E. Schuler

Ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter survey

Despite major improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation over the past decades, corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) cause high mortality. Preclinical evidence indicates the potent anti-inflammatory properties of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. In this retrospective survey, 19 stem cell transplant centers in Europe and the United States reported outcome data from 95 patients who had received ruxolitinib as salvage therapy for SR-GVHD. Patients were classified as having SR-aGVHD (n=54, all grades III or IV) or SR-cGVHD (n=41, all moderate or severe). The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 3 for both SR-aGVHD (1–7) and SR-cGVHD (1–10). The overall response rate was 81.5% (44/54) in SR-aGVHD including 25 complete responses (46.3%), while for SR-cGVHD the ORR was 85.4% (35/41). Of those patients responding to ruxolitinib, the rate of GVHD-relapse was 6.8% (3/44) and 5.7% (2/35) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. The 6-month-survival was 79% (67.3–90.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and 97.4% (92.3–100%, 95% CI) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia and cytomegalovirus-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD that should be validated in a prospective trial.

Integrating clinical features and genetic lesions in the risk assessment of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with variable clinical course. To predict the clinical outcome, we previously developed a CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) based on clinical parameters and cytogenetics. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that accounting for gene mutations would further improve risk stratification of CMML patients. We therefore sequenced 38 genes to explore the role of somatic mutations in disease phenotype and clinical outcome. Overall, 199 of 214 (93%) CMML patients carried at least 1 somatic mutation. Stepwise linear regression models showed that these mutations accounted for 15% to 24% of variability of clinical phenotype. Based on multivariable Cox regression analyses, cytogenetic abnormalities and mutations in RUNX1, NRAS, SETBP1, and ASXL1 were independently associated with overall survival (OS). Using these parameters, we defined a genetic score that identified 4 categories with significantly different OS and cumulative incidence of leukemic evolution. In multivariable analyses, genetic score, red blood cell transfusion dependency, white blood cell count, and marrow blasts retained independent prognostic value. These parameters were included into a clinical/molecular CPSS (CPSS-Mol) model that identified 4 risk groups with markedly different median OS (from >144 to 18 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.69) and cumulative incidence of leukemic evolution (from 0% to 48% at 4 years, HR = 3.84) (P < .001). The CPSS-Mol fully retained its ability to risk stratify in an independent validation cohort of 260 CMML patients. In conclusion, integrating conventional parameters and gene mutations significantly improves risk stratification of CMML patients, providing a robust basis for clinical decision-making and a reliable tool for clinical trials.

Refined medullary blast and white blood cell count based classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias

Since 2001, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is classified by the WHO as myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic neoplasm. Herein we tried to better describe CMML patients with regard to hematological characteristics and prognosis using data of the Duesseldorf registry. We created 6 CMML subgroups, by dividing dysplastic and proliferative CMML at the cut-off of white blood cell count of 13,000/μL and splitting these two groups into 3 subgroups: CMML 0 with <5% blasts (n=101), CMML I with 5-9% blasts (n=204) and CMML II with 10-19% blasts (n=81). For comparison we included patients with RCMD, RAEB I and II. The newly created CMML 0 group had better prognosis than CMML I and II, median survival times were 31 months (ms), 19ms and 13ms, respectively (p<0.001). Median survival times between the corresponding dysplastic and proliferative subgroups 0 and 1 differed significantly: CMML 0 dysplastic 48ms and CMML 0 proliferative 17ms (p=0.03), CMML I dysplastic 29ms and CMML I proliferative 15ms (p=0.008), CMML II dysplastic 17ms and CMML II proliferative 10ms (p=0.09). Outcome of CMML patients worsens with increasing medullary blasts and when presenting as proliferative type. Therefore it is justified to separate CMML with <5% medullary blasts.

Results of a multicenter prospective phase II trial investigating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated del(5q) (LE-MON 5).

Results of a multicenter prospective phase II trial investigating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated del(5q) (LE-MON 5)

Myelodysplastic syndromes without peripheral monocytosis but with evidence of marrow monocytosis share clinical and molecular characteristics with CMML

MDS patients may present with monocytic marrow proliferation not fulfilling criteria for CMML. We analyzed MDS patients with or without a marrow monocytic proliferation by following up the amount of monocytic proliferation and characterizing their molecular profile. 315 MDS patients of Duesseldorf MDS registry were divided into two groups: A) 183 patients with monocytic esterase positive cells in marrow and monocytes between 101 and 900/μl in blood and B) 132 patients without monocytic esterase positive cells in marrow and monocytes in blood ≤100/μl. Twenty patients of each group were screened with regard to ASXL1, TET2, RUNX1, SETBP1, NRAS, and SRSF2 using Illumina myeloid panel. Group A patients were older, had significantly higher WBC, hemoglobin levels, neutrophils and platelets. CMML evolution rates were 4.9% and 1.5%, respectively (p=n.s.). TET2, NRAS and SRFS2 mutation frequencies were higher in group A and four patients had coexisting TET2 and SRFS2 mutation, which was shown to be characteristic but not specific for CMML. MDS patients with marrow monocytic proliferation have a more CMML-like pheno- and genotype and develop CMML more often. Those patients could potentially be very early stages of CMML or represent a CMML-like myeloid neoplasma with marrow adherence of the monocytic cell population.

Calreticulin mutations are not present in patients with myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Dear Editor, Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has been classified into a new category of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases (MDS/MPN) according to the last WHO classification of myeloid malignancies [1]. However, some patients with CMML show proliferative features (MP-CMML) such as leukocytosis and organomegaly, making them clinically and biologically similar to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). At biological level, JAK2V617F mutations in MP-CMML have been described at a lower frequency than in MPN [2]. Recently, CALR gene mutations have been described in 67–88 % JAK2V617F and MPL-negative MPN; these cases also have a good prognosis [3–7]. The role of CALR mutations in CMML is not well known, and the few studies carried out so far have not focused on MP subtype [3, 4, 8]. The objective of this study was to characterize the frequency, type, and prognostic implications of CALR mutations in MP-CMML. CALR exon 9 mutations were studied in 30 patients (22 males, median age 66 years) diagnosed of CMML according toWHO classification [1], and all of them belonged to MP-CMML according to the French-American-British Co-operative Leukaemia Group (Table 1). All patients provided informed consent for sample collection. Biological analyses were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Mutation analysis was performed as previously described [3]. An informative result was obtained in 29/30 patients, and no CALR exon 9 mutation was found. Although a small percentage of mutated MP-CMML patients was expected [4], no mutations were detected in the samples studied. These results are in concordance with those of Klampfl T et al. [3] and Hou et al. [8], who found no CALR mutations in 64 and 48 CMML patients, respectively (subtype not specified), but they do differ from the results of Nangalia et al., who found 1/33 CMML mutated patient (subtype not specified) [4]. There is also another study [9] of other MDS/ MPN groups (atypical CML and unclassifiable MDS/MPN) where CALR mutations were not seen in either entity (n=30). Therefore, outside essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, CALR mutations are only found in (1) a few patients with MDS/MPN, most of them defined as having refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts associated with marked thrombocytosis, even though the percentage described is very variable depending on the series (0 to 12.5 %) [3, 4, 10] and (2) a few MDS patients, mainly with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, refractory anemia, and refractory anemia with excess blasts [3, 4, 8, 10]. This observation could indicate a relationship between CALR mutations and the thrombocytosis phenotype within myeloid neoplasms, suggesting that calreticulin mutations primarily affect the biology of megakaryocytes [11]. L. Zamora (*) :M. Cabezon : S. Marce : L. Palomo : F. Milla : E. Feliu : B. Xicoy ICO Badalona, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut de Recerca contra la Leucemia Josep Carreras, Badalona, Spain e-mail: lzamora@iconcologia.net