Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Edward R. Mariano is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Edward R. Mariano.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2004

Anesthetic concerns for robot-assisted laparoscopy in an infant.

Edward R. Mariano; Louise Furukawa; Russell Woo; Craig T. Albanese; John G. Brock-Utne

A 2-mo-old infant with biliary atresia was scheduled for laparoscopic Kasai with robot assistance. Before surgery, a practice trial maneuvering the cumbersome robotic equipment was performed to ensure rapid access to the patient in case of emergency. IV access, tracheal intubation, and arterial line placement followed inhaled anesthesia induction with sevoflurane. Robotic setup took 53 min and severely limited patient access. No adverse events occurred during the procedure requiring the removal of the robotic equipment, and the patient was discharged after a stable postoperative recovery. Advance preparation is required to maximize patient safety during robotic surgery.


Anesthesiology | 2008

Ambulatory continuous femoral nerve blocks decrease time to discharge readiness after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study.

Brian M. Ilfeld; Linda T. Le; R. Scott Meyer; Edward R. Mariano; Krista Vandenborne; Pamela W. Duncan; Daniel I. Sessler; F. Kayser Enneking; Jonathan J. Shuster; Douglas W. Theriaque; Linda F. Berry; Eugene H. Spadoni; Peter F. Gearen

Background:The authors tested the hypotheses that, compared with an overnight continuous femoral nerve block (cFNB), a 4-day ambulatory cFNB increases ambulation distance and decreases the time until three specific readiness-for-discharge criteria are met after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty. Methods:Preoperatively, all patients received a cFNB (n = 50) and perineural ropivacaine 0.2% from surgery until the following morning, at which time they were randomly assigned to either continue perineural ropivacaine or switch to perineural normal saline. Primary endpoints included (1) time to attain three discharge criteria (adequate analgesia, independence from intravenous analgesics, and ambulation of at least 30 m) and (2) ambulatory distance in 6 min the afternoon after surgery. Patients were discharged with their cFNB and a portable infusion pump, and catheters were removed on postoperative day 4. Results:Patients given 4 days of perineural ropivacaine attained all three discharge criteria in a median (25th–75th percentiles) of 25 (21–47) h, compared with 71 (46–89) h for those of the control group (estimated ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–0.67; P <0.001). Patients assigned to receive ropivacaine ambulated a median of 32 (17–47) m the afternoon after surgery, compared with 26 (13–35) m for those receiving normal saline (estimated ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.85; P = 0.42). Conclusions:Compared with an overnight cFNB, a 4-day ambulatory cFNB decreases the time to reach three important discharge criteria by an estimated 53% after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty. However, the extended infusion did not increase ambulation distance the afternoon after surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00135889.)


Anesthesiology | 2014

Inpatient falls after total knee arthroplasty: the role of anesthesia type and peripheral nerve blocks.

Stavros G. Memtsoudis; Thomas Danninger; Rehana Rasul; Jashvant Poeran; Philipp Gerner; Ottokar Stundner; Edward R. Mariano; Madhu Mazumdar

Background:Much controversy remains on the role of anesthesia technique and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in inpatient falls (IFs) after orthopedic procedures. The aim of the study is to characterize cases of IFs, identify risk factors, and study the role of PNB and anesthesia technique in IF risk in total knee arthroplasty patients. Methods:The authors selected total knee arthroplasty patients from the national Premier Perspective database (Premier Inc., Charlotte, NC; 2006–2010; n = 191,570, >400 acute care hospitals). The primary outcome was IF. Patient- and healthcare system–related characteristics, anesthesia technique, and presence of PNB were determined for IF and non-IF patients. Independent risk factors for IFs were determined by using conventional and multilevel logistic regression. Results:Overall, IF incidence was 1.6% (n = 3,042). Distribution of anesthesia technique was 10.9% neuraxial, 12.9% combined neuraxial/general, and 76.2% general anesthesia. PNB was used in 12.1%. Patients suffering IFs were older (average age, 68.9 vs. 66.3 yr), had higher comorbidity burden (average Deyo index, 0.77 vs. 0.66), and had more major complications, including 30-day mortality (0.8 vs. 0.1%; all P < 0.001). Use of neuraxial anesthesia (IF incidence, 1.3%; n = 280) had lower adjusted odds of IF compared with adjusted odds of IF with the use of general anesthesia alone (IF incidence, 1.6%; n = 2,393): odds ratio, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56–0.87). PNB was not significantly associated with IF (odds ratio, 0.85 [CI, 0.71–1.03]). Conclusions:This study identifies several risk factors for IF in total knee arthroplasty patients. Contrary to common concerns, no association was found between PNB and IF. Further studies should determine the role of anesthesia practices in the context of fall-prevention programs.


Pain | 2010

A Multicenter, Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial of The Effect of Ambulatory Continuous Femoral Nerve Blocks on Discharge-Readiness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty In Patients on General Orthopaedic Wards

Brian M. Ilfeld; Edward R. Mariano; Paul J. Girard; Vanessa J. Loland; R. Scott Meyer; John F. Donovan; George A. Pugh; Linda T. Le; Daniel I. Sessler; Jonathan J. Shuster; Douglas W. Theriaque; Scott T. Ball

&NA; A continuous femoral nerve block (cFNB) involves the percutaneous insertion of a catheter adjacent to the femoral nerve, followed by a local anesthetic infusion, improving analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Portable infusion pumps allow infusion continuation following hospital discharge, raising the possibility of decreasing hospitalization duration. We therefore used a multicenter, randomized, triple‐masked, placebo‐controlled study design to test the primary hypothesis that a 4‐day ambulatory cFNB decreases the time until each of three predefined readiness‐for‐discharge criteria (adequate analgesia, independence from intravenous opioids, and ambulation ≥30 m) are met following TKA compared with an overnight inpatient‐only cFNB. Preoperatively, all patients received a cFNB with perineural ropivacaine 0.2% from surgery until the following morning, at which time they were randomized to either continue perineural ropivacaine (n = 39) or switch to normal saline (n = 38). Patients were discharged with their cFNB and portable infusion pump as early as postoperative day 3. Patients who were given 4 days of perineural ropivacaine attained all three criteria in a median (25th–75th percentiles) of 47 (29–69) h, compared with 62 (45–79) h for those of the control group (Estimated ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.00; p = 0.028). Compared with controls, patients randomized to ropivacaine met the discharge criterion for analgesia in 20 (0–38) versus 38 (15–64) h (p = 0.009), and intravenous opioid independence in 21 (0–37) versus 33 (11–50) h (p = 0.061). We conclude that a 4‐day ambulatory cFNB decreases the time to reach three important discharge criteria by an estimated 20% following TKA compared with an overnight cFNB, primarily by improving analgesia.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2009

Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block via an Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Approach: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study

Edward R. Mariano; Robert Afra; Vanessa J. Loland; NavParkash S. Sandhu; Richard H. Bellars; Michael L. Bishop; Gloria S. Cheng; Lynna P. Choy; Rosalita C. Maldonado; Brian M. Ilfeld

BACKGROUND: The posterior approach for placing continuous interscalene catheters has not been studied in a controlled investigation. In this randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study, we tested the hypothesis that an ultrasound-guided continuous posterior interscalene block provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to a single-injection ropivacaine interscalene block after moderately painful shoulder surgery. METHODS: Preoperatively, subjects received a stimulating interscalene catheter using an ultrasound-guided, in-plane posterior approach. All subjects received an initial bolus of ropivacaine. Postoperatively, subjects were discharged with oral analgesics and a portable infusion device containing either ropivacaine 0.2% or normal saline programmed to deliver a perineural infusion over 2 days. The primary outcome was average pain on postoperative day (POD) 1 (scale: 0–10). Secondary outcomes included least and worst pain scores, oral opioid requirements, sleep disturbances, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Of the 32 subjects enrolled, 30 perineural catheters were placed per protocol. Continuous ropivacaine perineural infusion (n = 15) produced a statistically and clinically significant reduction in average pain (median [10th–90th percentile]) on POD 1 compared with saline infusion (n = 15) after initial ropivacaine bolus (0.0 [0.0–5.0] versus 3.0 [0.0–6.0], respectively; P < 0.001). Median oral opioid consumption (oxycodone) was lower in the ropivacaine group than in the placebo group on POD 1 (P = 0.002) and POD 2 (P = 0.002). Subjects who received a ropivacaine infusion suffered fewer sleep disturbances than those in the placebo group (P = 0.005 on POD 0 and 1 nights) and rated their satisfaction with analgesia higher than subjects who received normal saline (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a single-injection interscalene block, a 2-day continuous posterior interscalene block provides greater pain relief, minimizes supplemental opioid requirements, greatly improves sleep quality, and increases patient satisfaction after moderate-to-severe painful outpatient shoulder surgery.


Anesthesiology | 2008

Ambulatory Continuous Posterior Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks after Hip Arthroplasty : A Dual-center, Randomized, Triple-masked, Placebo-controlled Trial

Brian M. Ilfeld; Scott T. Ball; Peter F. Gearen; Linda T. Le; Edward R. Mariano; Krista Vandenborne; Pamela W. Duncan; Daniel I. Sessler; F. Kayser Enneking; Jonathan J. Shuster; Douglas W. Theriaque; R. Scott Meyer

Background:The authors tested the hypotheses that after hip arthroplasty, ambulation distance is increased and the time required to reach three specific readiness-for-discharge criteria is shorter with a 4-day ambulatory continuous lumbar plexus block (cLPB) than with an overnight cLPB. Methods:A cLPB consisting of 0.2% ropivacaine was provided from surgery until the following morning. Patients were then randomly assigned either to continue ropivacaine or to be switched to normal saline. Primary endpoints included (1) time to attain three discharge criteria (adequate analgesia, independence from intravenous analgesics, and ambulation ≥ 30 m) and (2) ambulatory distance in 6 min the afternoon after surgery. Patients were discharged with their cLPB and a portable infusion pump, and catheters were removed on the fourth postoperative day. Results:Patients given 4 days of perineural ropivacaine (n = 24) attained all three discharge criteria in a median (25th–75th percentiles) of 29 (24–45) h, compared with 51 (42–73) h for those of the control group (n = 23; estimated ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.92; P = 0.011). Patients assigned to receive ropivacaine ambulated a median of 34 (9–55) m the afternoon after surgery, compared with 20 (6–46) m for those receiving normal saline (estimated ratio = 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–3.0; P = 0.42). Three falls occurred in subjects receiving ropivacaine (13%), versus none in subjects receiving normal saline. Conclusions:Compared with an overnight cLPB, a 4-day ambulatory cLPB decreases the time to reach three predefined discharge criteria by an estimated 38% after hip arthroplasty. However, the extended infusion did not increase ambulation distance to a statistically significant degree.


Anesthesiology | 2011

Continuous Femoral Nerve Blocks: Varying Local Anesthetic Delivery Method (Bolus versus Basal) to Minimize Quadriceps Motor Block while Maintaining Sensory Block

Matthew T. Charous; Sarah J. Madison; Preetham J. Suresh; NavParkash S. Sandhu; Vanessa J. Loland; Edward R. Mariano; Michael Donohue; Pascual H. Dutton; Eliza J. Ferguson; Brian M. Ilfeld

Background: Whether the method of local anesthetic administration for continuous femoral nerve blocks—basal infusion versus repeated hourly bolus doses—influences block effects remains unknown. Methods: Bilateral femoral perineural catheters were inserted in volunteers (n = 11). Ropivacaine 0.1% was concurrently administered through both catheters: a 6-h continuous 5 ml/h basal infusion on one side and 6 hourly bolus doses on the contralateral side. The primary endpoint was the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps femoris muscle at hour 6. Secondary endpoints included quadriceps MVIC at other time points, hip adductor MVIC, and cutaneous sensation 2 cm medial to the distal quadriceps tendon in the 22 h after initiation of local anesthetic administration. Results: Quadriceps MVIC for limbs receiving 0.1% ropivacaine as a basal infusion declined by a mean (SD) of 84% (19) compared with 83% (24) for those receiving 0.1% ropivacaine as repeated bolus doses between baseline and hour 6 (paired t test P = 0.91). Intrasubject comparisons (left vs. right) also reflected a lack of difference: the mean basal-bolus difference in quadriceps MVIC at hour 6 was −1.1% (95% CI −22.0–19.8%). The similarity did not reach the a priori threshold for concluding equivalence, which was the 95% CI decreasing within ± 20%. There were similar minimal differences in the secondary endpoints during local anesthetic administration. Conclusions: This study did not find evidence to support the hypothesis that varying the method of local anesthetic administration—basal infusion versus repeated bolus doses—influences continuous femoral nerve block effects to a clinically significant degree.


Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine | 2009

Electrical stimulation versus ultrasound guidance for popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial.

Edward R. Mariano; Gloria S. Cheng; Lynna P. Choy; Vanessa J. Loland; Richard H. Bellars; NavParkash S. Sandhu; Michael L. Bishop; Daniel K. Lee; Rosalita C. Maldonado; Brian M. Ilfeld

Background: Sciatic perineural catheters via a popliteal fossa approach and subsequent local anesthetic infusion provide potent analgesia and other benefits after foot and ankle surgery. Electrical stimulation (ES) and, more recently, ultrasound (US)-guided placement techniques have been described. However, because these techniques have not been compared in a randomized fashion, the optimal method remains undetermined. Therefore, we tested the hypotheses that popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters placed via US guidance require less time for placement and produce equivalent results, as compared with catheters placed using ES. Methods: Preoperatively, subjects receiving a popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter for foot and/or ankle surgery were randomly assigned to either the ES with a stimulating catheter or US-guided technique with a nonstimulating catheter. The primary end point was catheter insertion duration (in minutes) starting when the US transducer (US group) or catheter-placement needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter-placement needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results: All US-guided catheters were placed per protocol (n = 20), whereas only 80% of stimulation-guided catheters could be placed per protocol (n = 20, P = 0.106). All catheters placed per protocol in both groups resulted in a successful surgical block. Perineural catheters placed by US took a median (10th-90th percentile) of 5.0 min (3.9-11.1 min) compared with 10.0 min (2.0-15.0 min) for stimulation (P = 0.034). Subjects in the US group experienced less pain during catheter placement, scoring discomfort a median of 0 (0.0-2.1) compared with 2.0 (0.0-5.0) for the stimulation group (P = 0.005) on a numeric rating scale of 0 to 10. Conclusions: Placement of popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters takes less time and produces less procedure-related discomfort when using US guidance compared with ES.


Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine | 2007

Hospitalization Costs of Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Provided Only in the Hospital Versus on an Ambulatory Basis: A Retrospective, Case-Control, Cost-Minimization Analysis

Brian M. Ilfeld; Edward R. Mariano; Brian A. Williams; Jennifer N. Woodard; Alex Macario

Background and Objectives: After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), hospitalization may be shortened by allowing patients to return home with a continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB). This study quantified the hospitalization costs for 10 TKA patients receiving ambulatory CFNB versus a matched cohort of 10 patients who received CFNB only during hospitalization. Methods: We examined the medical records (n = 125) of patients who underwent a unilateral, primary, tricompartment TKA with a postoperative CFNB by 1 surgeon at one institution in an 18-month period beginning January 2004. Each of the 10 patients discharged home with an ambulatory CFNB (cases) was matched with a patient with a hospital-only CFNB (controls) for age, gender, body mass index, and health status. Financial data were extracted from the hospital microcosting database. Results: Nine patients with ambulatory CFNB (cases) were discharged home on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 1 on POD 4. Of the controls, 3 were discharged home on POD 3, 6 on POD 4, and 1 on POD 5. The median (range) costs of hospitalization (excluding implant and professional fees) was


Anesthesiology | 2010

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: is local anesthetic dose the only factor, or do concentration and volume influence infusion effects as well?

Brian M. Ilfeld; Lisa K. Moeller; Edward R. Mariano; Vanessa J. Loland; Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley; Adam S. Fleisher; Paul J. Girard; Michael Donohue; Eliza J. Ferguson; Scott T. Ball

5,292 (

Collaboration


Dive into the Edward R. Mariano's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge