Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. Mazets is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. Mazets.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2003

Discovery of GRB 020405 and Its Late Red Bump

P. A. Price; S. R. Kulkarni; Edo Berger; D. W. Fox; J. S. Bloom; S. G. Djorgovski; Dale A. Frail; Titus J. Galama; Fiona A. Harrison; Patrick J. McCarthy; Daniel E. Reichart; Re'em Sari; Scott A. Yost; Helmut Jerjen; K. P. Flint; A. Phillips; B. E. Warren; Timothy S. Axelrod; Roger A. Chevalier; J. Holtzman; Randy A. Kimble; Brian Paul Schmidt; J. C. Wheeler; F. Frontera; Enrico Costa; L. Piro; K. Hurley; T. L. Cline; C. Guidorzi; E. Montanari

We present the discovery of GRB 020405 made with the Interplanetary Network (IPN). With a duration of 60 s, the burst appears to be a typical long-duration event. We observed the 75 arcmin2 IPN error region with the Mount Stromlo Observatorys 50 inch robotic telescope and discovered a transient source that subsequently decayed and was also associated with a variable radio source. We identify this source as the afterglow of GRB 020405. Subsequent observations by other groups found varying polarized flux and established a redshift of 0.690 to the host galaxy. Motivated by the low redshift, we triggered observations with WFPC2 on board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Modeling the early ground-based data with a jet model, we find a clear red excess over the decaying optical light curves that is present between day 10 and day 141 (the last HST epoch). This bump has the spectral and temporal features expected of an underlying supernova (SN). In particular, the red color of the putative SN is similar to that of the SN associated with GRB 011121 at late time. Restricting the sample of GRBs to those with z < 0.7, a total of five bursts, red bumps at late times are found in GRB 970228, GRB 011121, and GRB 020405. It is possible that the simplest idea, namely, that all long-duration γ-ray bursts have underlying SNe with a modest dispersion in their properties (especially peak luminosity), is sufficient to explain the nondetections.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Panchromatic Observations of SN 2011dh Point to a Compact Progenitor Star

Alicia M. Soderberg; R. Margutti; B. A. Zauderer; Miriam I. Krauss; B. Katz; Laura Chomiuk; Jason A. Dittmann; Ehud Nakar; Takanori Sakamoto; Nobuyuki Kawai; K. Hurley; S. D. Barthelmy; Takahiro Toizumi; Mikio Morii; Roger A. Chevalier; M. A. Gurwell; G. Petitpas; Michael P. Rupen; K. D. Alexander; Emily M. Levesque; Claes Fransson; A. Brunthaler; M. F. Bietenholz; N. N. Chugai; J. E. Grindlay; Antonio Copete; V. Connaughton; M. S. Briggs; Charles A. Meegan; A. von Kienlin

– 3 –the first three weeks after explosion. Combining these observations with earlyoptical photometry, we show that the panchromatic dataset is well-described bynon-thermal synchrotron emission (radio/mm) with inverse Compton scattering(X-ray) of a thermal population of optical photons. We derive the properties ofthe shockwave and the circumstellar environment and find a time-averaged shockvelocity of v ≈ 0.1c and a progenitor mass loss rate of M˙ ≈ 6 × 10


The Astrophysical Journal | 2001

GRB 000418: A Hidden Jet Revealed

Edo Berger; A. Diercks; Dale A. Frail; S. R. Kulkarni; J. S. Bloom; Re'em Sari; J. P. Halpern; N. Mirabal; G. B. Taylor; K. Hurley; Guy G. Pooley; K. M. Becker; R. M. Wagner; D. M. Terndrup; Thomas S. Statler; Daniel R. Wik; E. Mazets; T. L. Cline

We report on optical, near-infrared and centimeter radio observations of GRB000418 which allow us to follow the evolution of the afterglow from 2 to 200 days after the gamma-ray burst. In modeling these broad-band data, we find that an isotropic explosion in a constant density medium is unable to simultaneously fit both the radio and optical data. However, a jet-like outflow with an opening angle of 10-20 degress provides a good description of the data. The evidence in favor of a jet interpretation is based on the behavior of the radio light curves, since the expected jet break is masked at optical wavelengths by the light of the host galaxy. We also find evidence for extinction, presumably arising from within the host galaxy, with A(V)=0.4 mag, and host flux densities of F_R=1.1 uJy and F_K=1.7 uJy. These values supercede previous work on this burst due to the availability of a broad-band data set allowing a global fitting approach. A model in which the GRB explodes into a wind-stratified circumburst medium cannot be ruled out by these data. However, in examining a sample of other bursts (e.g. GRB990510, GRB000301C) we favor the jet interpretation for GRB000418.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Reactivation and Precise Interplanetary Network Localization of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1900+14

K. Hurley; C. Kouveliotou; Peter M. Woods; T. L. Cline; Paul Butterworth; E. Mazets; S. Golenetskii; D. Frederics

In 1998 May, the soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 emerged from several years of quiescence and emitted a series of intense bursts, one with a time history unlike any previously observed from this source. Triangulation using Ulysses, BATSE, and KONUS data gives a 1.6 arcmin2 error box near the Galactic supernova remnant G42.8+0.6. This error box contains a quiescent soft X-ray source that is probably a neutron star associated with the soft repeater.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2002

The unusually long duration gamma-ray burst GRB 000911: Discovery of the afterglow and host galaxy

Paul A. Price; Edo Berger; S. R. Kulkarni; S. G. Djorgovski; Derek B. Fox; Ashish A. Mahabal; K. Hurley; J. S. Bloom; Dale A. Frail; Titus J. Galama; Fiona A. Harrison; Graham Lindsay Morrison; Daniel E. Reichart; S. A. Yost; Re'em Sari; Tim Axelrod; T. L. Cline; S. Golenetskii; E. Mazets; Brian Paul Schmidt; J. Trombka

Of all the well-localized gamma-ray bursts, GRB 000911 has the longest duration (T90 = 500 s) and ranks in the top 1% of BATSE bursts for fluence. Here we report the discovery of the afterglow of this unique burst. In order to simultaneously fit our radio and optical observations, we are required to invoke a model involving a hard electron distribution, p ~ 1.5, and a jet-break time less than 1.5 days. A spectrum of the host galaxy taken 111 days after the burst reveals a single emission line, interpreted as [O II] at a redshift z = 1.0585, and a continuum break that we interpret as the Balmer limit at this redshift. Despite the long T90, the afterglow of GRB 000911 is not unusual in any other way when compared to the set of afterglows studied to date. We conclude that the duration of the GRB plays little part in determining the physics of the afterglow.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2002

Afterglow Upper Limits for Four Short-duration, Hard Spectrum Gamma-ray Bursts

K. Hurley; Edo Berger; A. J. Castro-Tirado; J. M. Castro Cerón; T. L. Cline; M. Feroci; Dale A. Frail; F. Frontera; N. Masetti; C. Guidorzi; E. Montanari; Dieter H. Hartmann; Arne A. Henden; Stephen E. Levine; E. Mazets; S. Golenetskii; Dmitry D. Frederiks; Graham Lindsay Morrison; A Oksanen; M Moilanen; H.-S. Park; Paul A. Price; Jason X. Prochaska; J. Trombka; George Grant Williams

We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history information for four short-duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray bursts, GRB 000607, GRB 001025B, GRB 001204, and GRB 010119. All of these events were followed up with sensitive radio and optical observations (the first and only such bursts to be followed up in the radio to date), but no detections were made, demonstrating that the short bursts do not have anomalously intense afterglows. We discuss the upper limits and show that the lack of observable counterparts is consistent with both the hypothesis that the afterglow behavior of the short bursts is like that of the long-duration bursts, many of which similarly have no detectable afterglows, as well as the hypothesis that the short bursts have no detectable afterglows at all. Small number statistics do not allow a clear choice between these alternatives, but given the present detection rates of various missions, we show that progress can be expected in the near future.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

SN 2010ay is a Luminous and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova within a Low-metallicity Host Galaxy

Nathan Edward Sanders; Alicia M. Soderberg; S. Valenti; Ryan J. Foley; Ryan Chornock; L. Chomiuk; Edo Berger; S. J. Smartt; K. Hurley; S. D. Barthelmy; Emily M. Levesque; Gautham S. Narayan; M. T. Botticella; M. S. Briggs; V. Connaughton; Yukikatsu Terada; N. Gehrels; S. Golenetskii; E. Mazets; T. L. Cline; A. von Kienlin; William V. Boynton; K. C. Chambers; T. Grav; J. N. Heasley; K. W. Hodapp; Robert Jedicke; N. Kaiser; Robert P. Kirshner; R.-P. Kudritzki

We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and follow-up observations of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN Ic) 2010ay at z = 0.067 imaged by the Pan-STARRS1 3π survey just ~4 days after explosion. The supernova (SN) had a peak luminosity, MR ≈ –20.2 mag, significantly more luminous than known GRB-SNe and one of the most luminous SNe Ib/c ever discovered. The absorption velocity of SN 2010ay is v Si ≈ 19 × 103 km s–1 at ~40 days after explosion, 2-5 times higher than other broad-lined SNe and similar to the GRB-SN 2010bh at comparable epochs. Moreover, the velocity declines ~2 times slower than other SNe Ic-BL and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered by radioactive decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually large mass of 56Ni, M Ni = 0.9 M ☉. Applying scaling relations to the light curve, we estimate a total ejecta mass, M ej ≈ 4.7 M ☉, and total kinetic energy, EK ≈ 11 × 1051 erg. The ratio of M Ni to M ej is ~2 times as large for SN 2010ay as typical GRB-SNe and may suggest an additional energy reservoir. The metallicity (log (O/H)PP04 + 12 = 8.19) of the explosion site within the host galaxy places SN 2010ay in the low-metallicity regime populated by GRB-SNe, and ~0.5(0.2) dex lower than that typically measured for the host environments of normal (broad-lined) SNe Ic. We constrain any gamma-ray emission with E γ 6 × 1048 erg (25-150 keV), and our deep radio follow-up observations with the Expanded Very Large Array rule out relativistic ejecta with energy E 1048 erg. We therefore rule out the association of a relativistic outflow like those that accompanied SN 1998bw and traditional long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), but we place less-stringent constraints on a weak afterglow like that seen from XRF 060218. If this SN did not harbor a GRB, these observations challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the production of relativistic ejecta and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.


Astronomy Letters | 2007

Giant flare in SGR 1806-20 and its Compton reflection from the Moon

Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; Valentin Pal'Shin; R. L. Aptekar; V. N. Ilyinskii; F. P. Oleinik; E. Mazets; T. L. Cline

We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14 while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an attenuated signal of inverse Compton scattering of the initial pulse emission by the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14 while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an attenuated signal of Compton back-scattering of the initial pulse emission by the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.


Astronomy Letters | 2007

On the possibility of identifying the short hard burst GRB 051103 with a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M81 group of galaxies

Dmitry D. Frederiks; Valentin Pal'Shin; R. L. Aptekar; S. Golenetskii; T. L. Cline; E. Mazets

The light curve, energy characteristics, and localization of the short hard burst GRB 051103 are considered. Evidence for identifying this event with a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the nearby M81 group of interacting galaxies is discussed.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Unusual Burst Emission from the New Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1627–41

E. Mazets; R. L. Aptekar; Paul Butterworth; T. L. Cline; Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; K. Hurley; V. N. Il'inskii

In June-July 1998 the Konus-Wind burst spectrometer observed a series of bursts from the new soft gamma repeater SGR 1627-41. Time histories and energy spectra of the bursts have been studied, revealing fluences and peak fluxes in the ranges of 3 ·10−7 7.5 ·10−6 erg cm−2 and 10−5 10−4 erg cm−2 s−1 respectively. One event, 18 June 6153.5s UT stands out dramatically from this series. Its fluence is ∼ 7 · 10−4 erg cm−2 and peak flux ∼ 2 · 10−2 erg cm−2 s−1. These values from a source at a distance of 5.8 kpc yield an energy output of ∼ 3 · 10 erg and maximum luminosity of ∼ 8 · 10 erg s−1, similar to the values for the famous March 5, 1979 and August 27, 1998 events. In terms of energy, this event is another giant outburst seen in a third SGR! However, this very energetic burst differs significantly from the other giant outbursts. It exhibits no separate initial pulse with a fast rise time, no extended tail, and no pulsations. It is rather similar to ordinary repeated bursts but is a few hundred times stronger in intensity. According to the magnetar model by Thompson and Duncan (1995) such a burst may be initiated by a strong starquake when a crust fracture propagates over the whole surface of a neutron star.In 1998 June-July, the Konus-Wind burst spectrometer observed a series of bursts from the new soft gamma repeater SGR 1627-41. Time histories and energy spectra of the bursts have been studied, revealing fluences and peak fluxes in the ranges 3 × 10-7 to 7.5 × 10-6 ergs cm-2 and 10-5 to 10-4 ergs cm-2 s-1, respectively. One event, 18 June 6153.5 s UT, stands out dramatically from this series. Its fluence is ~7 × 10-4 ergs cm-2, and its peak flux is ~2 × 10-2 ergs cm-2 s-1. These values from a source at a distance of 5.8 kpc yield an energy output of ~3 × 1042 ergs and a maximum luminosity of ~8 × 1043 ergs s-1 for isotropic emission, similar to the values for the famous 1979 March 5 and 1998 August 27 events. In terms of energy, this event is another giant outburst seen in a third soft gamma repeater! However, this very energetic burst differs significantly from the other giant outbursts. It exhibits no separate initial pulse with a fast rise time, no extended tail, and no pulsations. It is rather similar to ordinary repeated bursts, but is a few hundred times stronger in intensity. According to the magnetar model by Thompson & Duncan, such a burst may be initiated by a strong starquake when a crust fracture propagates over the whole surface of a neutron star.

Collaboration


Dive into the E. Mazets's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Golenetskii

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Valentin Pal'Shin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. L. Aptekar

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin C. Hurley

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Svinkin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge