Elisabetta Pietri

Trastuzumab in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundHER2/neu overexpression is linked to promotion of angiogenesis in breast cancer. We therefore tested the activity of the combination of Trastuzumab with metronomic, low dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and methotrexate (MTX) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsBetween April 2002 and June 2005, twenty-two patients with metastatic breast cancer with the presence of overexpression or amplification of HER2-/neu, all pre-treated with trastuzumab plus other cytotoxics, were treated with trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every three weeks) in combination with metronomic chemotherapy (MTX 2.5 mg, bid on Day 1 and Day 4 every week) and CTX (50 mg daily) (CM).ResultsThe 22 enrolled patients are evaluable: most had an ECOG performance status of 0 (17 pts), and all were pre-treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 14 had progressive disease at study entry, and 11 had progressive disease during the last trastuzumab therapy. Metastatic sites included: lung (5 pts), liver (14 pts), bone (12 pts), lymph nodes (8 pts), central nervous system (CNS) (9 pts). We observed 4 partial remission (PR) (18%, 95% CI 5–40%), 10 stable disease (SD) (46%, 95% CI 24–68%), and 8 PD (36%, CI 17–59%). The clinical benefit (RP plus RC plus SD for ≥ 24 weeks) in all pts and in pts with disease resistant to previous trastuzumab therapy were 46% (95% CI, 24–68%) and 27% (95% CI, 6–61%), respectively. Median time to progression was 6 months and median duration of treatment was 5 months (range, 0,7 to 18.4 months and range, 1 to 18 months, respectively). Overall clinical toxicity was generally mild. Grade ≥2 reversible liver toxicity and leukopenia were reported in 5 and 3 pts, respectively.ConclusionThe combination of trastuzumab and metronomic chemotherapy is effective and minimally toxic in advanced breast cancer patients. The efficacy observed in patients with disease resistant to trastuzumab supports the need of larger trial to confirm a role of this combination to delay acquired trastuzumab resistance.

Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in early breast cancer patients: a retrospective study of possible risk and protective factors

Objective Although adjuvant trastuzumab improves survival in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, there is growing concern about the long-term effect of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC). We retrospectively assessed the incidence of TIC and heart failure (HF) to identify possible risk and protective factors. Design Retrospective study. Setting Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Medical Oncology Department. Patients Consecutive patients who started adjuvant trastuzumab between 2007 and 2010. Main outcome Measures TIC was defined as an absolute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decrease ≥15 points from baseline or a LVEF<50%. Logistic regression was used to estimate OR and their 95% CI in order to evaluate the risk of TIC, considering potential cardiac risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes mellitus, smoke, cardiac ischaemia and previous chest radiotherapy) and protective factors (β-blockers, ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers). Results Among 179 patients, 78 cases of TIC (44%, 95% CI 37% to 51%) and four cases of HF (2%, 95% CI 0% to 4%) were reported. 14 patients stopped trastuzumab as a result of TIC. None of the cardiac risk factors or concomitant cardiovascular medications altered the risk of TIC. A previous cumulative dose >240 mg/m2 of doxorubicin or >500 mg/m2 of epirubicin increased the risk of TIC compared with lower doses (OR 3.07; 95% CI 1.29 to 7.27, p=0.0011). Conclusions TIC is a frequent, albeit generally mild, adverse event in clinical practice. Further studies are warranted to better define the risk of and protective factors for TIC.

Topoisomerase IIα gene status and prediction of pathological complete remission after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in endocrine non-responsive Her2/neu-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE Topoisomerase IIalpha (Topo II) is a potential marker of responsiveness to anthracycline-based therapy. We analyzed the role of Topo II gene status in the prediction of pathological complete remission (pCR) after primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy in non- endocrine responsive breast cancers overexpressing Her2/neu. METHODS Twenty-three patients, with T2-T4, ER and PgR absent, overexpressing Her2/neu breast cancers treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy were evaluated. Topo II gene status was assessed by FISH in pre-treatment tumor specimens and the results were correlated to pathological and clinical responses. RESULTS Overall, six patients had a pCR (26%). Topo II was amplified in 5 (22%) of the tumors. In all patients with Topo II amplification, Her2/neu gene amplification was also detected. Among patients without amplification, one had polysomia of chromosome (Cr) 17 and four patients had deletion of the Topo II gene. A higher probability of pCR was observed when Topo II amplification and Cr 17 polysomy were present: pCR was reported in 3 of 5 amplified tumors (60%), in the polysomic tumor (amplified plus polysomic 67%) and in only 2 out of 13 tumors without alteration of Topo II status (15%). If we compare the frequency of pCR in tumors with amplification or polysomy versus the frequency of tumors with not amplification (deletion or no modification), a significant difference was detected (p=0.02). One progressive disease (PD) was reported in one tumor with Topo II deletion (1/4, 25%) and one in tumor without any modification of Topo II gene status (1/13, 8%). CONCLUSIONS In patients with endocrine unresponsive and Her2 overexpressing tumors, Topo II amplification or the presence of chromosome 17 polysomy correlate with a significantly high probability of achieving pCR after neoadjuvant, anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Further prospective studies in order to more clearly define the predictive role of Topo II status in this subgroup of patients are warranted.

