Elisabeth Flum
University Hospital Heidelberg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elisabeth Flum.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | 2014
Martina Kamradt; Kayvan Bozorgmehr; Johannes Krisam; Tobias Freund; Marion Kiel; Markus Qreini; Elisabeth Flum; Sarah Berger; Werner Besier; Joachim Szecsenyi; Dominik Ose
BackgroundOne of the most widely used self-reporting tools assessing diabetes self-management in English is the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure. To date there is no psychometric validated instrument in German to assess self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, this study aimed to translate the SDSCA into German and examine its psychometric properties.MethodsThe English version of the SDSCA was translated into German following the guidelines for cultural adaptation. The German version of the SDSCA (SDSCA-G) was administered to a random sample of 315 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and item characteristics were assessed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were carried out to explore the construct validity. A multivariable linear regression model was used to identify the influence of predictor variables on the SDSCA-G sum score.ResultsThe Cronbach’s alpha for the SDSCA-G (all items) was αu2009=u20090.618 and an acceptable correlation between the SDSCA-G and Self-management Diabetes Mellitus-Questionnaire (SDQ) (ρu2009=u20090.664) was identified. The EFA suggested a four factor construct as did the postulated model. The CFA showed the goodness of fit of the SDSCA-G. However, item 4 was found to be problematic regarding the analysis of psychometric properties. The omission of item 4 yielded an increase in Cronbach’s alpha (αu2009=u20090.631) and improvements of the factor structure and model fit. No statistically significant influences of predictor variables on the SDSCA-G sum score were observed.ConclusionThe revised German version of the SDSCA (SDSCA-G) is a reliable and valid tool assessing self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Elisabeth Flum; Sarah Berger; Joachim Szecsenyi; Sabine Marquard; Jost Steinhaeuser
Introduction For the effective and safe management of complex care needs for patients in community settings, high quality family medicine (FM) training programmes are needed. In less primary care oriented countries, training standards statements for FM postgraduate training are less commonly found. The aim of this study was to review international training standards statements in FM postgraduate training and to catalogue these statements to be used as a best practice standard guide for FM training programs in Germany. Materials and Methods A structured three-tiered search was performed: a systematic literature search in MEDLINE®; a search of international indicator databases; and a search in grey literature, consisting of a survey of international experts and a search in “Google (Scholar)”. From all identified documents, training standards statements were extracted, translated and summarized into categories referring to the same quality aspect. Results The search strategy revealed 25 relevant documents (MEDLINE® n = 15, databases n = 2, experts n = 7, “Google” n = 1), containing 337 training standards statements. These were summarized into 80 statements. They covered structure quality (n = 35); process quality (n = 43); and two training standards statements referred to outcome quality (n = 2). Conclusion A broad range of internationally sourced training standards statements for FM postgraduate training could be identified from countries with well-established primary care systems. Only few statements internationally referred to outcome quality, expressing the difficulty in assessing outcome. The resulting inventory of training standards statements for FM postgraduate training can serve as a resource for institutions seeking to formalise and systematise FM training at regional or national levels.
European Journal of General Practice | 2018
Jan Valentini; Katja Goetz; Kathrin Yen; Joachim Szecsenyi; Andrea Dettling; Stefanie Joos; Jost Steinhaeuser; Elisabeth Flum
Abstract Background: The external post-mortem examination (EPME) is an important medical, legal and socio-economic task with far-reaching relevance; however, due to discrepancies between findings from EPMEs and actual cause of death, improvements in accuracy and quality are needed. Objectives: To investigate knowledge, competencies and attitudes regarding EPME in general practitioner (GP) post-graduate trainees. Methods: Before four post-graduate training courses on the EPME for general practitioner trainees, organized in 2014 in the German federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, a questionnaire on the EPME was distributed by the lecturer, completed by the GP post-graduate trainees and returned to the lecturer. The questionnaire consisted of 19 items related to three main categories: knowledge, competencies and attitudes. Results: Out of 380 GP post-graduate trainees, 128 completed and returned the questionnaire (response rate 33.7%). Less than 18% felt adequately confident in identifying a natural cause of death and less than 5% felt adequately confident in identifying an unnatural cause of death. Only 33% consistently fully uncover the corpse for the EPME. Conclusion: We found an important uncertainty in GP post-graduate trainees regarding their EPME knowledge and competencies.
Complementary Medicine Research | 2018
Jan Valentini; Elisabeth Flum; Simon Schwill; Katja Krug; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefanie Joos
Hintergrund: Inhalte aus den Bereichen der klassischen Naturheilverfahren und Komplementärmedizin sind im Rahmen der ärztlichen Approbationsordnung curricular verankert. Im Gegensatz dazu werden in den Weiterbildungsordnungen zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin keine komplementärmedizinischen Inhalte abgebildet. Bisher ist nicht bekannt, ob Ärzte in Weiterbildung (ÄiW) zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin innerhalb ihrer Weiterbildung mit komplementärmedizinischen Verfahren in Kontakt kommen und ob sie solche erlernen bzw. erlernen möchten. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Erhebung der Einstellung zum und des Weiterbildungsbedarfs im Bereich Komplementärmedizin bei ÄiW zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin. Methoden: In Rahmen einer Querschnittsstudie erfolgte eine Fragebogen-gestützte Umfrage unter ÄiW zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin innerhalb des Weiterbildungsprogramms «Verbundweiterbildungplus Baden-Württemberg». Diese wurde onlinebasiert initiiert und durch eine papierbasierte Umfrage komplettiert. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt nahmen 138 Teilnehmer der Verbundweiterbildungplus Baden-Württemberg an der Umfrage teil. Der Gesamtrücklauf betrug damit 28%. Dabei zeigte sich, dass die Teilnehmenden ein hohes Interesse an Komplementärmedizin hatten. Gleichzeitig gaben sie an, Unsicherheiten sowohl inhaltlicher als auch formaler Art wahrzunehmen (z.B. Evidenz der einzelnen Methoden und Kostenübernahme durch gesetzliche Krankenkassen). Die große Mehrheit der befragten Ärzte befürwortete, dass in der Weiterbildung zum Facharzt Allgemeinmedizin Kompetenzen aus dem Bereich Komplementärmedizin vermittelt werden. Schlussfolgerungen: Vor dem Hintergrund der weiten Verbreitung komplementärmedizinischer Methoden im hausärztlichen Alltag muss diskutiert werden, ob im Rahmen der Weiterbildung zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin Basiskompetenzen für diesen Bereich definiert werden sollten. Diese könnten beispielsweise in das «Kompetenzbasierte Curriculum Allgemeinmedizin» der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM) einfließen.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2017
Cornelia Straßner; Petra Kaufmann-Kolle; Elisabeth Flum; Simon Schwill; Bettina Brandt; Jost Steinhäuser
BACKGROUNDnGeneral practitioners (GPs) are among the specialists who prescribe the highest number of medication. Therefore the improvement of pharmacological competencies is an important part of the GP specialist training. The self-concept of general practice stating that GPs are the first contact persons for all health problems makes it challenging to define and acquire competencies for specialist training. While the Competence-based Curriculum developed by the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians defines diagnoses, reasons for counselling and competencies which are essential for general practice, a similar orientation guide is lacking for the pharmacological field. The aim of this study is to define and characterize pharmacological substances which every GP should know so well that he or she is able to conduct counselling and monitoring.nnnMETHODSnWe analysed private and public health insurance prescriptions of all general practices participating in the CONTENT project in the period from 2009 to 2014. The analysis was limited to substances with oral application which were prescribed at least once by at least 25xa0% (nxa0=xa011) of the practices. While the 100 most frequent prescriptions were included due to their frequency, less frequently prescribed substances were assessed concerning their relevance for general practice in a rating procedure. The substances included were classified by diagnoses and reasons for counselling.nnnRESULTSnWe analysed 1,912,896 prescriptions from 44 practices and 112,535 patients on the basis of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. After applying the inclusion criteria, 453 substances were left, 302 of which were considered relevant for general practice and could be assigned to 45 diagnoses / reasons for counselling.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe result of this study could be considered a working draft for a pharmacological curriculum for general practice, which may complement the Competence-based Curriculum in the medium term.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Kristina Jäkel; Elisabeth Flum; Joachim Szecsenyi; Jost Steinhäuser
BACKGROUNDnMedical education is intended to enable students to become a physician who can practise the profession of medicine on his own authority, responsibility and accountability. In 2015, the competencies required to accomplish this have been described in the National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives Medicine. The aim of this study was to survey the extent to which the respective medical procedures were learned during medical school. Postgraduate trainees were asked to self-assess their level of proficiency in carrying out procedures commonly performed in family medicine.nnnMETHODSnA questionnaire involving 17 procedures was distributed among 328 postgraduate trainees in family medicine attending training sessions in Baden-Wuerttemberg. Participants could assess the extent to which they were able to independently perform each procedure (ranging from not able to do it, able to do it under direct supervision, able to do it if supervision is provided upon request to able to do it on my own, and able to provide supervision to others respectively). Respondents that were able to perform procedures without the need for supervision were asked to indicate when they acquired the competency. Data were analysed descriptively.nnnRESULTSnA total of 196 postgraduate trainees (59.8%) completed the questionnaire. The average age was 35 years, 71xa0% of the participants were female. For five out of 17 procedures at least half of the participants regarded themselves as being able to do it on my own or able to provide supervision to others. The procedure that was most often (52.5xa0%) named as having been learned in medical school was otoscopy, followed by wound suturing and mask ventilation (42%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnFollowing graduation, GP trainees are unable to independently perform the majority of common procedures in family medicine. This indicates that insufficient proficiency in procedural skills is provided in undergraduate medical education, revealing the need for structured, supervised specialty training following graduation.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Hannah Haumann; Elisabeth Flum; Stefanie Joos
BACKGROUNDnAcademic institutions of general practice at German medical faculties have grown during the past years. This leads to an increase in the need of qualified young researchers and teachers in general practice (GP). Little is known about the interest in research and teaching skills and their training among general practice trainees and young GPs.nnnRESEARCH QUESTIONnThis cross-sectional survey among GP trainees and young GPs examined 1. if there is an interest in the training in research and teaching skills during post-graduate GP training, 2. which fostering and hindering factors have an effect on this interest and 3. which roles are attributed to academic institutions of general practice.nnnMETHODSnA web-based cross-sectional study was performed among members of Verbundweiterbildungplus, a network of GP trainees, as well as Junge Allgemeinmedizin Deutschland, the German network of young GPs. Descriptive analysis was conducted.nnnRESULTSn148 GP trainees and young GPs participated in the study, 76% (n=109) of them were GP trainees. There was interest in a position in research and teaching during post-graduate GP training among 55% (n=78). Factors associated with the interest in a position in research and teaching during post-graduate GP training were (MV 5-point Likert scale ± SD): compatibility of clinical work and research/teaching and of family and career (4.4±0.8; 4.7±0.6 respectively). The roles of academic institutions of general practice were attributed to training of medical students (4.6±0.6), post-graduate GP training (4.5±0.7) and research (4.5±0.7). GP trainees assessed the importance of training in research and teaching skills during post-graduate GP training and of the compatibility of family and career differently from young GPs (3.7±1.0 vs. 4.1±0.8 p=0.027; 4.8±0.5 vs. 4.3±0.9, p=0.016). Those interested in a position in research and teaching during post-graduate GP training showed a stronger interest in specific training in research skills (3.7±1.1 vs. 2.8±1.1, p<0.001), a future clinical position in a research practice (3.8±1.2 vs. 2.5±1.2, p<0.001) and as a lecturer at an academic institution of general practice (4.3±0.9 vs. 3.9±1.1, p=0.04).nnnDISCUSSIONnThere is an interest in professional involvement in research and teaching during post-graduate GP training among GP trainees and young GPs. For those interested, structured concepts (e.g. clinician scientist) need to be developed in order to facilitate the combination of clinical work and a position in research and teaching during post-graduate GP training. In doing so, the existing potential could be better exploited and more future GPs could be involved in research and teaching.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Thomas Ledig; Elisabeth Flum; Julia Magez; Christiane Eicher; Peter Engeser; Stefanie Joos; Simon Schwill; Joachim Szecsenyi; Jost Steinhäuser
BACKGROUNDnA Train-The-Trainer course (TTT course) for general practice trainers was developed as part of the program Verbundweiterbildungplus Baden-Württemberg. The course included aspects of training such as organizational and legal knowledge as well as didactic skills for trainers in 9.5 teaching units (45minutes each). The present article analyzes the evaluation of the course and considers possible future developments for TTT courses in Germany.nnnMETHODSnAn evaluation tool was used covering aspects such as information, relevance for daily work, opportunities for participant engagement in the seminars and working environment as well as didactic competencies among teachers. Within five years, 256 trainers participated in a TTT course and received an evaluation sheet. Data were analyzed descriptively.nnnRESULTSn249 evaluation sheets were included (response rate 97xa0%). Overall, the participants were (very) satisfied with the course in general, its organization, the exchange with colleagues and the teaching units. The participants used the free text mode to give positive feedback; in particular, teaching units in organizational and legal regulations as well as practical feedback training to strengthen professionalism were evaluated positively. Suggestions for improvements included follow-up courses or a deepening of understanding of course contents.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe participants gave a very positive overall rating and claimed to have benefited from the course contents. Future projects should address further qualifications of general practice trainers and facilitate the exchange with colleagues on an ongoing basis.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Mariell Hoffmann; Elisabeth Flum; Jost Steinhäuser
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEnMore than 600 trainees in family medicine (FM trainees) have participated in the Verbundweiterbildung(plus) (VWB(plus)) since this rotation network programme has been implemented in 2009. Mentoring as need-based support and counselling is an essential element of this programme. The aim of this study was to identify FM trainees most frequent reasons for counselling in order to explore the qualifications and requirements to be a mentor.nnnMETHODSn141 e-mails written between December 2009 and July 2014 were analysed according to Mayring. This procedure generated thematic categories of common reasons for seeking counselling.nnnRESULTSn32xa0% of all VWB(plus) participants asked mentors of the programme for advice. The most frequent questions (38xa0%) related to job vacancies, the application process and employment contracts. The second most common inquiries (30xa0%) referred to participation in the VWB(plus) as well as contents of education meetings within the VWB(plus). Other questions pertained to general aspects of postgraduate training in family medicine (16xa0%), individual conflict consulting (10xa0%) and funding applications (6xa0%).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe results of the needs assessment survey reveal that a mentoring programme needs competent advisors with experience in family medicine. While FAQ lists are helpful in answering general questions, specific requests such as, for example, a personal crisis require individual counselling provided by a mentor.
GMS Zeitschrift für medizinische Ausbildung | 2015
Elisabeth Flum; Roar Maagaard; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Nigel Scarborough; Nynke Scherpbier; Thomas Ledig; Marco Roos; Jost Steinhäuser
Background: Although demands on family physicians (FP) are to a large extent similar in the European Union, uniform assessment standards for family medicine (FM) specialty training and assessment do not exist. Aim of this pilot study was to elicit and compare the different modalities and assessment methods of FM specialty training in five European countries. Methods: A semi structured survey was undertaken based on a convenient sample in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom). The respondents were asked to respond to ten items about aspects of FM specialty training and assessment methods in their respective countries. If available, this data was completed with information from official websites of the countries involved. Results: FM specialty training is performed heterogeneously in the surveyed countries. Training time periods range from three to five years, in some countries requiring a foundation program of up to two years. Most countries perform longitudinal assessment during FM specialty training using a combination of competence-based approach with additional formative and summative assessment. There is some evidence on the assessments methods used, however the assessment method used and costs of assessment differs remarkably between the participating countries. Conclusions: Longitudinal and competence-based assessment is the presently preferred approach for FM specialty training. Countries which use less multifaceted methods for assessment could learn from best practice. Potential changes have significant cost implications.