Doudou Sow
Cheikh Anta Diop University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Doudou Sow.
BMC Infectious Diseases | 2013
Khadime Sylla; Annie Abiola; R. Tine; Babacar Faye; Doudou Sow; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Magatte Ndiaye; Aminata Colé Lo; Kuaku Folly; Léon Amath Ndiaye; Oumar Gaye
BackgroundMalaria remains a major public health problem in developing countries. Then in these countries prompt access to effective antimalarial treatment such as Artemisinin based-Combination Therapies (ACT) proves to be an essential tool for controlling the disease. In Senegal, since 2006 a nationwide scaling up program of ACT is being implemented. In this context it has become relevant to monitor ACT efficacy and provide recommendations for the Senegalese national malaria control program.MethodsAn open randomized trial was conducted during two malaria transmission seasons (2011 and 2012) to assess the efficacy and safety of three combinations: dihydro-artemisinin-piperaquine (DHAPQ), artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ). The primary end point of the study was represented by a PCR adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) at day 28. Secondary end points included: (i) a ACPR at days 35 and 42, (ii) a parasite and fever clearance time, (iii) ACTs safety and tolerability. The 2003 WHO’s protocol for antimalarial drug evaluation was used to assess each outcome.ResultsOverall, 534 patients were randomized selected to receive, either ASAQ (n = 180), AL (n = 178) or DHAPQ (n = 176). The PCR adjusted ACPR at day 28 was 99.41% for the group ASAQ, while that was 100% in the AL and DHAPQ groups (p = 0.37). The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated at 99.37% in the ASAQ arm versus 100% in AL and DHAPQ arm at day 35 (p = 0.37). At day 42, the ACPR was 99.27% in the ASAQ group versus 100% for both AL and DHAPQ groups, (p = 0.36). No serious adverse event was noted during the study period. Also a similar safety profile was noted in the 3 study groups.ConclusionIn the context of scaling up of ACTs in Senegal, ASAQ, AL and DHAPQ are highly effective and safe antimalarial drugs. However, it’s remains important to continue to monitor their efficacy.Trial registrationPACTR 201305000552290.
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2014
Roger Tine; Cheikh T Ndour; Babacar Faye; Matthew Cairns; Khadime Sylla; Magatte Ndiaye; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Doudou Sow; Badara Cisse; Pascal Magnussen; Ib C. Bygbjerg; Oumar Gaye
BACKGROUND Home-based management of malaria (HMM) may improve access to diagnostic testing and treatment with artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). In the Sahel region, seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is now recommended for the prevention of malaria in children. It is likely that combinations of antimalarial interventions can reduce the malaria burden. This study assessed the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of combining SMC and HMM delivered by community health workers (CHWs). METHODS A cluster-randomised trial was carried out during two transmission seasons in eight villages located in the south-eastern part of Senegal. Intervention communities received HMM+SMC while control communities received HMM. Primary end point was the incidence of malaria attacks during the follow up period. Secondary end points included: malaria diagnostic accuracy; access to ACT treatment; SMC coverage; safety and drug tolerability. RESULTS The adjusted rate ratio for incidence of malaria attacks in intervention and control communities was 0.15, indicating a protective effect of HMM+SMC of 85% (95% CI: 39.9-96.3%, p=0.01). Access to ACT treatment was 96.4% while SMC coverage represented 97.3% (95% CI: 91.3-100%) in 2010, and 88.8% (95% CI: 84.2-93.6%) in 2011. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION It seems feasible and safe to combine SMC with HMM intervention, while achieving high coverage and effectiveness of both SMC and HMM. TRIAL REGISTRATION (www.pactr.org) PACTR201305000551876.
Malaria Journal | 2012
Roger Tine; Babacar Faye; Khadime Sylla; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Magatte Ndiaye; Doudou Sow; Aminata C Lo; Annie Abiola; Mamadou C Ba; Oumar Gaye
BackgroundPrompt treatment of malaria attacks with arteminisin-based combination therapy (ACT) is an essential tool for malaria control. A new co-blister tablet of artesunate-mefloquine (AM) with 25 mg/kg mefloquine has been developed for the management of uncomplicated malaria attacks. This non-inferiority randomized trial, was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the new formulation of AM in comparison to artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for the treatment of acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in adults in Senegal.MethodsThe study was carried out from September to December 2010 in two health centres in Senegal. The study end points included (i) PCR corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) at day 28, (ii) ACPR at days 42 and 63, (iii) parasites and fever clearance time, (iv) incidence of adverse events and patients biological profile at day 7 using the WHO 2003 protocol for anti-malarial drug evaluation.ResultsOverall, 310 patients were randomized to receive either AM (n = 157) or AL (n = 153). PCR corrected ACPR at day 28 was at 95.5% in the AM arm while that in the AL arm was at 96.7% (p = 0.83). Therapeutic efficacy was at 98.5% in the AM arm versus 98.2% in the AL group at day 42 (p = 1). At day 63, ACPR in the AM and AL arms was at 98.2% and 97.7%, respectively (p = 0.32). The two treatments were well tolerated with similar biological profile at day 7. However, dizziness was more frequent in the AM arm.ConclusionArtesunate-mefloquine (25 mg/Kg mefloquine) is efficacious and well-tolerated for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in adult patients.
Malaria Journal | 2013
Roger Tine; Pascal Ndiaye; Cheikh T Ndour; Babacar Faye; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Khadime Sylla; Magatte Ndiaye; Badara Cisse; Doudou Sow; Pascal Magnussen; Ib C. Bygbjerg; Oumar Gaye
BackgroundCommunity case management of malaria (CCMm) and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) are anti-malarial interventions that can lead to substantial reduction in malaria burden acting in synergy. However, little is known about the social acceptability of these interventions. A study was undertaken to assess whether combining the interventions would be an acceptable approach to malaria control for community health workers (CHWs).MethodsSixty-one interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted nested in a cluster-randomized trial assessing the impact of combining CCMm and SMC in a rural area of Senegal. Participants consisted of: (i) members of village associations, (ii) members of families who had access to the interventions as well as members of families who did not access the interventions, (iii) CHWs, and (iv) community leaders, e g, religious guides and village chiefs.ResultsThe interventions were acceptable to the local population and perceived as good strategy to make health care services available to community members and thus, to reduce the delays in access to anti-malarial treatment as well as expenses related to patients’ transfer to the health post. The use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) contributed to improving CHWs diagnostic capacity as well as malaria treatment practices. Study participants notified RDT and drugs stock-out as the major risk for sustainability of the intervention at community level.ConclusionCombining CCMm and SMC is a well accepted, community-based approach that can contribute to control malaria in areas where malaria transmission is seasonal.
International Scholarly Research Notices | 2013
Roger Tine; Babacar Faye; Cheikh T Ndour; Khadime Sylla; Doudou Sow; Magatte Ndiaye; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Pascal Magnussen; Michael Alifrangis; Ib C. Bygbjerg; Oumar Gaye
Although malaria is declining in many countries in Africa, malaria and anaemia remain frequent in children. This study was conducted to assess the relationship between malaria parasitaemia, intestinal worms, and anaemia, in children <5 years living in low transmission area in Senegal. A survey was carried out in 30 villages in the central part of Senegal. A two-level random cluster sampling technique was used to select study participant. Children <5 years were enrolled after informed consent. For each child, blood thick and smear tests were performed, haemoglobin concentration was measured with HemoCue, and stool samples were collected and examined using the Ritchie technique. A total of 736 children were recruited. Malaria parasite prevalence was 1.5% (0.7–2.6); anaemia was found in 53.4% (48.2–58.9), while intestinal parasites and stunting represented 26.2% (22.6–30.2) and 22% (18.6–25.5), respectively. In a logistic regression analysis, anaemia was significantly associated with malaria parasitaemia (aOR= 6.3 (1.5–53.5)) and stunting (aOR = 2 (1.2–3.1)); no association was found between intestinal parasites and anaemia. Malaria and anaemia remain closely associated even when malaria is declining. Scaling up antimalarial interventions may contribute to eliminate malaria and reduce the occurrence of anaemia among children.
Tropical Medicine & International Health | 2011
Alexandra de Sousa; Leon Paul Rabarijaona; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Doudou Sow; Mouhamed Ndyiae; Jacques Hassan; Nilda Lambo; Paul Adovohekpe; Flavia Guidetti; Judith Recht; Alphonse Mingnimon Affo
Objective Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) is a malaria control strategy currently recommended by WHO for implementation at scale in Africa, consisting of administration of sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine (SP) coupled with routine immunizations offered to children under 1 year. In this study, we analysed IPTi acceptability by communities and health staff.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2012
Alexandra de Sousa; Leon Paul Rabarijaona; Ofori Tenkorang; Ebenezer Inkoom; Hantamalala V. Ravelomanantena; Sabrina Njarasoa; Jeremiah Nee Whang; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Youssoupha Ndiaye; M. Ndiaye; Doudou Sow; Guinoussa Akadiri; Jacques Hassan; Alassane Dicko; Issaka Sagara; Prestor Kubalalika; Don P. Mathanga; Ketema Bizuneh; Jean Rene Randriasamimanana; Judith Recht; Ivana Bjelic; Alexander Dodoo
