Nicole E. Sharp

Current Patterns of Practice and Technique in the Repair of Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistua: An IPEG Survey

BACKGROUND Optimal surgical treatment of infants with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) remains controversial. In order to better understand variability in management, we surveyed the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) membership. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online-based survey, conducted in 2012, was sent to all IPEG members. RESULTS The survey was completed by 170 surgeons from 31 countries. A majority of respondents practiced in academic/university settings (86%) and performed one to three EA/TEF repairs annually (67%). Those practicing for over 15 years made up 39% of the study group, followed by those practicing 6-10 years (24%), 0-5 years (22%), and 11-15 years (15%). Utilization of a thoracoscopic approach was reported by half of the respondents with a frequency of 1-3 cases (76%), 4-6 cases (17%), and greater than 7 cases (7%) per year. Low birth weight, congenital heart disease, long gap length, and compromised physiologic status were identified as the most common exclusion criteria for thoracoscopic repair. The thoracoscopic repair was almost uniformly performed via an intrapleural approach (96%), in contrast with the open repair that was done extrapleurally in 89%. Preoperative bronchoscopy was routinely performed by 60%. Size 4-0 to 5-0 absorbable suture predominated for EA repair. Postoperative chest tube/drain and transanastomotic tube placement were used by 83%. A normal esophagram was required by 85% to initiate oral feeding. Sixty-six percent initiated transanastomotic feeds prior to obtaining an esophagram. Postoperative antibiotic use was common (76%) and varied from less than 1 to greater than 14 days. Acid suppression medication was used by 76% with duration ranging from 7 days to lifelong. For long gap EA, spiral myotomies were rarely performed (10%), and gastric transposition was the favored method for esophageal replacement (66%). CONCLUSIONS Considerable variability existed among the IPEG membership in treatment of patients with EA/TEF. The identification of variance is the first step in creating future studies to identify best practices.

Radiation exposure - how do CT scans for appendicitis compare between a free standing children's hospital and non-dedicated pediatric facilities?

BACKGROUND We compare the amount of radiation children receive from CT scans performed at non-dedicated pediatric facilities (OH) versus those at a dedicated childrens hospital (CH). METHODS Using a retrospective chart review, all children undergoing CT scanning for appendicitis at an OH were compared to children undergoing CT imaging for appendicitis at a CH between January 2011 and November 2012. RESULTS One hundred sixty-three children underwent CT scans at 42 different OH. Body mass index was similar between the two groups (21.00±6.49kg/m(2), 19.58±5.18kg/m(2), P=0.07). Dose length product (DLP) was 620±540.3 at OH and 253.78±211.08 at CH (P < 0.001). OH CT scans accurately diagnosed appendicitis in 81%, while CT scans at CH were accurate in 95% (P=0.026). CTDIvol was recorded in 65 patients with subset analysis showing CTDIvol of 16.98±15.58 and 4.89±2.64, a DLP of 586.25±521.59 and 143.54±41.19, and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) of 26.71±23.1 and 3.81±2.02 at OH and CH, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION Using SSDE as a marker for radiation exposure, children received 86% less radiation and had improved diagnostic accuracy when CT scans are performed at a CH.

Patient Scar Assessment After Single-Incision Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND The single-incision laparoscopic approach for cholecystectomy has been reported to be cosmetically superior in the traditional four-port technique in several case series; however, prospective comparative data are lacking. We conducted a 60-patient, prospective, randomized trial comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard four-port cholecystectomy, including validated scar assessment evaluation around 6 weeks and 18 months after the operation in an effort to determine if a cosmetic advantage existed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients over 12 years of age and parents of patients under 12 years of age enrolled in the trial were asked to complete the validated Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ). The PSAQ consists of four subscales: Appearance, Consciousness, Satisfaction with Appearance, and Satisfaction with Symptoms. The Symptoms subscale is omitted from analysis per PSAQ instructions because of insufficient reliability. Each subscale is a set of items with 4-point categorical responses (from 1=most favorable to 4=least favorable). The sum of the questions quantifies each subscale. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation values. RESULTS Eighteen single-site patients and 8 four-port patients completed early questionnaires, in which there was no difference in overall scar assessment (P=.17). Telephone follow-up was accomplished for 17 single-site patients and 24 four-port patients and revealed that the overall scar assessment significantly favored the single-site approach (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS Patients or parents of patients do not identify an overall superior scar assessment at early follow-up after single-site laparoscopic versus four-port cholecystectomy. However, they do perceive a superior scar assessment at long-term follow-up, suggesting that there is a cosmetic benefit favoring the single-site approach.

Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND Achalasia is a rare idiopathic neuromuscular disorder of the esophagus, characterized as a syndrome of impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and decreased peristalsis of the esophageal body. OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to determine the best first-line treatment for pediatric achalasia based on the consolidation of the current literature that compares outcomes after pneumatic dilatation (PD) versus surgical myotomy (Heller esophagomyotomy [HM]). DATA SOURCES A systematic review of English articles using OVID was performed. STUDY SELECTION OVID was used to search for articles focusing on the treatment of pediatric esophageal achalasia with PD versus HM. DATA EXTRACTION Independent extraction of data was performed by N.E.S using predefined data fields. DATA SYNTHESIS Seven articles were included in the systematic review. Techniques of HM and PD varied widely. The best first-line treatment of pediatric achalasia was determined to be HM in two articles, PD in one article, and equal efficacy in one article. Three articles concluded that appropriate initial treatment was determined by the age of the child. CONCLUSION Adequate comparative data are lacking to determine the ideal treatment of pediatric achalasia. Appropriately designed randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to determine ideal treatment algorithms in pediatric achalasia.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors in children

BACKGROUND Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMFT) is an uncommon neoplasm in children. METHODS Retrospective review from 1993 to 2014 of patients ≤18years of age with a histopathologic diagnosis of IMFT treated at two tertiary centers. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were diagnosed with IMFT. Mean (±SD) age was 9.3±5.7years at diagnosis. Tumor location was variable: abdomen/pelvis (28%), head/neck region (22%), intrathoracic (22%), genitourinary (9%), bowel (6%) liver (6%), and musculoskeletal (6%). Median follow-up was 2.6±4.6years, with 3 recurrences and 2 deaths, which occurred only after recurrence. Positive microscopic margin after resection was associated with recurrence, compared to those that had a negative margin (40% vs. 0%, p=0.04). Recurrence was associated with increased mortality (67% vs 0%, p=0.01). Time from first symptoms to resection was shorter in those with recurrence (25.8±22 vs. 179±275days, p=0.01) and in nonsurvivors (44.0±8.0 vs. 194.3±53.4days, p=0.02). Adjuvant chemotherapy, not including steroid monotherapy, either given before or after resection, was administered more often to nonsurvivors (100% vs 4%, p=0.009), and use of corticosteroids was also higher in the nonsurvivors (100% vs. 15%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS IMFT is a rare pediatric neoplasm with variable locations. Complete excision is critical for cure. Proposed guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of theses tumors in children are reported.

Pulmonary hypertension predicts mortality in infants with omphalocele

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify predictors of mortality in infants with omphalocele. METHODS Medical records of infants with omphalocele born between January 1992 and June 2012, with follow-up toDecember 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. Survivors and non-survivors were compared. Evidence for pulmonary hypertension was sought between the second and seventh day after birth. All included infants had increased right ventricular pressures (RVP >40 mmhg) on echocardiogram on the second day of life with increased oxygen requirements, therefore, the finding of increased pressure was not considered a result of the transitional circulation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the importance and independence of various factors. RESULTS Of 51 infants whose records were reviewed, 13 died (25%) and 38 survived (75%). The median time to death was 34 days (range: 4 -408 days). The median follow-up time for those who died was 1.5 years (range: 0.01-15 years) and for survivors was 2.6 years (range: 0.08-15 years). Logistic regression revealed that respiratory insufficiency at birth (OR: 14.8; 95% CI: 2.5-85.0) and pulmonary hypertension (OR: 6.4; 95% CI: 1.1-39.0) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION Respiratory insufficiency after birth and pulmonary hypertension are independent predictors of mortality in infants with omphalocele.

Implications of Foley catheterization in children with perforated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND We treat patients after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using a background continuous dose. We usually place urinary catheters in these patients because of concerns of urinary retention. The objective of the present study was to determine the rate of urinary retention in this patient population when a catheter was not used or was removed before the continuous PCA infusion was discontinued. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had received PCA postoperatively for perforated appendicitis from December 2008 to May 2011. The demographics, need for replacement of a Foley catheter, number of recorded nursing calls to physicians, and the incidence of urinary tract infection was recorded. Patients who had received a urinary catheter intraoperatively were compared with those who had not. Subgroups were also created according to whether the patients with a Foley catheter had undergone removal of their catheter before or after cessation of the continuous PCA infusion. RESULTS Of 242 patients, 20 (8.3%) did not have a catheter postoperatively, 1 of whom required a catheter because of retention. Of the 222 patients who started with a catheter, 2 required reinsertion for retention (P = 0.59). Age, gender, and body mass index were similar for patients with and without a catheter. In the subgroup analysis, of the patients with a catheter, 48 (21.6%) had their catheter removed before discontinuation of the continuous PCA infusion and none required Foley catheter replacement. Of the 174 patients whose catheters were removed after discontinuation of the continuous PCA dose, 2 required catheter replacement (P = 0.46). A significantly higher percentage of telephone calls was generated for patients with a catheter than for patients without a Foley catheter (41.4% versus 10%, P = 0.007). No patients with a catheter developed a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a perforated appendicitis who receive a continuous PCA have a low rate of urinary retention whether or not a catheter has been placed intraoperatively.

Burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children.

BACKGROUND Complications of totally implanted venous access ports are well documented. A concerning mechanical complication we have encountered is posterior penetration of plastic ports with the access needle. The purpose of this study is to investigate the burden of posterior penetrations. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all ports placed between November 2007 and December 2011 at a single institution. RESULTS There were 247 children who received a port. 117 children (47%) received a port with a plastic posterior wall, 95 children (38%) received a port with a metal posterior wall, and 35 children (14%) had ports that were unable to be identified as plastic or metal. Posterior port penetrations occurred 8 times (3.2% overall, 6.8% of plastic ports). All perforations occurred in plastic ports of a single brand and product code. Average time from port insertion to penetration was 11.2±21.3 months (range 0.3 to 63.4 months). Other complications included catheter malfunction (14), infection (9), pain (2), inability to draw/aspirate (4), leak (3), port migration (2), and malfunctioning not otherwise specified (15). CONCLUSIONS There is an unacceptably high risk of needle penetration of the posterior wall of plastic ports. We recommend utilizing ports with metal backing to avoid this complication.

The role of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric trauma: a collective review

Abstract Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been utilized in selective trauma patients, there a relative paucity of literature on its role in both blunt and penetrating trauma in the pediatric population. Our purpose is to review the current literature on the role of MIS in abdominal and thoracic pediatric trauma. A review of the literature, indications, risks, and benefits of MIS in trauma will be presented. Relevant literature was obtained from use of the PubMed database.

Nursing preference of topical silver sulfadiazine versus collagenase ointment for treatment of partial thickness burns in children: survey follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.

We performed a nursing survey to inquire about nursing preferences toward the use of silver sulfadiazine (SSD) and collagenase (CO). We performed a survey between September 2012 and December 2012 asking nurses to rate the application/removal of both products and provide a description of their preferences. Ten study nurses (83%) preferred CO over SSD (P < .001). Two nurses (17%) had no preference. Negative comments on SSD were pseudoeschar (50%), difficult application burns (25%), messiness (67%), and increased number of dressing changes (25%). Negative comments on CO were the need for an additional antimicrobial agent (58%), although 1 nurse noted the higher expense with CO. Nurses preferred CO because of cleanliness of dressing (17%), lack of pseudoeschar (25%), and less pain with dressing changes (8%). Despite no difference in outcomes between SSD and CO, experienced burn nurses prefer CO because of perceptions of decreased trauma and frequency of dressing changes.