Multicentric/multifocal breast cancer with a single histotype: is the biological characterization of all individual foci justified?

BACKGROUND Invasive multiple breast cancers with a single histological feature (MBCSH) are routinely assessed for biological parameters to indicate adjuvant treatments only in the largest invasive carcinomas. However, the heterogeneity of individual foci in multiple carcinomas has not been widely studied. We analyzed whether such biological features are differently expressed in different MBCSH foci. PATIENT AND METHODS One hundred and thirteen invasive MBCSH were tested over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. RESULTS Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, invasive MBCSH showed heterogeneity among foci. In our clinical practice, such assessment led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor.BACKGROUND Invasive multiple breast cancers with a single histological feature (MBCSH) are routinely assessed for biological parameters to indicate adjuvant treatments only in the largest invasive carcinomas. However, the heterogeneity of individual foci in multiple carcinomas has not been widely studied. We analyzed whether such biological features are differently expressed in different MBCSH foci. PATIENT AND METHODS One hundred and thirteen invasive MBCSH were tested over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. RESULTS Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, invasive MBCSH showed heterogeneity among foci. In our clinical practice, such assessment led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor.

Androgen receptor signaling pathways as a target for breast cancer treatment

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor, and its effects on breast range from physiological pubertal development and age-related modifications to cancer onset and proliferation. The prevalence of AR in early breast cancer is around 60%, and AR is more frequently expressed in ER-positive than in ER-negative tumors. We offer an overview of AR signaling pathways in different breast cancer subtypes, providing evidence that its oncogenic role is likely to be different in distinct biological and clinical scenarios. In particular, in ER-positive breast cancer, AR signaling often antagonizes the growth stimulatory effect of ER signaling; in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), AR seems to drive tumor progression (at least in luminal AR subtype of TNBC with a gene expression profile mimicking luminal subtypes despite being negative to ER and enriched in AR expression); in HER2-positive breast cancer, in the absence of ER expression, AR signaling has a proliferative role. These data represent the rationale for AR-targeting treatment as a potentially new target therapy in breast cancer subset using androgen agonists in some AR-positive/ER-positive tumors, AR antagonists in triple-negative/AR-positive tumors and in combination with anti-HER2 agents or with other signaling pathways inhibitors (including PI3K/MYC/ERK) in HER2-positive/AR-positive tumors. Only the ongoing and future prospective clinical trials will allow us to establish which agents are the best option in every specific condition, keeping in mind that there is evidence of opposite androgens and AR agonist/antagonist drug effects on cell proliferation particularly in AR-positive/ER-positive tumors.

Factor V Leiden Mutation in Patients with Breast Cancer with a Central Venous Catheter: Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the prothrombotic factor V Leiden (FVL) and G20210A prothrombin mutations on the frequency of the first episode of catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in a cohort of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer during continuous venous insult (infusion of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1999 and February 2001, we retrospectively analyzed the incidence of first DVT in 300 consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated at a single institution with a combination of chemotherapy administered continuously through a totally implanted access port. We identified 25 women (study group) with catheter-related DVT. For each of the 25 patients, we selected 2 women eligible for identical chemotherapy who had similar age, stage of disease, and prognostic features as a control group. The prothrombotic FVL and prothrombin mutation G20210A genotype analyses were performed in all patients. Analyses were performed on blinded samples, and all patients signed a specific informed consent form. A total of 25 cases (with thrombosis) and 50 frequency-matched controls were evaluated for FVL. RESULTS Five cases and 2 controls were found with the mutation in the FVL, for incidences of 20% (95% CI, 9%-39%) and 4% (95% CI, 1%-14%), respectively. Thus, the frequency of the mutation was significantly higher in the cases than in controls (P = 0.04), and a logistic regression analysis, adjusted by age, yielded an odds ratio of 6.1 (95% CI, 1.1%-34.3%; P = 0.04). Time from start of infusion chemotherapy to thrombosis was not significantly different between those with the mutation (median, 31 days) and without the mutation (median, 43 days; P = 0.6). Only 1 subject (in the case group) was found with the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene. CONCLUSION Factor V Leiden carriers with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer are at high risk of catheter-related DVT during chemotherapy. Clinicians should be aware of this increased risk, and alternative cytotoxic treatments not requiring continuous infusions should be considered for these patients.

Burned out phenomenon of the testis in retroperitoneal seminoma.

To the Editor A 42-year-old male patient presented to his local doctor with profuse night sweating and back pain. Multiple retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (from 2.1 to 3.5 cm masses) were found to the right of the aorta on the computed tomography (CT) scan. The masses displace the aorta, renal right arteria and cava vein with CT evidence of infiltration. A testicular ultrasound confirmed a 3.0 cm hypoechoic nodule within the left testicle; the right testicle was normal in size. Tumour marker b-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) was out of range (11 mUI/m) and a-fetoprotein (a-FP) was normal. Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) was found out of

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of pertuzumab in breast cancer therapy

Introduction: Pertuzumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the dimerization domain of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), inhibiting the heterodimerization of HER2 with other HER receptors. It has shown synergy with trastuzumab in preclinical studies, and has led to a significant prolongation of progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo when added to trastuzumab and docetaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC). Areas covered: The HER family of receptors and their pathways, pertuzumab pharmacodynamics and preclinical activity, results from the main clinical trials, new drug combinations being developed, and predictors of response are discussed. Expert opinion: Pertuzumab represents an important anti-HER2 agent that differs from, but is synergistic with, trastuzumab. It is already a standard of care in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic BC, and studies are ongoing to define its role in the adjuvant setting. It is now imperative to identify which tumors need dual HER2 targeting and to study the activity of pertuzumab in combination with other HER-targeted agents, including anti-HER1, -HER3 or -HER4, which could also prove useful in HER2-normal cancers. Potential competitors are anti-HER3 antibodies and bi- or tri-specific antibodies. Development in combination with phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors or with anti PD-L1 is warranted.

A Phase II Study of a Dose-Density Regimen With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide on Days 1 and 4 Every 14 Days With Filgrastim Support Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel in Women With Primary Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Recent evidence shows that use of anthracycline and taxane adjuvant chemotherapy and dose-dense regimens, consisting of more frequent administration of the drugs, have improved outcomes for breast cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated administration of an epirubicin-based regimen with paclitaxel in a sequential, dose-dense schedule as adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer. METHODS In a phase II Simon two-stage design study, we evaluated the feasibility of a modified fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen at high dose intensity (fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 4, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 4, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 4; all drugs were administered every 14 days for 3 cycles) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support followed by dose-intense weekly paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) for 8 cycles. In 11 patients with breast cancer following quadrantectomy (n = 8) or modified radical mastectomy (n = 3), any grade 3 (G3) or higher nonhematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia, nausea or vomiting, and bone pain, which might be a consequence of the administration of filgrastim) and adherence to the scheduled dose-dense treatment (deliverability) were monitored with the purpose of enrolling an additional 27 patients in the case of a satisfying toxicity profile and deliverability of the planned treatment (at least 7 patients completing the treatment). RESULTS Five of 11 patients experienced G3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity during the FEC regimen. We did not observe G3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity related to paclitaxel treatment. In particular, three patients experienced G3 fatigue, one patient had G3 oral mucositis, three patients had G3 hypokalemia, one patient had G3 syncope, one patient had G3 transaminitis (alanine aminotransferase), one patient experienced G4 pulmonary thromboembolism, and 1 patient had a G3 breast infection. Four of 11 patients received the regimen with a 25% dose reduction of day 1 and 4 administrations of FEC. Seven of 11 patients required FEC delay ≥7 days in at least 1 cycle, regardless of dose intensity. Two patients failed to complete the FEC regimen. Two of the remaining 9 patients were treated with paclitaxel delay ≥7 days in at least one cycle. After a median follow-up of 28 months, 9 patients were continuously disease free. CONCLUSION The tolerability rate of a dose-density regimen with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel was considered not promising for completing the accrual of this study.

Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer: What Differences Between Primary Tumor and Metastases?

Genomic studies have shown that the androgen receptor (AR) pathway plays an important role in some breast cancer subtypes. However few data are present on the concordance between AR expression in primary tumors and metastases. We investigated AR expression by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 164 primary tumors and 83 metastases, to explore its distribution in the different tumor subtypes and its concordance between the two sample types and according to sampling time. AR was more highly expressed in luminal A and B than HER2-positive and triple negative primary tumors. A similar distribution was found in metastases, and the concordance of AR expression between primary tumors and metastases was greater than 60%. No association between sampling time and AR expression was observed. We found a good concordance of AR expression between primary tumor and metastasis, but the variability remains high between the two types of specimens, regardless of the variation in sampling time. For this reason, if used for treatment decisions, AR evaluation should be repeated in each patient whenever a new biopsy is performed, as commonly done for the other breast cancer biomarkers.