Kiaran J. O'Malley

A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND Posttransplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. We performed a randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in a group of renal allograft recipients considered at high risk for CMV disease due to the use of OKT3 induction therapy. METHODS A total of 101 recipients of cadaveric (83) and zero haplotype-matched live donor (18) kidney transplants were entered into the trial. A total of 22 D-R- patients received no prophylaxis. Twenty-seven D+R-, 29 D+R+, and 23 D-R+ patients were randomized to receive 3 months of either oral acyclovir (800 mg q.i.d.) or oral ganciclovir (1000 mg t.i.d.). Doses were adjusted according to the level of renal function. The D+R- patients were also given CMV immune globulin biweekly for 16 weeks. Surveillance blood cultures were obtained at transplantation, at months 1, 2, 3, and 6, and when clinically indicated. The primary study end points were time to CMV infection and disease the first 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS The mean follow up was 14.4 months. Both agents were well tolerated, and no drug interruptions for toxicity occurred. CMV was isolated in 14 of 39 (35.9%) acyclovir-treated and 1 of 40 (2.5%) ganciclovir-treated recipients by 6 months (P=0.0001). Symptomatic CMV disease occurred in 9 of 14 (64%) of the acyclovir patients, two with tissue-invasive disease. Infection rates for acyclovir vs. ganciclovir, respectively, stratified by CMV serology were: D+R-, 54 vs. 0%, P=0.0008; D+R+, 43 vs. 6.6%, P=0.01; D-R+, 8.3 vs. 0%, P=NS. No patient developed CMV infection while taking oral ganciclovir, however three delayed infections occurred 2-7 months after finishing therapy. Each patient had been previously treated for acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Oral acyclovir provides effective CMV prophylaxis only for recipients of seronegative donor kidneys. Oral ganciclovir is a superior agent providing effective CMV prophylaxis for recipients of seropositive donor kidneys. Recipients who are treated for acute rejection are at risk for delayed CMV infection during the first posttransplantation year.

TRANSPLANTATION OF PEDIATRIC EN BLOC CADAVER KIDNEYS INTO ADULT RECIPIENTS1

BACKGROUND To maximize the renal donor pool, cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidneys have been transplanted as a dual unit by some transplant centers. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of adult recipients of cadaveric pediatric en bloc renal transplants versus those of matched recipients of cadaveric adult kidneys. METHODS Thirty-three adults who received pediatric en bloc kidney transplants between April 1990 and September 1997 were retrospectively identified and were compared with 33 matched adults who received adult cadaveric kidney transplants. The groups were identical for transplantation era, immunosuppression, recipient sex, race, cause of renal failure, mean weight, and follow-up duration (37.8 vs. 37.5 months). The mean recipient age study versus control was lower (36.3 vs. 48.9 years, P=0.0003). Results. There was no difference between the en bloc and adult donor groups in the 3-year patient survival rates (95% vs. 87%, P=0.16) or the 3-year graft survival rates (87.3% vs. 84.2%, P=0.35). Further, there was no difference in en bloc patient or en bloc graft survival time stratified by recipient age (14-44 vs. >45 years, P=0.11), en bloc donor age (<24 vs. >24 months, P=0.39), or recipient weight (<60, 61-75, >75 kg; P=0.60). Differences in serum creatinine (mg/dl) for the en bloc versus the control group at the time of discharge (3.0 vs. 7.8 mg/dl, P=0.06), at 1 year (1.4 vs. 2.0 mg/dl, P=0.06), and at 2 years (1.1 vs. 1.6 mg/dl, P=0.14) had dissipated by the time of the 5-year follow-up examination (1.1 vs. 1.6 mg/dl, P=0.14). Vascular complications were more prevalent in the en bloc group: renal vein thrombosis (one case), thrombosis of donor aorta (two cases), arterial thrombosis of one renal moiety (two cases), and renal artery stenosis (two cases). There were no differences between groups in delayed graft function, acute or chronic rejection, posttransplant hypertension, posttransplant protein-uria, or long-term graft function. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, these data indicate that transplanting pediatric en bloc kidneys into adult recipients results in equivalent patient and graft survival compared with adult cadaveric kidneys. Further, the data also suggest that pediatric en bloc kidneys need not be strictly allocated based on recipient weight or age criteria.

