Doreen Papajcik

RENAL OUTCOME 25 YEARS AFTER DONOR NEPHRECTOMY

PURPOSE The extended outcome after kidney donation has been a particular concern ever since the recognition of hyperfiltration injury. Few published reports have examined donor renal outcome after 20 years or greater. Kidney transplantation has been performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation since 1963, at which there is extensive experience with live donor transplantation. We assess the impact of donor nephrectomy on renal function, urinary protein excretion and development of hypertension postoperatively to examine whether renal deterioration occurs with followup after 20 years or greater. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1963 to 1975, 180 live donor nephrectomies were performed at the Cleveland Clinic. We attempted to contact all patients to request participation in our study. Those 70 patients who agreed to participate in the study were mailed a package containing a 24-hour urine container (for assessment of creatinine, and total protein and albumin), a vial for blood collection (for assessment of serum creatinine) and a medical questionnaire. All specimens were returned to and processed by the Cleveland Clinic medical laboratories. Blood pressure was taken and recorded by a local physician. A 24-hour creatinine clearance and the Cockcroft-Gault formula were used to estimate renal function, and values were compared with an age adjusted glomerular filtration rate for a solitary kidney. RESULTS Mean patient followup was 25 years. The 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance decreased to 72% of the value before donation. For the entire study cohort serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure after donation were significantly increased compared with values before, although still in the normal range. The overall incidence of hypertension was comparable to that expected in the age matched general population. There was no gender or age difference (younger or older than 50 years) for 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance, or change in serum creatinine before or after donation. Urinary protein and albumin excretion after donation was significantly higher in males compared with females. There were 13 (19%) subjects who had a 24-hour urinary protein excretion that was greater than 0.15 gm./24 hours, 5 (7%) of whom had greater than 0.8. No gender difference was noted in blood pressure, and there were no significant changes in diastolic pressure based on gender or age. CONCLUSIONS Overall, renal function is well preserved with a mean followup of 25 years after donor nephrectomy. Males had significantly higher protein and albumin excretion than females but no other clinically significant differences in renal function, blood pressure or proteinuria were noted between them or at age of donation. Proteinuria increases with marginal significance but appears to be of no clinical consequence in most patients. Patients with mild or borderline proteinuria before donation may represent a subgroup at particular risk for the development of significant proteinuria 20 years or greater after donation. The overall incidence of proteinuria in our study is in the range of previously reported values after donor nephrectomy.

Should Obese Patients Lose Weight Before Receiving A Kidney Transplant

Background. The results of renal transplantation in obese recipients have been controversial, with some reports finding increased morbidity prohibitive and others finding increased morbidity acceptable. We attempted to determine whether obese patients in extreme excess of their ideal body weight should undergo transplantation. Methods. The study population included 127 obese (body mass index >30 kg/m 2 ) patients who were compared with a matched nonobese control group (body mass index <27 kg/m 2 ) of 127 recipients with similar demographics. There were no significant differences between the groups according to donor source, recipient race or sex, retransplants, transplant percent reactive antibodies, cause of renal failure, or hypertension. However, significantly more obese patients had a pretransplant history of angina (11.2% vs. 3.2%, P=0.02) or a previous myocardial infarction (5.6% vs. 0.8%, P=0.04). Results. The mean follow-up was 58.9±40 (range 3-170) months. Nonobese patients enjoyed a significantly (P=0.0002) greater patient survival (89% vs. 67%) at 5 years and suffered only about half the number of deaths (25 vs. 46) during the period of observation. Cardiac disease was the leading cause of death (39.1%) in the obese group. Patient death had a major impact on graft survival because there were no differences between the groups when death with graft function was censored from the analysis. There were no significant differences between the groups in delayed graft function, acute rejection, chronic rejection, length of hospital stay, operative blood loss, or mean serum creatinine up to 5 years. However, obese patients experienced significantly (P=0.0001) more complications per patient (3.3 vs. 2.2) and a greater incidence (P=0.0003) of posttransplant diabetes (12% vs. 2%). Similar cyclosporine blood levels were observed in obese recipients even though they were receiving 0.75-2 mg/kg/day less cyclosporine than the nonobese recipients. Conclusions. Outcome differences in obese renal transplant patients were primarily due to a higher mortality resulting from cardiac events. Obesity seems to have little effect on immunologic events, long-term graft function, or cyclosporine delivery. Aggressive pretransplant screening for ischemic heart disease is essential to identify an especially high-risk subgroup of obese patients. Although it would seem prudent to recommend weight reduction <30 kg/m 2 to all patients before transplant, these data suggest that obese patients with a history of cardiac disease should not be transplanted until weight reduction has been accomplished.

Determinants of chronic renal allograft rejection in cyclosporine-treated recipients

We analyzed the development of chronic rejection in 511 kidney-only renal transplants in 507 patients between July 1987 and November 1994. A database was established for recipients > or = 18 years old who received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and demonstrated graft survival for a minimum of 12 months. The 347 recipients of cadaver transplants (67.9%) and 164 recipients of live donor transplants (32.1%) were followed for 12 to 102 months (mean 51 months). Chronic rejection was diagnosed in 124 transplants (24%), with a mean time to diagnosis of 23+/-18 months (range 3-92). Risk factors were identified in a multivariate analysis using the Cox model. The impact of the timing and severity of rejection episodes was analyzed in a univariate model. The presence of chronic rejection resulted in decreased (P=0.0001) 5-year graft survival for both cadaver graft (83.7% vs. 58.2%) and live donor graft (93.2% vs. 53.1%) recipients. Significant variables for the development of chronic rejection included an acute rejection episode (P=0.0001), a black recipient (P=0.0006), donor age > or = 50 years (P=0.006), and a serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dl by 6 months after transplantation. Severity of rejection measured by peak serum creatinine or posttreatment return to baseline was not related to chronic rejection. However, acute rejection episodes lasting for more that 5 days (P=0.03) or occurring after 6 months (P=0.001) did influence time to chronic rejection. In addition, mismatching for donor-recipient race was a significant (P=0.008) risk factor for recipients of cadaver grafts. We conclude that acute rejection is the most significant risk factor for chronic rejection, and the long-term fate of grafts may be determined as early as the first 6 months. Racial matching of donor-recipient pairs may be useful to minimize chronic rejection risk. Future advances that diminish the incidence and severity of acute rejection may have the greatest impact on long-term survival.

TRANSPLANTATION OF PEDIATRIC EN BLOC CADAVER KIDNEYS INTO ADULT RECIPIENTS1

BACKGROUND To maximize the renal donor pool, cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidneys have been transplanted as a dual unit by some transplant centers. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of adult recipients of cadaveric pediatric en bloc renal transplants versus those of matched recipients of cadaveric adult kidneys. METHODS Thirty-three adults who received pediatric en bloc kidney transplants between April 1990 and September 1997 were retrospectively identified and were compared with 33 matched adults who received adult cadaveric kidney transplants. The groups were identical for transplantation era, immunosuppression, recipient sex, race, cause of renal failure, mean weight, and follow-up duration (37.8 vs. 37.5 months). The mean recipient age study versus control was lower (36.3 vs. 48.9 years, P=0.0003). Results. There was no difference between the en bloc and adult donor groups in the 3-year patient survival rates (95% vs. 87%, P=0.16) or the 3-year graft survival rates (87.3% vs. 84.2%, P=0.35). Further, there was no difference in en bloc patient or en bloc graft survival time stratified by recipient age (14-44 vs. >45 years, P=0.11), en bloc donor age (<24 vs. >24 months, P=0.39), or recipient weight (<60, 61-75, >75 kg; P=0.60). Differences in serum creatinine (mg/dl) for the en bloc versus the control group at the time of discharge (3.0 vs. 7.8 mg/dl, P=0.06), at 1 year (1.4 vs. 2.0 mg/dl, P=0.06), and at 2 years (1.1 vs. 1.6 mg/dl, P=0.14) had dissipated by the time of the 5-year follow-up examination (1.1 vs. 1.6 mg/dl, P=0.14). Vascular complications were more prevalent in the en bloc group: renal vein thrombosis (one case), thrombosis of donor aorta (two cases), arterial thrombosis of one renal moiety (two cases), and renal artery stenosis (two cases). There were no differences between groups in delayed graft function, acute or chronic rejection, posttransplant hypertension, posttransplant protein-uria, or long-term graft function. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, these data indicate that transplanting pediatric en bloc kidneys into adult recipients results in equivalent patient and graft survival compared with adult cadaveric kidneys. Further, the data also suggest that pediatric en bloc kidneys need not be strictly allocated based on recipient weight or age criteria.

Quantitative Assessment Of The First Acute Rejection As A Predictor Of Renal Transplant Outcome

BACKGROUND Acute rejection (AR) of the transplanted kidney has been identified as the major risk factor for the development of chronic rejection and immunological graft loss. However, the clinical presentation and response to AR therapy can vary considerably between recipients. METHODS We studied the first AR episode in 201 kidney-only recipients transplanted between January 1987 and June 1998 who were biopsied between April 1993 and June 1998 and were graded using the Banff schema. All patients received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. There were 134 cadaver donor (66.7%) and 67 live donor (33.3%) recipients followed for a mean of 46.2 (range 4-128) months. All Banff grade 1-3 and 40/78 borderline (BL) cases were treated for rejection after biopsy. These patients were compared with a contemporaneous control population who did not experience AR. Demographic risk factors associated with graft loss were identified in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Daily (0-18) serum creatinine (SCr) values during and after the AR were plotted for each patient to generate curves and calculate area under the serum creatinine versus time curve (mg/dl/day). Four response patterns to treatment were identified according to the velocity of % increase (V1) and decrease (V2) of serum creatinine. These were identified as rapid rise and fall (n=62); rapid rise and slow fall (n=43); slow rise and fall (n=55); and slow rise and rapid fall (n=41). Kaplan-Meier graft survivals were compared between the groups. RESULTS Any Banff grade was associated with increased risk for graft loss (P=0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between the Banff BL and B1-3 groups, or among those BL patients who were treated or remained untreated for AR. Multivariate analysis identified a black recipient (P=0.03, risk ratio 2.0) and area under the serum creatinine versus time curve (P=0.0001, risk ratio 3.2) as significant risk factors for graft loss. The AR response pattern RS resulted in a significantly (P=0.0072) diminished 5-year graft survival (45%) compared with the other groups. Serum creatinine pattern, but not Banff grade, was also a significant (P=0.025) predictor of re-rejection. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that all Banff grades, including BL, carry a significant risk for graft loss, and the initial response to antirejection therapy can predict long-term graft outcome. They support the practice of treating AR promptly and definitively and suggest that the RS subgroup of rejecting grafts could be targeted for additional antirejection therapy. This subgroup can be identified by 10 days of AR therapy, and should be the subject of further study.

Validity testing of the long-term medication behavior self-efficacy scale

Self-efficacy is an important determinant of health behavior that can be targeted for intervention. Little effort has been given to the development of valid measures for self-efficacy with medication taking for adherence research. The purpose of this study was to determine the criterion validity of the Long-Term Medication Behavior Self-Efficacy Scale (LTMBSES). Individual patient data from 6 existing adherence studies in transplant, hyperlipidemia, and AIDS/HIV patients (n = 1021) were pooled. Validity was determined by assessing the relation between the LTMBSES score and medication adherence—both self-reported and electronically monitored. A weak relationship was found between the LTMBSES score and adherence, which can possibly be attributed to a ceiling effect, caused by a too homogeneous population and/or a failure of the scale to challenge patients. Generalized Estimating Equations revealed that the total average self-efficacy score predicted reported medication adherence (p < .0001). The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve revealed the area under the curve was 0.67, indicating a significant (p < .0001), but poor predictive capability. Evidence for criterion validity of the Long-Term Medication Behavior Self-Efficacy Scale is not yet convincing. Future research should focus on: (1) validation in a population with a more heterogenous level of adherence, and (2) making the scale more challenging by referring to “always taking the medication without exception.”

Cadaveric kidney transplantation under prophylactic polyclonal antibody immunosuppression with anti-lymphoblast globulin versus anti-thymocyte globulin

OBJECTIVES This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the clinical and immunologic outcomes following prophylactic induction treatment with Minnesota anti-lymphoblast globulin (MALG) and Upjohn anti-thymocyte globulin (ATGAM) in cadaver renal transplantation. METHODS From 1990 to 1994, 63 patients with renal transplants from cadavers received MALG and 77 patients received ATGAM for induction treatment. Most pretransplant parameters were equivalent in both groups. There was no significant difference in the total dose and mean duration of MALG/ATGAM administration. The post-transplant outcome in these groups was compared. RESULTS There was no difference between the MALG and ATGAM groups with respect to the overall number of rejection episodes, median days to rejection, or the number of steroid-resistant rejection episodes. However, MALG-treated patients experienced a greater number of rejections in the first 60 days postoperatively (P = 0.06). There was no difference in the nadir serum creatinine level in the first 20 postoperative days in the two groups; however, it took fewer days to reach the nadir in the ATGAM group (P = 0.03). The incidence of delayed graft function was higher in the MALG group than in the ATGAM group (38% versus 31%) but not statistically significant. Graft survival at 12 and 24 months was comparable in both groups. However, patient survival was superior at 12 and 24 months in ATGAM-treated transplant recipients (P = 0.03). The mean serum creatinine at 6, 12, and 24 months was similar in both the MALG and ATGAM groups. The mean fall and recovery of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-lymphocyte subsets while on MALG/ATGAM were similar in both groups. The incidence of infectious complications was greater in the MALG group. CONCLUSIONS MALG and ATGAM have comparable clinical immunosuppressive effects. Patients receiving ATGAM experienced fewer rejections in the first 2 months, fewer infections, and better survival.

Should Obese Patients Lose Weight Before Receiving a Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND The results of renal transplantation in obese recipients have been controversial, with some reports finding increased morbidity prohibitive and others finding increased morbidity acceptable. We attempted to determine whether obese patients in extreme excess of their ideal body weight should undergo transplantation. METHODS The study population included 127 obese (body mass index >30 kg/m2) patients who were compared with a matched nonobese control group (body mass index <27 kg/m2) of 127 recipients with similar demographics. There were no significant differences between the groups according to donor source, recipient race or sex, retransplants, transplant percent reactive antibodies, cause of renal failure, or hypertension. However, significantly more obese patients had a pretransplant history of angina (11.2% vs. 3.2%, P=0.02) or a previous myocardial infarction (5.6% vs. 0.8%, P=0.04). RESULTS The mean follow-up was 58.9+/-40 (range 3-170) months. Nonobese patients enjoyed a significantly (P=0.0002) greater patient survival (89% vs. 67%) at 5 years and suffered only about half the number of deaths (25 vs. 46) during the period of observation. Cardiac disease was the leading cause of death (39.1%) in the obese group. Patient death had a major impact on graft survival because there were no differences between the groups when death with graft function was censored from the analysis. There were no significant differences between the groups in delayed graft function, acute rejection, chronic rejection, length of hospital stay, operative blood loss, or mean serum creatinine up to 5 years. However, obese patients experienced significantly (P=0.0001) more complications per patient (3.3 vs. 2.2) and a greater incidence (P=0.0003) of posttransplant diabetes (12% vs. 2%). Similar cyclosporine blood levels were observed in obese recipients even though they were receiving 0.75-2 mg/kg/day less cyclosporine than the nonobese recipients. CONCLUSIONS Outcome differences in obese renal transplant patients were primarily due to a higher mortality resulting from cardiac events. Obesity seems to have little effect on immunologic events, long-term graft function, or cyclosporine delivery. Aggressive pretransplant screening for ischemic heart disease is essential to identify an especially high-risk subgroup of obese patients. Although it would seem prudent to recommend weight reduction <30 kg/m2 to all patients before transplant, these data suggest that obese patients with a history of cardiac disease should not be transplanted until weight reduction has been accomplished.