Edward R. Nowicki

Should Patients With Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Delay Surgery Until Symptoms Develop

BACKGROUND The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines recommending surgery for asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation caused by degenerative disease remain controversial. This study examined whether delaying surgery until symptoms occur causes adverse cardiac changes and jeopardizes outcome. METHODS From January 1985 to January 2008, 4,586 patients had primary isolated mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation; 4,253 (93%) underwent repair. Preoperatively, 30% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I (asymptomatic), 56% in class II, 13% in class III, and 2% in class IV. Multivariable analysis and propensity matching were used to assess association of symptoms (NYHA class) with cardiac structure and function and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Increasing NYHA class was associated with progressive reduction in left ventricular function, left atrial enlargement, and development of atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. These findings were evident even in class II patients (mild symptoms). Repair was accomplished in 96% of asymptomatic patients, and in progressively fewer as NYHA class increased (93%, 86%, and 85% in classes II to IV, respectively; p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality was 0.37%, but was particularly high in class IV (0.29%, 0.20%, 0.67%, and 5.1% for classes I to IV, respectively; p = 0.004). Although long-term survival progressively diminished with increasing NHYA class, these differences were largely related to differences in left ventricular function and increased comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation, the development of even mild symptoms by the time of surgical referral is associated with deleterious changes in cardiac structure and function. Therefore, particularly because successful repair is highly likely, early surgery is justified in asymptomatic patients with degenerative disease and severe mitral regurgitation.

Mitral valve repair and replacement in northern New England.

BACKGROUND The etiology of mitral valvular disease has changed in the last 20 years, and new techniques for the diagnosis and repair of mitral valves have been advanced. A retrospective regional study was conducted to identify changes in patient and disease characteristics and in population-based rates for mitral valve repair and replacement in northern New England. METHODS Data from 1648 patients were collected from 5 clinical centers in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1999. U.S. Census data were used to calculate population-based rates. RESULTS Total mitral valve procedures increased 2.4 times, from 8.7 to 20.6 cases/100,000/year (p(trend) = 0.004). Primary procedures increased from 6.7 to 16.9 cases/100,000/year (p(trend) = 0.014). Primary mitral valve repair procedures increased 3.7 times, from 2.4 to 8.9 cases/100,000/year (p(trend) = 0.012), whereas mitral valve replacement increased only 1.9 times, from 4.3 to 8.0 cases/100,000/year (p(trend) = 0.016). Repeat mitral valve operations did not change significantly (p(trend) = 0.810). During this period, there was a significant increase of the percentage of octogenarians (p(trend) = 0.016) and of patients with ejection fractions <40% (p(trend) = 0.012). There was a decrease in the percentage of patients with mitral stenosis (p(trend) = 0.024). CONCLUSION In an era of a change in the etiology of mitral valvular disease and new techniques for diagnosis and repair of mitral valvular disease, regional data demonstrate substantial increased rates of mitral repair and replacement and expanded indications of older age and poorer left ventricular function.

Erratum: Endovascular versus open elephant trunk completion for extensive aortic disease (Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2013) 146 (1408-1417))

Re: Idrees J, Roselli EE, Raza S, Krishnaswamy A, Mick S, Kapadia S, et al. Aborted sternotomy due to unexpected porcelain aorta: does transcatheter aortic valve replacement offer an alternative choice? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:131-4. In the above-noted article, the name of Dr Idrees was incorrect. The corrected author list is printed below. Jay J. Idrees, MD, Eric E. Roselli, MD, Sajjad Raza, MD, Amar Krishnaswamy, MD, Stephanie Mick, MD, Samir Kapadia, MD, Gosta B. Pettersson, MD, PhD, Murat Tuzcu, MD, and Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD