E. J. Hyer
United States Naval Research Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. J. Hyer.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Mingquan Mu; James T. Randerson; G. R. van der Werf; Louis Giglio; Prasad S. Kasibhatla; Douglas C. Morton; G.J. Collatz; Ruth S. DeFries; E. J. Hyer; Elaine M. Prins; David W. T. Griffith; Debra Wunch; G. C. Toon; Vanessa Sherlock; Paul O. Wennberg
Attribution of the causes of atmospheric trace gas and aerosol variability often requires the use of high resolution time series of anthropogenic and natural emissions inventories. Here we developed an approach for representing synoptic- and diurnal-scale temporal variability in fire emissions for the Global Fire Emissions Database version 3 (GFED3). We disaggregated monthly GFED3 emissions during 2003–2009 to a daily time step using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived measurements of active fires from Terra and Aqua satellites. In parallel, mean diurnal cycles were constructed from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) Wildfire Automated Biomass Burning Algorithm (WF_ABBA) active fire observations. Daily variability in fires varied considerably across different biomes, with short but intense periods of daily emissions in boreal ecosystems and lower intensity (but more continuous) periods of burning in savannas. These patterns were consistent with earlier field and modeling work characterizing fire behavior dynamics in different ecosystems. On diurnal timescales, our analysis of the GOES WF_ABBA active fires indicated that fires in savannas, grasslands, and croplands occurred earlier in the day as compared to fires in nearby forests. Comparison with Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) column CO observations provided evidence that including daily variability in emissions moderately improved atmospheric model simulations, particularly during the fire season and near regions with high levels of biomass burning. The high temporal resolution estimates of fire emissions developed here may ultimately reduce uncertainties related to fire contributions to atmospheric trace gases and aerosols. Important future directions include reconciling top-down and bottom up estimates of fire radiative power and integrating burned area and active fire time series from multiple satellite sensors to improve daily emissions estimates.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009
T. F. Eck; Brent N. Holben; Jeffrey S. Reid; A. Sinyuk; E. J. Hyer; N. T. O'Neill; Glenn E. Shaw; J. Vande Castle; F. S. Chapin; Oleg Dubovik; A. Smirnov; Eric F. Vermote; J. S. Schafer; David M. Giles; I. Slutsker; M. Sorokine; W. W. Newcomb
[1]xa0Long-term monitoring of aerosol optical properties at a boreal forest AERONET site in interior Alaska was performed from 1994 through 2008 (excluding winter). Large interannual variability was observed, with some years showing near background aerosol optical depth (AOD) levels (<0.1 at 500 nm) while 2004 and 2005 had August monthly means similar in magnitude to peak months at major tropical biomass burning regions. Single scattering albedo (ω0; 440 nm) at the boreal forest site ranged from ∼0.91 to 0.99 with an average of ∼0.96 for observations in 2004 and 2005. This suggests a significant amount of smoldering combustion of woody fuels and peat/soil layers that would result in relatively low black carbon mass fractions for smoke particles. The fine mode particle volume median radius during the heavy burning years was quite large, averaging ∼0.17 μm at AOD(440 nm) = 0.1 and increasing to ∼0.25 μm at AOD(440 nm) = 3.0. This large particle size for biomass burning aerosols results in a greater relative scattering component of extinction and, therefore, also contributes to higher ω0. Additionally, monitoring at an Arctic Ocean coastal site (Barrow, Alaska) suggested transport of smoke to the Arctic in summer resulting in individual events with much higher AOD than that occurring during typical spring Arctic haze. However, the springtime mean AOD(500 nm) is higher during late March through late May (∼0.150) than during summer months (∼0.085) at Barrow partly due to very few days with low background AOD levels in spring compared with many days with clean background conditions in summer.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2008
Kateryna Lapina; Richard E. Honrath; R. C. Owen; M. Val Martin; E. J. Hyer; Paulo Fialho
task with significant uncertainties in the methods used. In this work, we assess the impact of seasonal trends in fuel consumption and flaming/smoldering ratios on emissions of species dominated by flaming combustion (e.g., NOx) and species dominated by smoldering combustion (e.g., CO). This is accomplished using measurements of CO and NOy at the free tropospheric Pico Mountain observatory in the central North Atlantic during the active boreal fire seasons of 2004 and 2005. DNOy/DCO enhancement ratios in aged fire plumes had higher values in June-July (7.3 � 10 �3 mol mol �1 ) relative to the values in August-September (2.8 � 10 �3 mol mol � 1 ), indicating that NOx/CO emission ratios declined significantly as the fire season progressed. This is consistent with our understanding that an increased amount of fuel is consumed via smoldering combustion during late summer, as deeper burning of the drying organic soil layer occurs. A major growth in fuel consumption per unit area is also expected, due to deeper burning. Emissions of CO and NOx from North American boreal fires were estimated using the Boreal Wildland Fire Emissions Model, and their long-range transport to the sampling site was modeled using FLEXPART. These simulations were generally consistent with the observations, but the modeled seasonal decline in the DNOy/DCO enhancement ratio was less than observed. Comparisons using alternative fire emission injection height scenarios suggest that plumes with the highest CO levels at the observatory were lofted well above the boundary layer, likely as a result of intense crown fires.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
T. F. Eck; Brent N. Holben; Jeffrey S. Reid; Peng Xian; David M. Giles; A. Sinyuk; A. Smirnov; J. S. Schafer; I. Slutsker; Ju-Hye Kim; J.‐H. Koo; M. Choi; K. C. Kim; Itaru Sano; Antti Arola; A. M. Sayer; Robert C. Levy; L. A. Munchak; N. T. O'Neill; Alexei Lyapustin; N. C. Hsu; C. A. Randles; A. da Silva; Virginie Buchard; R. C. Govindaraju; E. J. Hyer; J. H. Crawford; P. Wang; Xugui Xia
Analysis of sun photometer measured and satellite retrieved aerosol optical depth (AOD) data has shown that major aerosol pollution events with very high fine mode AOD (>1.0 in mid-visible) in the China/Korea/Japan region are often observed to be associated with significant cloud cover. This makes remote sensing of these events difficult even for high temporal resolution sun photometer measurements. Possible physical mechanisms for these events that have high AOD include a combination of aerosol humidification, cloud processing, and meteorological co-variation with atmospheric stability and convergence. The new development of Aerosol Robotic network (AERONET) Version 3 Level 2 AOD with improved cloud screening algorithms now allow for unprecedented ability to monitor these extreme fine mode pollution events. Further, the Spectral Deconvolution Algorithm (SDA) applied to Level 1 data (L1; no cloud screening) provides an even more comprehensive assessment of fine mode AOD than L2 in current and previous data versions. Studying the 2012 winter-summer period, comparisons of AERONET L1 SDA daily average fine mode AOD data showed that Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite remote sensing of AOD often did not retrieve and/or identify some of the highest fine mode AOD events in this region. Also, compared to models that include data assimilation of satellite retrieved AOD, the L1 SDA fine mode AOD was significantly higher in magnitude, particularly for the highest AOD events that were often associated with significant cloudiness.
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2011
Y. Shi; Jianglong Zhang; Jeffrey S. Reid; E. J. Hyer; T. F. Eck; Brent N. Holben; Ralph A. Kahn
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2012
Y. Shi; Jianglong Zhang; Jeffrey S. Reid; E. J. Hyer; N. C. Hsu
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
T. F. Eck; Brent N. Holben; Jeffrey S. Reid; M. M. Mukelabai; Stuart J. Piketh; Omar Torres; Hiren Jethva; E. J. Hyer; D. E. Ward; Oleg Dubovik; A. Sinyuk; J. S. Schafer; David M. Giles; Mikhail Sorokin; A. Smirnov; I. Slutsker
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2013
Y. Shi; Jianglong Zhang; Jeffrey S. Reid; B. Liu; E. J. Hyer
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2012
James R. Campbell; Jason L. Tackett; Jeffrey S. Reid; Jianglong Zhang; Cynthia A. Curtis; E. J. Hyer; W. R. Sessions; Douglas L. Westphal; Joseph M. Prospero; Ellsworth J. Welton; Ali H. Omar; Mark A. Vaughan; David M. Winker
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2013
Travis D. Toth; Jianglong Zhang; James R. Campbell; E. J. Hyer; Jeffrey S. Reid; Y. Shi; Douglas L. Westphal