Douglas J. Wirthlin

Abdominal aortic aneurysms in "high-risk" surgical patients: comparison of open and endovascular repair.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the early results of endovascular grafting for high-risk surgical candidates in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Summary Background DataSince the approval of endoluminal grafts for treatment of AAA, endovascular repair of AAA (EVAR) has expanded to include patients originally considered too ill for open AAA repair. However, some concern has been expressed regarding technical failure and the durability of endovascular grafts. MethodsThe University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Computerized Vascular Registry identified all patients who underwent abdominal aneurysm repair between January 1, 2000, and June 12, 2002. Patients were stratified by type of repair (open AAA vs. EVAR) and were classified as low risk or high risk. Patients with at least one of the following classifications were classified as high risk: age more than 80 years, chronic renal failure (creatinine > 2.0), compromised cardiac function (diminished ventricular function or severe coronary artery disease), poor pulmonary function, reoperative aortic procedure, a “hostile” abdomen, or an emergency operation. Death, systemic complications, and length of stay were tabulated for each group. ResultsDuring this 28-month period, 404 patients underwent AAA repair at UAB. Eighteen patients (4.5%) died within 30 days of their repair or during the same hospitalization. Two hundred seventeen patients (53%) were classified as high risk. Two hundred fifty-nine patients (64%) underwent EVAR repair, and 130 (50%) of these were considered high-risk patients (including four emergency procedures). One hundred forty-five patients (36%) underwent open AAA repair, including 15 emergency operations. All deaths occurred in the high-risk group: 12 (8.3%) died after open AAA repair and 6 (2.3%) died after EVAR repair. Postoperative length of stay was shorter for EVAR repair compared to open AAA. ConclusionsHigh-risk and low-risk patients can undergo EVAR repair with a lower rate of short-term systemic complications and a shorter length of stay compared to open AAA. Despite concern regarding the durability of EVAR, high-risk patients should be evaluated for EVAR repair before committing to open AAA repair.

Endovascular Repair of a Traumatic Infrarenal Aortic Transection A Case Report and Review

Blunt abdominal aortic trauma occurs in up to 0.04% of all nonpenetrating traumas. Although uncommon, mortality from this injury ranges from 18% to 37%. Seat belt injury is associated with almost 50% of reported blunt abdominal aortic traumas. The authors present the case of a 21-year-old man, a restrained passenger who was involved in a high-speed motor vehicle accident. In the emergency room, he had obvious evidence of lap-belt injury. His peripheral pulses were normal and there was no pulsatile abdominal mass. Computer tomography (CT) revealed a large amount of free intraperitoneal fluid throughout with signs of mesenteric avulsion and fracture/dislocation of T11-T12. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Right hemicolectomy and resection of small bowel was performed. CT angiography revealed an aortic transection and surrounding pseudoaneurysm 2 cm above the aortic bifurcation. The patient returned to the operating room for endovascular repair. Via a right femoral cutdown, a 14 mm x 5.5 cm stent-graft was placed across the distal abdominal aorta. Followup arteriogram revealed complete obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm without evidence of leak. There were no complications related to the aortic stent-graft in the postoperative period. The patient was discharged in good condition. As this case demonstrates, endovascular repair of traumatic aortic injury is feasible and may represent an improved treatment in certain settings.

Vascular Complications Arising from Maldeployed Stents

The authors present 6 unusual vascular complications secondary to maldeployed or undeployed vascular stents. They retrospectively reviewed patients referred for complications of vascular stent placement from September 1998 to March 1999. Information on patient history was obtained from a computerized database and clinical document file. Radiographic information was obtained from arteriograms, ultrasound, and computed tomography imaging. Case 1 describes an undeployed stent in the superior mesenteric artery with subsequent thrombosis in addition to celiac occlusion secondary to attempted balloon angioplasty. Case 2 refers to a malpositioned stent placed in the aortic arch and proximal left common carotid artery. Case 3 involves an undeployed coronary stent that migrated to the right distal posterior tibial artery, causing vascular occlusion and chronic pain. In Case 4, an attempted stent placement into the left iliac artery resulted in an undeployed stent lodged across the aortic bifurcation. Case 5 illustrates a partially deployed stent occluding the left renal artery that was unamenable to further angioplasty. Case 6 demonstrates arterial dissection with a pseudoaneurysm following stent placement for right subclavian stenosis. Five patients required operative intervention. Increased use of stents may escalate the number of complications requiring operative intervention. Foreign bodies can migrate distally and potentiate thrombotic occlusion of vessels. Caution must be used not only at the time of deployment but also in the follow-up period. Continued surveillance becomes important after vascular stent placement.