Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. Capocasale is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. Capocasale.


Transplantation | 2001

Kidney preservation with university of Wisconsin and Celsior solution: a prospective multicenter randomized study.

A. Faenza; Fausto Catena; Bruno Nardo; Roberto Montalti; E. Capocasale; Nicola Busi; Ugo Boggi; Fabio Vistoli; Antonio Di Naro; Alberto Albertazzi; Franco Mosca; Antonino Cavallari

Background. Although the University of Wisconsin (U.W.) solution continues to be the most commonly used for intra-abdominal organs, a new solution, Celsior, already used for heart and lungs, has been proposed for kidney and liver preservation. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with U.W. on immediate graft function and a 2-year follow-up of kidney transplants. Methods. A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Celsior solution in the clinical preservation of the kidney. In this report, we present the data collected as of September 2000. One hundred donors were included in the trial resulting in 187 renal transplants. Ninety-nine kidneys were stored in Celsior solution and 88 in U.W. solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. Results. Delayed graft function occurred in 31.3% of the Celsior group and in 33.9% of the U.W. group (P =n.s.). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also comparable. Two year graft survival in kidneys preserved with Celsior was 84% as compared with 75% for U.W.-preserved kidneys without any significant statistical difference. Conclusions. Our data show that the preservation of kidneys in Celsior solution in a clinical setting is equivalent to that of U.W. solution. When using Celsior during multiple-organ donor harvesting it would be possible to perform an in situ flush of all intra-abdominal and intrathoracic organs with a single cold storage solution.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2011

Analysis of 80 dual-kidney transplantations: a multicenter experience.

Bruno Nardo; R. Bertelli; Giuseppe Cavallari; E. Capocasale; Gianni Cappelli; M.P. Mazzoni; L. Benozzi; R. Dalla Valle; G. Fuga; N. Busi; Chiara Gilioli; Alberto Albertazzi; Sergio Stefoni; Antonio Daniele Pinna; A. Faenza

INTRODUCTION The use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is an attractive strategy to enlarge the pool of organs available for transplantation. Considering the fact that ECD organs have a reduced nephron mass, they are preferentially allocated for dual-kidney transplantation (DKT). Authors have reported excellent results of DKT when pretransplant ECD organs are evaluated for histological scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate DKT donor and recipient characteristics for comparison with DKT posttransplant outcomes versus those of recipients of single-kidney transplantations from expanded criteria (edSKT) and ideal donors (idSKT). We analyzed the potential prognostic factors involved in DKT among a population derived from three transplant centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, DKT (n = 80) were performed based upon the ECD kidney allocation assessed by biopsy. RESULTS The average donor ages for the DKT, edSKT, and idSKT groups were 68.8 ± 7.8, 65.3 ± 7.2, and 40.1 ± 13.8 years, respectively (P < .001). The number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches was greater in the DKT group (3.1 ± 1.2, P < .05). Patient and graft 5-year survival rates were similar among DKT, edSKT, and idSKT recipients, namely, 97.5% versus 95.8% versus 96.9% and 93.7% versus 87.4% versus 86.9%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine values at discharge were lower in the DKT and idSKT recipients (1.5 ± 0.9 and 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dL; P < .05) compared with the edSKT group (1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Correlations between supposed prognostic factors and survival among the DKT group noted worse outcomes in reoperation cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION We confirmed that DKT produced successful outcomes. An accurate surgical procedure is particularly important to try to avoid reoperations. In our experience, the use of a biopsy as an absolute criterion to allocate ECD kidneys may be too protective.


Transplantation | 2012

Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Chylous Leakage After Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy

E. Capocasale; Maurizio Iaria; Fabio Vistoli; S Signori; Maria Patrizia Mazzoni; Raffaele Dalla Valle; Nelide De Lio; Vittorio Perrone; G Amorese; Franco Mosca; Ugo Boggi

Background. Chylous leakage (CL) is a rare complication of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN). It may lead to malnutrition and immunological deficits because of protein and lymphocyte depletion. Methods. Data from 208 consecutive LLDN performed at two institutions, between April 2000 and September 2010, were reviewed to identify the anatomical basis behind CL along with its diagnostic and therapeutic options. Results. CL developed in eight donors (3.8%), as determined by high-volume drainage (range 540–800 mL/24 hr) of triglyceride-rich fluid. All donors were managed conservatively. Seven were put on total parenteral nutrition plus octreotide. One received low-fat diet, medium-chain triglyceride supplementation, and octreotide. Chylous fistulas resolved in 5 to 16 days (mean time 12.3 days). Drains were removed before hospital discharge, and no donor was readmitted and/or needed outpatient care. Conclusions. CL is a potentially insidious and perhaps misdiagnosed complication after LLDN. It occurs in nearly 4% of LLDN and it seems to be uniquely associated to left-sided kidney recovery because of distinctive lymphatics distribution around the periaortic area of dissection. Conservative therapy is effective in most donors and should be initially attempted. Surgical ligatures or fibrin sealants may be indicated in case of refractory CL before the arising of malnutrition and/or relevant immunodeficiency.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2008

Multicenter study on double kidney transplantation.

R. Bertelli; Bruno Nardo; E. Capocasale; Gianni Cappelli; Giuseppe Cavallari; M.P. Mazzoni; L. Benozzi; R. Dalla Valle; G. Fuga; N. Busi; Chiara Gilioli; Alberto Albertazzi; Sergio Stefoni; A.D. Pinna; A. Faenza

BACKGROUND Marginal organs not suitable for single kidney transplantation are considered for double kidney transplantation (DKT). Herein we have reviewed short and long-term outcomes of DKT over a 7-year experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, 80 DKT were performed in the transplant centers of Bologna, Parma, and Modena, Italy. Recipient mean age was 61+/-5 years. The main indications were glomerular nephropathy (n=33) and hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n=14). Mean HLA A, B, and DR mismatches were 3.1+/-1.2. Donor mean age was 69+/-8 years and mean creatinine clearance was 75+/-27 mL/min. Almost all kidneys were perfused with Celsior solution. Mean cold ischemia time was 17+/-4 hours and mean warm ischemia time was 41+/-17 minutes. Mean biopsy score was 4.4. Immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus (n=52) or cyclosporine (n=26). RESULTS Fifty (62.5%) patients displayed good postoperative renal function. Thirty (37.5%) experienced acute tubular necrosis and required postoperative dialysis treatment; 8 acute rejections occurred. Urinary complications were 13.7% with 8/11 requiring surgical revision. There were 6 surgical reexplorations: intestinal perforation (n=2), bleeding (n=3), and lymphocele (n=1). Two patients lost both grafts due to vascular and infectious complications at 7 or 58 days after transplantation. Two patients underwent intraoperative transplantectomy due to massive vascular thrombosis. Four (5%) patients underwent transplantectomy of a single graft due to vascular complications (n=2), bleeding (n=1), or infectious complications (n=1). Graft and patient survivals were 95% and 100% versus 93% and 97% at 3 versus 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DKT is a safe approach for organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or accepted.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2010

Total Duodenectomy with Enteric Duct Drainage: A Rescue Operation for Duodenal Complications Occurring after Pancreas Transplantation

Ugo Boggi; Fabio Vistoli; M Del Chiaro; C Moretto; C Croce; S Signori; S D’Imporzano; G Amorese; Daniela Campani; F. Calabrese; E. Capocasale; Piero Marchetti

Duodenal graft complications (DGC) occur frequently after pancreas transplantation but rarely cause graft loss. Graft pancreatectomy, however, may be required when DGC compromise recipients safety. We herein report on two patients with otherwise untreatable DGC in whom the entire pancreas was salvaged by means of total duodenectomy with enteric drainage of both pancreatic ducts. The first patient developed recurrent episodes of enteric bleeding, requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions, starting 21 months after transplantation. The disease causing hemorrhage could not be defined, despite extensive investigations, but the donor duodenum was eventually identified as the site of bleeding. The second patient was referred to us with a duodenal stump leak, 5 months after transplantation. Two previous surgeries had failed to seal the leak, despite opening a diverting stoma above the duodenal graft. Thirty‐nine and 16 months after total duodenectomy with dual duct drainage, respectively, both patients are insulin‐independent and free from abdominal complaints. Magnetic resonance pancreatography shows normal ducts both basal and after intravenous injection of secretin. The two cases presented herein show that when DGC jeopardize pancreas function or recipient safety, total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage may become an option.


Rivista Urologia | 2007

Ligation of the native ureter in kidney transplant

E. Capocasale; N. Busi; M.P. Mazzoni; R. Della Valle; G. Ferreri; M. Sianesi

The urinary tract reconstruction in renal transplantation is usually performed by a ureterocystoneostomy according to Gregoire-Lich technique. In selected patients, native ureteral ligation with nephrectomy was done when end-to-end anastomosis for ureteroureterostomy was performed. Recently, some Authors have proposed the ligation of the native ureter without nephrectomy. We report our experience in the ligation of the native ureter with no associated nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In 978 renal transplantations performed from April 1986 through December 2006, we evaluated 68 recipients (69.5%) who underwent ureteral ligation without nephrectomy. Mean diuresis was 314 cc/day (range 0-1200 cc/day). Follow-up was 1 to 187 months. RESULTS. Only one patient (1.5%) required native nephrectomy for fever and abdominal pain. None of the other patients showed infections involving native kidney or flank pain during the follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Our experience confirms the safety and feasibility of native ureter ligation without omolateral nephrectomy. Nephrectomy is indicated in the case of coexistent intrinsic renal disease, such as non-treatable nephrovascular hypertension, symptomatic polycystic kidney disease, chronic renal infection.


Rivista Urologia | 2009

[Living donor nephrectomy: open versus laparoscopic technique].

M. Franceschin; E. Capocasale; R. Dalla Valle; M.P. Mazzoni; N. Busi; Mario Sianesi

The living donor nephrectomy has to be safe and effective, allowing a good graft function in the recipient. In the past, donor nephrectomy was performed only by open technique; more recently this nephrectomy has also been performed by laparoscopic technique. The best technique has not been established in literature. The purpose of this study is to report the results of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 1992 to August 2008, 37 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 23 nephrectomies were achieved by laparoscopic procedure (LDN) and 14 by open technique (ODN). The 2 groups were comparable regarding both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS. All laparoscopic nephrectomies were successfully performed without conversion to open procedure. No donor deaths were reported in either groups. 3 complications (13%) in the LDN group and 1 (7.1%) in the ODN group (p=0.6) were observed. Mean operative time was higher in the LDN group (p<0.036). Mean warm and cold ischemia time, resumption of oral intake and hospital stay were shorter in the LDN group (p<0.04)( p<0.03) (p<0.0001), whereas the return to normal occupational life was similar (p<0.52). We had no significant differences in the surgical complication rates, graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS. Our experience suggests that both procedures can be used safely and efficiently, and assure a good renal function in the recipient. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, although more difficult, provides post-operative advantages. However, laparoscopic procedure must be performed by experienced centres only to prevent serious complications in the donor.


Rivista Urologia | 2007

Endourological management of ureteral stenosis and vesicoureteral reflux after renal transplantation

A. Frattini; E. Capocasale; P. Granelli; M.P. Mazzoni; M.P. Maestroni; R. Dalla Valle; P. Salsi; N. Busi; P. Ferreri; P. Cortellini; Mario Sianesi

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES. Ureteral stenosis and vesicocoureteral reflux after renal transplantation represent a key concern because of their incidence and the associated morbidity. Prompt diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment are mandatory in immunosuppressed patients with single kidney. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success rate of the endourological techniques in the management of such complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between January 1996 and December 2006, 647 kidney transplants were performed. Urinary tract continuity was re-established by ureteroneocystostomy according to Gregoir-Lich technique. We observed 13 cases of ureteral stenosis (2%) and 11 cases of symptomatic vesicoureteric reflux (1.7%). The endourogical procedure was performed in 13 patients: 5 cases of II-III grade vesicoureteric reflux, 4 early ureteral stenosis and 4 late ureteral stenosis. Patients with vesicoureteric reflux underwent endoscopic injection of macroplastique in 4 cases and Durasphere in 1. Early ureteral stenoses were treated using balloon dilation in 2 cases, balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy in 3, ureteral stent placement in the other. Recipients with late stenosis underwent laser incision and balloon dilation in 2 cases, balloon dilation in 1 and a laser incision only in the last case. Combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic approach was performed in 7 patients, whereas retrograde access in 1. RESULTS. Endourologic treatment was successful in 9 cases (69.2%); 2 patients required open reconstructive surgery due to endourological technique failure (early ureteropelvic junction stricture, late ureterovesical anastomotic stricture). Vesicoureteric reflux was corrected in 3 patients (60%), 2 patients underwent uretero-ureterostomy for recurrent reflux. No technique-related morbidity was observed. With a mean follow- up of 81.6 months, 8 patients show normal renal function, 5 patients have returned to haemodialysis (4 for chronic rejection, 1 for carcinoma in the graft). CONCLUSIONS. Considering their low morbidity and the satisfactory success rate, we claim that endourological procedures should be considered the preferred treatment for ureteral stenosis and vesicoureteric reflux in selected patients.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2005

Acute Diverticulitis With Colon Perforation in Renal Transplantation

R. Dalla Valle; E. Capocasale; M.P. Mazzoni; N. Busi; L. Benozzi; R. Sivelli; Mario Sianesi


Transplantation Proceedings | 2006

Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after renal transplantation : A preliminary experience

E. Capocasale; N. Busi; R.D. Valle; M.P. Mazzoni; L. Bignardi; U. Maggiore; Carlo Buzio; Mario Sianesi

Collaboration


Dive into the E. Capocasale's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Faenza

University of Bologna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge