N. Busi

Analysis of 80 dual-kidney transplantations: a multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION The use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is an attractive strategy to enlarge the pool of organs available for transplantation. Considering the fact that ECD organs have a reduced nephron mass, they are preferentially allocated for dual-kidney transplantation (DKT). Authors have reported excellent results of DKT when pretransplant ECD organs are evaluated for histological scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate DKT donor and recipient characteristics for comparison with DKT posttransplant outcomes versus those of recipients of single-kidney transplantations from expanded criteria (edSKT) and ideal donors (idSKT). We analyzed the potential prognostic factors involved in DKT among a population derived from three transplant centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, DKT (n = 80) were performed based upon the ECD kidney allocation assessed by biopsy. RESULTS The average donor ages for the DKT, edSKT, and idSKT groups were 68.8 ± 7.8, 65.3 ± 7.2, and 40.1 ± 13.8 years, respectively (P < .001). The number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches was greater in the DKT group (3.1 ± 1.2, P < .05). Patient and graft 5-year survival rates were similar among DKT, edSKT, and idSKT recipients, namely, 97.5% versus 95.8% versus 96.9% and 93.7% versus 87.4% versus 86.9%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine values at discharge were lower in the DKT and idSKT recipients (1.5 ± 0.9 and 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dL; P < .05) compared with the edSKT group (1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Correlations between supposed prognostic factors and survival among the DKT group noted worse outcomes in reoperation cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION We confirmed that DKT produced successful outcomes. An accurate surgical procedure is particularly important to try to avoid reoperations. In our experience, the use of a biopsy as an absolute criterion to allocate ECD kidneys may be too protective.

Multicenter study on double kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND Marginal organs not suitable for single kidney transplantation are considered for double kidney transplantation (DKT). Herein we have reviewed short and long-term outcomes of DKT over a 7-year experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2007, 80 DKT were performed in the transplant centers of Bologna, Parma, and Modena, Italy. Recipient mean age was 61+/-5 years. The main indications were glomerular nephropathy (n=33) and hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n=14). Mean HLA A, B, and DR mismatches were 3.1+/-1.2. Donor mean age was 69+/-8 years and mean creatinine clearance was 75+/-27 mL/min. Almost all kidneys were perfused with Celsior solution. Mean cold ischemia time was 17+/-4 hours and mean warm ischemia time was 41+/-17 minutes. Mean biopsy score was 4.4. Immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus (n=52) or cyclosporine (n=26). RESULTS Fifty (62.5%) patients displayed good postoperative renal function. Thirty (37.5%) experienced acute tubular necrosis and required postoperative dialysis treatment; 8 acute rejections occurred. Urinary complications were 13.7% with 8/11 requiring surgical revision. There were 6 surgical reexplorations: intestinal perforation (n=2), bleeding (n=3), and lymphocele (n=1). Two patients lost both grafts due to vascular and infectious complications at 7 or 58 days after transplantation. Two patients underwent intraoperative transplantectomy due to massive vascular thrombosis. Four (5%) patients underwent transplantectomy of a single graft due to vascular complications (n=2), bleeding (n=1), or infectious complications (n=1). Graft and patient survivals were 95% and 100% versus 93% and 97% at 3 versus 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DKT is a safe approach for organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or accepted.

[Living donor nephrectomy: open versus laparoscopic technique].

The living donor nephrectomy has to be safe and effective, allowing a good graft function in the recipient. In the past, donor nephrectomy was performed only by open technique; more recently this nephrectomy has also been performed by laparoscopic technique. The best technique has not been established in literature. The purpose of this study is to report the results of open and laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 1992 to August 2008, 37 living donor nephrectomies were performed. 23 nephrectomies were achieved by laparoscopic procedure (LDN) and 14 by open technique (ODN). The 2 groups were comparable regarding both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS. All laparoscopic nephrectomies were successfully performed without conversion to open procedure. No donor deaths were reported in either groups. 3 complications (13%) in the LDN group and 1 (7.1%) in the ODN group (p=0.6) were observed. Mean operative time was higher in the LDN group (p<0.036). Mean warm and cold ischemia time, resumption of oral intake and hospital stay were shorter in the LDN group (p<0.04)( p<0.03) (p<0.0001), whereas the return to normal occupational life was similar (p<0.52). We had no significant differences in the surgical complication rates, graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS. Our experience suggests that both procedures can be used safely and efficiently, and assure a good renal function in the recipient. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, although more difficult, provides post-operative advantages. However, laparoscopic procedure must be performed by experienced centres only to prevent serious complications in the donor.

Endourological management of ureteral stenosis and vesicoureteral reflux after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES. Ureteral stenosis and vesicocoureteral reflux after renal transplantation represent a key concern because of their incidence and the associated morbidity. Prompt diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment are mandatory in immunosuppressed patients with single kidney. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success rate of the endourological techniques in the management of such complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between January 1996 and December 2006, 647 kidney transplants were performed. Urinary tract continuity was re-established by ureteroneocystostomy according to Gregoir-Lich technique. We observed 13 cases of ureteral stenosis (2%) and 11 cases of symptomatic vesicoureteric reflux (1.7%). The endourogical procedure was performed in 13 patients: 5 cases of II-III grade vesicoureteric reflux, 4 early ureteral stenosis and 4 late ureteral stenosis. Patients with vesicoureteric reflux underwent endoscopic injection of macroplastique in 4 cases and Durasphere in 1. Early ureteral stenoses were treated using balloon dilation in 2 cases, balloon dilation and laser endoureterotomy in 3, ureteral stent placement in the other. Recipients with late stenosis underwent laser incision and balloon dilation in 2 cases, balloon dilation in 1 and a laser incision only in the last case. Combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic approach was performed in 7 patients, whereas retrograde access in 1. RESULTS. Endourologic treatment was successful in 9 cases (69.2%); 2 patients required open reconstructive surgery due to endourological technique failure (early ureteropelvic junction stricture, late ureterovesical anastomotic stricture). Vesicoureteric reflux was corrected in 3 patients (60%), 2 patients underwent uretero-ureterostomy for recurrent reflux. No technique-related morbidity was observed. With a mean follow- up of 81.6 months, 8 patients show normal renal function, 5 patients have returned to haemodialysis (4 for chronic rejection, 1 for carcinoma in the graft). CONCLUSIONS. Considering their low morbidity and the satisfactory success rate, we claim that endourological procedures should be considered the preferred treatment for ureteral stenosis and vesicoureteric reflux in selected patients.