Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James F. Trotter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James F. Trotter.


Hepatology | 2005

Treatment of advanced hepatitis C with a low accelerating dosage regimen of antiviral therapy

Gregory T. Everson; James F. Trotter; Lisa M. Forman; Marcelo Kugelmas; Arthur Halprin; Barbara Fey; Catherine Ray

Patients with advanced hepatitis C virus (HCV) are at risk of death and are candidates for liver transplantation. After transplantation, HCV recurs and may rapidly progress to cirrhosis and graft loss. Treatment is needed to prevent progression of disease and minimize recurrence after liver transplantation. We evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and outcome of a low accelerating dose regimen (LADR) of antiviral therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced HCV. One hundred twenty‐four patients (male/female ratio 81:43; age range 37‐71 years; 70% genotype 1) were treated with LADR. Sixty‐three percent had clinical complications of cirrhosis (ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, varices, variceal hemorrhage, encephalopathy). The mean Child‐Turcotte‐Pugh (CTP) score was 7.4 ± 2.3, and the mean MELD score was 11.0 ± 3.7. Fifty‐six patients were CTP class A, 45 were class B, and 23 were class C. Forty‐six percent were HCV RNA–negative at end of treatment, and 24% were HCV RNA–negative at last follow‐up. Sustained virological response (SVR) was 13% in patients infected with genotype 1 HCV and 50% in patients infected with non‐1 genotypes (P < .0001). Non‐1 genotype, CTP class A (genotype 1 only), and ability to tolerate full dose and duration of treatment (P < .0001) were predictors of SVR. Twelve of 15 patients who were HCV RNA–negative before transplantation remained HCV RNA–negative 6 months or more after transplantation. In conclusion, in a sizeable proportion of patients with advanced HCV, LADR may render blood free of HCV RNA, stabilize clinical course, and prevent posttransplantation recurrence. (HEPATOLOGY 2005;42:255–262.)


Gastroenterology | 2008

Donor Morbidity After Living Donation for Liver Transplantation

Rafik M. Ghobrial; Chris E. Freise; James F. Trotter; Lan Tong; Akinlolu Ojo; Jeffrey H. Fair; Robert A. Fisher; Jean C. Emond; Alan J. Koffron; Timothy L. Pruett; Kim M. Olthoff

BACKGROUND & AIMS Reports of complications among adult right hepatic lobe donors have been limited to single centers. The rate and severity of complications in living donors were investigated in the 9-center Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). METHODS A retrospective observational study design was used. Participants included all potential living donors evaluated between 1998 and 2003. Complication severity was graded using the Clavien scoring system. RESULTS Of 405 donors accepted for donation, 393 underwent donation, and 12 procedures were aborted. There were 245 donors (62%) who did not experience complications; 82 (21%) had 1 complication, and 66 (17%) had 2 or more. Complications were scored as grade 1 (minor; n = 106, 27%), grade 2 (potentially life threatening; n = 103, 26%), grade 3 (life threatening; n = 8, 2%), and grade 4 (leading to death; n = 3, 0.8%). Common complications included biliary leaks beyond postoperative day 7 (n = 36, 9%), bacterial infections (n = 49, 12%), incisional hernia (n = 22, 6%), pleural effusion requiring intervention (n = 21, 5%), neuropraxia (n = 16, 4%), reexploration (n = 12, 3%), wound infections (n = 12, 3%), and intraabdominal abscess (n = 9, 2%). Two donors developed portal vein thrombosis, and 1 had inferior vena caval thrombosis. Fifty-one (13%) donors required hospital readmission, and 14 (4%) required 2 to 5 readmissions. CONCLUSIONS Adult living liver donation was associated with significant donor complications. Although most complications were of low-grade severity, a significant proportion were severe or life threatening. Quantification of complication risk may improve the informed consent process, perioperative planning, and donor care.


