Elizabeth C. Verna

EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study

BACKGROUND A trucut needle biopsy device that can be used to obtain specimens from the pancreas and other perigastric organs under EUS guidance has been developed and successfully tested in animals. Moreover, EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy has been used safely in humans and appears to provide more accurate results than EUS-guided FNA. This study prospectively assessed the clinical utility of this new device in patients with solid pancreatic masses. METHODS Twenty-three consecutive patients with radiologically detected solid pancreatic masses underwent EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy. Pancreatic malignancy detected by EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy was considered a definitive diagnosis. Further diagnostic procedures and clinical course were used to establish or exclude the presence of malignancy in all other patients. RESULTS Pancreatic tissue was obtained in 17 of the 23 patients (74%), including all patients in whom the transgastric approach was used. No acute or long-term complication was observed. Histopathologic evaluation revealed pancreatic cancer in 12 patients. CT-guided biopsy specimens were obtained in 4 of the 5 patients with a negative EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy result; two were positive for adenocarcinoma. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 61%. Subgroup analysis of the 16 patients in whom EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy was successful and who were available for follow-up revealed a diagnostic accuracy of 87.5%. CONCLUSIONS This prospective study demonstrates that EUS-guided trucut needle biopsy, when performed transgastrically, is safe and accurate in the evaluation of patients with solid pancreatic masses.

Pancreatic Cancer Screening in a Prospective Cohort of High-Risk Patients: A Comprehensive Strategy of Imaging and Genetics

Purpose: Pancreatic cancer is a virtually uniformly fatal disease. We aimed to determine if screening to identify curable neoplasms is effective when offered to patients at high risk. Experimental Design: Patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer were prospectively enrolled into a screening program. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and genetic testing were offered by a multidisciplinary team according to each patients risk. Results: Fifty-one patients in 43 families were enrolled, with mean age of 52 years, 35% of whom were male. Of these patients, 31 underwent EUS and 33 MRI. EUS revealed two patients with pancreatic cancer (one resectable, one metastatic), five with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), seven with cysts, and six with parenchymal changes. Five had pancreatic surgery (one total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, three distal and one central pancreatectomy for pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and IPMN). A total of 24 (47%) had genetic testing (19 for BRCA1/2 mutations, 4 for CDKN2A, 1 for MLH1/MSH2) and 7 were positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. Four extrapancreatic neoplasms were found: two ovarian cancers on prophylactic total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, one carcinoid, and one papillary thyroid carcinoma. Overall, 6 (12%) of the 51 patients had neoplastic lesions in the pancreas and 9 (18%) had neoplasms in any location. All were on the initial round of screening. All patients remain alive and without complications of screening. Conclusions: Pancreatic cancer screening for high-risk patients with a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics is effective and identifies curable neoplasms that can be resected. Ongoing study will better define who will benefit from screening and what screening strategy will be the most effective. Clin Cancer Res; 16(20); 5028–37. ©2010 AACR.

Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir for Previously Treated HCV Infection

BACKGROUND Patients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and who do not have a sustained virologic response after treatment with regimens containing direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have limited retreatment options. METHODS We conducted two phase 3 trials involving patients who had been previously treated with a DAA‐containing regimen. In POLARIS‐1, patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had previously received a regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir, and the protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (150 patients) or matching placebo (150 patients) once daily for 12 weeks. Patients who were infected with HCV of other genotypes (114 patients) were enrolled in the sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir group. In POLARIS‐4, patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3 infection who had previously received a DAA regimen but not an NS5A inhibitor were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir (163 patients) or sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir (151 patients) for 12 weeks. An additional 19 patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were enrolled in the sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir group. RESULTS In the three active‐treatment groups, 46% of the patients had compensated cirrhosis. In POLARIS‐1, the rate of sustained virologic response was 96% with sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir, as compared with 0% with placebo. In POLARIS‐4, the rate of response was 98% with sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir and 90% with sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. In the active‐treatment groups in both trials, the percentage of patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events was 1% or lower. CONCLUSIONS Sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir‐voxilaprevir taken for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response among patients across HCV genotypes in whom treatment with a DAA regimen had previously failed. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; POLARIS‐1 and POLARIS‐4 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02607735 and NCT02639247.)

Use of probiotics in gastrointestinal disorders: what to recommend?

Perturbation of bacterial microflora of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may play an important role in the pathophysiology of some GI disorders. Probiotics have been used as a treatment modality for over a century. They may restore normal bacterial microflora and effect the functioning of the GI tract by a variety of mechanisms. Probiotics are not currently regulated and only few randomized controlled trials exist investigating their efficacy in different GI disorders. They are available in a variety of formulations and delivery systems making interpretation and comparison of studies even more difficult. The efficacy of probiotics, either as a single strain or a combination of probiotics, has been tested in antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile colitis, infectious diarrhea, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, pouchitis, and irritable bowel syndrome, among other disorders. Results of the studies are reviewed in this article and recommendations for probiotic use in these disorders are made. Although probiotics appear to be generally safe in an outpatient setting, the situation may be different in immunocompromised, hospitalized patients who may be at a greater risk of developing probiotic sepsis. No studies exist addressing the issue of safety specifically. Many questions regarding use of probiotics in GI disorders remain to be answered in future studies, such as most optimal doses, duration of treatment, physiological and immunological effects, efficacy of specific probiotics in specific disease states, and safety in debilitated patients.

A US multicenter study of hepatitis C treatment of liver transplant recipients with protease-inhibitor triple therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS NS3/4A protease inhibitors, boceprevir or telaprevir, combined with peginterferon and ribavirin was the standard treatment for HCV genotype 1 and remains the only available direct antiviral drug based therapy in some countries. Efficacy and safety data in liver transplant recipients are limited. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 81 patients with genotype 1 HCV treated with boceprevir (10%) or telaprevir (90%) plus peginterferon and ribavirin at 6 US transplant centers (53% stage 3-4/4 fibrosis, 57% treatment experienced). The primary end point was undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). RESULTS The intent-to-treat SVR12 rate was 63% (51/81). Patients with an extended rapid virologic response, (undetectable HCV RNA at 4 and 12 weeks after starting boceprevir or telaprevir), had a higher rate of SVR12 than all other patients (85% vs. 15%, p<0.001). Adverse effects were common; 21% of patients experienced hemoglobin <8g/dl and 57% required blood transfusions during the first 16 weeks. Twenty seven percent were hospitalized and 9% died; all were liver-related. CONCLUSIONS The addition of boceprevir or telaprevir to peginterferon and ribavirin yields SVR12 of 63% in liver transplant recipients with genotype 1 recurrent HCV, despite a high prevalence of advanced fibrosis and prior non-response to peginterferon and ribavirin. Rapid virologic response predicted a high likelihood of SVR. Despite a doubling of SVR rates, poor tolerability and high rates of adverse events were frequent and pose barriers to its widespread application.

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography vs. eight clinical prediction rules for non‐invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in biopsy‐proven non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study

Two‐dimensional magnetic resonance elastography (2D‐MRE) is an advanced magnetic resonance method with high diagnostic accuracy for predicting advanced fibrosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. However, no prospective, head‐to‐head comparisons between 2D‐MRE and clinical prediction rules (CPRs) have been performed in patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD.

Hepatitis C virus-infected women have a higher risk of advanced fibrosis and graft loss after liver transplantation than men.

In natural history studies of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, women have a lower risk of disease progression to cirrhosis. Whether female sex influences outcomes of HCV in the posttransplantation setting is unknown. All patients transplanted for HCV‐related liver disease from 2002‐2007 at five United States transplantation centers were included. The primary outcome was development of advanced disease, defined as biopsy‐proven bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. Secondary outcomes included death, graft loss, and graft loss with advanced recurrent disease. A total of 1,264 patients were followed for a median of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.8‐4.7), 304 (24%) of whom were women. The cumulative rate of advanced disease at 3 years was 38% for women and 33% for men (P = 0.31), but after adjustment for recipient age, donor age, donor anti‐HCV positivity, posttransplantation HCV treatment, cytomegalovirus infection and center, female sex was an independent predictor of advanced recurrent disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02‐1.70; P = 0.04). Among women, older donor age and treated acute rejection were the primary predictors of advanced disease. The unadjusted cumulative 3‐year rates of patient and graft survival were numerically lower in women (75% and 74%, respectively) than men (80% and 78%, respectively), and in multivariable analyses, female sex was an independent predictor for death (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01‐1.67; P = 0.04) and graft loss (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02‐1.67; P = 0.03). Conclusion: Female sex represents an underrecognized risk factor for advanced recurrent HCV disease and graft loss. Further studies are needed to determine whether modification of donor factors, immunosuppression, and posttransplantation therapeutics can equalize HCV‐specific outcomes in women and men. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;)

Standing the test of time: Outcomes of a decade of prioritizing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, results of the UNOS natural geographic experiment

Priority is given to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to receive liver transplants, potentially causing significant regional disparities in organ access and possibly outcomes in this population. Our aim was to assess these disparities by comparing outcomes in long waiting time regions (LWTR, regions 5 and 9) and short waiting time regions (SWTR regions 3 and 10) by analyzing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. We analyzed 6,160 HCC patients who received exception points in regions 3, 5, 9, and 10 from 2002 to 2012. Data from regions 5 and 9 were combined and compared to data from regions 3 and 10. Survival was studied in three patient cohorts: an intent‐to‐treat cohort, a posttransplant cohort, and a cohort examining overall survival in transplanted patients only (survival from listing to last posttransplant follow‐up). Multivariate analysis and log‐rank testing were used to analyze the data. Median time on the list in the LWTR was 7.6 months compared to 1.6 months for SWTR, with a significantly higher incidence of death on the waiting list in LWTR than in SWTR (8.4% versus 1.6%, P < 0.0001). Patients in the LWTR were more likely to receive loco‐regional therapy, to have T3 tumors at listing, and to receive expanded‐criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts than patients in the SWTR (P < 0.0001 for all). Survival was significantly better in the LWTR compared to the SWTR in all three cohorts (P < 0.0001 for all three survival points). Being listed/transplanted in an SWTR was an independent predictor of poor patient survival on multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 1.545, 95% confidence interval 1.375‐1.736). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that expediting patients with HCC to transplant at too fast a rate may adversely affect patient outcomes. (Hepatology 2014;60:1956–1961)

Intestinal cell damage and systemic immune activation in individuals reporting sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease.

Objective Wheat gluten and related proteins can trigger an autoimmune enteropathy, known as coeliac disease, in people with genetic susceptibility. However, some individuals experience a range of symptoms in response to wheat ingestion, without the characteristic serological or histological evidence of coeliac disease. The aetiology and mechanism of these symptoms are unknown, and no biomarkers have been identified. We aimed to determine if sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease is associated with systemic immune activation that may be linked to an enteropathy. Design Study participants included individuals who reported symptoms in response to wheat intake and in whom coeliac disease and wheat allergy were ruled out, patients with coeliac disease and healthy controls. Sera were analysed for markers of intestinal cell damage and systemic immune response to microbial components. Results Individuals with wheat sensitivity had significantly increased serum levels of soluble CD14 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein, as well as antibody reactivity to bacterial LPS and flagellin. Circulating levels of fatty acid-binding protein 2 (FABP2), a marker of intestinal epithelial cell damage, were significantly elevated in the affected individuals and correlated with the immune responses to microbial products. There was a significant change towards normalisation of the levels of FABP2 and immune activation markers in a subgroup of individuals with wheat sensitivity who observed a diet excluding wheat and related cereals. Conclusions These findings reveal a state of systemic immune activation in conjunction with a compromised intestinal epithelium affecting a subset of individuals who experience sensitivity to wheat in the absence of coeliac disease.

Steroid use in acute liver failure

Drug‐induced and indeterminate acute liver failure (ALF) might be due to an autoimmune‐like hepatitis that is responsive to corticosteroid therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether corticosteroids improve survival in fulminant autoimmune hepatitis, drug‐induced, or indeterminate ALF, and whether this benefit varies according to the severity of illness. We conducted a retrospective analysis of autoimmune, indeterminate, and drug‐induced ALF patients in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group from 1998‐2007. The primary endpoints were overall and spontaneous survival (SS, survival without transplant). In all, 361 ALF patients were studied, 66 with autoimmune (25 steroids, 41 no steroids), 164 with indeterminate (21 steroids, 143 no steroids), and 131 with drug‐induced (16 steroids, 115 no steroids) ALF. Steroid use was not associated with improved overall survival (61% versus 66%, P = 0.41), nor with improved survival in any diagnosis category. Steroid use was associated with diminished survival in certain subgroups of patients, including those with the highest quartile of the Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) (>40, survival 30% versus 57%, P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis controlling for steroid use and diagnosis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.37 per decade), coma grade (OR 2.02 grade 2, 2.65 grade 3, 5.29 grade 4), MELD (OR 1.07), and pH < 7.4 (OR 3.09) were significantly associated with mortality. Although steroid use was associated with a marginal benefit in SS overall (35% versus 23%, P = 0.047), this benefit did not persistent in multivariate analysis; mechanical ventilation (OR 0.24), MELD (OR 0.93), and alanine aminotransferase (1.02) were the only significant predictors of SS. Conclusion: Corticosteroids did not improve overall survival or SS in drug‐induced, indeterminate, or autoimmune ALF and were associated with lower survival in patients with the highest MELD scores. (Hepatology 2014;59:612–621)