Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos
University of São Paulo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Hotspot
Dive into the research topics where Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos is active.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos.
Bar. Brazilian Administration Review | 2008
Paulo Roberto Gião; Moacir de Miranda Oliveira Junior; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos
This articles main objective is to examine some known management theories under the offshoring point of view. It detaches some factors in existing theories and how they can be at risk in an increasing offshoring of services processes. In the absence of more systematic studies about the effects of offshoring over value chain and core competencies imprecise borders and definitions, we try to interpret them in a holistic manner and stimulate discussions in a new area of study rather than to provide definitive general conclusions. The methodological aspects mainly concerning the offshoring bibliography are very impressive, especially since 2000. There seems to be a new trend appearing, like a wedge between strategy and international business theories, or that at least complements these theories. The analysis presented in this paper is offered as an aid to systematic investigation involving value chains, core competencies, innovations and the accelerated process of offshore outsourcing of services. Some preliminary evidence showed countries and companies in good conditions to improve their participation in the international market. The internationalization of these new firms from emerging countries and their learning process may need extension to existing theories, at least from the perspective of emerging and in the developing world.
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation | 2010
Miriam Christi Midori Oishi Nemoto; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Reed Elliot Nelson
The decision to adopt a new technology or not depends on the benefits to be gained by incorporating new technical, functional or esthetic solutions, in order to attain the company’s competitive positioning; this decision also depends on the costs and risks involved. In general terms, businesses lack the resources, whether financial, human, or structural, to innovate or even to adapt new technologies. The objectives of this study are to test an innovation adoption model on a real case and show the importance of international cooperation for new technology implementation processes, based on a decision-making case about whether or not to adopt a new technology that occurred in eletronic company in Brazil (called “A”). The new technology might help to solve certain challenges the company faced in its printer plant, by increasing efficiency and cutting costs.
Globalización, Competitividad y Gobernabilidad de Georgetown/Universia | 2012
Ozaki Adalton Masalu; Roberto Sbragia; Melo Jr Augusto C. B. de; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos
This article analyzes the process of technology strategy formulation in two cases of Brazilian subsidiaries from telecom industry. One company belongs to the equipment layer (EQUIPCOMPANY), and the other to the network layer (NETCOMPANY). In EQUIPCOMPANY, technology strategy and corporate strategy are formulated in conjunction, and the subsidiary is involved in the creation of global products. The main advantage of this approach is the alignment around a common vision and the synergy created among subsidiaries. However, the subsidiaries’ autonomy to create innovations highly adapted to a specific country is limited. In NETCOMPANY, the technology strategy derives from the marketing vision of the future, and the Brazilian subsidiary can define its own strategy, merely requesting parent company approval for implementation. This approach brings agility to decision making and allows its subsidiaries to create innovations highly adapted to local specific needs. Nevertheless, NETCOMPANY faces poor coordination among subsidiaries, possible duplication of work and investment, and a lack of synergy and collaboration on innovation projects.
Revista de Administração | 2013
José Guilherme Ferraz de Campos; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Gil Kruglianskas
Revista de Administração (São Paulo) | 2013
José Guilherme Ferraz de Campos; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Gil Kruglianskas
REGE - Revista de Gestão | 2007
Reed Elliot Nelson; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos
Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies | 2013
Ailton Conde Jussani; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos
The International Journal of Management | 2012
Miriam Christi Midori Oishi Nemoto; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Michitoshi Oishi
Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia | 2009
Sérgio Nunes Muritiba; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Patricia Morilha Muritiba; John Lawrence French
Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management | 2009
Sérgio Nunes Muritiba; Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim de Vasconcellos; Patricia Morilha Muritiba; John Lawrence French