BACKGROUND Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) is a new malaria control strategy coupled with the delivery of routine immunizations recommended by the World Health Organization since 2009 for countries with moderate to high endemicity. To evaluate its safety profile and identify potential new adverse events (AEs) following simultaneous administration of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-IPTi) with immunizations, we measured AE incidence and evaluated spontaneous AE reporting. METHODS A cohort event monitoring study was conducted on 24 000 infants in 2 countries after administration of SP-IPTi during routine immunizations. Additional pharmacovigilance training and supervision were conducted to stimulate AE passive reporting in 6 African countries. RESULTS No serious AEs were found by active follow-up, representing 95% probability that the rate does not exceed 1 per 8000. No serious AEs were found by retrospective review of hospital registers. The rate of moderate AEs probably linked to immunization and/or SP-IPTi was 1.8 per 1000 doses (95% confidence interval, 1.50-2.00). Spontaneous reporting of AEs remained <1% of cases collected by active follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous administration of SP-IPTi and immunizations is a safe strategy for implementation with a low risk of serious AEs to infants. Strategies toward strengthening spontaneous reporting in Africa should include not only the provider but also beneficiaries or their caregivers.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2017
Roger Tine; Khadime Sylla; Babacar Faye; Eugenie Poirot; Fatou Ba Fall; Doudou Sow; Duolao Wang; Magatte Ndiaye; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Brian Greenwood; Oumar Gaye; Paul Milligan
Summary Adding low-dose primaquine to malaria treatment reduced gametocyte carriage by 73%. Patients who received primaquine had more frequent hemoglobinuria and there was a greater reduction in haemoglobin concentration in G6PD-deficient patients. One patient who received primaquine developed moderately severe anemia.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2017
Philippe Halfon; Khadime Sylla; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Pascal Delaunay; Oumar Gaye; Babacar Faye; Fadi Bittar; Yémou Dieng; Thérèse Dieng; Philippe Parola; Didier Raoult; Sabine Camiade; Magatte Ndiaye; Doudou Sow; Roger Tine
Gastrointestinal parasite infections represent one of the biggest public health problems in the world. Therefore, appropriate innovative tools are needed for assessing interventions to control these infections. This study aims to compare the performance of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to microscopic examination for detection of intestinal parasites. A direct microscopic examination and stool concentration was performed on 98 stool samples from patients attending Senegalese hospitals. Negative microscopic control samples were also collected in Nice and Marseille (France). Species-specific primers/probes were used to detect 20 common gastrointestinal protozoans and helminths. Positive frequency and the sensitivity of each real-time PCR assay were compared with conventional microscopic examination. Real-time PCR was positive in 72 of 98 samples (73.5%), whereas microscopic examination was positive in 37 (37.7%) samples (P < 0.001). The real-time PCR assays were more sensitive than microscopy, with 57.4% (31/54) versus 18.5% (10/54), respectively, in the detection of parasites in asymptomatic patients (P < 0.05). In terms of polyparasitism, there were more coinfections detected by real-time PCR assays compared with microscopic methods (25.5% versus 3.06%). In comparison to parasite prevalence on individual samples, the results showed a perfect agreement (100%) between the two techniques for seven species, whereas discrepancies were observed for the others (agreement percentage varying from 64.2% to 98.9%). Real-time PCR appeared to be superior to microscopic examination for the detection of parasites in stool samples. This assay will be useful in diagnostic laboratories and in the field for evaluating the efficacy of mass drug administration programs.
Pathogens and Global Health | 2013
Babacar Faye; Milli Nath-Chowdhury; R. Tine; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Khadime Sylla; Fabio Wasquez Camargo; Nathalie Martel; Kouakou Foly; Aminata Collé Lô; Annie Abiola; Doudou Sow; Magatte Ndiaye; Daouda Ndiaye; Momar Ndao; Oumar Gaye
Abstract Rapid diagnosis tests (RDTs) allow for the confirmation of malaria diagnosis. In Senegal, RDTs detecting HRP2 have been adopted in 2008 for malaria diagnosis. However, the sustainability of this strategy requires adequate and regular quality control. PCR on DNA extracted in nitrocellulose band of RDTs enable quality control. A RDT (Malaria Antigen P.f®) and a thick smear were performed on patients with suspected malaria. DNA was extracted from the nitrocellulose band of RDTs to which a non-specific PCR and a specific PCR were applied. The results of the RDT were compared with those obtained from the thick smear and the PCR to measure sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values. For 81·6% of the 273 patients involved, the thick smear was positive. Rapid diagnosis tests were positive for 85·7% of the patients. Non-specific PCR was positive on 87·9% of RDTs. Plasmodium falciparum was found in 99·5% of patients and Plasmodium ovale appeared in only 0·4% of patients. Sensitivity of the Malaria Antigen Pf® RDT in relation to thick smear and to PCR was 98·2% and 97·1% respectively. Quality control with PCR on the nitrocellulose band performed several months after it was used confirms its adequate level of sensitivity. The collection and screening of DNA present in already used RDT is a good means of quality control for this tool. It is also a relevant alternative to the molecular approach in the context of a reduction in the transmission of malaria.