Vascular rejection post heart transplantation is associated with positive flow cytometric cross-matching

OBJECTIVE Use of flow cytometry cross-matching for measurement of donor-specific alloreactivity and monitoring anti-donor antibodies is well established. This study was performed to determine (1) its accuracy as a marker of vascular rejection, (2) its correlation with post-transplant outcome and (3) its ability to monitor highly sensitized patients requiring antibody removal with plasma exchange. METHODS Serial serum samples from 99 heart transplant recipients were examined for the presence of anti-donor antibodies of the IgG class that were reactive with T and/or B cryopreserved donor lymphocytes. A sub-group of 20 HLA sensitized patients required plasma exchange to remove the anti-HLA antibodies and were monitored with flow cytometry cross-matching to assess the degree of antibody removal. RESULTS Positive T-cell reactions were observed in 26 patients and positive B-cell reactions in 54. Twenty patients had vascular rejection. A significantly larger number of patients with a positive flow cytometry cross-match had vascular rejection (42% versus 12% for T-cell reactions, and 32% versus 7% for B-cell reactions; P = 0.002 each). Of the patients who had vascular rejection, 11 had a positive T-cell reaction (flow cytometry cross-match sensitivity of 55%), and 17 had a positive B-cell reaction (sensitivity of 85%). Of the 79 patients who did not develop vascular rejection, 64 had a negative T-cell reaction (specificity of 81%), and 42 had a negative B-cell reaction (specificity of 53%). The actuarial 2-year survival estimates were significantly higher in patients with negative T-cell reactions (90% versus 75%; P = 0.04), and B-cell reactions (95% versus 78%; P = 0.02). In the highly sensitized subgroup (n = 20) the effectiveness of plasma exchange to decrease anti-HLA antibody reactivity was a strong predictor of outcome. For patients in whom plasma exchange (PE) reduced anti-donor reactivity, 1-year survival was 87% compared to 25% in those whom PE did not reduce the level of antibody binding as assessed with flow cytometry cross-matching (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Flow cytometry cross-matching provides a valuable marker for the detection of vascular rejection after cardiac transplantation. Quantitative measurements may allow evaluation of the efficacy of treatment modalities employed in the management of vascular rejection in an attempt to improve outcome.

A randomized prospective trial of low-dose OKT3 induction therapy to prevent rejection and minimize side effects in recipients of kidney transplants

BACKGROUND We attempted to minimize the undesired side effects and maximize the benefit of OKT3 induction therapy in renal transplantation. METHODS One hundred and one recipients of kidney-only transplants were randomized to three groups. Each received low-dose 2.5-mg OKT3 induction for 7-14 days, but different premedication on days 0, 1, and 2. Group I was given 250 mg i.v. methylprednisolone at 1 and 6 hr, and group II received another 500 mg at 1 hr before initial OKT3. Group III received Atgam 15 mg/kg on day 0 and began OKT3 on day 1. A CD3+ T-cell cut-off of 50/mm3 was used to guide therapy. Maintenance therapy included cyclosporine and steroids for each patient. However, groups I and II were also given mycophenolate mofetil, and group III received azathioprine as a third agent. All rejections were biopsy confirmed and Banff scored. RESULTS No differences in demographic or transplant characteristics were noted between groups I, II, and III, and mean follow-up was 25.7 (1-38) months. There was no significant difference in actuarial patient (90%, 91%, 94%) or graft survival (83%, 88%, 84%) at 3 years between the respective groups. Mean creatinine values and infectious complications were similar for each group. No patient experienced acute rejection during induction, and eight patients required dose escalation to sustain suppression of CD3 counts. The incidence of acute rejection at 6 and 12 months was significantly (P=0.004) greater in group III (38.2, 44.1%) than in either group I (15.1, 18.1%) or group II (14.7, 17.6%); relative risk 1.988 (95% CI 1.012-3.906). Formation of anti-OKT3 antibody was significantly (P=0.006) greater in group III (26.5%) than in group I (6%) or group II (2.9%). Group I recipients enjoyed significantly (P=0.001) fewer (2.17) OKT3 side effects on days 0, 1, and 2 than group II (3.03) or group III (2.49), and contained the largest number (61%) of recipients who experienced no side effects. Group I also exhibited the most suppressed profile of OKT3-induced release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (P=0.006), interferon-gamma (P=NS), and interleukin-6 (P=0.01) on days 0 and 1. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose 2.5-mg OKT3 with pretreatment of split-dose steroids on days 0, 1, and 2 provides the most effective method for OKT3 induction, which minimizes side effects for most patients. Subsequent maintenance therapy with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids provides effective rejection prophylaxis without increased complications for up to 3 years. Predepletion of T cells before exposure to OKT3 does not prevent cytokine release.