Eimear Nic Lughadha
Royal Botanic Gardens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Eimear Nic Lughadha.
BioScience | 2012
José Fernando A. Baumgratz; Carlos Eduardo de Mattos Bicudo; Dora A. L. Canhos; A. Carvalho; Marcus A. Nadruz Coelho; Andrea Ferreira da Costa; Denise Pinheiro da Costa; Mike Hopkins; Paula Leitman; Lúcia G. Lohmann; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Leonor Costa Maia; Gustavo Martinelli; Mariângela Menezes; Marli Pires Morim; Ariane Luna Peixoto; José Rubens Pirani; Jefferson Prado; Luciano Paganucci de Queiroz; Sidnei de Souza; Vinicius Castro Souza; João Renato Stehmann; Lana da Silva Sylvestre; Bruno M. T. Walter; Daniela C. Zappi
A comprehensive new inventory of Brazilian plants and fungi was published just in time to meet a 2010 Convention on Biological Diversity target and offers important insights into this biodiversitys global significance. Brazil is the home to the worlds richest flora (40,989 species; 18,932 endemic) and includes two of the hottest hotspots: Mata Atlântica (19,355 species) and Cerrado (12,669 species). Although the total number of known species is one-third lower than previous estimates, the absolute number of endemic vascular plant species is higher than was previously estimated, and the proportion of endemism (56%) is the highest in the Neotropics. This compilation serves not merely to quantify the scale of the challenge faced in conserving Brazils unique flora but also serves as a key resource to direct action and monitor progress. Similar efforts by other megadiverse countries are urgently required if the 2020 targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation are to be attained.
Conservation Biology | 2009
Charlotte Murray-Smith; Neil Brummitt; Ary Teixeira de Oliveira-Filho; Steven P. Bachman; Justin Moat; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Eve Lucas
Plant-diversity hotspots on a global scale are well established, but smaller local hotspots within these must be identified for effective conservation of plants at the global and local scales. We used the distributions of endemic and endemic-threatened species of Myrtaceae to indicate areas of plant diversity and conservation importance within the Atlantic coastal forests (Mata Atlântica) of Brazil. We applied 3 simple, inexpensive geographic information system (GIS) techniques to a herbarium specimen database: predictive species-distribution modeling (Maxent); complementarity analysis (DIVA-GIS); and mapping of herbarium specimen collection locations. We also considered collecting intensity, which is an inherent limitation of use of natural history records for biodiversity studies. Two separate areas of endemism were evident: the Serra do Mar mountain range from Paraná to Rio de Janeiro and the coastal forests of northern Espírito Santo and southern Bahia. We identified 12 areas of approximately 35 km(2) each as priority areas for conservation. These areas had the highest species richness and were highly threatened by urban and agricultural expansion. Observed species occurrences, species occurrences predicted from the model, and results of our complementarity analysis were congruent in identifying those areas with the most endemic species. These areas were then prioritized for conservation importance by comparing ecological data for each.
Taxon | 2007
Eve Lucas; Stephen A. Harris; Fiorella Fernanda Mazine; Stephen R. Belsham; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Annika Telford; Peter Gasson; Mark W. Chase
To clarify relationships within the predominantly Neotropical and exclusively fleshy-fruited Myrteae (49 genera and c. 2,500 species), we provide a phylogenetic hypothesis for evolutionary relationships between 31 of these genera by analyzing nuclear ITS and ETS ribosomal DNA, and plastid psbA-trnH and matK DNA sequences from 75 Myrteae species and 13 outgroup taxa using parsimony and Bayesian inference. Four morphological characters are epitomized on the resulting trees, and biogeographical analyses are also performed. Myrteae are monophyletic, comprising seven clades plus two isolated taxa of unclear relationships. Morphological characters exhibit homoplasy, although in combination are useful for clade diagnosis. Biogeographical analyses are inconclusive regarding the ancestral area of the tribe, but South American colonization before northern radiation via the Andes appears likely. The largest genera, Eugenia and Myrcia s.1., have western and south-eastern South American origins, respectively.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Neil Brummitt; Steven P. Bachman; Janine Griffiths-Lee; Maiko Lutz; Justin Moat; Aljos Farjon; John S. Donaldson; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Thomas R. Meagher; Sara Albuquerque; Elina Aletrari; A. Kei Andrews; Guy Atchison; Elisabeth Baloch; Barbara Barlozzini; Alice Brunazzi; Julia Carretero; Marco Celesti; Helen Chadburn; Eduardo Cianfoni; Chris Cockel; Vanessa Coldwell; Benedetta Concetti; Sara Contu; Vicki Crook; Philippa Dyson; Lauren M. Gardiner; Nadia Ghanim; Hannah Greene; Alice Groom
Plants provide fundamental support systems for life on Earth and are the basis for all terrestrial ecosystems; a decline in plant diversity will be detrimental to all other groups of organisms including humans. Decline in plant diversity has been hard to quantify, due to the huge numbers of known and yet to be discovered species and the lack of an adequate baseline assessment of extinction risk against which to track changes. The biodiversity of many remote parts of the world remains poorly known, and the rate of new assessments of extinction risk for individual plant species approximates the rate at which new plant species are described. Thus the question ‘How threatened are plants?’ is still very difficult to answer accurately. While completing assessments for each species of plant remains a distant prospect, by assessing a randomly selected sample of species the Sampled Red List Index for Plants gives, for the first time, an accurate view of how threatened plants are across the world. It represents the first key phase of ongoing efforts to monitor the status of the world’s plants. More than 20% of plant species assessed are threatened with extinction, and the habitat with the most threatened species is overwhelmingly tropical rain forest, where the greatest threat to plants is anthropogenic habitat conversion, for arable and livestock agriculture, and harvesting of natural resources. Gymnosperms (e.g. conifers and cycads) are the most threatened group, while a third of plant species included in this study have yet to receive an assessment or are so poorly known that we cannot yet ascertain whether they are threatened or not. This study provides a baseline assessment from which trends in the status of plant biodiversity can be measured and periodically reassessed.
International Journal of Plant Sciences | 2011
Eve Lucas; Kazue Matsumoto; Stephen A. Harris; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Benedetta Benardini; Mark W. Chase
Phylogenetic relationships of Myrcia s.l., the most species-rich tree genus in the Brazilian cerrado and Atlantic forests, are reconstructed by analysis, with parsimony and Bayesian inference, of four plastid regions (psbA-trnH intergenic spacer, trnL intron, trnL-F intergenic spacer, and matK exon) and the external and internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. The resulting phylogenetic hypothesis is evaluated in conjunction with key morphological characters and abiotic factors suggested to have influenced the group’s current distribution. Some lineages identified by previous classifications are supported; others with morphological and/or ecological correspondence are recognized for the first time. Sequence divergence levels provide good resolution of relationships within but not between the main clades of Myrcia s.l. The previously recognized genera Calyptranthes and Gomidesia are shown to be monophyletic, whereas Marlierea is shown not to be; all are nested within paraphyletic Myrcia. A new subgeneric classification is required. An interpretation of the origins of Myrcia s.l. and potential causes of speciation in the group is made on the basis of recently published data and accepted geological events.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Diego Juffe-Bignoli; Thomas M. Brooks; Stuart H. M. Butchart; R. K. B. Jenkins; Kaia Boe; Michael R. Hoffmann; Ariadne Angulo; Steve P. Bachman; Monika Böhm; Neil Brummitt; Kent E. Carpenter; Pat J. Comer; Neil A. Cox; Annabelle Cuttelod; William Darwall; Moreno Di Marco; Lincoln D. C. Fishpool; Bárbara Goettsch; Melanie Heath; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Jon Hutton; Tim Johnson; Ackbar Joolia; David A. Keith; Penny F. Langhammer; Jennifer Luedtke; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Maiko Lutz; Ian May; Rebecca M. Miller
Knowledge products comprise assessments of authoritative information supported by standards, governance, quality control, data, tools, and capacity building mechanisms. Considerable resources are dedicated to developing and maintaining knowledge products for biodiversity conservation, and they are widely used to inform policy and advise decision makers and practitioners. However, the financial cost of delivering this information is largely undocumented. We evaluated the costs and funding sources for developing and maintaining four global biodiversity and conservation knowledge products: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems, Protected Planet, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. These are secondary data sets, built on primary data collected by extensive networks of expert contributors worldwide. We estimate that US
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2010
Malin C. Rivers; Steven P. Bachman; Thomas R. Meagher; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Neil Brummitt
160 million (range: US
Conservation Biology | 2011
Kate Hardwick; Peggy L. Fiedler; Lyndon C. Lee; Bruce M. Pavlik; Richard J. Hobbs; James Aronson; Martin I. Bidartondo; Eric Black; David J. Coates; Matthew I. Daws; Kingsley W. Dixon; Stephen Elliott; Kern Ewing; George Gann; David W. Gibbons; Joachim Gratzfeld; Martin Hamilton; David Hardman; Jim Harris; Pat M. Holmes; Meirion Jones; David J. Mabberley; Andrew Mackenzie; Carlos Magdalena; R.H. Marrs; William Milliken; Anthony J. Mills; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Margaret M. Ramsay; Paul Smith
116–204 million), plus 293 person-years of volunteer time (range: 278–308 person-years) valued at US
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2015
Neil Brummitt; Steven P. Bachman; Elina Aletrari; Helen Chadburn; Janine Griffiths-Lee; Maiko Lutz; Justin Moat; Malin C. Rivers; Mindy M. Syfert; Eimear Nic Lughadha
14 million (range US
PLOS ONE | 2015
Marcelo Freire Moro; Igor Aurélio Silva; Francisca Soares de Araújo; Eimear Nic Lughadha; Thomas R. Meagher; Fernando Roberto Martins
12–16 million), were invested in these four knowledge products between 1979 and 2013. More than half of this financing was provided through philanthropy, and nearly three-quarters was spent on personnel costs. The estimated annual cost of maintaining data and platforms for three of these knowledge products (excluding the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems for which annual costs were not possible to estimate for 2013) is US
Collaboration
Dive into the Eimear Nic Lughadha's collaboration.
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
View shared research outputs