Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Douglas B. Yager.
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger
In 1995, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Geological Survey identified zinc along with 12 other elements to investigate within the Humboldt River basin located in northern Nevada. These elements are important because of their role as pathfinder elements for mineral deposits or as potential toxins in the environment. This report is one of the 13 separate published reports (MF-2407A-M) that integrate the results of two geochemical studies conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey and that present geochemical maps created using computer models of stream-sediment and soil geochemistry. The other 12 reports present geochemical maps for Ag, As, Au, Ce, Co, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sc, and Se. These geochemical maps provide a visual aid to interpreting the trends and anomalies in element concentration when combined with information about the geology, topography, and mining districts in the Humboldt River basin. The Humboldt River basin is a naturally occurring, internally draining river basin that covers approximately 43,700 km2 (16,900 mi2) and forms a substantial part of the larger Great Basin. The Humboldt River basin includes the upper reaches of the Little Humboldt River in Elko County, the Reese River in Lander County, and the main Humboldt River and its many tributaries that flow ultimately westward into the Humboldt Sink. Figure 1 shows the map area and the Humboldt River basin. Stream-sediment and soil samples originally collected for the NURE (National Uranium Resource Evaluation) program were reanalyzed in 1994 for the Winnemucca-Surprise mineral resource assessment (3,524 samples; King and others, 1996) and in 1996 for the mineral and environmental assessment of the Humboldt River basin (3,626 samples; Folger, 2000) (fig. 2). An additional 206 stream-sediment samples were collected for the Winnemucca-Surprise mineral resource assessment by the USGS to fill gaps in the sample coverage. The combined sample coverage is generally spatially uniform with a sample density of one sample site per 17 km2. Sample density is greatest along range fronts and sparsest along mountain ridges and broad valley bottoms.
Data Series | 2002
Robert W. Blair; Douglas B. Yager; Stanley E. Church
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Stanley E. Church; Philip L. Verplanck; Laurie Wirt
Reviews in Engineering Geology | 2007
Stanley E. Church; J. Robert Owen; Paul Von Guerard; Philip L. Verplanck; Briant A. Kimball; Douglas B. Yager
US Geological Survey professional paper | 2007
Paul Von Guerard; Stanley E. Church; Douglas B. Yager; John M. Besser
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map | 2003
Douglas B. Yager; Helen W. Folger