Journal of Hepatology | 2010

Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: The ups and downs

Ton Lisman; Stephen H. Caldwell; Andrew K. Burroughs; Patrick G. Northup; Marco Senzolo; R. Todd Stravitz; Armando Tripodi; James F. Trotter; D. Valla; Robert J. Porte

Patients with chronic or acute liver failure frequently show profound abnormalities in their hemostatic system. Whereas routine laboratory tests of hemostasis suggest these hemostatic alterations result in a bleeding diathesis, accumulating evidence from both clinical and laboratory studies suggest that the situation is more complex. The average patient with liver failure may be in hemostatic balance despite prolonged routine coagulation tests, since both pro- and antihemostatic factors are affected, the latter of which are not well reflected in routine coagulation testing. However, this balance may easily tip towards a hypo- or hypercoagulable situation. Indeed, patients with liver disease may encounter both hemostasis-related bleeding episodes as well as thrombotic events. During the 3rd International Symposium on Coagulopathy and Liver disease, held in Groningen, The Netherlands (18-19 September 2009), a multidisciplinary panel of experts critically reviewed the current data concerning pathophysiology and clinical consequences of hemostatic disorders in patients with liver disease. Highlights of this symposium are summarized in this review.


Liver Transplantation | 2006

Documented deaths of hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation

James F. Trotter; René Adam; Chung Mau Lo; Jeremy Kenison

The actual risk of death in hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown because of the lack of a comprehensive database. In the absence of a definitive estimate of the risk of donor death, the medical literature has become replete with anecdotal reports of donor deaths, many of which cannot be substantiated. Because donor death is one of the most important outcomes of LDLT, we performed a comprehensive survey of the medical and lay literature to provide a referenced source of worldwide donor deaths. We reviewed all published articles from the medical literature on LDLT and searched the lay literature for donor deaths from 1989 to February 2006. We classified each death as “definitely,” “possibly,” or “unlikely” related to donor surgery. We identified 19 donor deaths (and one additional donor in a chronic vegetative state). Thirteen deaths and the vegetative donor were “definitely,” 2 were “possibly,” and 4 were “unlikely” related to donor surgery. The estimated rate of donor death “definitely” related to donor surgery is 0.15%. The rate of donor death which is “definitely” or “possibly” related to the donor surgery is 0.20%. This analysis provides a source document of all identifiable living liver donor deaths, provides a better estimate of donor death rate, and may provide an impetus for centers with unreported deaths to submit these outcomes to the liver transplantation community. Liver Transpl 12:1485‐1488, 2006.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2008

Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: Findings from the A2ALL retrospective cohort study

Chris E. Freise; Brenda W. Gillespie; Alan J. Koffron; Anna S. Lok; Timothy L. Pruett; Jean C. Emond; Jeffrey H. Fair; Robert A. Fisher; K. Olthoff; James F. Trotter; Rafik M. Ghobrial; James E. Everhart

Patients considering living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) need to know the risk and severity of complications compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). One aim of the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) was to examine recipient complications following these procedures. Medical records of DDLT or LDLT recipients who had a living donor evaluated at the nine A2ALL centers between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. Among 384 LDLT and 216 DDLT, at least one complication occurred after 82.8% of LDLT and 78.2% of DDLT (p = 0.17). There was a median of two complications after DDLT and three after LDLT. Complications that occurred at a higher rate (p < 0.05) after LDLT included biliary leak (31.8% vs. 10.2%), unplanned reexploration (26.2% vs. 17.1%), hepatic artery thrombosis (6.5% vs. 2.3%) and portal vein thrombosis (2.9% vs. 0.0%). There were more complications leading to retransplantation or death (Clavien grade 4) after LDLT versus DDLT (15.9% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.023). Many complications occurred more commonly during early center experience; the odds of grade 4 complications were more than two‐fold higher when centers had performed ≤20 LDLT (vs. >40). In summary, complication rates were higher after LDLT versus DDLT, but declined with center experience to levels comparable to DDLT.


Annals of Surgery | 1998

Thymic carcinoids in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Bin Tean Teh; Jan Zedenius; Soili Kytölä; Britt Skogseid; James F. Trotter; Hélène du Boullay Choplin; Steve Twigg; Filip Farnebo; Sophie Giraud; D. Cameron; Bruce G. Robinson; Alain Calender; Catharina Larsson; Pasi I. Salmela

Thymic carcinoid is a rare malignancy with about 150 cases reported to date. It is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), but compared with other MEN-1-related neoplasia little is known about it. We have recently described and studied 20 MEN-1-related cases and found that up to 25% of all reported thymic carcinoids are MEN-1 related. It is an insidious tumour not associated with Cushings syndrome or carcinoid syndrome. Local invasion, recurrence and distant metastasis are common with no known effective treatment. Its male predominance, the absence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the MEN1 region, clustering in some MEN-1 families and the findings of different MEN1 mutations in these clustered families suggest the involvement of additional aetiological factors. We propose that computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest should be included as part of the clinical workup for all MEN-1 patients. Prophylactic thymectomy should be considered during subtotal or total parathyroidectomy on MEN-1 patients to reduce the risk of this malignancy.


Liver Transplantation | 2008

Sirolimus-based immunosuppression following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Michael A. Zimmerman; James F. Trotter; Michael Wachs; Tom Bak; Jeffrey Campsen; Afshin Skibba; Igal Kam

Experience with sirolimus (SRL)‐based immunosuppression following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is rapidly accumulating. In combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), SRL may reduce the incidence of acute rejection and lower overall required drug levels. This study sought to quantify long‐term outcome following OLT in patients with cirrhosis and concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with an SRL‐based regimen as a primary therapy. From January 2000 to June 2007, 97 patients underwent OLT for end‐stage liver disease and HCC at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Of those, 45 patients received SRL, in addition to CNIs, as a component of their primary immunosuppression regimen post‐OLT. Conversely, 52 patients received the standard immunosuppression regimen including CNIs, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The 2 treatment groups were compared with respect to the following variables: age, gender, tumor stage by explant, grade, size, presence of vascular invasion, focality, Childs class, baseline creatinine, and warm and cold ischemic times. The 2 groups were comparable by all factors save for cold ischemic time, which was significantly longer in the CNI‐treated group. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years post‐OLT for patients treated with SRL was 95.5% and 78.8%, respectively. Conversely, survival in patients treated with CNIs exclusively at the same time intervals was 83% and 62%. Although there was no difference in the incidence of major complications, the SRL group experienced a modest improvement in renal function. Cumulatively, these data suggest a potential survival benefit with SRL‐based therapy in patients undergoing OLT for end‐stage liver disease and concomitant malignancy. Liver Transpl 2008.


Liver Transplantation | 2008

Total tumor volume predicts risk of recurrence following liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Christian Toso; James F. Trotter; A. Wei; David L. Bigam; Shimul A. Shah; Joshua Lancaster; David R. Grant; Paul D. Greig; A. M. James Shapiro; Norman M. Kneteman

Criteria for the selection of candidates for liver transplantation in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should accurately predict posttransplant recurrence while not excluding excessive numbers of patients from candidacy. Existing criteria are challenged by the limited accuracy of radiological assessment. The total tumor volume (TTV) was calculated by the addition of the volume of each individual tumor. A preliminary analysis was carried out on HCC patient data from the Alberta Liver Transplant Program (52 patients) and then validated on the populations of the Universities of Toronto and Colorado programs (154 and 82 patients). A TTV cutoff of 115 cm3 was chosen on the basis of the risk of recurrence with use of a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology correlated more closely to pathology with TTV than with Milan and University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) criteria (91% versus 69% and 75% of patients, P < 0.0001). Although more patients met qualifying criteria for transplant with TTV (28%‐53% more than Milan and 16%‐26% more than UCSF), no deterioration of outcome was demonstrated in an analysis of patients within TTV ≤ 115 cm3 in comparison with those meeting Milan or UCSF classifications at all institutions. Patients with TTV > 115 cm3 experienced more recurrences and lower patient survival in the Alberta and Colorado series (P < 0.05). When TTV with a cutoff of 115 cm3 is used for candidate selection, the accuracy of pretransplant radiological assessment is enhanced, with posttransplant outcomes not different from those achieved with Milan and UCSF classifications despite a more inclusive patient population. Liver Transpl 14:1107–1115, 2008.


Hepatology | 2008

Clinical risk factors for portopulmonary hypertension.

Steven M. Kawut; Michael J. Krowka; James F. Trotter; Kari E. Roberts; Raymond L. Benza; David B. Badesch; Darren B. Taichman; Evelyn M. Horn; Steven Zacks; Neil Kaplowitz; Robert S. Brown; Michael B. Fallon

Portopulmonary hypertension affects up to 6% of patients with advanced liver disease, but the predictors and biologic mechanism for the development of this complication are unknown. We sought to determine the clinical risk factors for portopulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced liver disease. We performed a multicenter case‐control study nested within a prospective cohort of patients with portal hypertension recruited from tertiary care centers. Cases had a mean pulmonary artery pressure > 25 mm Hg, pulmonary vascular resistance > 240 dynes · second · cm−5, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤ 15 mm Hg. Controls had a right ventricular systolic pressure < 40 mm Hg (if estimable) and normal right‐sided cardiac morphology by transthoracic echocardiography. The study sample included 34 cases and 141 controls. Female sex was associated with a higher risk of portopulmonary hypertension than male sex (adjusted odds ratio = 2.90, 95% confidence interval 1.20‐7.01, P = 0.018). Autoimmune hepatitis was associated with an increased risk (adjusted odds ratio = 4.02, 95% confidence interval 1.14‐14.23, P = 0.031), and hepatitis C infection was associated with a decreased risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.09‐0.65, P = 0.005) of portopulmonary hypertension. The severity of liver disease was not related to the risk of portopulmonary hypertension. Conclusion: Female sex and autoimmune hepatitis were associated with an increased risk of portopulmonary hypertension, whereas hepatitis C infection was associated with a decreased risk in patients with advanced liver disease. Hormonal and immunologic factors may therefore be integral to the development of portopulmonary hypertension. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.)


Gastroenterology | 2008

Impact of Hepatopulmonary Syndrome on Quality of Life and Survival in Liver Transplant Candidates

Michael B. Fallon; Michael J. Krowka; Robert S. Brown; James F. Trotter; Steven Zacks; Kari E. Roberts; Vijay H. Shah; Neil Kaplowitz; Lisa M. Forman; Keith M. Wille; Steven M. Kawut

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) affects 10%-30% of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but the impact on functional status, quality of life, and survival is poorly defined. We assessed the impact of HPS in patients evaluated for liver transplantation. METHODS We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation in 7 academic centers in the United States. Patients with HPS (defined as an increased alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient with intrapulmonary vasodilation) were compared with those without HPS in terms of demographics and clinical variables. New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life, and survival were assessed. RESULTS Seventy-two patients with HPS and 146 patients without HPS were compared. There were no differences in age, sex, or etiology or severity of liver disease between the groups; however, patients with HPS were less likely to have a history of smoking (P = .03). Patients with HPS had worse New York Heart Association functional class (P = .005) and had significantly worse quality of life in certain domains compared with patients without HPS. In addition, patients with HPS also had a significantly increased risk of death compared with patients without HPS despite adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and liver transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-4.41; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS HPS was associated with a significant increase in risk of death as well as worse functional status and quality of life in patients evaluated for liver transplantation.

Collaboration


Dive into the James F. Trotter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Igal Kam

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory T. Everson

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Bak

Anschutz Medical Campus

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert S. Brown

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Goran B. Klintmalm

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa M. Forman

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcelo Kugelmas

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greg J. McKenna

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge