Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where E. Terrence Slonecker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by E. Terrence Slonecker.


Marine Pollution Bulletin | 2016

The new Landsat 8 potential for remote sensing of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM)

E. Terrence Slonecker; Daniel K. Jones; Brian A. Pellerin

Due to a combination of factors, such as a new coastal/aerosol band and improved radiometric sensitivity of the Operational Land Imager aboard Landsat 8, the atmospherically-corrected Surface Reflectance product for Landsat data, and the growing availability of corrected fDOM data from U.S. Geological Survey gaging stations, moderate-resolution remote sensing of fDOM may now be achievable. This paper explores the background of previous efforts and shows preliminary examples of the remote sensing and data relationships between corrected fDOM and Landsat 8 reflectance values. Although preliminary results before and after Hurricane Sandy are encouraging, more research is needed to explore the full potential of Landsat 8 to continuously map fDOM in a number of water profiles.


Science of The Total Environment | 2018

A detailed risk assessment of shale gas development on headwater streams in the Pennsylvania portion of the Upper Susquehanna River Basin, U.S.A.

Kelly O. Maloney; John A. Young; Stephen P. Faulkner; Atesmachew Hailegiorgis; E. Terrence Slonecker; L.E. Milheim

The development of unconventional oil and gas (UOG) involves infrastructure development (well pads, roads and pipelines), well drilling and stimulation (hydraulic fracturing), and production; all of which have the potential to affect stream ecosystems. Here, we developed a fine-scaled (1:24,000) catchment-level disturbance intensity index (DII) that included 17 measures of UOG capturing all steps in the development process (infrastructure, water withdrawals, probabilistic spills) that could affect headwater streams (<200km2 in upstream catchment) in the Upper Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. The DII ranged from 0 (no UOG disturbance) to 100 (the catchment with the highest UOG disturbance in the study area) and it was most sensitive to removal of pipeline cover, road cover and well pad cover metrics. We related this DII to three measures of high quality streams: Pennsylvania State Exceptional Value (EV) streams, Class A brook trout streams and Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture brook trout patches. Overall only 3.8% of all catchments and 2.7% of EV stream length, 1.9% of Class A streams and 1.2% of patches were classified as having medium to high level DII scores (>50). Well density, often used as a proxy for development, only correlated strongly with well pad coverage and produced materials, and therefore may miss potential effects associated with roads and pipelines, water withdrawals and spills. When analyzed with a future development scenario, 91.1% of EV stream length, 68.7% of Class A streams and 80.0% of patches were in catchments with a moderate to high probability of development. Our method incorporated the cumulative effects of UOG on streams and can be used to identify catchments and reaches at risk to existing stressors or future development.


Journal of Applied Remote Sensing | 2009

Automated imagery orthorectification pilot

E. Terrence Slonecker; Brad Johnson; Joe McMahon

Automated orthorectification of raw image products is now possible based on the comprehensive metadata collected by Global Positioning Systems and Inertial Measurement Unit technology aboard aircraft and satellite digital imaging systems, and based on emerging pattern-matching and automated image-to-image and control point selection capabilities in many advanced image processing systems. Automated orthorectification of standard aerial photography is also possible if a camera calibration report and sufficient metadata is available. Orthorectification of historical imagery, for which only limited metadata was available, was also attempted and found to require some user input, creating a semi-automated process that still has significant potential to reduce processing time and expense for the conversion of archival historical imagery into geospatially enabled, digital formats, facilitating preservation and utilization of a vast archive of historical imagery. Over 90 percent of the frames of historical aerial photos used in this experiment were successfully orthorectified to the accuracy of the USGS 100K base map series utilized for the geospatial reference of the archive. The accuracy standard for the 100K series maps is approximately 167 feet (51 meters). The main problems associated with orthorectification failure were cloud cover, shadow and historical landscape change which confused automated image-to-image matching processes. Further research is recommended to optimize automated orthorectification methods and enable broad operational use, especially as related to historical imagery archives.


Science of The Total Environment | 2018

Brook trout distributional response to unconventional oil and gas development: Landscape context matters

Eric R. Merriam; J. Todd Petty; Kelly O. Maloney; John A. Young; Stephen P. Faulkner; E. Terrence Slonecker; Lesley E. Milheim; Atesmachew Hailegiorgis; Jonathan M. Niles

We conducted a large-scale assessment of unconventional oil and gas (UOG) development effects on brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) distribution. We compiled 2231 brook trout collection records from the Upper Susquehanna River Watershed, USA. We used boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis to predict occurrence probability at the 1:24,000 stream-segment scale as a function of natural and anthropogenic landscape and climatic attributes. We then evaluated the importance of landscape context (i.e., pre-existing natural habitat quality and anthropogenic degradation) in modulating the effects of UOG on brook trout distribution under UOG development scenarios. BRT made use of 5 anthropogenic (28% relative influence) and 7 natural (72% relative influence) variables to model occurrence with a high degree of accuracy [Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUC)=0.85 and cross-validated AUC=0.81]. UOG development impacted 11% (n=2784) of streams and resulted in a loss of predicted occurrence in 126 (4%). Most streams impacted by UOG had unsuitable underlying natural habitat quality (n=1220; 44%). Brook trout were predicted to be absent from an additional 26% (n=733) of streams due to pre-existing non-UOG land uses (i.e., agriculture, residential and commercial development, or historic mining). Streams with a predicted and observed (via existing pre- and post-disturbance fish sampling records) loss of occurrence due to UOG tended to have intermediate natural habitat quality and/or intermediate levels of non-UOG stress. Simulated development of permitted but undeveloped UOG wells (n=943) resulted in a loss of predicted occurrence in 27 additional streams. Loss of occurrence was strongly dependent upon landscape context, suggesting effects of current and future UOG development are likely most relevant in streams near the probability threshold due to pre-existing habitat degradation.


Journal of Environmental Management | 2018

Canopy volume removal from oil and gas development activity in the upper Susquehanna River basin in Pennsylvania and New York (USA): An assessment using lidar data

John A. Young; Kelly O. Maloney; E. Terrence Slonecker; L.E. Milheim; David Siripoonsup

Oil and gas development is changing the landscape in many regions of the United States and globally. However, the nature, extent, and magnitude of landscape change and development, and precisely how this development compares to other ongoing land conversion (e.g. urban/sub-urban development, timber harvest) is not well understood. In this study, we examine land conversion from oil and gas infrastructure development in the upper Susquehanna River basin in Pennsylvania and New York, an area that has experienced much oil and gas development over the past 10 years. We quantified land conversion in terms of forest canopy geometric volume loss in contrast to previous studies that considered only areal impacts. For the first time in a study of this type, we use fine-scale lidar forest canopy geometric models to assess the volumetric change due to forest clearing from oil and gas development and contrast this land change to clear cut forest harvesting, and urban and suburban development. Results show that oil and gas infrastructure development removed a large volume of forest canopy from 2006 to 2013, and this removal spread over a large portion of the study area. Timber operations (clear cutting) on Pennsylvania State Forest lands removed a larger total volume of forest canopy during the same time period, but this canopy removal was concentrated in a smaller area. Results of our study point to the need to consider volumetric impacts of oil and gas development on ecosystems, and to place potential impacts in context with other ongoing land conversions.


Journal of Maps | 2016

Forest cover changes due to hydrocarbon extraction disturbance in central Pennsylvania (2004–2010)

C.M. Roig-Silva; E. Terrence Slonecker; L.E. Milheim; Jesse R. Ballew; S. Gail Winters

ABSTRACT The state of Pennsylvania has a long history of oil and gas extraction. In recent years with advances in technology such as hydraulic fracturing, hydrocarbon sources that were not profitable in the past are now being exploited. Here, we present an assessment of the cumulative impact of oil and gas extraction activities on the forests of 35 counties in Pennsylvania and their intersecting sub-watersheds between 2004 and 2010. The assessment categorizes counties and sub-watersheds based on the estimated amount of change to forest cover in the area. From the data collected we recognize that although forest cover has not been greatly impacted (with an average loss of percent forest coverage of 0.16% at the county level), landscape structure is affected. Increase in edge forest and decrease in interior forest is evident in many of the counties and sub-watersheds examined. These changes can have a detrimental effect on forest biodiversity and dynamics.


Remote Sensing of Environment | 2013

Hyperspectral versus multispectral crop-productivity modeling and type discrimination for the HyspIRI mission

Isabella Mariotto; Prasad S. Thenkabail; Alfredo R. Huete; E. Terrence Slonecker; Alexander Platonov


Landscape Ecology | 2010

Riparian habitat changes across the continental United States (1972–2003) and potential implications for sustaining ecosystem services

K. Bruce Jones; E. Terrence Slonecker; Maliha S. Nash; Anne C. Neale; Timothy G. Wade; Sharon Hamann


Environment | 2015

Landscape Disturbance from Unconventional and Conventional Oil and Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale Region of Pennsylvania, USA

E. Terrence Slonecker; Lesley E. Milheim; Yu-Pin Lin


Journal of Applied Remote Sensing | 2018

Full-range, solar-reflected hyperspectral microscopy to support earth remote sensing research

E. Terrence Slonecker; David W. Allen; Ronald G. Resmini; Robert S. Rand; Emily Paine

Collaboration


Dive into the E. Terrence Slonecker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lesley E. Milheim

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.M. Roig-Silva

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Young

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kelly O. Maloney

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.E. Milheim

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Allen

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily Paine

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Bruce Jones

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maliha S. Nash

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge