Duncan W. Thomas
Washington State University Vancouver
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Duncan W. Thomas.
Nature | 2014
Nathan L. Stephenson; Adrian J. Das; Richard Condit; Sabrina E. Russo; Patrick J. Baker; Noelle G. Beckman; David A. Coomes; Emily R. Lines; William K. Morris; Nadja Rüger; Eric A. Álvarez; C. Blundo; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; G. Chuyong; Stuart J. Davies; Alvaro Duque; Corneille E. N. Ewango; Olivier Flores; Jerry F. Franklin; H. R. Grau; Zhanqing Hao; Mark E. Harmon; Stephen P. Hubbell; David Kenfack; Yiching Lin; Jean-Remy Makana; A. Malizia; Lucio R. Malizia; R. J. Pabst; Nantachai Pongpattananurak
Forests are major components of the global carbon cycle, providing substantial feedback to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Our ability to understand and predict changes in the forest carbon cycle—particularly net primary productivity and carbon storage—increasingly relies on models that represent biological processes across several scales of biological organization, from tree leaves to forest stands. Yet, despite advances in our understanding of productivity at the scales of leaves and stands, no consensus exists about the nature of productivity at the scale of the individual tree, in part because we lack a broad empirical assessment of whether rates of absolute tree mass growth (and thus carbon accumulation) decrease, remain constant, or increase as trees increase in size and age. Here we present a global analysis of 403 tropical and temperate tree species, showing that for most species mass growth rate increases continuously with tree size. Thus, large, old trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon compared to smaller trees; at the extreme, a single big tree can add the same amount of carbon to the forest within a year as is contained in an entire mid-sized tree. The apparent paradoxes of individual tree growth increasing with tree size despite declining leaf-level and stand-level productivity can be explained, respectively, by increases in a tree’s total leaf area that outpace declines in productivity per unit of leaf area and, among other factors, age-related reductions in population density. Our results resolve conflicting assumptions about the nature of tree growth, inform efforts to undertand and model forest carbon dynamics, and have additional implications for theories of resource allocation and plant senescence.
Ecology Letters | 2008
Hélène Morlon; George B. Chuyong; Richard Condit; Stephen P. Hubbell; David Kenfack; Duncan W. Thomas; Renato Valencia; Jessica L. Green
Species spatial turnover, or β-diversity, induces a decay of community similarity with geographic distance known as the distance–decay relationship. Although this relationship is central to biodiversity and biogeography, its theoretical underpinnings remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a general framework to describe how the distance–decay relationship is influenced by population aggregation and the landscape-scale species-abundance distribution. We utilize this general framework and data from three tropical forests to show that rare species have a weak influence on distance–decay curves, and that overall similarity and rates of decay are primarily influenced by species abundances and population aggregation respectively. We illustrate the utility of the framework by deriving an exact analytical expression of the distance–decay relationship when population aggregation is characterized by the Poisson Cluster Process. Our study provides a foundation for understanding the distance–decay relationship, and for predicting and testing patterns of beta-diversity under competing theories in ecology. Ecology Letters (2008) 11: 904–917
Journal of Ecology | 2013
Ryan A. Chisholm; Helene C. Muller-Landau; Kassim Abdul Rahman; Daniel P. Bebber; Yue Bin; Stephanie A. Bohlman; Norman A. Bourg; Joshua S. Brinks; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Nathalie Butt; Hong-Lin Cao; Min Cao; Dairon Cárdenas; Li-Wan Chang; Jyh-Min Chiang; George B. Chuyong; Richard Condit; H. S. Dattaraja; Stuart J. Davies; Alvaro Duque; Christine Fletcher; Nimal Gunatilleke; Savitri Gunatilleke; Zhanqing Hao; Rhett D. Harrison; Robert W. Howe; Chang-Fu Hsieh; Stephen P. Hubbell; Akira Itoh; David Kenfack
1. The relationship between species richness and ecosystem function, as measured by productivity or biomass, is of long-standing theoretical and practical interest in ecology. This is especially true for forests, which represent a majority of global biomass, productivity and biodiversity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015
J. W. Ferry Slik; Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez; Shin-ichiro Aiba; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Luciana F. Alves; Peter S. Ashton; Patricia Balvanera; Meredith L. Bastian; Peter J. Bellingham; Eduardo van den Berg; Luís Carlos Bernacci; Polyanna da Conceição Bispo; Lilian Blanc; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Pascal Boeckx; Frans Bongers; Brad Boyle; M. Bradford; Francis Q. Brearley; Mireille Breuer-Ndoundou; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Darley Calderado; Leal Matos; Miguel Castillo-Santiago; Eduardo Luís Martins Catharino; Shauna-Lee Chai; Yukai Chen; Eizi Suzuki; Natália Targhetta; Duncan W. Thomas
Significance People are fascinated by the amazing diversity of tropical forests and will be surprised to learn that robust estimates of the number of tropical tree species are lacking. We show that there are at least 40,000, but possibly more than 53,000, tree species in the tropics, in contrast to only 124 across temperate Europe. Almost all tropical tree species are restricted to their respective continents, and the Indo-Pacific region appears to be as species-rich as tropical America, with each of these two regions being almost five times as rich in tree species as African tropical forests. Our study shows that most tree species are extremely rare, meaning that they may be under serious risk of extinction at current deforestation rates. The high species richness of tropical forests has long been recognized, yet there remains substantial uncertainty regarding the actual number of tropical tree species. Using a pantropical tree inventory database from closed canopy forests, consisting of 657,630 trees belonging to 11,371 species, we use a fitted value of Fisher’s alpha and an approximate pantropical stem total to estimate the minimum number of tropical forest tree species to fall between ∼40,000 and ∼53,000, i.e., at the high end of previous estimates. Contrary to common assumption, the Indo-Pacific region was found to be as species-rich as the Neotropics, with both regions having a minimum of ∼19,000–25,000 tree species. Continental Africa is relatively depauperate with a minimum of ∼4,500–6,000 tree species. Very few species are shared among the African, American, and the Indo-Pacific regions. We provide a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | 2012
Claire A. Baldeck; Kyle E. Harms; Joseph B. Yavitt; Robert John; Benjamin L. Turner; Renato Valencia; Hugo Navarrete; Stuart J. Davies; George B. Chuyong; David Kenfack; Duncan W. Thomas; Sumedha Madawala; Nimal Gunatilleke; Savitri Gunatilleke; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Somboon Kiratiprayoon; Adzmi Yaacob; M. N. N. Supardi; James W. Dalling
Both habitat filtering and dispersal limitation influence the compositional structure of forest communities, but previous studies examining the relative contributions of these processes with variation partitioning have primarily used topography to represent the influence of the environment. Here, we bring together data on both topography and soil resource variation within eight large (24–50 ha) tropical forest plots, and use variation partitioning to decompose community compositional variation into fractions explained by spatial, soil resource and topographic variables. Both soil resources and topography account for significant and approximately equal variation in tree community composition (9–34% and 5–29%, respectively), and all environmental variables together explain 13–39% of compositional variation within a plot. A large fraction of variation (19–37%) was spatially structured, yet unexplained by the environment, suggesting an important role for dispersal processes and unmeasured environmental variables. For the majority of sites, adding soil resource variables to topography nearly doubled the inferred role of habitat filtering, accounting for variation in compositional structure that would previously have been attributable to dispersal. Our results, illustrated using a new graphical depiction of community structure within these plots, demonstrate the importance of small-scale environmental variation in shaping local community structure in diverse tropical forests around the globe.
Scientific Reports | 2015
Jean-François Bastin; Nicolas Barbier; Maxime Réjou-Méchain; Adeline Fayolle; Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury; Danae Maniatis; T. de Haulleville; Fidèle Baya; Hans Beeckman; D. Beina; Pierre Couteron; G. Chuyong; Gilles Dauby; Jean-Louis Doucet; Vincent Droissart; Marc Dufrêne; Corneille Ewango; Jean-François Gillet; C. H. Gonmadje; Terese B. Hart; T. Kavali; David Kenfack; Moses Libalah; Yadvinder Malhi; Jean-Remy Makana; Raphaël Pélissier; Pierre Ploton; A. Serckx; Bonaventure Sonké; Tariq Stevart
Large tropical trees and a few dominant species were recently identified as the main structuring elements of tropical forests. However, such result did not translate yet into quantitative approaches which are essential to understand, predict and monitor forest functions and composition over large, often poorly accessible territories. Here we show that the above-ground biomass (AGB) of the whole forest can be predicted from a few large trees and that the relationship is proved strikingly stable in 175 1-ha plots investigated across 8 sites spanning Central Africa. We designed a generic model predicting AGB with an error of 14% when based on only 5% of the stems, which points to universality in forest structural properties. For the first time in Africa, we identified some dominant species that disproportionally contribute to forest AGB with 1.5% of recorded species accounting for over 50% of the stock of AGB. Consequently, focusing on large trees and dominant species provides precise information on the whole forest stand. This offers new perspectives for understanding the functioning of tropical forests and opens new doors for the development of innovative monitoring strategies.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2013
Claire A. Baldeck; Kyle E. Harms; Joseph B. Yavitt; Robert John; Benjamin L. Turner; Renato Valencia; Hugo Navarrete; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Somboon Kiratiprayoon; Adzmi Yaacob; M. N. N. Supardi; Stuart J. Davies; Stephen P. Hubbell; G. Chuyong; David Kenfack; Duncan W. Thomas; James W. Dalling
Tropical tree communities are shaped by local-scale habitat heterogeneity in the form of topographic and edaphic variation, but the life-history stage at which habitat associations develop remains poorly understood. This is due, in part, to the fact that previous studies have not accounted for the widely disparate sample sizes (number of stems) that result when trees are divided into size classes. We demonstrate that the observed habitat structuring of a community is directly related to the number of individuals in the community. We then compare the relative importance of habitat heterogeneity to tree community structure for saplings, juveniles and adult trees within seven large (24–50 ha) tropical forest dynamics plots while controlling for sample size. Changes in habitat structuring through tree life stages were small and inconsistent among life stages and study sites. Where found, these differences were an order of magnitude smaller than the findings of previous studies that did not control for sample size. Moreover, community structure and composition were very similar among tree sub-communities of different life stages. We conclude that the structure of these tropical tree communities is established by the time trees are large enough to be included in the census (1 cm diameter at breast height), which indicates that habitat filtering occurs during earlier life stages.
Ecology Letters | 2014
Ryan A. Chisholm; Richard Condit; K. Abd Rahman; Patrick J. Baker; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Yu-Yun Chen; George B. Chuyong; H. S. Dattaraja; Stuart J. Davies; Corneille E. N. Ewango; C.V.S. Gunatilleke; I. A. U. Nimal Gunatilleke; Stephen P. Hubbell; David Kenfack; Somboon Kiratiprayoon; Yiching Lin; Jean-Remy Makana; Nantachai Pongpattananurak; Sandeep Pulla; Ruwan Punchi-Manage; Raman Sukumar; Sheng-Hsin Su; I-Fang Sun; Hebbalalu S. Suresh; Sylvester Tan; Duncan W. Thomas; Sandra L. Yap
Long-term surveys of entire communities of species are needed to measure fluctuations in natural populations and elucidate the mechanisms driving population dynamics and community assembly. We analysed changes in abundance of over 4000 tree species in 12 forests across the world over periods of 6-28 years. Abundance fluctuations in all forests are large and consistent with population dynamics models in which temporal environmental variance plays a central role. At some sites we identify clear environmental drivers, such as fire and drought, that could underlie these patterns, but at other sites there is a need for further research to identify drivers. In addition, cross-site comparisons showed that abundance fluctuations were smaller at species-rich sites, consistent with the idea that stable environmental conditions promote higher diversity. Much community ecology theory emphasises demographic variance and niche stabilisation; we encourage the development of theory in which temporal environmental variance plays a central role.
Ecology | 2006
James V. LaFrankie; Peter S. Ashton; George B. Chuyong; Leonardo Co; Richard Condit; Stuart J. Davies; Robin B. Foster; Stephen P. Hubbell; David Kenfack; Daniel Lagunzad; Elizabeth Losos; Noor Supardi Md.Nor; Sylvester Tan; Duncan W. Thomas; Renato Valencia; Gorky Villa
In large samples of trees > or = 1 cm dbh (more than 1 million trees and 3000 species), in six lowland tropical forests on three continents, we assigned species with >30 individuals to one of six classes of stature at maturity (SAM). We then compared the proportional representation of understory trees (1-2 cm dbh) among these classes. The understory of the three Asian sites was predominantly composed of the saplings of large-canopy trees whereas the African and American sites were more richly stocked with trees of the smaller SAM classes. Differences in class representation were related to taxonomic families that were present exclusively in one continent or another. Families found in the Asian plots but not in the American plot (e.g., Dipterocarpaceae, Fagaceae) were predominantly species of the largest SAM classes, whereas families exclusive to the American plots (e.g., Melastomataceae sensu stricto, Piperaceae, and Malvaceae [Bombacacoidea]) were predominantly species of small classes. The African plot was similar to Asia in the absence of those American families rich in understory species, while similar to America in lacking the Asian families rich in canopy species. The numerous understory species of Africa were chiefly derived from families shared with Asia and/or America. The ratio of saplings (1-2 cm dbh) to conspecific canopy trees (>40 cm dbh) was lower in American plots than in the Asian plots. Possible explanations for these differences include phenology, moisture and soil fertility regimes, phyletic constraints, and the role of early successional plants in forest development. These results demonstrate that tropical forests that appear similar in tree number, basal area, and the family taxonomy of canopy trees nonetheless differ in ecological structure in ways that may impact the ecology of pollinators, dispersers, and herbivores and might reflect fundamental differences in canopy tree regeneration.
Science | 2017
Joseph A. LaManna; Scott A. Mangan; Alfonso Alonso; Norman A. Bourg; Warren Y. Brockelman; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Li-Wan Chang; Jyh-Min Chiang; George B. Chuyong; Keith Clay; Richard Condit; Susan Cordell; Stuart J. Davies; Tucker J. Furniss; Christian P. Giardina; I. A. U. Nimal Gunatilleke; C. V. Savitri Gunatilleke; Fangliang He; Robert W. Howe; Stephen P. Hubbell; Chang-Fu Hsieh; Faith M. Inman-Narahari; David Janík; Daniel J. Johnson; David Kenfack; Lisa Korte; Kamil Král; Andrew J. Larson; James A. Lutz; Sean M. McMahon
Maintaining tree diversity Negative interaction among plant species is known as conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD). This ecological pattern is thought to maintain higher species diversity in the tropics. LaManna et al. tested this hypothesis by comparing how tree species diversity changes with the intensity of local biotic interactions in tropical and temperate latitudes (see the Perspective by Comita). Stronger local specialized biotic interactions seem to prevent erosion of biodiversity in tropical forests, not only by limiting populations of common species, but also by strongly stabilizing populations of rare species, which tend to show higher CNDD in the tropics. Science, this issue p. 1389; see also p. 1328 A global analysis of ~3000 species and ~2.4 million trees elucidates variations in tree species diversity between tropical and temperate latitudes. Theory predicts that higher biodiversity in the tropics is maintained by specialized interactions among plants and their natural enemies that result in conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD). By using more than 3000 species and nearly 2.4 million trees across 24 forest plots worldwide, we show that global patterns in tree species diversity reflect not only stronger CNDD at tropical versus temperate latitudes but also a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance. CNDD was stronger for rare species at tropical versus temperate latitudes, potentially causing the persistence of greater numbers of rare species in the tropics. Our study reveals fundamental differences in the nature of local-scale biotic interactions that contribute to the maintenance of species diversity across temperate and tropical communities.