E. Marty Knott

National trends in approach and outcomes with appendicitis in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical conditions in children. Laparoscopy has become the standard approach to appendectomy over the past decade. Some critics cite a lack of evidence documenting clear advantages to laparoscopy. To define the pattern of approach compared to outcomes in the United States, we analyzed the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to document the impact on outcomes with the rise in laparoscopy. METHODS After IRB approval, we queried the PHIS database for all patients over 12 years. The percentages of cases performed open (OA) and laparoscopically (LA) were established for each year. Annual complication percentages were identified for wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, subsequent laparotomy, and obstruction. For each complication, trend comparisons between LA and OA were made with generalized linear models. RESULTS There were 111,194 appendectomies with a positive trend in percentage of laparoscopy from 1999 (22.2%) to 2010 (90.8%), P<0.0001. Over 12 years, there were significant differential trends between LA and OA in rates of wound infection, abscesses, bowel obstructions, and laparotomies within 30 days (P<0.0001 for each). There was no trend in wound infection rates within OA over time (P=0.31), while there was a decrease in infection rates within LA over time (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of a national database analysis, laparoscopy has increased for appendectomy in children over the past 12 years and is associated with a significant decrease in post-operative complications.

Impact of Body Habitus on Single-Site Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Nonperforated Appendicitis: Subset Analysis from a Prospective, Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION There have been several series documenting the utility of single-site laparoscopic appendectomy. However, there are no data to support patient selection based on their physical characteristics. We recently completed a large prospective, randomized trial comparing single-site laparoscopic appendectomy with standard three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis. This dataset was used to examine the relative impact of body habitus on operative approach. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We performed an analysis of the dataset collected in a prospective, randomized trial of 360 appendectomy patients who presented with nonperforated appendicitis. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and plotted on a growth chart to obtain BMI percentile according to gender and age. Standard definitions for overweight (BMI 85-95%) and obesity (BMI >95%) were used. RESULTS In the single-site group there were 26 overweight and 19 obese patients. In the three-port group there were 25 overweight and 16 obese patients. There were no significant differences between overweight and normal with either approach. However, with the single-site approach there was longer mean operative time, more doses of postoperative narcotics given, longer length of stay, and greater hospital charges in obese patients. In the three-port group, there were no differences between normal and obese patients. CONCLUSIONS When using the single-site approach for appendectomy, obesity in children creates longer operative times, more doses of postoperative analgesics, longer length of stay, and greater charges. However, obesity has no impact on three-port appendectomy.

Experience with an evidence-based protocol using fibrinolysis as first line treatment for empyema in children

INTRODUCTION We previously reported a prospective, randomized trial comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication (VATS) to fibrinolysis for the treatment of empyema. In that study no advantages to VATS were identified, although VATS resulted in significantly higher hospital charges. We subsequently implemented the algorithm from the trial utilizing primary fibrinolytic therapy in all children diagnosed with empyema. In this study, we reviewed our experience to examine the clinical efficacy of this protocol. METHODS After IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective review of all children diagnosed with empyema as all were treated with the fibrinolysis protocol utilized in the prospective trial since the completion of the trial. RESULTS In 102 consecutive patients treated with fibrinolysis, 16 patients (15.7%) required subsequent VATS. No patients were treated with initial VATS. No major side effects were seen from fibrinolytic therapy. Mean operative time for VATS after fibrinolysis was 62 minutes. The length of stay after VATS was 5.9 days. CONCLUSIONS The results of an evidence-based protocol using fibrinolysis to treat empyema have replicated the results of the trial that led to the implementation of the protocol. The pediatric empyema population can be successfully treated without an operation in the majority of cases.

A multicenter study of the incidence and factors associated with redo Nissen fundoplication in children

AIM The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and factors associated with redo Nissen fundoplication in children. METHODS After Institutional Review Board approval (5100277), data for children under 18 years of age from two childrens hospitals with fundoplication performed between January 1994 and December 2010 were reviewed. Children with one fundoplication were compared to those with redos to identify factors associated with redo. Variables were compared using t-tests for continuous and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Logistic regression evaluated for independence. RESULTS There were 823 patients and 54.7% were male. A redo fundoplication was required in 100 (12.2% of cohort); 82 had 1 redo, 14 had 2 redos, and 4 had 3 redos. Follow-up ranged from 0.01 to 16.9 years (median: 2.9 years). Factors associated with redo were: younger age at first fundoplication, (p=0.002), hiatal dissection (p<0.001), and male gender (p=0.008). Independent predictors of redo were: hiatal dissection at first fundoplication, OR: 8.45 (95% CI: 2.45-29.11), retching, OR: 3.59 (95% CI: 1.56-8.25) and younger age at first fundoplication, OR: 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98). CONCLUSION The incidence of redo fundoplication in children is 12.2%. The risk of redo is significantly increased if patients are younger, have retching, and if the esophageal hiatus is dissected at the first fundoplication.

Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND Single site laparoscopy for appendectomy is a technique with several case series suggesting a cosmetic advantage, but without prospective comparative data. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing single site laparoscopic appendectomy to the standard 3-port approach, including scar assessment at early and long-term follow-up. METHODS Enrolled patients over 12years old and parents of patients less than 12years old were asked to complete the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) at early follow-up around 6weeks and by phone after 18months. The PSAQ consists of 4 scored subscales: Appearance, Consciousness, Appearance Satisfaction, and Symptom Satisfaction. Each subscale has a set of questions with a 4-point categorical response (1=most favorable, 4=least favorable). The sum of the scores quantifies each subscale. RESULTS Early questionnaires were obtained from 98 3-port and 100 single-site patients with the single-site approach producing superior overall scar assessment (P=0.003). By telephone follow-up, questionnaires were completed by 49 3-port and 56 single-site patients at a median of 25 (18-32) months. In this longer-term follow-up, overall scar assessment was not significantly different between groups (P=0.06). CONCLUSION Patients or parents express superior scar assessment with the single site approach at early follow-up, but this difference disappears in the long-term.

Decreased resource utilization since initiation of institutional clinical pathway for care of children with perforated appendicitis.

PURPOSE We instituted a clinical pathway for the care of patients with perforated appendicitis based on outcomes from several clinical trials. The objective of this study was to review effects on resource utilization with this protocol. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted to compare all patients undergoing appendectomy during initial admission for perforated appendicitis prior to the pathway (July 2001 to December 2003) to after (December 2008 to March 2011). Demographics and management strategies were evaluated. RESULTS Charts of 151 patients prior to and 259 after the start of the pathway were reviewed. The percentage of patients leaving the operating room with a nasogastric tube (NGT) was significantly lower in the after-group, while similar numbers of patients during each period had a NGT placed on the floor. The proportion of patients receiving peripherally inserted central catheters and total parenteral nutrition, and the number of intravenous antibiotics per day and lab draws were significantly reduced with the protocol. Patients were started on a regular diet significantly earlier, and length of stay was shortened by more than one day. CONCLUSION The evidence-based clinical pathway developed from prospective trials has drastically reduced resource utilization for children with perforated appendicitis.

Interval appendectomy after perforated appendicitis: what are the operative risks and luminal patency rates?

BACKGROUND The need for interval appendectomy after nonoperative management of a perforated appendicitis is being questioned owing to recent studies that estimated recurrence rates as low as 5% because of obliteration of the appendiceal lumen. We review our experience with interval appendectomy in this subset of patients to determine the postoperative outcomes and luminal patency rates. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all children treated nonoperatively for a perforated appendicitis followed by elective interval appendectomy during the past 10 years. The data collected included initial hospitalization, convalescence period, perioperative course, and luminal patency rates. RESULTS A total of 128 patients were identified, of whom 55% were male. Their mean ± SD age was 9.1 ± 4.2 years. The mean interval from the initial presentation to appendectomy was 65.9 ± 20.3 d. All but 2 of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with 3 conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 43.6 ± 19.2 min. The complication rate was 9%, including 1 postoperative abscess, 1 reoperation for bleeding, and 1 readmission for Clostridium difficile infection. Six patients had a superficial wound infection, and 2 patients underwent outpatient procedures for suture granuloma. No risk factors for complications were identified. Of the specimens, 16% had obliterated lumens. CONCLUSIONS Major postoperative morbidity for interval appendectomy after a perforated appendicitis is low and should not be a deterrent in offering interval appendectomy to this subset of patients.

Implications of Foley catheterization in children with perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND We treat patients after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using a background continuous dose. We usually place urinary catheters in these patients because of concerns of urinary retention. The objective of the present study was to determine the rate of urinary retention in this patient population when a catheter was not used or was removed before the continuous PCA infusion was discontinued. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had received PCA postoperatively for perforated appendicitis from December 2008 to May 2011. The demographics, need for replacement of a Foley catheter, number of recorded nursing calls to physicians, and the incidence of urinary tract infection was recorded. Patients who had received a urinary catheter intraoperatively were compared with those who had not. Subgroups were also created according to whether the patients with a Foley catheter had undergone removal of their catheter before or after cessation of the continuous PCA infusion. RESULTS Of 242 patients, 20 (8.3%) did not have a catheter postoperatively, 1 of whom required a catheter because of retention. Of the 222 patients who started with a catheter, 2 required reinsertion for retention (P = 0.59). Age, gender, and body mass index were similar for patients with and without a catheter. In the subgroup analysis, of the patients with a catheter, 48 (21.6%) had their catheter removed before discontinuation of the continuous PCA infusion and none required Foley catheter replacement. Of the 174 patients whose catheters were removed after discontinuation of the continuous PCA dose, 2 required catheter replacement (P = 0.46). A significantly higher percentage of telephone calls was generated for patients with a catheter than for patients without a Foley catheter (41.4% versus 10%, P = 0.007). No patients with a catheter developed a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a perforated appendicitis who receive a continuous PCA have a low rate of urinary retention whether or not a catheter has been placed intraoperatively.

Is routine chest radiograph necessary after chest tube removal

BACKGROUND Obtaining a chest radiograph (CXR) after chest tube (CT) removal to rule out a pneumothorax is a universal practice. However, the yield of this CXR has not been well documented. Additionally, most iatrogenic pneumothoraces resulting from CT removal are atmospheric in origin, asymptomatic, and can be observed. Recently, we have begun to discontinue routine CXR for CT removal. We evaluated our experience with CT removal to clarify the usefulness of routine post CT removal CXR. METHODS After IRB approval, a retrospective study was conducted on patients who had a CT placed in the past decade. Cardiac patients requiring a CT were excluded. Patient demographics, diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Patients were divided into two groups, those with a CXR after CT removal (Group 1) and those without (Group 2). Percentages were compared with Chi square with Yates correction. RESULTS 462 patients were identified (group 1=327, group 2=135). Indications for CT included; empyema (n=176), lung resection (n=146), pneumothorax (n=71), pleural effusion (n=26), spinal fusion (n=20), trauma (n=16), and miscellaneous (n=7). Seven patients (2.1%) in group 1 required reinsertion for pneumothorax (n=4), empyema (n=2), and pleural effusion (n=1) compared to 1 patient (0.7%) in group 2 who required reinsertion for pleural effusion. This difference was not significant (P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS In non-cardiac patients with a CT, tube reinsertion is uncommon and tube replacement is secondary to symptoms. Therefore, routine post CT removal CXR is not necessary. CXR in these patients should be obtained based upon clinical indications after CT removal.

Burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children.

BACKGROUND Complications of totally implanted venous access ports are well documented. A concerning mechanical complication we have encountered is posterior penetration of plastic ports with the access needle. The purpose of this study is to investigate the burden of posterior penetrations. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all ports placed between November 2007 and December 2011 at a single institution. RESULTS There were 247 children who received a port. 117 children (47%) received a port with a plastic posterior wall, 95 children (38%) received a port with a metal posterior wall, and 35 children (14%) had ports that were unable to be identified as plastic or metal. Posterior port penetrations occurred 8 times (3.2% overall, 6.8% of plastic ports). All perforations occurred in plastic ports of a single brand and product code. Average time from port insertion to penetration was 11.2±21.3 months (range 0.3 to 63.4 months). Other complications included catheter malfunction (14), infection (9), pain (2), inability to draw/aspirate (4), leak (3), port migration (2), and malfunctioning not otherwise specified (15). CONCLUSIONS There is an unacceptably high risk of needle penetration of the posterior wall of plastic ports. We recommend utilizing ports with metal backing to avoid this complication.