Eberhard Roeseler

Longitudinal cohort study on the effectiveness of lipid apheresis treatment to reduce high lipoprotein(a) levels and prevent major adverse coronary events.

Background We investigated in a longitudinal, multicenter, cohort study whether combined lipid apheresis and lipid-lowering medication can reduce extremely high levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and thus prevent major adverse coronary events (MACE) more efficaciously than lipid-lowering medication alone.Methods Eligible patients had coronary artery disease and Lp(a) levels ≥2.14 µmol/l (95th percentile). All patients received lipid-lowering medications alone until maximally tolerated doses were no longer effective, followed by combined lipid apheresis and lipid-lowering medication. The rates of the primary outcome, MACE, were recorded for both periods.Results A total of 120 patients were included. The mean duration of lipid-lowering therapy alone was 5.6±5.8 years, and that of apheresis was 5.0±3.6 years. Median Lp(a) concentration was reduced from 4.00 µmol/l to 1.07 µmol/l with apheresis treatment (P<0.0001); the corresponding mean annual MACE rate per patient was 1.056 versus 0.144 (P<0.0001).Conclusions Lowering of Lp(a) levels by apheresis was efficacious and safe, and we recommend this therapy for patients in whom maximally tolerated doses of medication alone have failed to control coronary artery disease-associated events.

Lipoprotein Apheresis in Patients With Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Therapy, Lipoprotein(a)-Hyperlipoproteinemia, and Progressive Cardiovascular Disease Prospective Observational Multicenter Study

Background— Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) hyperlipoproteinemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is not affected by treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors. This study sought to assess the effect of chronic lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with progressive cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering treatment. Methods and Results— In a prospective observational multicenter study, 170 patients were investigated who commenced LA because of Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia and progressive cardiovascular disease. Patients were characterized regarding plasma lipid status, lipid-lowering drug treatment, and variants at the LPA gene locus. The incidence rates of cardiovascular events 2 years before (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively 2 years during LA treatment (y+1, y+2) were compared. The mean age of patients was 51 years at the first cardiovascular event and 57 years at the first LA. Before LA, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Lp(a) were 2.56±1.04 mmol·L−1 (99.0±40.1 mg·dL−1) and Lp(a) 3.74±1.63 µmol·L−1 (104.9±45.7 mg·dL−1), respectively. Mean annual rates for major adverse coronary events declined from 0.41 for 2 years before LA to 0.09 for 2 years during LA (P<0.0001). Event rates including all vascular beds declined from 0.61 to 0.16 (P<0.0001). Analysis of single years revealed increasing major adverse coronary event rates from 0.30 to 0.54 (P=0.001) for y-2 to y-1 before LA, decline to 0.14 from y-1 to y+1 (P<0.0001) and to 0.05 from y+1 to y+2 (P=0.014). Conclusions— In patients with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, progressive cardiovascular disease, and maximally tolerated lipid-lowering medication, LA effectively lowered the incidence rate of cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de. Unique identifier: DRKS00003119.

Lipoprotein Apheresis for Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Cardiovascular Disease

Objective—Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results—This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter (P<0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions—Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however.Objective— Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results— This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene ( LPA ) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter ( P <0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions— Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however. # Highlights {#article-title-29}

Lipoprotein Apheresis for Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Cardiovascular Disease: Prospective 5 Years of Follow-Up and Apolipoprotein(a) Characterization

Objective—Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results—This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter (P<0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions—Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however.Objective— Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results— This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene ( LPA ) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter ( P <0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions— Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however. # Highlights {#article-title-29}

First data from the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR)

OBJECTIVE In recent years the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), a paramount decision-making body of the German health care system challenged the approval of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for regular reimbursement, including lipoprotein apheresis therapy. Years before an interdisciplinary German apheresis working group, established by members of both German Societies of Nephrology (Verband Deutsche Nierenzentren (VDN), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nephrologie (DGfN)), initiated a revision of the indication of lipoprotein apheresis therapy according to current guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of lipid disorders. This working group was convinced, that data derived from a registry would support lipoprotein apheresis as a therapy for severe hyperlipidemic patients suffering from progressive cardiovascular diseases. METHODS AND RESULTS In 2009 the working group established the indication for lipoprotein apheresis with respect to current cardiovascular guidelines and scientific knowledge for the registry, which are in line with the reimbursement guidelines. In 2011 financing by sponsors was secured and an internet-based registry was created. A pilot project with 5 apheresis centers finished in 2012 - since then the registry is available to all German apheresis centers. CONCLUSIONS There has been consensus between the medical societies and health care carriers regarding the need for a German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR). The launch of this registry complies with requirements of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Complementing the Pro(a)LiFe-Study, first data from GLAR support the safety of the different apheresis treatment procedures. In addition these first data suggest, with respect to the results of Pro(a)LiFe-Study, effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular progression as well. Here, further data are needed to statistically substantiate these early findings.

Impact of the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) on therapeutic options to reduce increased Lp(a) levels.

Background The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) has been initiated by members of the Nephrology Foundation (WiNe), the German association of kidney centres (DN), the German society of nephrology (DGfN) and additional medical associations taking part in the apheresis working group. Its goal is the introduction of a substantial database, suitable to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures. Data have been added to the DLAR since October 2011. In this article, preliminary results are first reported. Methods and results Data are stored on a secured Internet platform. The recorded information comprises mean values and rates of change in lipid levels (cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) before and after apheresis therapy, blood/plasma volume, frequency and type of adverse effects, medication, vascular events, diagnoses and comorbidity. It is collected by participating apheresis centres from all over Germany. Up until October 2014, a total of 7946 lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatments of 991 patients (787 with documented LDL-C and 688 with documented Lp(a) levels) via 96 medical accounts were documented and analysed. The current share of Lp(a) patients is 50.6 % (Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dl; n = 348/688). For both LDL-C and Lp(a), lowering rates exceeding 60 % have been observed. Likely in conjunction with these reduction rates, the preliminary analysis shows a 90 % decline in major adverse coronary events (MACE) as well as a decrease in major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by 69 %. As before, good tolerability and low rates of adverse effects (< 3 %) of LA therapy were found. Conclusions The available numbers suggest in parts very good response by the participating centres to the DLAR. Unfortunately, there are also centres that have not documented any patients so far or LA treatments at all. The benchmark values for reduction rates in lipoprotein concentration required by the directives of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) have all been met. The decrease in MACE and MANCE rates currently observed is very promising. However, the comparably short runtime of the registry does not allow for high confidence in the current results. Certainly, reliable data will be extractable in the coming years. Given the high interest expressed by European neighbours, the extension of the registry to the European level should be a future goal for the DLAR as well.

Differenzierung der Indikation zur Lipoproteinapherese bei erhöhtem Lp(a) durch unterschiedliche Messmethoden

ZusammenfassungLipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] ist ein unabhängiger kardiovaskulärer Risikofaktor. In Studien konnte bisher gezeigt werden, dass ab einer Lp(a)-Massenkonzentration [Lp(a)-M] von > 30 mg/dl kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse signifikant zunehmen können. Es ist schon länger bekannt, dass die Messergebnisse selbst bei einem Vergleich der bisher etablierten laborchemischen Methoden aufgrund deren fehlender Standardisierung und der teilweise niedrigen Präzision und hohen Varianz für die Lp(a)-M-Bestimmung aus einer Blutprobe zum Teil deutlich voneinander abweichen. Daher wurde auch in Deutschland kürzlich eine auf das WHO/IFCC-Referenzmaterial SRM2B rückführbare, isoformunabhängige und gut reproduzierbare Methode in die Labordiagnostik eingeführt, deren Konzentration allerdings in nmol/l, entsprechend der Einheit Anzahl der Lp(a)-Partikel [Lp(a)-P] pro Liter, angegeben wird. Bei einem Lp(a)-P > 75 nmol/l steigt das kardiovaskuläre Risiko deutlich an. Um diese neue Einheit (Anzahl/l) in die alte Einheit (Masse/l) möglicherweise umrechnen zu können, wurde ein Umrechnungsfaktor von 0,4167 ng/nmol angegeben. Angesichts der Heterogenität der Lp(a)-Partikel mit den vorhandenen unterschiedlichen Kettenlängen des Apolipoprotein A, der unterschiedlichen Lipoproteingröße und Lipidzusammensetzung sowie der unterschiedlichen Größe des LDL-Cholesterinanteils des Lp(a) kann dieser Umrechnungsweg nur fehlerhaft sein, was auch durch eigene Vergleichsmessungen gezeigt werden konnte. Daher sollten therapeutische Konsequenzen aus einer Umrechnung von einer in die andere Lp(a)-Konzentration, wie die Indikation zur Lipoproteinapherese (LA), möglichst vermieden werden. Die deutsche Arbeitsgruppe Apherese empfiehlt daher, dass die Indikation zur LA bei betroffenen Patienten für die Lp(a)-M-Methode weiterhin ab ≥ 60 mg/dl, wie vom Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss festgelegt, besteht. Bei der neu eingeführten Lp(a)-P-Methode sollte die Indikation unter Zugrundelegung bisheriger Studienergebnisse ab ≥ 120 nmol/l liegen, sofern die weiteren klinischen Voraussetzungen für eine LA-Therapie erfüllt sind.

The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) – almost 5 years on

Background Since 2005 an interdisciplinary German apheresis working group has been established by members of both German Societies of Nephrology and of Lipidologists and completed the data set for the registry according to the current guidelines and the German indication guideline for apheresis in 2009. In 2011 the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) was launched and data are available over nearly 5 years now. Methods and results During the time period 2012–2016, 71 German apheresis centers collected retrospective and prospective observational data of 1435 patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment of high LDL-C levels and/or high Lp (a) levels suffering from cardiovascular disease (CVD) or progressive CVD. A total of 15,527 completely documented LA treatments were entered into the database. All patients treated by LA showed a median LDL-C reduction rate of 67.5%, and a median Lp (a) reduction rate of 71.1%. Analog to the Pro(a)LiFe pattern, patient data were analyzed to the incidence rate of coronary events (MACE) 1 and 2 years before the beginning of LA treatment (y-2 and y‑1) and prospectively two years on LA treatment (y + 1 and y + 2). During two years of LA treatment a MACE reduction of 78% was observed. In the years considered, side effects of LA treatment were low (5.9%) and mainly comprised puncture problems. Conclusions The data generated by the GLAR shows that LA lowers the incidence rate of cardiovascular events in patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp (a) levels, progressive CVD, and maximally tolerated lipid lowering medication. In addition, LA treatments were found to be safe with a low rate of side effects.

Extrem niedrige LDL-Cholesterinkonzentrationen durch moderne lipidsenkende Therapien

ZusammenfassungProprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Typ 9 (PCSK9)-Inhibitoren in Form subkutan injizierter monoklonaler Antikörper sind seit 2015 in Deutschland verfügbar und erlauben additiv zur bestehenden Medikation LDL-Cholesterin (LDL-C) hocheffektiv zu senken. Bei vielen Patienten mit einem erhöhten Risiko oder bereits bestehenden atherosklerotischen kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen (ASCVD) kann nun das Ziel eines LDL-C < 70 mg/dl (< 1,8 mmol/l) erreicht oder sogar erheblich unterschritten werden, um dem Fortschreiten der Gefäßerkrankung entgegen zu wirken. Allerdings resultiert aus diesen niedrigen LDL-C-Konzentrationen bei Patienten, die zusätzlich eine hohe Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a])-Konzentration aufweisen, ein Auswertungsproblem. Das Lp(a)-Partikel selbst besteht neben dem Apolipoprotein(a) auch aus einem LDL-C-Anteil, der bei allen in Deutschland etablierten Labormethoden zur LDL-Cholesterinbestimmung mitgemessen wird. Aktuell kann die Lp(a)-Konzentration durch die zugelassene lipidsenkende Medikation nur geringfügig abgesenkt werden. So kann bei Patienten mit niedriger LDL-C- und erhöhter Lp(a)-Konzentration trotz effektiver lipidsenkender Medikation die gemessene LDL-C-Konzentration vermeintlich nicht im gewünschten Therapiebereich liegen - die mitgemessenen LDL-C-Anteile der Lp(a) (Lp[a]-LDL-C) kann die Konzentration der „freien“ LDL-C formal überdecken. Es empfiehlt sich daher bei diesen Patienten parallel neben der LDL-C- auch eine Lp(a)-Konzentrationsbestimmung durchzuführen, um die tatsächliche Effektivität der eingesetzten LDL-C-senkenden Therapie zu bewerten.

Lipoprotein Apheresis for Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Cardiovascular DiseaseHighlights

Objective—Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results—This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter (P<0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions—Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however.Objective— Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results— This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene ( LPA ) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter ( P <0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions— Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however. # Highlights {#article-title-29}