Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elena Arrigoni is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elena Arrigoni.


Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology | 2016

ATP-binding cassette transmembrane transporters and their epigenetic control in cancer: an overview

Elena Arrigoni; Sara Galimberti; Mario Petrini; Romano Danesi; Antonello Di Paolo

ABSTRACT Introduction: Members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transmembrane transporters control the passage of several substrates across cell membranes, including drugs. This means that ABC transporters may exert a significant influence on the kinetics and dynamics of pharmacological agents, being responsible for the occurrence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype. Pharmacogenetic analyses have shed light on gene expression and polymorphisms as possible markers predictive of transporter activity. However, a non-negligible part of the variability in drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics still remains. Further research has demonstrated that different epigenetic mechanisms exert a coordinated control over ABC genes, and on the corresponding MDR phenotype. Areas covered: DNA methylation and histone modifications (namely acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, etc.) significantly impact gene expression, as well as noncoding RNA molecules that are involved in the post-transcriptional control of the ABC transporters ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCG2. We describe the epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression control for ABC transporters and their relevant association with the MDR phenotype in human cancer. Expert opinion: The clinical meaning of those observations is discussed in the review, highlighting the importance of the epigenetic control of the ABC transporters for the clinical therapeutic outcomes that despite their effects and applications, requires further investigation.


International Journal of Molecular Sciences | 2017

Pharmacogenetic Foundations of Therapeutic Efficacy and Adverse Events of Statins

Elena Arrigoni; Marzia Del Re; Leonardo Fidilio; Stefano Fogli; Romano Danesi; Antonello Di Paolo

Background: In the era of precision medicine, more attention is paid to the search for predictive markers of treatment efficacy and tolerability. Statins are one of the classes of drugs that could benefit from this approach because of their wide use and their incidence of adverse events. Methods: Literature from PubMed databases and bibliography from retrieved publications have been analyzed according to terms such as statins, pharmacogenetics, epigenetics, toxicity and drug–drug interaction, among others. The search was performed until 1 October 2016 for articles published in English language. Results: Several technical and methodological approaches have been adopted, including candidate gene and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses, the latter being more robust and reliable. Among genes identified as possible predictive factors associated with statins toxicity, cytochrome P450 isoforms, transmembrane transporters and mitochondrial enzymes are the best characterized. Finally, the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) transporter seems to be the best target for future studies. Moreover, drug–drug interactions need to be considered for the best approach to personalized treatment. Conclusions: Pharmacogenetics of statins includes several possible genes and their polymorphisms, but muscular toxicities seem better related to SLCO1B1 variant alleles. Their analysis in the general population of patients taking statins could improve treatment adherence and efficacy; however, the cost–efficacy ratio should be carefully evaluated.


Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 2017

Association of the hOCT1/ABCB1 genotype with efficacy and tolerability of imatinib in patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia

Laura Galeotti; F. Ceccherini; Dario Domingo; Marco Laurino; Marialuisa Polillo; Antonello Di Paolo; Claudia Baratè; Carmen Fava; Antonio D’Avolio; Giulia Cervetti; Francesca Guerrini; Giulia Fontanelli; Elena Ciabatti; Susanna Grassi; Elena Arrigoni; Romano Danesi; Mario Petrini; Fulvio Cornolti; Giuseppe Saglio; Sara Galimberti

PurposeThe present study was aimed at investigating whether imatinib pharmacogenetics is related to its pharmacodynamics in patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia.MethodsThrough a procedure based on a sequence of classical statistics methods, we investigated the possible relationships between treatment efficacy/tolerability and combinations of time-independent variables as gender and genetic covariates in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or combinations thereof. Moreover, since the drug tolerability has a strong incidence on the discontinuation of the therapy, we investigated whether the time of manifestation of the most frequent toxic effects can be related to time-independent patients’ characteristics or not.ResultsWe found that a combination of two polymorphisms, namely hOCT1 c.480C>G (rs683369) and ABCB1 c.3435C>T (rs1045642), seems to play the role of predictor for imatinib in both efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, the time of manifestation of edema toxicity is found to be associated to a combination of gender and ABCB1 c.3435C>T, whereas the time of manifestation of cramp toxicity appears related to gender.ConclusionsThe novelty of this study is dual: the achievement of results that potentially have a significant clinical interest and the demonstration that the adoption of composed covariates may represent a unique tool to study different aspects of the treatment with imatinib.


Frontiers in Pharmacology | 2017

Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Pharmacological Basis of the Alternative 2/1 Schedule

Antonello Di Paolo; Sergio Bracarda; Elena Arrigoni; Romano Danesi

Sunitinib is an inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factors receptor (PDGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) tyrosine-kinase activities, and it is registered for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Indeed, sunitinib 50mg/day for 28 days every 6 weeks is effective against mRCC and induces significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) with respect to interferon-α and interleukin-2, even in cytokine-resistant tumors (Motzer et al., 2006a,b; Motzer et al., 2007). Moreover, in some patients (30–50%) sunitinib efficacy is counterbalanced by toxicities (Najjar et al., 2014), which are mainly represented by thrombocytopenia (10%), fatigue (9%), asthenia, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome (each 7%) (Gore et al., 2015). Toxic effects usually worse between weeks 3 and 4 of therapy, requiring treatment interruption in approximately one-third of patients (van der Veldt et al., 2008; Najjar et al., 2014). The most severe toxicities are associated with low body surface area, older age, and female gender (van der Veldt et al., 2008). Intriguingly, those three factors could be potentially related to increased sunitinib exposure, because the drug is administered as a fixed dose without any adjustment. Indeed, the apparent drug clearance was slightly reduced (approximately 8%) in women with respect to men, while the body weight influenced the apparent volume of distribution (Houk et al., 2009). Those results could be the basis for patients’ stratification, but the individualization of the dose appeared to be difficult because those variables were clinically evident only in combination (i.e., a thin woman) and the inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was about 40–60% (Houk et al., 2009). The third obstacle to dose individualization is represented by the non-linear pharmacokinetics of sunitinib, “making dose-response modeling challenging” (Houk et al., 2010). Therefore, the occurrence of moderate-to-severe toxicities seems related to changes/alterations in drug pharmacokinetics in particular subgroups of patients, but dose individualization seems still difficult. In the very recent past, several studies have described a modified schedule for the administration of sunitinib, 50mg/day for 14 days every 3 weeks (2/1 schedule) instead of the standard 4/2 schedule (4 weeks on treatment and 2 weeks of rest). The new schedule has the same dose intensity with respect the classical one, but tolerability has significantly increased (Bracarda et al., 2015). Those evidence and hypothesis find solid pharmacological bases.


Oncotarget | 2017

The hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms do not influence the pharmacodynamics of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Sara Galimberti; Cristina Bucelli; Elena Arrigoni; Claudia Baratã; Susanna Grassi; Federica Ricci; Francesca Guerrini; Elena Ciabatti; Carmen Fava; Antonio D'Avolio; Giulia Fontanelli; Giovanna Rege Cambrin; Alessandro Isidori; Federica Loscocco; Giovanni Caocci; Marianna Greco; Monica Bocchia; Lara Aprile; Antonella Gozzini; Barbara Scappini; Daniele Cattaneo; Anna Rita Scortechini; Giorgio La Nasa; Alberto Bosi; Pietro Leoni; Romano Danesi; Giuseppe Saglio; Giuseppe Visani; Agostino Cortelezzi; Mario Petrini

First-line nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia is more effective than imatinib to achieve early and deep molecular responses, despite poor tolerability or failure observed in one-third of patients. The toxicity and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors might depend on the activity of transmembrane transporters. However, the impact of transporters genes polymorphisms in nilotinib setting is still debated. We investigated the possible correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms of hOCT1 (rs683369 [c.480C>G]) and ABCB1 (rs1128503 [c.1236C>T], rs2032582 [c.2677G>T/A], rs1045642 [c.3435C>T]) and nilotinib efficacy and toxicity in a cohort of 78 patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia in the context of current clinical practice. The early molecular response was achieved by 81% of patients while 64% of them attained deep molecular response (median time, 26 months). The 36-month event-free survival was 86%, whereas 58% of patients experienced toxicities. Interestingly, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms alone or in combination did not influence event-free survival or the adverse events rate. Therefore, in contrast to data obtained in patients treated with imatinib, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms do not impact on nilotinib efficacy or toxicity. This could be relevant in the choice of the first-line therapy: patients with polymorphisms that negatively condition imatinib efficacy might thus receive nilotinib as first-line therapy.


