Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Elizabeth K. Darling is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Elizabeth K. Darling.


Birth-issues in Perinatal Care | 2010

Cesarean and Vaginal Birth in Canadian Women: A Comparison of Experiences

Beverley Chalmers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Elizabeth K. Darling; Maureen Heaman; Deshayne B. Fell; Beverley O’Brien; Lily Lee

BACKGROUND Many publications have examined the reasons behind the rising cesarean delivery rate around the world. Womens responses to the Maternity Experiences Survey of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System were examined to explore correlates of having a cesarean section on other experiences surrounding labor, birth, mother-infant contact, and breastfeeding. METHODS A randomly selected sample of 8,244 estimated eligible women stratified primarily by province and territory was drawn from the May 2006 Canadian Census. Completed responses were obtained from 6,421 women (78%). RESULTS Three-quarters of the women (73.7%) gave birth vaginally and 26.3 percent by cesarean section, including 13.5 percent with a planned cesarean and 12.8 percent with an unplanned cesarean. In addition to more interventions in labor, women who had a cesarean birth after attempting a vaginal birth had less mother-infant contact after birth and less optimal breastfeeding practices. CONCLUSION Findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey indicated that women who have cesarean births experience more interventions during labor and birth and have less optimal birthing and early parenting outcomes.


Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health | 2010

A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Ocular Prophylactic Agents Used for the Prevention of Gonococcal and Chlamydial Ophthalmia Neonatorum

Elizabeth K. Darling; Helen McDonald

INTRODUCTION Neonatal eye prophylaxis has been routine in North America for more than a century. Contextual changes justify reexamining this practice, and prompted a systematic review of the efficacy of prophylactic agents. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (1966-2008), EMBASE (1980-2008), CINAHL (1982-2008), and the Cochrane library (the first quarter of 2008) for relevant clinical trials and hand-searched the resulting reference lists. We independently evaluated eligibility and study quality. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model. RESULTS Each of the eight included studies had substantial methodologic weaknesses. Data to estimate the efficacy of prophylaxis in the prevention of gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum (GON) were not available. One study found no differences in rates of chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum (CON) when three agents were compared to no prophylaxis: silver nitrate (relative risk [RR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.02; 2225 newborns), erythromycin (RR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.79; 2306 newborns), and tetracycline (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.42-1.63; 2299 newborns). No statistically significant differences were found between agents in the prevention of GON. Erythromycin and povidone-iodine both decrease the risk of CON when compared to silver nitrate (RR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97; 4514 newborns, and RR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.71; 2005 newborns, respectively). DISCUSSION Failure rates of universal eye prophylaxis support reexamination of this policy where the prevalence of maternal infection is low.


BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014

Contribution of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain to caesarean birth in Canada

Susie Dzakpasu; John Fahey; Russell S. Kirby; Suzanne Tough; Beverley Chalmers; Maureen Heaman; Sharon Bartholomew; Anne Biringer; Elizabeth K. Darling; Lily Lee; Sarah D. McDonald

BackgroundOverweight and obese women are known to be at increased risk of caesarean birth. This study estimates the contribution of prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) to caesarean births in Canada.MethodsWe analyzed data from women in the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey who had a singleton term live birth in 2005-2006. Adjusted odds ratios for caesarean birth across BMI and GWG groups were derived, separately for nulliparous women and parous women with and without a prior caesarean. Population attributable fractions of caesarean births associated with above normal BMI and excess GWG were calculated.ResultsThe overall caesarean birth rate was 25.7%. Among nulliparous and parous women without a previous caesarean birth, rates in obese women were 45.1% and 9.7% respectively, and rates in women who gained above their recommended GWG were 33.5% and 8.0% respectively. Caesarean birth was more strongly associated with BMI than with GWG. However, due to the high prevalence of excess GWG (48.8%), the proportion of caesareans associated with above normal BMI and excess GWG was similar [10.1% (95% CI: 9.9-10.2) and 10.9% (95% CI: 10.7-11.1) respectively]. Overall, one in five (20.2%, 95% CI: 20.0-20.4) caesarean births was associated with above normal BMI or excess GWG.ConclusionsOverweight and obese BMI and above recommended GWG are significantly associated with caesarean birth in singleton term pregnancies in Canada. Strategies to reduce caesarean births must include measures to prevent overweight and obese BMI prior to conception and promote recommended weight gain throughout pregnancy.


Current Pediatric Reviews | 2017

Newborn Bilirubin Screening for Preventing Severe Hyperbilirubinemia and Bilirubin Encephalopathy: A Rapid Review

Kalpana Bhardwaj; Tiffany Locke; Anne Biringer; Allyson Booth; Elizabeth K. Darling; Shelley Dougan; Jane Harrison; Stephen Hill; Ana Johnson; Susan Makin; Beth K. Potter; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil; Julian Little

According to the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics guideline on the management of hyperbilirubinemia, every newborn should be assessed for the risk of developing severe hyperbilirubinemia with the help of predischarge total serum bilirubin or transcutaneous bilirubin measurements and/or assessments of clinical risk factors. The aim of this rapid review is 1) to review the evidence for 1) predicting and preventing severe hyperbilirubinemia and bilirubin encephalopathy, 2) determining the efficacy of home/community treatments (home phototherapy) in the prevention of severe hyperbilirubinemia, and 3) non-invasive/transcutaneous methods for estimating serum bilirubin level. METHODS In this rapid review, studies were identified through the Medline database. The main outcomes of interest were severe hyperbilirubinemia and encephalopathy. A subset of articles was double screened and all articles were critically appraised using the SIGN and AMSTAR checklists. This review investigated if systems approach is likely to reduce the occurrence of severe hyperbilirubinemia. RESULTS Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies assessed the association between bilirubin measurement early in neonatal life and the subsequent development of severe hyperbilirubinemia and chronic bilirubin encephalopathy/kernicterus. It was observed that, highest priority should be given to (i) universal bilirubin screening programs; (ii) implementation of community and midwife practice; (iii) outreach to communities for education of prospective parents; and (iv) development of clinical pathways to monitor, evaluate and track infants with severe hyperbilirubinemia. CONCLUSIONS We found substantial observational evidence that severe hyperbilirubinemia can be accurately predicted and prevented through universal bilirubin screening. So far, there is no evidence of any harm.


Implementation Science | 2015

A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol

Sandra Dunn; Ann E. Sprague; Jeremy Grimshaw; Ian D. Graham; Monica Taljaard; Deshayne B. Fell; Wendy E. Peterson; Elizabeth K. Darling; JoAnn Harrold; Graeme N. Smith; Jessica Reszel; Andrea Lanes; Carolyn Truskoski; Jodi Wilding; Deborah Weiss; Mark Walker

BackgroundThere are wide variations in maternal-newborn care practices and outcomes across Ontario. To help institutions and care providers learn about their own performance, the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario has implemented an audit and feedback system, the Maternal-Newborn Dashboard (MND), for all hospitals providing maternal-newborn care. The dashboard provides (1) near real-time feedback, with site-specific and peer comparison data about six key performance indicators; (2) a visual display of evidence-practice gaps related to the indicators; and (3) benchmarks to provide direction for practice change. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the dashboard, dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitation/support needs that influence the use of this audit and feedback system to improve performance. The objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate the effect of implementing the dashboard across Ontario; (2) explore factors that potentially explain differences in the use of the MND among hospitals; (3) measure factors potentially associated with differential effectiveness of the MND; and (4) identify factors that predict differences in hospital performance.Methods/designA mixed methods design includes (1) an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the effect of the intervention on six indicators, (2) key informant interviews with a purposeful sample of directors/managers from up to 20 maternal-newborn care hospitals to explore factors that influence the use of the dashboard, (3) a provincial survey of obstetrical directors/managers from all maternal-newborn hospitals in the province to measure factors that influence the use of the dashboard, and (4) a multivariable generalized linear mixed effects regression analysis of the indicators at each hospital to quantitatively evaluate the change in practice following implementation of the dashboard and to identify factors most predictive of use.DiscussionStudy results will provide essential data to develop knowledge translation strategies for facilitating practice change, which can be further evaluated through a future cluster randomized trial.


Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health | 2018

Outcomes for the First Year of Ontario's Birth Center Demonstration Project

Ann E. Sprague; Dana Sidney; Elizabeth K. Darling; Vicki Van Wagner; Bobbi Soderstrom; Judy Rogers; Erin Graves; Doug Coyle; Amanda Sumner; Vivian Holmberg; Bushra Khan; Mark Walker

Introduction In 2014, Ontario opened 2 stand‐alone midwifery‐led birth centers. Using mixed methods, we evaluated the first year of operations for quality and safety, client experience, and integration into the maternity care community. This article reports on our study of safety and quality of care. Methods This descriptive evaluation focused on women admitted to a birth center at the beginning of labor. For context, we matched this cohort (on a 1:4 basis) with similar low‐risk midwifery clients giving birth in a hospital. Data sources included Ontarios Better Outcomes Registry and Network (BORN) Information System, the Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ontario census data, and birth center records. Results Of 495 women admitted to a birth center, 87.9% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth, regardless of the eventual location of birth, and 7.7% had a cesarean birth. The transport rate to a hospital was 26.3%. When compared with midwifery clients with a planned hospital birth, rates of intervention (epidural analgesia, labor augmentation, assisted vaginal birth, and cesarean birth) were significantly lower in the planned birth center group, even when controlled for previous cesarean birth and body mass index. Markers of potential morbidity were identified in about 10% of birth center births; however, there were no short‐term health impacts up to discharge from midwifery care at 6 weeks postpartum. Care was low in intervention and safe (minimal negative outcomes and transport rates comparable to the literature). Discussion In the first year of operation, care was consistent with national guidelines, and morbidity and mortality rates and intervention rates were low for women with low‐risk pregnancies seeking a low‐intervention approach for labor and birth. Further evaluation to confirm these findings is required as the number of births grows.


Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health | 2018

The Integration of Ontario Birth Centers into Existing Maternal-Newborn Services: Health Care Provider Experiences

Jessica Reszel; Dana Sidney; Wendy E. Peterson; Elizabeth K. Darling; Vicki Van Wagner; Bobbi Soderstrom; Judy Rogers; Erin Graves; Bushra Khan; Ann E. Sprague

Introduction In 2014, 2 freestanding, midwifery‐led birth centers opened in Ontario, Canada. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the integration of the birth centers into the local, preexisting intrapartum systems from the perspective of health care providers and managerial staff. Methods Focus groups or interviews were conducted with health care providers (paramedics, midwives, nurses, physicians) and managerial staff who had experienced urgent and/or nonurgent maternal or newborn transports from a birth center to one of 4 hospitals in Ottawa or Toronto. A descriptive qualitative approach to data analysis was undertaken. Results Twenty‐four health care providers and managerial staff participated in a focus group or interview. Participants described positive experiences transporting women and/or newborns from the birth centers to hospitals; these positive experiences were attributed to the collaborative planning, training, and communication that occurred prior to opening the birth centers. The degree of integration was dependent on hospital‐specific characteristics such as history, culture, and the presence or absence of midwifery privileging. Participants described the need for only minor improvements to administrative processes as well as the challenge of keeping large numbers of staff updated with respect to urgent transport policies. Planning and opening of the birth centers was seen as a driving force in further integrating midwifery care and improving interprofessional practice. Discussion The collaborative approach for the planning and implementation of the birth centers was a key factor in the successful integration into the existing maternal‐newborn system and contributed to improving integrated professional practice among midwives, paramedics, nurses, and physicians. This approach may be used as a template for the integration of other new independent health care facilities and programs into the existing health care system.


Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health | 2018

Distance from Home Birth to Emergency Obstetric Services and Neonatal Outcomes: A Cohort Study

Elizabeth K. Darling; Karen M. Lawford; Kathi Wilson; Michelle Kryzanauskas; Ivy Lynn Bourgeault

INTRODUCTION Little is known about the relationship between distance from hospital services and the outcomes of planned home births. We examined whether greater driving distance from a hospital with continuous cesarean capability was associated with a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcome among individuals who were planning to give birth at home. METHODS Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we conducted a population-based cohort study of 11,869 individuals who planned to give birth at home in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015. We used postal codes to determine the driving time from maternal residence to the closest hospital offering level 2 or higher maternity care services (ie, hospital with continuous cesarean birth capability). We used log binomial regression analysis to compare the outcomes of individuals who planned a birth more than a 30-minute drive from a level 2 hospital with those of individuals whose births were planned to occur within 30 minutes. We adjusted for maternal age, parity, gestational age, season, and maternal material deprivation quintile. RESULTS We found no statistically significant difference in the rates of 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7 (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10; P = .58), perinatal mortality, meconium aspiration syndrome, and emergency medical service usage. Neonates born to individuals who planned to give birth at a greater distance from a hospital had a lower rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (aRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.44-0.81; P = .001). DISCUSSION We found no increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes for births that were planned to occur more than 30 minutes from a hospital. Our findings can be considered, along with individual risk factors and contextual factors, in decision making about the choice of home birth for individuals who live more than half an hour from a hospital with cesarean capacity.


BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2015

Contribution of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain to adverse neonatal outcomes: population attributable fractions for Canada.

Susie Dzakpasu; John Fahey; Russell S. Kirby; Suzanne Tough; Beverley Chalmers; Maureen Heaman; Sharon Bartholomew; Anne Biringer; Elizabeth K. Darling; Lily Lee; Sarah D. McDonald


Birth-issues in Perinatal Care | 2011

The Experience of Pregnancy and Birth with Midwives: Results from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey

Beverley O’Brien; Beverley Chalmers; Deshayne B. Fell; Maureen Heaman; Elizabeth K. Darling; Pearl Herbert

Collaboration


Dive into the Elizabeth K. Darling's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann E. Sprague

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beverley Chalmers

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Walker

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deshayne B. Fell

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lily Lee

University of Ottawa

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge