Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Douglas B. Elliott is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Douglas B. Elliott.


Archive | 2004

Methodological Framework for Analysis of Buildings-Related Programs: The GPRA Metrics Effort

Douglas B. Elliott; Dave M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Donna J. Hostick

The requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993 mandate the reporting of outcomes expected to result from programs of the Federal government. The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) develops official metrics for its 11 major programs using its Office of Planning, Budget Formulation, and Analysis (OPBFA). OPBFA conducts an annual integrated modeling analysis to produce estimates of the energy, environmental, and financial benefits expected from EERE’s budget request. Two of EERE’s major programs include the Building Technologies Program (BT) and Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program (WIP). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) supports the OPBFA effort by developing the program characterizations and other market information affecting these programs that is necessary to provide input to the EERE integrated modeling analysis. Throughout the report we refer to these programs as “buildings-related” programs, because the approach is not limited in application to BT or WIP. To adequately support OPBFA in the development of official GPRA metrics, PNNL communicates with the various activities and projects in BT and WIP to determine how best to characterize their activities planned for the upcoming budget request. PNNL then analyzes these projects to determine whatmorexa0» the results of the characterizations would imply for energy markets, technology markets, and consumer behavior. This is accomplished by developing nonintegrated estimates of energy, environmental, and financial benefits (i.e., outcomes) of the technologies and practices expected to result from the budget request. These characterizations and nonintegrated modeling results are provided to OPBFA as inputs to the official benefits estimates developed for the Federal Budget. This report documents the approach and methodology used to estimate future energy, environmental, and financial benefits produced by technologies and practices supported by BT and by WIP. However, the approach is general enough for analysis of buildings-related technologies, independent of any specific program. An overview describes the GPRA process and the models used to estimate energy savings. The body of the document describes the algorithms used and the diffusion curve estimates.«xa0less


Archive | 2003

Methodological Framework for Analysis of GPRA Metrics: Application to FY04 Projects in BT and WIP

Dave M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Douglas B. Elliott; Donna J. Hostick; Michael J. Scott

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) estimated the fiscal year (FY) 2004 energy, environmental, and financial benefits (i.e., metrics) of the technologies and practices in the U.S. Department of Energys (DOEs) former Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs (BTS) within the DOEs Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). During the development of the estimates, EERE went through a large-scale reorganization, resulting in the reallocation of the former BTS projects (along with the other former offices) into two new Program Offices: the Office of Building Technologies Program (BT) and the Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program (WIP). The remainder of this document will refer to these projects as BT/WIP for the sake of simplicity. This effort is referred to as GPRA Metrics because it stems from the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, which mandates the reporting of performance goals and measures. The benefits developed for EERE through the GPRA Metrics effort are submitted to EEREs Office of Planning, Budget Formulation, and Analysis (PBFA) as part of EEREs budget request. The GPRA estimates are also used in the formulation of EEREs performance measures. This report includes sections that detail the approach and methodologymorexa0» used to estimate future energy, environmental, and financial benefits produced by technologies and practices supported by BT/WIP in the FY 2004. An overview describes the GPRA process and the models used to estimate savings. The body of the document describes the models used and the diffusion curve estimates. Appendixes contain tables of forecasted benefits for all projects through 2030, along with individual project characterizations and overall results of the FY 2004 GPRA effort.«xa0less


Archive | 2003

Impact of 2004 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Buildings-Related Projects on United States Employment and Earned Income

Michael J. Scott; David M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Douglas B. Elliott; Donna J. Hostick

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) is interested in assessing the potential economic impacts of its portfolio of projects on national employment and income. A special purpose version of the IMPLAN input-output model called ImBuild II is used in this study of all 37 buildings-related projects reported to the Office of Management and Budget on February 3, 2003 for inclusion in the revised FY 2004 budget request. Energy savings, investments, and impacts on U.S. national employment and earned income are reported by project for selected years to the year 2030. Energy savings and investments from these projects have the potential of creating a total of 297,000 jobs and about


Archive | 2004

Hanford Area 2000 Population

Douglas B. Elliott; Michael J. Scott; Ernest J. Antonio; Kathleen Rhoads

4.16 billion in earned income (2002


Archive | 2004

Baseline Inputs for BEAMS: Data used in preparing Methodological Framework for Analysis of Building-Related Programs: The GPRA Metrics Effort, June 2004

Douglas B. Elliott; Dave M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Donna J. Hostick

) by the year 2030.


Archive | 2004

Impact of the FY 2005 Building Technologies Program on United States Employment and Earned Income

Michael J. Scott; Dave M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Douglas B. Elliott; Donna J. Hostick

This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office, Surface Environmental Surveillance Project, to provide demographic data required for ongoing environmental assessments and safety analyses at the DOE Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. This document includes 2000 Census estimates for the resident population within an 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius of the Hanford Site. Population distributions are reported relative to five reference points centered on meteorological stations within major operating areas of the Hanford Site - the 100 F, 100 K, 200, 300, and 400 Areas. These data are presented in both graphical and tabular format, and are provided for total populations residing within 80 km (50 mi) of the reference points, as well as for Native American, Hispanic and Latino, total minority, and low-income populations.


Archive | 2004

Impact of the FY 2005 Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program on United States Employment and Earned Income

Michael J. Scott; David M. Anderson; David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; James A. Dirks; Douglas B. Elliott; Donna J. Hostick

This report contains the appendix to the PNNL report, Methodological Framework for Analysis of Buildings-Related Programs: The GPRA Metrics Effort.


Archive | 2009

Analyzing the Life Cycle Energy Savings of DOE Supported Buildings Technologies

Katherine A. Cort; Donna J. Hostick; James A. Dirks; Douglas B. Elliott

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) is interested in assessing the potential economic impacts of its portfolio of subprograms on national employment and income. A special purpose version of the IMPLAN input-output model called ImBuild II is used in this study of all 21 Building Technologies Program subprograms in the EERE final FY 2005 budget request to the Office of Management and Budget on February 2, 2004. Energy savings, investments, and impacts on U.S. national employment and earned income are reported by subprogram for selected years to the year 2030. Energy savings and investments from these subprograms have the potential of creating a total of 396,000 jobs and about


Archive | 2008

Methodological Framework for Analysis of Buildings-Related Programs with BEAMS, 2008

Douglas B. Elliott; James A. Dirks; Donna J. Hostick

5.6 billion in earned income (2003


Archive | 2006

1996-2004 Trends in the Single-Family Housing Market: Spatial Analysis of the Residential Sector

Dave M. Anderson; Douglas B. Elliott

) by the year 2030.

Collaboration


Dive into the Douglas B. Elliott's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna J. Hostick

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Dirks

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine A. Cort

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Belzer

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Scott

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dave M. Anderson

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Anderson

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Cw Kintner-Meyer

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge