Donald M. Poretz

Medicare Coverage of Outpatient Ambulatory Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy: A Program that Pays for Itself

A number of studies have documented the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of outpatient intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy for patients with infectious diseases. Nevertheless, Medicare policy prohibiting coverage of outpatient, self-administered drugs has severely limited access of Medicare patients to ambulatory i.v. therapy, thus forcing them to rely on more costly, impatient hospital care. To test the hypothesis that a new Medicare benefit providing coverage for ambulatory i.v. antibiotic therapy could significantly reduce the programs expenditures for the treatment of infectious diseases (including pneumonia, osteomyelitis, cellulitis, and endocarditis), a cost model was constructed with use of patient care information from the clinical literature as well as clinical experts, Medicare data, and other medical claims databases. The model shows cumulative 5-year savings of nearly

Executive functioning and compliance in HIV patients.

1.5 billion associated with the new Medicare benefit. Policy makers should consider implementing such a benefit.

Infectious Diseases Specialty Intervention is Associated with Better Outcomes among Privately Insured Individuals Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

25 adult HIV patients were evaluated in a study of appointments, medication, and compliance with restrictions on sexual activity. The Executive Interview (EXIT) was useful in assessing these patients for cognitive difficulties; compliance with medication and countertransference issues were negatively correlated with EXIT scores.

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Today

BACKGROUND Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) can be managed by specialists in infectious diseases (ID) or by other physicians. Better management of OPAT can reduce the likelihood of readmission or emergency department (ED) use. The relative success of ID specialists and other physicians in managing OPAT has received little study. METHODS We analyzed a national database of insurance claims for privately insured individuals under age 65, locating inpatient acute-care stays in 2013 and 2014 that were followed by OPAT. Through propensity scoring, patients who received outpatient ID intervention (ID-led OPAT) were matched 1-to-1 with those who did not (Other OPAT). We estimated regression models of hospital and ED admissions and of total healthcare payments over the first 30 days after discharge. RESULTS The final analytic sample of 8200 observations was well balanced on clinical and demographic characteristics. Soft-tissue infection and osteomyelitis were the most common infections in the index event, each affecting more than 40% of individuals. Relative to those with Other OPAT, people with ID-led OPAT had lower odds of an ED admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.449, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.311-0.645) or hospitalization (OR 0.661, 95% CI 0.557-0.791) over 30 days, and they accumulated

The Infusion Center: A Model for Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy

1488 less in total healthcare payments (95% CI -2 688.56--266.58). CONCLUSIONS Among privately insured individuals below age 65, ID consultations during OPAT are associated with large and significant reductions in the rates of ED admission and hospital admission in the 30 days after index events, as well as lower total healthcare spending.