Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dugald Tinch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dugald Tinch.


Conservation Biology | 2014

Quantifying Preferences for the Natural World Using Monetary and Nonmonetary Assessments of Value

Martin Dallimer; Dugald Tinch; Nick Hanley; Katherine N. Irvine; James R. Rouquette; Philip H. Warren; Lorraine Maltby; Kevin J. Gaston; Paul R. Armsworth

Given that funds for biodiversity conservation are limited, there is a need to understand people’s preferences for its different components. To date, such preferences have largely been measured in monetary terms. However, how people value biodiversity may differ from economic theory, and there is little consensus over whether monetary metrics are always appropriate or the degree to which other methods offer alternative and complementary perspectives on value. We used a choice experiment to compare monetary amounts recreational visitors to urban green spaces were willing to pay for biodiversity enhancement (increases in species richness for birds, plants, and aquatic macroinvertebrates) with self-reported psychological gains in well-being derived from visiting the same sites. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates were significant and positive, and respondents reported high gains in well-being across 3 axes derived from environmental psychology theories (reflection, attachment, continuity with past). The 2 metrics were broadly congruent. Participants with above-median self-reported well-being scores were willing to pay significantly higher amounts for enhancing species richness than those with below-median scores, regardless of taxon. The socio-economic and demographic background of participants played little role in determining either their well-being or the probability of choosing a paying option within the choice experiment. Site-level environmental characteristics were only somewhat related to WTP, but showed strong associations with self-reported well-being. Both approaches are likely to reflect a combination of the environmental properties of a site and unobserved individual preference heterogeneity for the natural world. Our results suggest that either metric will deliver mutually consistent results in an assessment of environmental preferences, although which approach is preferable depends on why one wishes to measure values for the natural world.


European Review of Agricultural Economics | 2006

Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Under the Water Framework Directive: Are Benefits Transferable?

Nick Hanley; Sergio Colombo; Dugald Tinch; Andrew R. Black; Ashar Aftab


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2009

100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th century

Martin Dallimer; Dugald Tinch; Szvetlana Acs; Nick Hanley; Humphrey Southall; Kevin J. Gaston; Paul R. Armsworth


Marine Policy | 2013

Valuing improvements to coastal waters using choice experiments: An application to revisions of the EU Bathing Waters Directive

Stephen Hynes; Dugald Tinch; Nick Hanley


Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | 2014

The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good

Jacob LaRiviere; Mikolaj Czajkowski; Nick Hanley; Margrethe Aanesen; Jannike Falk-Petersen; Dugald Tinch


Ecological Economics | 2006

Comparing augmented sustainability measures for Scotland: Is there a mismatch?

John C. V. Pezzey; Nick Hanley; Karen Turner; Dugald Tinch


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2008

Economic determinants of biodiversity change over a 400‐year period in the Scottish uplands

Nick Hanley; Althea Davies; Konstantinos Angelopoulos; Alastair Hamilton; Alasdair Ross; Dugald Tinch; Fiona Watson


Journal of Environmental Economics and Management | 2009

What drives long-run biodiversity change? New insights from combining economics, palaeoecology and environmental history

Nick Hanley; Dugald Tinch; Konstantinos Angelopoulos; Althea Davies; Edward B. Barbier; Fiona Watson


AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment | 2016

Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe: Balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base.

David M. Oliver; Nick Hanley; Melanie van Niekerk; David Kay; A. Louise Heathwaite; Sharyl J. M. Rabinovici; Julie L. Kinzelman; Lora E. Fleming; Jonathan Porter; Sabina L. Shaikh; Robert Fish; S. M. Chilton; Julie Hewitt; Elaine Connolly; Andy Cummins; Klaus Glenk; Calum McPhail; Eric McRory; Alistair McVittie; Amanna Giles; Suzanne Roberts; Katherine Simpson; Dugald Tinch; Ted Thairs; Lisa M. Avery; A.J.A. Vinten; Bill D. Watts; Richard S. Quilliam


Archive | 2003

AUGMENTED SUSTAINABILITY MEASURES FOR SCOTLAND

John C. V. Pezzey; Nick Hanley; Karen Turner; Dugald Tinch

Collaboration


Dive into the Dugald Tinch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nick Hanley

University of St Andrews

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Althea Davies

University of St Andrews

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge