Douglas Kelsey
Eli Lilly and Company
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Douglas Kelsey.
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2013
Richard Wender; Elizabeth T. H. Fontham; Ermilo Barrera; Graham A. Colditz; Timothy R. Church; David S. Ettinger; Ruth Etzioni; Christopher R. Flowers; G. Scott Gazelle; Douglas Kelsey; Samuel J. LaMonte; James S. Michaelson; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Ya Chen Tina Shih; Daniel C. Sullivan; William D. Travis; Louise C. Walter; Andrew M.D. Wolf; Otis W. Brawley; Robert A. Smith
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE
Drug Safety | 2003
Joachim F. Wernicke; Douglas Faries; Donald A. Girod; Jeffrey W. Brown; Haitao Gao; Douglas Kelsey; Humberto Quintana; Robert Lipetz; David Michelson; John H. Heiligenstein
AbstractBackground: Atomoxetine is a highly specific presynaptic inhibitor of the noradrenaline (norepinephrine) transporter that was recently approved in the US for the treatment of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Adverse effects on the cardiovascular system, including abnormalities in heart rate, blood pressure, or cardiac rhythm have been associated with several noradrenergic medications. Objective: To further elucidate the magnitude and impact of blood pressure and pulse elevations in patients taking atomoxetine. Study Design: Short-term cardiovascular safety in children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD was assessed in five randomised, double-blind trials (duration up to 10 weeks) with atomoxetine (n = 612) or placebo (n = 474). Long-term cardiovascular safety in children and adolescents (n = 169) was assessed in patients who entered an open-label extension or a blinded continuation following short-term treatment. Methods: Adverse events, blood pressure, sitting pulse, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were collected throughout the trials. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate by a data-specific correction factor (QTcD; derived from baseline ECGs) as well as standard methods. Results: Atomoxetine treatment was associated with small but statistically significant increases in mean systolic blood pressure in adults and diastolic blood pressure in children and adolescents. Mean pulse rate increased for all atomoxetine treatment groups. The increases in blood pressure and pulse tended to occur early in therapy, stabilised, and returned toward baseline upon drug discontinuation. There was no significant difference between atomoxetine and placebo treatment groups in change in QTcD interval for all study populations. Palpitations in the adult patient population were the only significant cardiovascular adverse event (p = 0.037) occurring more frequently in the atomoxetine treatment group (3.7%) than in the placebo group (0.8%). Discontinuations due to cardiovascular-related events were very uncommon in the adult group, and did not occur in the child/adolescent group. Conclusion: While atomoxetine has noradrenergic activity, increases in pulse and blood pressure were small and of little, if any, clinical significance. Atomoxetine was not associated with QT interval prolongation. Cardiovascular effects of atomoxetine were minimal, and atomoxetine was well tolerated in short- and long-term studies.
Neurology | 2005
Albert J. Allen; Roger Kurlan; Donald L. Gilbert; Barbara J. Coffey; Steven L. Linder; Donald W. Lewis; Paul Winner; David W. Dunn; Leon S. Dure; Floyd R. Sallee; Denái Milton; Mark Mintz; Randall K. Ricardi; Gerald Erenberg; L. L. Layton; Peter D. Feldman; Douglas Kelsey; Thomas J. Spencer
Objective: To test the hypothesis that atomoxetine does not significantly worsen tic severity relative to placebo in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid tic disorders. Methods: Study subjects were 7 to 17 years old, met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–IV criteria for ADHD, and had concurrent Tourette syndrome or chronic motor tic disorder. Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 72) or atomoxetine (0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/day, n = 76) for up to 18 weeks. Results: Atomoxetine treatment was associated with greater reduction of tic severity at endpoint relative to placebo, approaching significance on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale total score (–5.5 ± 6.9 vs –3.0 ± 8.7, p = 0.063) and Tic Symptom Self-Report total score (–4.7 ± 6.5 vs –2.9 ± 5.2, p = 0.095) and achieving significance on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) tic/neurologic severity scale score (–0.7 ± 1.2 vs –0.1 ± 1.0, p = 0.002). Atomoxetine patients also showed greater improvement on the ADHD Rating Scale total score (–10.9 ± 10.9 vs –4.9 ± 10.3, p < 0.001) and CGI severity of ADHD/psychiatric symptoms scale score (–0.8 ± 1.1 vs –0.3 ± 1.0, p = 0.015). Discontinuation rates were not significantly different between treatment groups. Atomoxetine patients had greater increases in heart rate and decreases of body weight, and rates of treatment-emergent decreased appetite and nausea were higher. No other clinically relevant treatment differences were seen in any other vital sign, adverse event, or electrocardiographic or laboratory measures. Conclusions: Atomoxetine did not exacerbate tic symptoms. Rather, there was some evidence of reduction in tic severity with a significant reduction of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Atomoxetine treatment appeared safe and well tolerated.
Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2004
Amy R. Perwien; Douglas Faries; Christopher J. Kratochvil; Calvin Russell Sumner; Douglas Kelsey; Albert J. Allen
ABSTRACT. Despite significant functional impairments associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the growing appreciation of the importance of health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment in children with chronic disorders, relatively few studies have examined the impact of ADHD treatment on HRQL. This investigation examines the effect of atomoxetine, a nonstimulant treatment for ADHD, on HRQL and identifies factors that are predictive of HRQL improvements. The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), which is a multidimensional HRQL measure, was collected during three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Children who received atomoxetine had significantly greater improvement in psychosocial functioning compared to the placebo group. No significant differences between once-a-day and twice-a-day dosing were found. Treatment with atomoxetine, lower HRQL baseline score, no history of stimulant use, and absence of oppositional defiant disorder were all associated with improvements in psychosocial functioning. Findings demonstrate the positive impact of atomoxetine on HRQL in children with ADHD.
Journal of Attention Disorders | 2008
Thomas J. Spencer; F. Randy Sallee; Donald L. Gilbert; David W. Dunn; James T. McCracken; Barbara J. Coffey; Cathy L. Budman; Randall K. Ricardi; Henrietta L. Leonard; Albert J. Allen; Denái Milton; Peter D. Feldman; Douglas Kelsey; Daniel A. Geller; Steven L. Linder; Donald W. Lewis; Paul Winner; Roger Kurlan; Mark Mintz
Objective: This study examines changes in severity of tics and ADHD during atomoxetine treatment in ADHD patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). Method: Subjects (7-17 years old) with ADHD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV) and TS were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 56) or atomoxetine (0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day, n = 61) for approximately 18 weeks. Results: Atomoxetine subjects showed significantly greater improvement on ADHD symptom measures. Treatment was also associated with significantly greater reduction of tic severity on two of three measures. Significant increases were seen in mean pulse rate and rates of treatment-emergent nausea, decreased appetite, and decreased body weight. No other clinically relevant treatment differences were observed in any other vital sign, adverse event, laboratory parameter, or electrocardiographic measure. Conclusion: Atomoxetine is efficacious for treatment of ADHD and its use appears well tolerated in ADHD patients with comorbid TS. (J. of Att. Dis. 2008; 11(4) 470-481)
Journal of Attention Disorders | 2008
Lenard A. Adler; Thomas J. Spencer; Louise R. Levine; Janet L. Ramsey; Roy N. Tamura; Douglas Kelsey; Susan Ball; Albert J. Allen; Joseph Biederman
Objective: ADHD is associated with significant functional impairment in adults. The present study examined functional outcomes following 6-month double-blind treatment with either atomoxetine or placebo. Method: Patients were 410 adults (58.5% male) with DSM-IV—defined ADHD. They were randomly assigned to receive either atomoxetine 40 mg/day to 80 mg/day (n = 271) or placebo (n = 139). The primary functional outcome measure was the Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS), and the secondary measure was the Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL). Patients were seen for four visits in 6 months. Results: At 6 months, both groups had nonsignificantly different improvements in EWPS total scores. Atomoxetine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement than placebo-treated patients on the AAQoL after controlling for baseline severity of ADHD. Both treatment groups had low 6-month study completion rates. Conclusion: Following 6-month treatment with atomoxetine, adults with ADHD showed significantly greater improvement in functioning on disease-specific measures of quality of life than patients treated with placebo. (J. of Att. Dis. 2008; 11(6) 720-727)
Journal of Attention Disorders | 2010
Thomas J. Spencer; Lenard A. Adler; Meihua Qiao; Keith Saylor; Thomas E. Brown; James Holdnack; Kory Schuh; Paula T. Trzepacz; Douglas Kelsey
Objective: Validation of the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) that measures aspects of ADHD in adults. Method: Psychometric properties of the AISRS total and AISRS subscales are analyzed and compared to the Conners’ Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) and the Clinical Global Impression-ADHD-Severity Scale using data from a placebo-controlled 6-month clinical trial of once-daily atomoxetine. Results: The AISRS has high internal consistency, good convergent, and discriminant validities; modest divergent validity; and small ceiling and floor effects (≤1%). It correlates highly with the CAARS-Inv:SV. Factor analysis confirms 2 AISRS subscales, hyperactivity-impulsive scale and inattention. The AISRS total and AISRS subscales perform stably. All scales demonstrate responsiveness to change with medication. Conclusion: The AISRS and its subscales are robust, valid efficacy measures of ADHD symptoms in adult patients. Its anchored items and semistructured interview are advancements over existing scales. (J. of Att. Dis. 2010; 14(1) 57-68)
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2006
Lenard A. Adler; Virginia K. Sutton; Rodney J. Moore; Anthony Dietrich; Frederick W. Reimherr; R. Bart Sangal; Keith Saylor; Kristina Secnik; Douglas Kelsey; Albert J. Allen
Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has its onset during childhood and is estimated to affect 3% to 7% of school-aged children. Unfortunately, the disorder frequently persists into adult life. The burden of this disorder is considerable and is often characterized by academic (or occupational) impairment and dysfunction within the family and society. Despite the existence of research demonstrating the effects of ADHD on certain aspects of life, the clinical trials of treatments for this disorder have focused primarily on efficacy and safety. Methods: Atomoxetine was approved in the United States in November 2002 for the treatment of ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults. The present study uses data from a clinical trial of atomoxetine in adult patients with ADHD that incorporated a measure of health-related quality of life (the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey [SF-36]) as part of the overall assessment of the success of this relatively new treatment. The primary outcome measure for ADHD symptoms was the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS) ADHD total symptom score. Results: In agreement with previous studies, adult patients with ADHD treated with atomoxetine at typical doses showed significant amelioration of ADHD symptoms, as measured on the CAARS. At baseline, the measures of overall mental health (one aspect of quality of life) of adult patients with ADHD were below the average level, as measured on the SF-36. Treatment with atomoxetine significantly improved the measures of mental health and ameliorated the ADHD symptoms. In addition, the 2 measures were correlated. Conclusions: These data suggest that pharmacological intervention with atomoxetine not only ameliorates ADHD symptoms in adult patients but also improves their perceived quality of life.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2004
Joachim F. Wernicke; Lenard A. Adler; T. Thomas Spencer; Scott A. West; Albert J. Allen; John H. Heiligenstein; Denái Milton; Dustin D. Ruff; W. Jeffrey Brown; Douglas Kelsey; David Michelson
Abstract: Drugs that affect neurotransmitter release can induce changes in neuroregulation during chronic administration. Thus, in addition to recurrence of symptoms of the illness, discontinuation of treatment can be associated with clinical signs and symptoms related to these changes. Atomoxetine, a new drug approved in the United States for treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is associated with blockade of the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter. Because treatment of ADHD typically involves chronic treatment, the potential for production of a discontinuation syndrome as well as recurrence of symptoms upon drug discontinuation were assessed as part of the clinical development process. The effects of discontinuation of atomoxetine were assessed in children and adults with ADHD following 9 to 10 weeks of continuous therapy in 4 large studies. Symptoms of ADHD worsened following drug discontinuation but did not return to pretreatment levels. The incidence of discontinuation-emergent adverse events was low and there were no statistically significant differences between the patients abruptly discontinuing from atomoxetine and those continuing on placebo. Discontinuation of atomoxetine did not result in the development of an acute discontinuation syndrome and was well tolerated. It appears that atomoxetine may be discontinued without risk for symptom rebound or discontinuation-emergent adverse effects. Tapering of doses is not necessary when atomoxetine is discontinued.
Clinical Pediatrics | 2009
Stan L. Block; Douglas Kelsey; Daniel L. Coury; Donald W. Lewis; Humberto Quintana; Virginia K. Sutton; Kory Schuh; Albert J. Allen; Calvin Russell Sumner
In this 3-arm, randomized, double-blind trial, once-daily morning-dosed atomoxetine, evening-dosed atomoxetine, and placebo were compared for treating pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Patients received morning atomoxetine/evening placebo (n = 102), morning placebo/evening atomoxetine (n = 93), or morning placebo/evening placebo (n = 93) for about 6 weeks. Core symptom efficacy was measured at weeks 0, 1, 3, and 6. Parent assessments of the child’s home behaviors in the evening and early morning were collected daily during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Morning-dosed and evening-dosed atomoxetine significantly decreased core ADHD symptoms relative to placebo and produced symptom improvements that were measured up to 24 hours later. Morning dosing was superior to evening dosing on some efficacy measures. Evening dosing showed greater tolerability with significantly more patients receiving morning atomoxetine reporting at least 1 adverse event than those receiving evening atomoxetine.