Elena B. Kabotyanski

Differential effects of prolactin and src/abl kinases on the nuclear translocation of STAT5B and STAT5A.

In this study, DNA binding and tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5A and STAT5B were compared with their subcellular localization determined using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Following prolactin activation, both STAT5A and STAT5B were rapidly translocated into the nucleus and displayed a detergent-resistant, punctate nuclear staining pattern. Similar to prolactin induction, src activation resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA binding of both STAT5A and STAT5B. However, nuclear translocation of only STAT5B but not STAT5A was observed. This selective nuclear translocation appears to be mediated via the carboxyl-terminal sequences in STAT5B. Furthermore, overexpression of a dominant negative kinase-inactive mutant of JAK2 prevented prolactin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT5A and STAT5B but did not block src kinase activation and nuclear translocation of STAT5B. In co-transfection assays, prolactin-mediated activation but not src kinase-mediated activation of STAT5B resulted in the induction of a β-casein promoter-driven reporter construct. These results suggest that STAT5 activation by src may occur by a mechanism distinct from that employed in cytokine activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, resulting in the selective nuclear translocation of STAT5B.

The Epigenetic Landscape of Mammary Gland Development and Functional Differentiation

Most of the development and functional differentiation in the mammary gland occur after birth. Epigenetics is defined as the stable alterations in gene expression potential that arise during development and proliferation. Epigenetic changes are mediated at the biochemical level by the chromatin conformation initiated by DNA methylation, histone variants, post-translational modifications of histones, non-histone chromatin proteins, and non-coding RNAs. Epigenetics plays a key role in development. However, very little is known about its role in the developing mammary gland or how it might integrate the many signalling pathways involved in mammary gland development and function that have been discovered during the past few decades. An inverse relationship between marks of closed (DNA methylation) or open chromatin (DnaseI hypersensitivity, certain histone modifications) and milk protein gene expression has been documented. Recent studies have shown that during development and functional differentiation, both global and local chromatin changes occur. Locally, chromatin at distal regulatory elements and promoters of milk protein genes gains a more open conformation. Furthermore, changes occur both in looping between regulatory elements and attachment to nuclear matrix. These changes are induced by developmental signals and environmental conditions. Additionally, distinct epigenetic patterns have been identified in mammary gland stem and progenitor cell sub-populations. Together, these findings suggest that epigenetics plays a role in mammary development and function. With the new tools for epigenomics developed in recent years, we now can begin to establish a framework for the role of epigenetics in mammary gland development and disease.

Lactogenic Hormonal Induction of Long Distance Interactions between β-Casein Gene Regulatory Elements

Lactogenic hormone regulation of β-casein gene expression in mammary epithelial cells provides an excellent model in which to study the mechanisms by which steroid and peptide hormone signaling control gene expression. Prolactin- and glucocorticoid-mediated induction of β-casein gene expression involves two principal regulatory regions, a proximal promoter and a distal enhancer located in the mouse approximately −6 kb upstream of the transcription start site. Using a chromosome conformation capture assay and quantitative real time PCR, we demonstrate that a chromatin loop is created in conjunction with the recruitment of specific transcription factors and p300 in HC11 mammary epithelial cells. Stimulation with both prolactin and hydrocortisone is required for the induction of these long range interactions between the promoter and enhancer, and no DNA looping was observed in nontreated cells or cells treated with each of the hormones separately. The lactogenic hormone-induced interaction between the proximal promoter and distal enhancer was confirmed in hormone-treated primary three-dimensional mammary acini cultures. In addition, the developmental regulation of DNA looping between the β-casein regulatory regions was observed in lactating but not in virgin mouse mammary glands. Furthermore, β-casein mRNA induction and long range interactions between these regulatory regions were inhibited in a progestin-dependent manner following stimulation with prolactin and hydrocortisone in HC11 cells expressing human PR-B. Collectively, these data suggest that the communication between these regulatory regions with intervening DNA looping is a crucial step required to both create and maintain active chromatin domains and regulate transcription.

Pregnancy-induced noncoding RNA (PINC) associates with polycomb repressive complex 2 and regulates mammary epithelial differentiation.

