E. Jewell
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Jewell.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2010
Ruthy Shaco-Levy; Sarah M. Bean; Robin T. Vollmer; E. Jewell; Ellen L. Jones; C. Leilani Valdes; Rex C. Bentley; M. Angelica Selim; Stanley J. Robboy
OBJECTIVE To resolve controversial issues regarding vulvar Paget disease through analysis of a substantial number of cases. STUDY DESIGN The medical records and pathology slides of 56 patients with a diagnosis of vulvar Paget disease were reviewed. Possible correlation between clinical and pathological data was examined. RESULTS Most patients were Caucasian and their mean age at diagnosis was 69 years. The average length of follow-up was 5.6 years. The most common symptom was pruritus, almost always accompanied by erythematous-white plaques. Substantial delay between appearance of symptoms and diagnosis was observed in many patients, and was significantly associated with larger lesions. Recurrence rate after surgical management was 32%, with disease involving the perineum being the only statistically significant risk factor. Patients with positive surgical margins had an increased recurrence rate, but this was not statistically significant. Intra-operative frozen section analysis of the margins as well as radical surgery as initial treatment did not reduce recurrence rate. In general, stromal invasion was not associated with worse prognosis, but the single patient who died of disease had the deepest stromal invasion. Radiation therapy given to five patients who either had multiple positive surgical margins or experienced disease recurrence and refused additional surgery resulted in complete response with no further recurrences. On the last day of follow-up 24 patients (43%) had no evidence of disease, 24 patients (43%) were dead of other causes, 5 patients (9%) were alive with disease, 2 patients (3%) were lost to follow-up, and 1 (2%) died due to vulvar Paget disease with invasive adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Vulvar Paget disease only rarely results in a patients death, but long term follow-up is required, as recurrences are common and can be noted many years after the initial treatment.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2014
Mario M. Leitao; Aleksandra Bartashnik; Isaac Wagner; Ari Caroline; William J. Hoskins; Howard T. Thaler; Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Carol L. Brown; E. Jewell; Richard R. Barakat; Ginger J. Gardner
OBJECTIVE: To assess the direct costs of three surgical approaches in uterine cancer and the cost-effectiveness of incorporating robot-assisted surgery. METHODS: A cost system that allocates the actual cost of resources used to treat each patient, as opposed to borrowing cost data from a billing system, was used to determine direct costs for patients who underwent surgery for uterine cancer from 2009 to 2010. These costs included all aspects of surgical care up to 6 months after discharge. Total amortized direct costs included the capital cost of three dual-console robotic platforms with 5 years of service contracts. Nonamortized costs were also calculated (excluded capital costs). Modeling was performed to estimate the mean cost of surgical care for patients presenting with endometrial cancer from 2007 to 2010. RESULTS: Of 436 cases (132 laparoscopic, 262 robotic, 42 laparotomy), total mean amortized direct costs per case were
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2013
S. Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J. Park; Kaled M. Alektiar; William P. Tew; Dennis S. Chi; Mario M. Leitao; E. Jewell; Richard R. Barakat; Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
20,489 (laparoscopy),
Gynecologic Oncology | 2013
Edward J. Tanner; Thomas Toussaint; Mario M. Leitao; Martee L. Hensley; Robert A. Soslow; Ginger J. Gardner; E. Jewell
23,646 (robot), and
Gynecologic Oncology | 2013
David M. Hyman; Lauren Bakios; Gina Gualtiere; Christina Carr; Rachel N. Grisham; Vicky Makker; Yukio Sonoda; Carol Aghajanian; E. Jewell
24,642 (laparotomy) (P<.05 [robot compared with laparoscopy]; P=.6 [robot compared with laparotomy]). Total nonamortized costs per case were
Gynecologic Oncology | 2011
Edward J. Tanner; Mario M. Leitao; Karuna Garg; Dennis S. Chi; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J. Gardner; Richard R. Barakat; E. Jewell
20,289,
Gynecologic Oncology | 2015
Rudy S. Suidan; Mario M. Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J. Gardner; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A. Levine; E. Jewell; Carol L. Brown; Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum; Mary E. Charlson; Dennis S. Chi
20,467, and
Gynecologic Oncology | 2014
Samith Sandadi; Jill A. Gadzinski; Dennis S. Chi; Yukio Sonoda; E. Jewell; Carol L. Brown; Ginger J. Gardner; Richard R. Barakat; Mario M. Leitao
24,433, respectively (P=.9 [robot compared with laparoscopy]; P=.03 [robot compared with laparotomy]). The planned surgical approach in 2007 was laparoscopy, 68%; robot, 8%; and laparotomy, 24% compared with 26%, 64%, and 9%, respectively, in 2010 (P<.001). The modeled mean amortized direct costs per case were
Value in Health | 2011
E. Jewell; Michael Smrtka; Gloria Broadwater; Fidel A. Valea; Debra M. Davis; Kimberly C. Nolte; Renea Valea; Evan R. Myers; Gregory P. Samsa; Laura J. Havrilesky
21,738 in 2007 and
Gynecologic Oncology | 2012
Mario M. Leitao; G. Briscoe; K. Santos; Abigail Winder; E. Jewell; William J. Hoskins; Dennis S. Chi; Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Carol L. Brown; Douglas A. Levine; Richard R. Barakat; Ginger J. Gardner
22,678 in 2010 (+