E. Pierpaoli
University of Southern California
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by E. Pierpaoli.
arXiv: Astrophysics | 2009
Joanna Dunkley; A. Amblard; C. Baccigalupi; M. Betoule; David T. Chuss; A. Cooray; J. Delabrouille; C. Dickinson; Gregory Dobler; Jessie L. Dotson; H. K. Eriksen; Douglas P. Finkbeiner; Dale J. Fixsen; P. Fosalba; A. A. Fraisse; Christopher M. Hirata; A. Kogut; Jostein R. Kristiansen; C. R. Lawrence; A. M. Magalhaes; M. A. Miville-Deschenes; S. S. Meyer; Amber D. Miller; S. K. Næss; Lyman A. Page; Hiranya V. Peiris; N. Phillips; E. Pierpaoli; G. Rocha; J. E. Vaillancourt
In this report we discuss the impact of polarized foregrounds on a future CMBPol satellite mission. We review our current knowledge of Galactic polarized emission at microwave frequencies, including synchrotron and thermal dust emission. We use existing data and our understanding of the physical behavior of the sources of foreground emission to generate sky templates, and start to assess how well primordial gravitational wave signals can be separated from foreground contaminants for a CMBPol mission. At the estimated foreground minimum of ∼100 GHz, the polarized foregrounds are expected to be lower than a primordial polarization signal with tensor‐to‐scalar ratio r = 0.01, in a small patch (∼1%) of the sky known to have low Galactic emission. Over 75% of the sky we expect the foreground amplitude to exceed the primordial signal by about a factor of eight at the foreground minimum and on scales of two degrees. Only on the largest scales does the polarized foreground amplitude exceed the primordial signal by a larger factor of about 20. The prospects for detecting an r = 0.01 signal including degree‐scale measurements appear promising, with 5σ_r∼0.003 forecast from multiple methods. A mission that observes a range of scales offers better prospects from the foregrounds perspective than one targeting only the lowest few multipoles. We begin to explore how optimizing the composition of frequency channels in the focal plane can maximize our ability to perform component separation, with a range of typically 40 ≲ ν ≲ 300 GHz preferred for ten channels. Foreground cleaning methods are already in place to tackle a CMBPol mission data set, and further investigation of the optimization and detectability of the primordial signal will be useful for mission design.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
N. Cappelluti; H. Böhringer; Peter Schuecker; E. Pierpaoli; C. R. Mullis; I. M. Gioia; J. P. Henry
Context. X-ray surveys facilitate investigations of the environment of AGNs. Deep Chandra observations have revealed that the AGN source surface density rises near clusters of galaxies. The natural extension of this finding is the measurement of spatial clustering of AGNs around clusters and the investigation of relative biasing between active galactic nuclei and galaxies near clusters. Aims. We aim to measure the correlation length of AGNs around clusters and the average clustering properties of a complete sample of AGNs in a dense environment. Methods. We present the first measurement of the soft X-ray cluster-AGN cross-correlation function in redshift space using the data of the ROSAT-NEP survey. The survey covers 9 x 9 deg 2 around the North Ecliptic Pole where 442 X-ray sources were detected and almost completely spectroscopically identified. Results. We detected a >3σ significant clustering signal on scales s < 50 h -1 70 Mpc. We performed a classical maximum-likelihood power-law fit to the data and obtained a correlation length so = 8.7 +1.2 -0.3 h -1 70 Mpc and a slope y = 1.7 +0.2 -0.7 (1σ errors). Conclusions. This is strong evidence that AGNs are good tracers of the large scale structure of the Universe. Our data were compared to the results obtained by cross-correlating X-ray clusters and galaxies. We observe, with a large uncertainty, a similar behaviour of AGN clustering around clusters similar to the clustering of galaxies around clusters.
Presented at: UNSPECIFIED. (2008) | 2008
Joanna Dunkley; A. Amblard; C. Baccigalupi; M. Betoule; David T. Chuss; A. Cooray; J. Delabrouille; C. Dickinson; Gregory Dobler; Jessie L. Dotson; H. K. Eriksen; Douglas P. Finkbeiner; Dale J. Fixsen; P. Fosalba; A. A. Fraisse; Christopher M. Hirata; A. Kogut; Jostein R. Kristiansen; C. R. Lawrence; A. M. Magalhaes; M.-A. Miville-Deschênes; S. S. Meyer; Amber D. Miller; S. K. Næss; Lyman A. Page; Hiranya V. Peiris; N. Phillips; E. Pierpaoli; G. Rocha; J. E. Vaillancourt
Archive | 2013
S. Colafrancesco; S. Colombi; L. P. L. Colombo; F. Cuttaia; G. de Gasperis; J. Delabrouille; C. Dickinson; H. Dole; S. Donzelli; M. Douspis; G. Efstathiou; F. Finelli; O. Forni; M. Frailis; E. Franceschi; S. Galeotta; Y. Giraud-Héraud; J. González-Nuevo; A. Gregorio; A. Gruppuso; S. Henrot-Versillé; C. Hernández-Monteagudo; D. Herranz; E. Hivon; M. Hobson; T. Jagemann; T. S. Kisner; R. Kneissl; J. Knoche; L. Knox
Proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics | 2011
E. Pierpaoli
arXiv: Astrophysics | 2007
N. Cappelluti; H. Böhringer; Peter Schuecker; E. Pierpaoli; Christopher Robinson Mullis; I. M. Gioia; J. P. Henry