Pregnancy-induced noncoding RNA (PINC) and retinoblastoma-associated protein 46 (RbAp46) are upregulated in alveolar cells of the mammary gland during pregnancy and persist in alveolar cells that remain in the regressed lobules following involution. The cells that survive involution are thought to function as alveolar progenitor cells that rapidly differentiate into milk-producing cells in subsequent pregnancies, but it is unknown whether PINC and RbAp46 are involved in maintaining this progenitor population. Here, we show that, in the post-pubertal mouse mammary gland, mPINC is enriched in luminal and alveolar progenitors. mPINC levels increase throughout pregnancy and then decline in early lactation, when alveolar cells undergo terminal differentiation. Accordingly, mPINC expression is significantly decreased when HC11 mammary epithelial cells are induced to differentiate and produce milk proteins. This reduction in mPINC levels may be necessary for lactation, as overexpression of mPINC in HC11 cells blocks lactogenic differentiation, while knockdown of mPINC enhances differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate that mPINC interacts with RbAp46, as well as other members of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), and identify potential targets of mPINC that are differentially expressed following modulation of mPINC expression levels. Taken together, our data suggest that mPINC inhibits terminal differentiation of alveolar cells during pregnancy to prevent abundant milk production and secretion until parturition. Additionally, a PRC2 complex that includes mPINC and RbAp46 may confer epigenetic modifications that maintain a population of mammary epithelial cells committed to the alveolar fate in the involuted gland.

Progesterone Receptor Directly Inhibits β-Casein Gene Transcription in Mammary Epithelial Cells Through Promoting Promoter and Enhancer Repressive Chromatin Modifications

Differentiated HC-11 cells ectopically expressing progesterone receptor (PR) were used to explore the molecular mechanisms by which progesterone suppresses β-casein gene transcription induced by prolactin (PRL) and glucocorticoids in the mammary gland. As detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, treatment of cells with the progestin agonist R5020 induced a rapid recruitment (5 min) of PR to the proximal promoter (-235 bp) and distal enhancer (-6 kb upstream of transcription start site) of β-casein. PR remained bound for 4 h and was dissociated by 24 h after treatment. Despite efficient binding, the hormone agonist-occupied PR did not stimulate transcription of the β-casein gene. Recruitment of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a, glucocorticoid receptor, and the CCAAT enhancer binding protein β to the enhancer and proximal promoter of β-casein induced by PRL and glucocorticoids was blocked by progestin cotreatment, whereas PR binding was induced under these conditions. PRL/glucocorticoid-induced histone acetylation and the recruitment of the coactivator p300 and RNA polymerase II required for gene activation were also inhibited by progestin. In addition, progestin prevented dissociation of the corepressors Yin and Yang 1 and histone deacetylase 3 from the promoter, and demethylation of lysine 9 of histone 3 induced by PRL and glucocorticoids. These studies are consistent with the conclusion that progesterone interferes with PRL/glucocorticoid induction of β-casein transcription by a physical interaction of PR with the promoter and enhancer that blocks assembly of a transcriptional activation complex and dissociation of corepressors and promotes repressive chromatin modifications. These studies define a novel mechanism of steroid receptor-mediated transcriptional repression of a physiologically important gene in mammary gland development and differentiation.

Plk2 regulates mitotic spindle orientation and mammary gland development

Disruptions in polarity and mitotic spindle orientation contribute to the progression and evolution of tumorigenesis. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating these processes in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that Polo-like kinase 2 (Plk2) regulates mitotic spindle orientation in the mammary gland and that this might account for its suggested role as a tumor suppressor. Plk2 is highly expressed in the mammary gland and is required for proper mammary gland development. Loss of Plk2 leads to increased mammary epithelial cell proliferation and ductal hyperbranching. Additionally, a novel role for Plk2 in regulating the orientation of the mitotic spindle and maintaining proper cell polarity in the ductal epithelium was discovered. In support of a tumor suppressor function for Plk2, loss of Plk2 increased the formation of lesions in multiparous glands. Collectively, these results demonstrate a novel role for Plk2 in regulating mammary gland development.

The chromatin landscape of the casein gene locus

Abstract For several decades, the regulation of casein gene expression by the lactogenic hormones, prolactin and glucocorticoids, has provided an excellent model system in which to study how steroid and peptide hormones regulate gene expression. Early studies of casein gene regulation defined conserved sequence elements in the 5′ flanking region of these genes, including one of which was identified as a γ-interferon activation sequence (GAS). Although this site was thought to interact with a mammary gland-specific factor, purification and cloning of this factor by Bernd Groner and his colleagues revealed it was instead a new member of the signal transducers and activators of transcription family, Stat5, which was expressed in many tissues. The exquisite tissue-specific expression of the casein genes was subsequently shown to depend not on a single transcription factor but on composite response elements that interacted with a number of ubiquitous transcription factors in response to the combinatorial effects of peptide and steroid hormone signaling. More recent studies have defined cooperative effects of prolactin and glucocorticoids as well as antagonistic effects of progesterone on the chromatin structure of both the casein gene proximal promoter region as well as a distal enhancer. Local chromatin modifications as well as long-range interactions facilitated by DNA looping are required for the hormonal regulation of β-casein gene expression. The casein genes are part of a large gene cluster, and the chromatin landscape of the entire cluster is regulated in a tissue-specific and developmental manner. Finally, newly discovered large non coding RNAs, such as the pregnancy-induced non coding RNA (PINC) may play an important role in the epigenetic regulation of mammary gland differentiation.

Abstract A05: The tumor suppressor function of Plk2 in triple-negative breast cancer may be mediated through regulation of Plk1

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are highly aggressive, associated with poor prognosis and lack targeted therapies. Current breast cancer therapies target the estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor (HER2) receptors, which are absent in TNBCs. Developing new treatment strategies for TNBCs requires a better understanding of the signaling networks regulating TNBCs. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a putative oncogene in TNBC. Plk1 is frequently overexpressed and promotes mitotic cell division, making it an attractive target for cancer therapy. Several inhibitors of Plk1 exist, one of which has accelerated to phase III clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia. However, these drugs also inhibit Plk2, another polo-like kinase family member. The impact that the presence of Plk2 has on the effectiveness of Plk1 inhibitors as a cancer therapy is unknown. We reported recently that a loss of Plk2 in the developing mammary gland results in increased proliferation, hyperbranching, misoriented mitotic spindle assembly and defects in polarity (Villegas et al Development 2015). Loss of Plk2 was accompanied by increased expression of Plk1. Genetic rescue experiments, knocking down Plk1 in Plk2 null mouse mammary epithelium, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays, using wildtype Plk2 and a kinase dead mutant (KD) of Plk2 as bait, revealed that Plk2 regulates these processes through its direct interaction with Plk1. Our preliminary data suggest that loss of Plk2 results in increased Plk1 protein but not RNA expression. We propose that Plk2 functions as a tumor suppressor by decreasing Plk1 stability in TNBCs. Loss of Plk2, therefore, may sensitize tumors to treatment with Plk1 inhibitors if these tumors display Plk1 oncogene addiction. We hypothesize that Plk2, through targeted degradation of Plk1, inhibits tumorigenesis in TNBC. We observed that loss of Plk2 alone is not sufficient to generate mouse mammary tumors, however more lesions form after multiple pregnancies in Plk2 null glands than wildtype. To examine the tumor suppressor function of Plk2 through its regulation of Plk1 in TNBC, we are generating preclinical mouse mammary tumor models integrating the germline loss of Plk2 with p53 loss or c-Myc overexpression frequently observed in TNBC. Finally, to investigate the clinical relevance of Plk2 in TNBC, we will use available tissue microarrays of TNBC patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models to identify those that exhibit loss of Plk2. We will treat the identified PDX models with Plk1 inhibitors to confirm that Plk2 loss promotes Plk1 in human TNBC samples. With these studies, we expect to find that Plk2 is involved in the targeted degradation of Plk1 in TNBC, sensitizing this aggressive breast cancer subtype to treatment with Plk1 inhibitors. The results of these studies should help validate whether Plk2 is a new biomarker for determining which patients will benefit from Plk1 targeted TNBC treatment. Supported by Susan G. Komen Foundation grant SAC110031. Citation Format: Deanna Acosta, Elizabeth Villegas, Elena Kabotyanski, Celina Montemayor, Sarah J. Kurley, Rocio Dominguez-Vidana, Chad A. Shaw, Thomas F. Westbrook, Jeffrey M. Rosen. The tumor suppressor function of Plk2 in triple-negative breast cancer may be mediated through regulation of Plk1. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research; Oct 17-20, 2015; Bellevue, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2016;14(2_Suppl):Abstract nr A05.