E. Gail Hutchinson
University College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Gail Hutchinson.
Structure | 1998
Andrew C. R. Martin; Christine A. Orengo; E. Gail Hutchinson; Susan Jones; Maria Karmirantzou; Roman A. Laskowski; John B. O. Mitchell; Chiara Taroni; Janet M. Thornton
BACKGROUND The recent rapid increase in the number of available three-dimensional protein structures has further highlighted the necessity to understand the relationship between biological function and structure. Using structural classification schemes such as SCOP, CATH and DALI, it is now possible to explore global relationships between protein fold and function, something which was previously impractical. RESULTS Using a relational database of CATH data we have generated fold distributions for arbitrary selections of proteins automatically. These distributions have been examined in the light of protein function and bound ligand. Different enzyme classes are not clearly reflected in distributions of protein class and architecture, whereas the type of bound ligand has a much more dramatic effect. CONCLUSIONS The availability of structural classification data has enabled this novel overview analysis. We conclude that function at the top level of the EC number enzyme classification is not related to fold, as only a very few specific residues are actually responsible for enzyme activity. Conversely, the fold is much more closely related to ligand type.
BioEssays | 1998
Mark B. Swindells; Christine A. Orengo; David Jones; E. Gail Hutchinson; Janet M. Thornton
In a similar manner to sequence database searching, it is also possible to compare three‐dimensional protein structures. Such methods can be extremely useful because a structural similarity may represent a distant evolutionary relationship that is undetectable by sequence analysis. In this review, we summarise the most popular structure comparison methods, show how they can be used for database searching, and then describe some of the most advanced attempts to develop comprehensive protein structure classifications. With such data, it is possible to identify distant evolutionary relationships, provide libraries of unique folds for structure prediction, estimate the total number of folds that exist, and investigate the preference for certain types of structures over others. BioEssays 20:884–891, 1998.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002
Xavier de la Cruz; E. Gail Hutchinson; Adrian J. Shepherd; Janet M. Thornton
Although secondary structure prediction methods have recently improved, progress from secondary to tertiary structure prediction has been limited. A promising but largely unexplored route to this goal is to predict structure motifs from secondary structure knowledge. Here we present a novel method for the recognition of β hairpins that combines secondary structure predictions and threading methods by using a database search and a neural network approach. The method successfully predicts 48 and 77%, respectively, of all of hairpin and nonhairpin β-coil-β motifs in a protein database. We find that the main contributors to motif recognition are predicted accessibility and turn propensities.
Protein Science | 1994
E. Gail Hutchinson; Janet M. Thornton
Trends in Biochemical Sciences | 1997
Roman A. Laskowski; E. Gail Hutchinson; Alex D. Michie; Andrew C. Wallace; Martin L. Jones; Janet M. Thornton
Journal of Molecular Biology | 1999
Gary M Salem; E. Gail Hutchinson; Christine A. Orengo; Janet M. Thornton
Protein Engineering | 1993
E. Gail Hutchinson; Janet M. Thornton
Protein Science | 1999
Nozomi Nagano; E. Gail Hutchinson; Janet M. Thornton
Protein Engineering | 1993
Derek N. Woolfson; Philip A. Evans; E. Gail Hutchinson; Janet M. Thornton
Structure Correlation, Volume 1 | 2008
E. Gail Hutchinson; A. Louise Morris; Janet M. Thornton