Stem Cells Translational Medicine | 2018

Concise Review: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Stem Cell Niche and Response to Pharmacologic Treatment

Elena Arrigoni; Marzia Del Re; Sara Galimberti; Giuliana Restante; Eleonora Rofi; Stefania Crucitta; Claudia Baratè; Mario Petrini; Romano Danesi; Antonello Di Paolo

Nowadays, more than 90% of patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) survive with a good quality of life, thanks to the clinical efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Nevertheless, point mutations of the ABL1 pocket occurring during treatment may reduce binding of TKIs, being responsible of about 20% of cases of resistance among CML patients. In addition, the presence of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) represents the most important event in leukemia progression related to TKI resistance. LSCs express stem cell markers, including active efflux pumps and genetic and epigenetic alterations together with deregulated cell signaling pathways involved in self‐renewal, such as Wnt/β‐catenin, Notch, and Hedgehog. Moreover, the interaction with the bone marrow microenvironment, also known as hematopoietic niche, may influence the phenotype of surrounding cells, which evade mechanisms controlling cell proliferation and are less sensitive or frankly resistant to TKIs. This Review focuses on the role of LSCs and stem cell niche in relation to response to pharmacological treatments. A literature search from PubMed database was performed until April 30, 2017, and it has been analyzed according to keywords such as chronic myeloid leukemia, stem cell, leukemic stem cells, hematopoietic niche, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and drug resistance. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:305–314


Drugs | 2018

Generic Substitution of Orphan Drugs for the Treatment of Rare Diseases: Exploring the Potential Challenges

Antonello Di Paolo; Elena Arrigoni

Generic drugs are important components of measures introduced by healthcare regulatory authorities to reduce treatment costs. In most patients and conditions the switch from a branded drug to its generic counterpart is performed with no major complications. However, evidence from complex diseases suggests that generic substitution requires careful evaluation in some settings and that current bioequivalence criteria may not always be adequate for establishing the interchangeability of branded and generic products. Rare diseases, also called orphan diseases, are a group of heterogeneous diseases that share important characteristics: in addition to their scarcity, most are severe, chronic, highly debilitating, and often present in early childhood. Finding a treatment for a rare disease is challenging. Thanks to incentives that encourage research and development programs in rare diseases, several orphan drugs are currently available. The elevated cost of orphan drugs is a highly debated issue and a cause of limited access to treatment for many patients. As patent protection and the exclusivity period of several orphan drugs will expire soon, generic versions of orphan drugs should reach the market shortly, with great expectations about their impact on the economic burden of rare diseases. However, consistent with other complex diseases, generic substitution may require thoughtful considerations and may be even contraindicated in some rare conditions. This article provides an overview of rare disease characteristics, reviews reports of problematic generic substitution, and discusses why generic substitution of orphan drugs may be challenging and should be undertaken carefully in rare disease patients.


Stem Cells | 2018

Concise Review: Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Role of Cancer Stem Cells

Marzia Del Re; Elena Arrigoni; Giuliana Restante; Antonio Passaro; Eleonora Rofi; Stefania Crucitta; Filippo De Marinis; Antonello Di Paolo; Romano Danesi

Among the potential mechanisms involved in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non‐small cell lung cancer, the manifestation of stem‐like properties in cancer cells seems to have a crucial role. Alterations involved in the development of TKI resistance may be acquired in a very early phase of tumorigenesis, supporting the hypothesis that these aberrations may be present in cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this regard, the characterization of tumor subclones in the initial phase and the identification of the CSCs may be helpful in planning a specific treatment to target selected biomarkers, suppress tumor growth, and prevent drug resistance. The aim of this review is to elucidate the role of CSCs in the development of resistance to TKIs and its implication for the management of patients. Stem Cells 2018;36:633–640


Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology | 2018

Pharmacogenetics of androgen signaling in prostate cancer: Focus on castration resistance and predictive biomarkers of response to treatment

Marzia Del Re; Stefania Crucitta; Giuliana Restante; Eleonora Rofi; Elena Arrigoni; Elisa Biasco; Andrea Sbrana; Erika Coppi; Luca Galli; Sergio Bracarda; Daniele Santini; Romano Danesi

Tumor heterogeneity strongly affects the molecular mechanisms driving resistance to hormonal therapies in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Since the current use of available treatments can be optimized on the basis of the molecular profile of tumor, the present review focuses on genetic biomarkers in prostate cancer and their application to a personalized treatment.


British Journal of Cancer | 2018

PD-L1 mRNA expression in plasma-derived exosomes is associated with response to anti-PD-1 antibodies in melanoma and NSCLC.

Marzia Del Re; Riccardo Marconcini; Giulia Pasquini; Eleonora Rofi; Caterina Vivaldi; Francesco Bloise; Giuliana Restante; Elena Arrigoni; Chiara Caparello; Maria Grazia Bianco; Stefania Crucitta; Iacopo Petrini; Enrico Vasile; Alfredo Falcone; Romano Danesi

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.85

Collaboration


Dive into the Elena Arrigoni's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge