Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ulrich Julius is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ulrich Julius.


Diabetologia | 1996

Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up

Markolf Hanefeld; S. Fischer; Ulrich Julius; Jan Schulze; Uta Schwanebeck; H. Schmechel; H. J. Ziegelasch; J. Lindner

Summary The Diabetes Intervention Study (DIS) is a prospective population-based multicentre trial of newly detected cases of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). This report analyses the risk factors for subsequent coronary heart disease and all-cause death during the 11-year follow-up. The prognostic significance of the categories of the NIDDM Policy Group was validated with respect to the incidence of coronary heart disease and mortality. At baseline 1139 subjects, aged 30–55 years at the time of diabetes detection and classified as diet controlled after a 6-week screening phase, were included. Of the patients 112 (15.2 %) suffered from myocardial infarction, 197 (19.82 %) of 994 had died. The odds ratio for all-cause mortality compared to the general population for males at the age of 36–45 years was 5.1 and for females 7.0. In multivariate analysis age, blood pressure and smoking were independent risk factors for myocardial infarction and male sex, age, blood pressure, triglycerides, postprandial blood glucose and smoking for death, respectively. The categories of the NIDDM Policy Group target parameters for blood glucose, triglycerides and blood pressure were significant predictors of both CHD and death. Thus, it appears that in NIDDM good control of blood glucose, blood pressure and triglycerides is associated with a lower incidence of coronary heart disease and death rate respectively. [Diabetologia (1996) 39: 1577–1583]


Circulation | 2013

Lipoprotein Apheresis in Patients With Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Therapy, Lipoprotein(a)-Hyperlipoproteinemia, and Progressive Cardiovascular Disease Prospective Observational Multicenter Study

Josef Leebmann; Eberhard Roeseler; Ulrich Julius; Franz Heigl; Ralf Spitthoever; Dennis Heutling; Paul Breitenberger; Winfried Maerz; Walter Lehmacher; Andreas Heibges; Reinhard Klingel

Background— Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) hyperlipoproteinemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is not affected by treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors. This study sought to assess the effect of chronic lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with progressive cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering treatment. Methods and Results— In a prospective observational multicenter study, 170 patients were investigated who commenced LA because of Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia and progressive cardiovascular disease. Patients were characterized regarding plasma lipid status, lipid-lowering drug treatment, and variants at the LPA gene locus. The incidence rates of cardiovascular events 2 years before (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively 2 years during LA treatment (y+1, y+2) were compared. The mean age of patients was 51 years at the first cardiovascular event and 57 years at the first LA. Before LA, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Lp(a) were 2.56±1.04 mmol·L−1 (99.0±40.1 mg·dL−1) and Lp(a) 3.74±1.63 µmol·L−1 (104.9±45.7 mg·dL−1), respectively. Mean annual rates for major adverse coronary events declined from 0.41 for 2 years before LA to 0.09 for 2 years during LA (P<0.0001). Event rates including all vascular beds declined from 0.61 to 0.16 (P<0.0001). Analysis of single years revealed increasing major adverse coronary event rates from 0.30 to 0.54 (P=0.001) for y-2 to y-1 before LA, decline to 0.14 from y-1 to y+1 (P<0.0001) and to 0.05 from y+1 to y+2 (P=0.014). Conclusions— In patients with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, progressive cardiovascular disease, and maximally tolerated lipid-lowering medication, LA effectively lowered the incidence rate of cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de. Unique identifier: DRKS00003119.


Diabetes Care | 1991

Diabetes Intervention Study Multi-Intervention Trial in Newly Diagnosed NIDDM

Markolf Hanefeld; S. Fischer; H. Schmechel; Gisela Rothe; Jan Schulze; Helmut Dude; Uta Schwanebeck; Ulrich Julius

Objective In a randomized 5-yr multi-intervention trial, we tested the efficacy of intensified health education (IHE) in improving metabolic control and reducing the level of coronary risk factors and incidence of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Research Design and Methods Within the intervention group, the benefit of clofibric acid was evaluated in a double-blind study. One thousand one hundred thirty-nine newly diagnosed middle-aged (30- to 55-yr-old) patients with non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) entered the study. They were classified as diet controlled after a 6- wk screening phase with conventional dietary treatment. During the follow-up, the control group (n = 378) was cared for at different diabetes outpatient clinics with a standardized surveillance. The intervention group (n = 761) had a structured IHE that included dietary advice, antismoking and antialcohol education, and ways to enhance physical activity. Results Randomly, 379 of the IHE patients received 1.6 g clofibric acid/day, and the others received placebo. IHE resulted in improved glucose control (adjusted fasting blood glucose) levels after 5 yr (control subjects 9.27 mM, IHE group 8.71 mM, and IHE plus clofibric acid group 8.60 mM, P < 0.01). The better glycemic control was achieved with fewer antidiabetic drugs. After 5 yr, antidiabetic drugs were prescribed to 47% of the control subjects, 28% of the IHE group, and 34% of the IHE plus clofibric acid group (cutoff limit for drug application was postprandial blood glucose of ≥13.87 mM). The ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids (0.26 vs. 0.40, P < 0.01) and physical activity (174 vs. 327 scores, P < 0.01) were increased, and blood pressure, tobacco, and alcohol consumption were significantly reduced by IHE. However, IHE had no effect on calorie intake, percentage of fat in the diet (45%), and body weight. The most important finding was the significant increase of blood cholesterol in all three groups (+ 0.47, +0.36, and +0.34 mM, respectively). Clofibric acid only prevented the increase of triglyceride levels (+ 0.56, +0.24, and +0.05 mM, respectively). The incidence rate per 1000 for myocardial infarction was 30.3 for control subjects, 53.6 for the IHE group, and 55.6 for the IHE plus clofibric acid group. The corresponding rates for IHD incidence were 90.9, 97.8, and 98.8, respectively. Men suffered more frequently from myocardial infarction, whereas women developed ECG criteria for IHD more frequently. Among the 35 cases of death, besides cardiovascular diseases, liver cirrhosis and neoplasia were the predominant causes. The death rate per 1000 in control subjects was 46.2, 30.6 in the IHE group, and 27 among patients with IHE plus clofibric acid. Conclusions IHE was of substantial benefit for the control of glycemia, significantly diminished the need for antidiabetic drugs, and reduced a cluster of risk factors but had no effect on the control of blood lipids. This could be one major reason for the failure of IHE, effective lowering of blood pressure, and clofibric acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. Clofibric acid was only effective in reducing triglycerides.


Acta Diabetologica | 2002

Insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have higher serum leptin levels independently of body fat mass

S. Fischer; Markolf Hanefeld; Steven M. Haffner; C. Fusch; Uta Schwanebeck; C. Köhler; K. Fücker; Ulrich Julius

Abstract. In obese people, an increase of plasma leptin levels is well-known and is seen as a consequence of the increased body fat mass. Moreover, a relationship between fasting concentrations of leptin and insulin has been described. Hyperinsulinemia is considered to be indicative of insulin resistance. We aimed at elucidating the interrelations between leptin, insulin and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. Under metabolic ward conditions, we investigated 21 moderately overweight men with type 2 diabetes. The patients had a mean age of 49.1 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.8 kg/m2, and a mean diabetes duration of 82.5 months. All patients were treated with diet alone. We measured fasting leptin and insulin levels, body composition by determination of total body water, and insulin resistance by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. At univariate analysis, fasting leptin level significantly and positively correlated with BMI (r=0.49, p=0.02) and with fasting insulin (r=0.69, p=0.001), while it negatively correlated with the glucose disposal rate (r=−0.62, p=0.002). Furthermore, leptin was inversely correlated with HDL-cholesterol (r=−0.45, p=0.04). When excluding the influence of body fat mass or of BMI in partial correlation analysis, the correlations between leptin and insulin or insulin sensitivity remained significant. The relationship between insulin resistance (as measured directly in the clamp experiments) and leptin concentrations was also shown by subdividing the diabetic patients according to tertiles of insulin sensitivity. The highest fasting leptin levels were observed in those patients with the most expressed insulin resistance. Our data point to a functional relationship between insulin resistance and leptin concentrations in insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic men, independently of body composition. This relationship is believed to be mediated by insulin.


Diabetes Care | 2008

Evaluation of a Diabetes Management System Based on Practice Guidelines, Integrated Care, and Continuous Quality Management in a Federal State of Germany : A population-based approach to health care research

Ulrike Rothe; Gabriele Müller; Peter Schwarz; Martin Seifert; Hildebrand Kunath; Rainer Koch; S. Bergmann; Ulrich Julius; Stefan R. Bornstein; Markolf Hanefeld; Jan Schulze

OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to evaluate the Saxon Diabetes Management Program (SDMP), which is based on integrated practice guidelines, shared care, and integrated quality management. The SDMP was implemented into diabetes contracts between health insurance providers, general practitioners (GPs), and diabetes specialized practitioners (DSPs) unified in the Saxon association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The evaluation of the SDMP in Germany represents a real-world study by using clinical data collected from participating physicians. Between 2000 and 2002 all DSPs and about 75% of the GPs in Saxony participated. Finally, 291,771 patients were included in the SDMP. Cross-sectional data were evaluated at the beginning of 2000 (group A1) and at the end of 2002 (group A2). A subcohort of 105,204 patients was followed over a period of 3 years (group B). RESULTS—The statewide implementation of the SDMP resulted in a change in therapeutic practice and in better cooperation. The median A1C at the time of referral to DSPs decreased from 8.5 to 7.5%, and so did the overall mean. At the end, 78 and 61% of group B achieved the targets for A1C and blood pressure, respectively, recommended by the guidelines compared with 69 and 50% at baseline. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes benefited the most. Preexisting regional differences were aligned. CONCLUSIONS—Integrated care disease management with practicable integrated quality management including collaboration between GPs and specialist services is a significant innovation in chronic care management and an efficient way to improve diabetes care continuously.


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2009

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibition counteracts cataract formation and early retinal changes in streptozotocin-diabetic rats.

Viktor R. Drel; Weizheng Xu; Jie Zhang; Peter F. Kador; T. K. Ali; Jeho Shin; Ulrich Julius; Barbara S. Slusher; Azza B. El-Remessy; Irina G. Obrosova

PURPOSE This study evaluated the role for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in diabetes-induced cataractogenesis and early retinal changes. METHODS Control and streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rats were treated with or without the PARP inhibitors 1,5-isoquinolinediol (ISO; 3 mg kg(-1) d(-1) intraperitoneally) and 10-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-2H-7-oxa-1,2-diaza-benzo[de]anthracen-3-1 (GPI-15427, 30 mg kg(-1) d(-1) orally) for 10 weeks after the first 2 weeks without treatment. Lens clarity was evaluated by indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit lamp examination, and retinal changes were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. In in vitro studies, cultured human lens epithelial cells and bovine retinal pericytes and endothelial cells were exposed to high glucose or palmitate. RESULTS PARP is expressed in lens, and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated proteins are primarily localized in the 38- to 87-kDa range of the protein spectrum, with several minor bands at 17 to 38 kDa. The 38- to 87-kDa and the 17- to 38-kDa poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated protein expression increased by 74% and 275%, respectively, after 4 weeks of diabetes and by approximately 65% early after exposure of lens epithelial cells to 30 mM glucose. Both PARP inhibitors delayed, but did not prevent, the formation of diabetic cataract. The number of TUNEL-positive nuclei in flatmounted retinas increased approximately 4-fold in STZ diabetic rats, and this increase was prevented by ISO and GPI-15427. Both PARP inhibitors reduced diabetes-induced retinal oxidative-nitrosative and endoplasmic reticulum stress and glial activation. GPI-15427 (20 microM) prevented oxidative-nitrosative stress and cell death in palmitate-exposed pericytes and endothelial cells. CONCLUSIONS PARP activation is implicated in the formation of diabetic cataract and in early retinal changes. These findings provide a rationale for the development of PARP inhibitors for the prevention of diabetic ocular complications.


Atherosclerosis Supplements | 2013

Lipoprotein apheresis: State of the art and novelties

Claudia Stefanutti; Ulrich Julius

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an extracorporeal technique which permits the unselective or specific removal of lipoproteins, namely Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL), as well as other apolipoprotein B100-containing lipoproteins from plasma. LA represents a selective upgrade (with both clinical and metabolic advantages) from conventional forms of extracorporeal therapy such as plasma-exchange (PEX) which was used in the seventies to treat severe hypercholesterolemia. The primary reason for using is the treatment of homo-, double- (or compound) and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (Hoz-, DHtz,- Htz,-FH). This technique has also been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of other severe forms of hyperlipoproteinemia such as: hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia, the familial combined hyperlipoproteinemia and other varieties associated with an elevated cardiovascular risk (CVR) when used in patients who are poor- or non-responders to pharmacological treatment following specific guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol in plasma. Patients with these severe forms of dyslipidemia and, particularly, those affected by FH are subject to coronary ischemic events and thus require an intensive, efficacious, continuous, and personalized form of therapy. A therapy based solely on current available drugs does not achieve the desired results in the Hoz- and DHtz forms of FH or in approximately 10-20% of the Htz form. For the aforementioned clinical conditions, LA treatment offers a necessary therapeutic approach. LA can also be applied in the prevention of secondary recurrence of coronary ischemic events and of arterial stenosis which appears, rather frequently after vascular surgery (coronary by-pass, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty). Clinical trials have shown that statins provide a major reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but often fail to attain desirable LDL-cholesterol target level in Hoz- and DHtz- (Compound) FH high cardiovascular risk patients. Intolerance to statins is also relatively frequent in Htz-FH and non-FH patients. LA has effectively replaced pharmacological cholesterol-lowering therapy for decades. Young high CVR risk patients survived to adulthood thanks only to LA. More recently, promising novel compounds aimed at other molecular targets are being studied for the treatment of severe dyslipidemia: Lomitapide, Mipomersen, PCSK9 inhibitors and HDL-enhancers. It is expected that these potent new agents will be combined with LA in the treatment of the most severe forms of hyperlipidemia.


Current Vascular Pharmacology | 2005

Role for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation in diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy.

Irina G. Obrosova; Ulrich Julius

Chronic complications of diabetes mellitus e.a. diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy develop in at least 30-50% of patients with both Type 1 (insulin-dependent) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes, and are the major cause of increased morbidity and mortality. The ultimate consequences of diabetes complications include renal failure, foot ulceration and amputation, and blindness. The magnitude of the problem and its economic impact make extremely important to understand the natural history of chronic diabetes complications and to identify more successful preventive and therapeutic options. The pathogenesis of diabetes complications involves multiple mechanisms. The importance of vascular component is well recognized in diabetic retinopathy, which is primarily a vascular disease, as well as diabetic nephropathy developing as a result of complex interplay between hemodynamic and metabolic factors. The importance of vascular versus non-vascular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy remains a subject of debate. Studies in animal and cell culture models revealed that such mechanisms as increased aldose reductase activity, non-enzymatic glycation/glycoxidation, activation of protein kinase C, impaired growth factor support, enhanced oxidative/nitrosative stress, and its downstream effectors such as mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, inflammatory response, endothelin-1 overexpression and impaired Ca(++) signaling, play an important role in all three tissue-targets for diabetes complications i.e. kidney, retina and peripheral nerve. Evidence for important role of the downstream effector of free radical and oxidant-induced DNA injury, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation, is emerging. This review describes recent studies addressing the role for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation in diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy.


Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy | 2008

Comparison of different LDL apheresis methods.

Ulrich Julius; Antje Frind; Sergej Tselmin; Steffi Kopprasch; Ines Poberschin; Gabriele Siegert

This article presents the generally accepted indications for LDL apheresis treatment. The available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to acute relative reductions of LDL cholesterol; mean values after the LDL apheresis treatments are not different. Serum triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) are also acutely reduced. Available LDL apheresis methods differ with respect to their impact on the coagulation system, on C-reactive protein and on leukocyte count. Cardiovascular events are clearly reduced by the LDL apheresis methods. There is an urgent need to prospectively compare the different LDL apheresis methods taking into account hard end points. The lower target values for LDL cholesterol suggested by international guidelines for high-risk patients will certainly require a more widespread use of LDL apheresis.


Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology | 2016

Lipoprotein Apheresis for Lipoprotein(a)-Associated Cardiovascular Disease

Eberhard Roeseler; Ulrich Julius; Franz Heigl; Ralf Spitthoever; Dennis Heutling; Paul Breitenberger; Josef Leebmann; Walter Lehmacher; Pia R. Kamstrup; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Winfried Maerz; Asma Noureen; Konrad Schmidt; Florian Kronenberg; Andreas Heibges; Reinhard Klingel

Objective—Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results—This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter (P<0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions—Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however.Objective— Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results— This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL]). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene ( LPA ) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter ( P <0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions— Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however. # Highlights {#article-title-29}

Collaboration


Dive into the Ulrich Julius's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Markolf Hanefeld

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan R. Bornstein

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Fischer

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jens Pietzsch

Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Tselmin

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernd Hohenstein

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Leonhardt

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Franz Heigl

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Bergmann

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eberhard Roeseler

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge