 years (median, 27 years) and 20 (63%) were male (Table 1). Cases were reported from 20 states; 7 cases (22%) were reported in California and 6 in Texas. Eleven patients were exposed to rabies in eight foreign countries on the basis of variant typing. The onset of illness occurred in all months and had no apparent seasonal pattern. Dates of exposure, based on the history of an animal bite, were obtained for 7 patients (22%) (Table 1). Table 1. Human Rabies in the United States, 1980-1996 Exposure History A definite history of animal exposure was identified in 7 of the 32 patients (22%), and 25 remained unknown or indefinite (Table 1). Of the 7 cases of definite exposure, 6 resulted from a dog bite received in a foreign country and 1 was from a bat bite received in the United States. Although rabies was not diagnosed in any of the animals that inflicted bites, in each case the rabies virus variant identified in the human sample was consistent with that in the animal species implicated as the source of infection (Table 1). Contact with an animal, thereby suggesting the source for infection, was identified in 12 persons (8 with a bat, 2 with a dog, 1 with a cow, and 1 with a cat). This human-animal contact, however, could not be linked to a bite or mucous membrane contact with the saliva of an animal potentially infected with rabies virus. The remaining 13 patients did not report animal contact; thus, a potential source of exposure was not identified. Histories were obtained before death from friends or relatives in 9 cases and from 4 children aged 11 to 13 years. Prophylaxis None of the 32 patients received a complete series of rabies prophylaxis after exposure; patient 7 reported receiving a single injection of an unknown type after a dog bite in Guatemala, and patients 15, 29, and 30 received human rabies immune globulin during the course of their clinical illness. Clinical Presentation For the 7 patients in which a definite animal bite occurred, the median incubation period was 85 days (range, 53 to 150 days). The first signs and symptoms of rabies were often nonspecific, including fever, sore throat, chills, malaise, anorexia, headache, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, cough, and weakness. Specific symptoms, such as paresthesias at or near the presumed exposure site, were also reported early in the clinical course, and 19 of the 32 patients (59%) had three or more clinical findings suggestive of rabies during the course of their illness (Table 2). The 32 patients were seen by physicians on an outpatient basis a median of one time (range, 0 to 5 times) before hospitalization, and the median length of time from the onset of illness attributable to rabies to hospitalization was 4 days (range, 1 to 10 days). Table 2. Clinical Findings Suggestive of Rabies in 32 Patients* On admission, 21 of the 32 patients (66%) were febrile (oral temperature > 37.8C), including 12 patients with temperatures greater than 39.5C. Of the 11 patients who were afebrile on admission, 5 reported being febrile before admission, 2 became febrile within 2 days of admission, and 4 had no additional temperatures recorded. The antemortem diagnosis of rabies was first considered at the time of hospitalization in 5 patients, within 1 day of hospitalization in 5 patients, and after a median of 6 days of hospitalization (range, 2 to 12 days) in 10 patients. In 12 patients, rabies was diagnosed after death. Th


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 1999

Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995: risk factors for patients without a reported exposure.

T. H. Roels; A. S. Bloom; J. Buffington; G. L. Muhungu; W. R. Mac Kenzie; Ali S. Khan; R. Ndambi; Donald L. Noah; H. R. Rolka; Clarence J. Peters; Thomas G. Ksiazek

In 1995, 316 people became ill with Ebola hemorrhagic fever (EHF) in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo. The exposure source was not reported for 55 patients (17%) at the start of this investigation, and it remained unknown for 12 patients after extensive epidemiologic evaluation. Both admission to a hospital and visiting a person with fever and bleeding were risk factors associated with infection. Nineteen patients appeared to have been exposed while visiting someone with suspected EHF, although they did not provide care. Fourteen of the 19 reported touching the patient with suspected EHF; 5 reported that they had no physical contact. Although close contact while caring for an infected person was probably the major route of transmission in this and previous EHF outbreaks, the virus may have been transmitted by touch, droplet, airborne particle, or fomite; thus, expansion of the use of barrier techniques to include casual contacts might prevent or mitigate future epidemics.


Journal of Wildlife Diseases | 1997

SURVEILLANCE AND SPATIOTEMPORAL ASSOCIATIONS OF RABIES IN RODENTS AND LAGOMORPHS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1985–1994

James E. Childs; Lesley Colby; John W. Krebs; Tara W. Strine; Michelle Feller; Donald L. Noah; Cherie L. Drenzek; Jean S. Smith; Charles E. Rupprecht

Between 1985 and 1994, 368 cases of rabies in rodents (95% of reports) and lagomorphs (5%) were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (USA), from 22 states. This was a 354% increase from the period 1971 to 1984. Most reports were cases of rabies in woodchucks (Marmota monax) (n = 317), primarily from the eastern United States, which has been recently experiencing an epizootic of raccoon (Procyon lotor) rabies. Cases of rabies in woodchucks were temporally and spatially associated with reports of raccoon rabies. Antigenic or genetic characterization of variants of rabies viruses from rodents and woodchucks corresponded to the variants associated with the major terrestrial wildlife reservoir within the geographic region of specimen origin. Although rodents and lagomorphs are infrequently infected with rabies and human contact with these animals rarely requires postexposure treatment, appropriate health authorities need to evaluate individual circumstances surrounding potential exposures.


Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal | 1995

Cluster of five children with acute encephalopathy associated with cat-scratch disease in South Florida

Donald L. Noah; Joseph S. Bresee; Margaret J. Gorensek; Jane A. Rooney; James L. Cresanta; Russell L. Regnery; Jackson Wong; Jorge Del Toro; James G. Olson; James E. Childs

Between August 12 and September 27, 1994, five children in South Florida were hospitalized at a single hospital because of encephalopathy, presenting as status epilepticus, associated with cat-scratch disease (CSD). Diagnoses were confirmed by using an indirect fluorescent antibody test to detect antibody to Bartonella henselae, the causative agent of CSD. These cases represent the first cluster of CSD encephalopathy cases to be recognized in the United States. The patients lived within 7 miles of each other and all reported contact with pet or stray cats before developing regional lymphadenopathy and encephalopathy. All recovered fully. A high proportion of 124 cats from the local area were seropositive (62%) or bacteremic (22%). This study suggests that B. henselae can be associated with geographically focal clusters of CSD encephalitis and should be considered in the evaluation of children with acute encephalopathy.


Military Medicine | 2006

Department of defense global emerging infections surveillance and response system indian ocean tsunami response

Jean-Paul Chretien; Jonathan S. Glass; Rodney C. Coldren; Donald L. Noah; Randall N. Hyer; Joel C. Gaydos; Joseph L. Malone

The Department of Defense (DoD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DoD-GEIS) identifies and addresses DoD vulnerabilities to emerging infections through a global network of partners. Following the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004, DoD-GEIS facilitated the DoD medical response and coordination with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. DoD-GEIS partners in Southeast Asia (U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit 2, Jakarta, Indonesia; and Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand) rapidly conducted health assessments and established surveillance for communicable diseases that threatened survivors. Preexisting collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and host countries was critical for the DoD-GEIS tsunami response.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 1999

Biological Warfare Training: Infectious Disease Outbreak Differentiation Criteriaa

Donald L. Noah; Annette L. Sobel; Stephen M. Ostroff; John A. Kildew

Abstract: The threat of biological terrorism and warfare may increase as the availability of weaponizable agents increase, the relative production costs of these agents decrease, and, most importantly, there exist terrorist groups willing to use them. Therefore, an important consideration during the current emphasis of heightened surveillance for emerging infectious diseases is the capability to differentiate between natural and intentional outbreaks. Certain attributes of a disease outbreak, while perhaps not pathognomic for a biological attack when considered singly, may in combination with other attributes provide convincing evidence for intentional causation. These potentially differentiating criteria include proportion of combatants at risk, temporal patterns of illness onset, number of cases, clinical presentation, strain/variant, economic impact, geographic location, morbidity/mortality, antimicrobial resistance patterns, seasonal distribution, zoonotic potential, residual infectivity/toxicity, prevention/therapeutic potential, route of exposure, weather/climate conditions, incubation period, and concurrence with belligerent activities of potential adversaries.


Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association | 2017

Survey of intestinal parasitism in dogs in the Phoenix metropolitan area

Heather N. Cornell; Peter R. O'Neal; Valerie M. Wong; Donald L. Noah

OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of selected intestinal parasites in pet dogs and recently apprehended free-roaming (AFR) shelter dogs in the Phoenix metropolitan area and compare those prevalences between the 2 groups. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SAMPLE Convenience samples of fecal specimens from owned pet dogs from the Phoenix metropolitan area (n = 175) and free-roaming dogs apprehended and admitted to Maricopa County Animal Care and Control and Arizona Humane Society facilities from November 2014 through March 2015 (188). PROCEDURES Fresh fecal specimens were collected from all dogs; for AFR shelter dogs, specimens were collected within 72 hours after facility admission. Standard centrifugal flotation tests and an ELISA were performed to detect 5 common intestinal parasites (roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, Giardia spp, and Cystoisospora spp). Group comparisons were performed by means of the χ2 test and Rogan-Gladen prevalence estimate. RESULTS At least 1 of the 5 evaluated parasites was detected in 85 (45.2%) fecal specimens from AFR shelter dogs and 24 (13.7%) specimens from owned pet dogs. This prevalence differed significantly between the groups. Notably, the prevalence of Giardia spp in AFR shelter dogs (n = 76 [40.4%]) was higher than previously reported in the United States. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The prevalence of the evaluated intestinal parasites, particularly of Giardia spp, in AFR shelter dogs was higher than expected. This information is important for veterinarians, animal shelter personnel, pet owners, human health-care providers, and public health officials to consider when devising effective interventions and risk communication efforts against potential zoonotic threats, particularly those relevant to the Phoenix metropolitan area.


JAMA | 1998

Chronic Multisymptom Illness Affecting Air Force Veterans of the Gulf War

Keiji Fukuda; Rosane Nisenbaum; Geraldine Stewart; William W. Thompson; Laura Robin; Rita M. Washko; Donald L. Noah; Drue H. Barrett; Bonnie Randall; Barbara L. Herwaldt; Alison C. Mawle; William C. Reeves


Archive | 2000

The Global Infectious Disease Threat and Its Implications for the United States

Donald L. Noah; George Fidas


Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America | 2002

The history and threat of biological warfare and terrorism

Donald L. Noah; Kermit D Huebner; Robert G Darling; Joseph F. Waeckerle

Collaboration


Dive into the Donald L. Noah's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Krebs

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean S. Smith

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen M. Ostroff

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annette L. Sobel

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cherie L. Drenzek

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James G. Olson

Naval Medical Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane A. Rooney

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie A. Pavlin

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge