Elizabeth Russell Esposito

The influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on walking performance in individuals with lower-limb impairments

BACKGROUND Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses utilize stiffness to improve gait performance through elastic energy storage and return. However, the influence of ankle-foot orthosis stiffness on gait performance has not been systematically investigated, largely due to the difficulty of manufacturing devices with precisely controlled stiffness levels. Additive manufacturing techniques such as selective laser sintering have been used to successfully manufacture ankle-foot orthoses with controlled stiffness levels. The purpose of this study was to use passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses manufactured with selective laser sintering to identify the influence of orthosis stiffness on walking performance in patients with lower-limb neuromuscular and musculoskeletal impairments. METHODS Thirteen subjects with unilateral impairments were enrolled in this study. For each subject, one passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis with stiffness equivalent to the subjects clinically prescribed carbon fiber orthosis, one 20% more compliant and one 20% more stiff, were manufactured using selective laser sintering. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data and electromyographic data were collected from each subject while they walked overground with each orthosis at their self-selected velocity and a controlled velocity. FINDINGS As the orthosis stiffness decreased, ankle range of motion and medial gastrocnemius activity increased while the knee became more extended throughout stance. Minimal changes in other kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic quantities were observed. INTERPRETATION Subjects effectively compensated for changes in ankle-foot orthosis stiffness with altered gastrocnemius activity, and the stiffness levels analyzed in this study had a minimal effect on overall walking performance.

Does unilateral transtibial amputation lead to greater metabolic demand during walking

Previous literature reports greater metabolic demand of walking following transtibial amputation. However, most research focuses on relatively older, less active, and often dysvascular amputees. Servicemembers with traumatic amputation are typically young, fit, and highly active before and often following surgical amputation of their lower limb. This study compared the metabolic demand of walking in young, active individuals with traumatic unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) and nondisabled controls. Heart rate (HR), rate of oxygen consumption, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were calculated as subjects walked at a self-selected velocity and at five standardized velocities based on leg length. The TTA group completed a Prosthetics Evaluation Questionnaire. Oxygen consumption (p = 0.89), net oxygen consumption (p = 0.32), and RPE (p = 0.14) did not differ between groups. Compared with controls, HR was greater in the TTA group and increased to a greater extent with velocity (p < 0.001). Overall, the TTA group rated their walking abilities as high (mean: 93% out of 100%). This is the first study to report equivalent metabolic demand between persons with amputation and controls walking at the same velocity. These results may reflect the physical fitness of the young servicemembers with traumatic amputations and may serve to guide outcome expectations in the future.

How Does Ankle-foot Orthosis Stiffness Affect Gait in Patients With Lower Limb Salvage?

BackgroundAnkle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed during rehabilitation after limb salvage. AFO stiffness is selected to help mitigate gait deficiencies. A new custom dynamic AFO, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), is available to injured service members but prescription guidelines are limited.Questions/purposesIn this study we ask (1) does dynamic AFO stiffness affect gait parameters such as joint angles, moments, and powers; and (2) can a given dynamic AFO stiffness normalize gait mechanics to noninjured control subjects?MethodsThirteen patients with lower limb salvage (ankle arthrodesis, neuropathy, foot/ankle reconstruction, etc) after major lower extremity trauma and 13 control subjects who had no lower extremity trauma and wore no orthosis underwent gait analysis at a standardized speed. Patients wore their custom IDEO with posterior struts of three different stiffnesses: nominal (clinically prescribed stiffness), compliant (20% less stiff), and stiff (20% stiffer). Joint angles, moments, powers, and ground reaction forces were compared across the varying stiffnesses of the orthoses tested and between the patient and control groups.ResultsAn increase in AFO compliance resulted in 20% to 26% less knee flexion relative to the nominal (p = 0.003) and stiff (p = 0.001) conditions, respectively. Ankle range of motion and power generation were, on average, 56% (p < 0.001) and 63% (p < 0.001), respectively, less than controls as a result of the relatively fixed ankle position.ConclusionsPatients with limb salvage readily adapted to different dynamic AFO stiffnesses and demonstrated few biomechanical differences among conditions during walking. None of the stiffness conditions normalized gait to controls.Clinical RelevanceThe general lack of differences across a 40% range of strut stiffness suggests that orthotists do not need to invest large amounts of time identifying optimal device stiffness for patients who use dynamic AFOs for low-impact activities such as walking. However, choosing a stiffer strut may more readily translate to higher-impact activities and offer less chance of mechanical failure.

The relationship between pelvis-trunk coordination and low back pain in individuals with transfemoral amputations §

Low back pain (LBP) is common in individuals with transfemoral amputation and may result from altered gait mechanics associated with prosthetic use. Inter-segmental coordination, assessed through continuous relative phase (CRP), has been used to identify specific patterns as risk factors. The purpose of this study was to explore pelvis and trunk inter-segmental coordination across three walking speeds in individuals with transfemoral amputations with and without LBP. Nine individuals with transfemoral amputations with LBP and seven without pain were compared to twelve able-bodied subjects. Subjects underwent a gait analysis while walking at slow, moderate, and fast speeds. CRP and CRP variability were calculated from three-dimensional pelvis and trunk segment angles. A two-way ANOVA and post hoc tests assessed statistical significance. Individuals with transfemoral amputation demonstrated some coordination patterns that were different from able-bodied individuals, but consistent with previous reports on persons with LBP. The patient groups maintained transverse plane CRP consistent with able-bodied participants (p = 0.966), but not sagittal (p < 0.001) and frontal plane CRP (p = 0.001). Sagittal and frontal CRP may have been re-optimized based on new sets of constraints, such as protective rigidity of the segments, muscular strength limitations, or prosthesis limitations. Patients with amputations and without LBP exhibited few differences. Only frontal and transverse CRP shifted toward out-of-phase as speed increased in the patient group with LBP. Although a cause and effect relationship between CRP and future development of back pain has yet to be determined, these results add to the literature characterizing biomechanical parameters of back pain in high-risk populations.

Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle–foot prostheses

Background: Individuals with leg amputations who use passive prostheses have greater metabolic demands than non-amputees likely due to limited net positive work compared to a biological ankle. New powered ankle–foot prostheses can perform net positive mechanical work to aid push-off capabilities, which may reduce metabolic demands. Objectives: Compare step-to-step transition work and metabolic demand during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses. Study Design: Repeated measures. Methods: Six individuals with transtibial amputation and six able-bodied controls walked at a standardized speed across level ground and up a 5° incline. Calculated measures included mechanical work during step-to-step transitions from the trailing prosthetic to leading intact limb, steady state metabolic rate, and ankle joint kinetics and kinematics. Results: The powered prosthesis generated 63% greater trailing limb step-to-step transition work than the passive during level walking only (p = 0.004). Metabolic rate was lower with the powered prosthesis during level (p = 0.006) but not inclined walking (p = 0.281). The powered prosthesis increased ankle power compared to the passive, to the extent that power was normalized to controls during inclined walking and greater than controls during level walking. Conclusion: The powered prosthesis improved ankle power, metabolic rate, and step-to-step transition work on level ground, with few negative consequences on inclines. These results may be used to guide the development and use of actively powered prosthetic devices in high-functioning individuals. Clinical relevance Overall, powered devices offer biomechanical and metabolic benefits over passive energy storage and return designs on level ground and perform as well as a passive model on inclines. The lower metabolic demand when using the powered device may delay fatigue for individuals with transtibial amputation when walking over level ground.

Biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis when using passive and powered ankle–foot prostheses

BACKGROUND Gait compensations following transtibial amputation negatively affect sound limb loading and increase the risk of knee osteoarthritis. Push-off assistance provided by new powered prostheses may decrease the demands on the sound limb. However, their effects in a young population in the early stages of prosthetic use are still unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare limb loading between 1. passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses, 2. sound and amputated limbs, and 3. individuals with amputations in the relatively early stages of prosthetic use and controls. METHODS Ten young, active individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation and 10 controls underwent biomechanical gait analysis at three speeds. The peak external knee flexor and adductor moments, adductor moments angular impulse, peak vertical ground reaction force and loading rate were calculated. Repeated measures ANOVAs compared between limbs, prostheses, and groups. FINDINGS The powered prosthesis did not decrease the sound limbs peak adduction moment or its impulse, but did decrease the external flexor moment, peak vertical force and loading rate as speed increased. The powered prosthesis decreased the loading rate from controls. The sound limb did not display a significantly greater risk for knee osteoarthritis than the intact limb or than controls in either device. INTERPRETATION In the early stages of prosthetic use, young individuals with transtibial amputation display few biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis development. However, a powered ankle-foot prosthesis still offers some benefits and may be used prophylactically to mitigate potential increases of these variables with continued prosthetic use over time.

Reliability of 3D gait data across multiple laboratories

The aim of this study was to analyze the repeatability of gait analysis studies performed across multiple trials, sessions, and laboratories. Ten healthy participants (6 male/4 female, mean age of 30, mean BMI of 24kg/m(2)) were assessed in 3 sessions conducted at each of the three Centers of Excellence for Amputee Care within the Department of Defense. For each test session, kinematic and kinetic parameters were collected during five walking trials for each limb. One independent examiner at each site placed markers on the subjects. Biomechanical data were collected at two walking speeds: self-selected and Froude speed. Variability of the gait data was attributed to inter-trial, inter-session, and inter-lab errors for each subject. These error sources were averaged across all ten subjects to obtain a pooled error estimate. The kinematic errors were fairly consistent at the two walking speeds tested. Median inter-lab kinematic errors were <5.0° (median 2.3°) for all joint angle measurements. However, the kinetic error differed significantly between walking speeds. The median inter-lab kinetic error for the self-selected speed was 0.112Nm/kg (ICR 0.091-0.184) with a maximum of 0.226Nm/kg. The errors were greatly reduced when the subjects walked at their Froude speed. The median inter-lab error was 0.048Nm/kg (ICR 0.025-0.078, maximum 0.086). These data demonstrate that it is possible to get reliable data across multiple gait laboratories, particularly when gait speed is standardized across testing sessions. A key similarity between sites was the use of identical anatomical segment definitions for the respective gait models.

Biomechanics of uphill walking using custom ankle-foot orthoses of three different stiffnesses §

UNLABELLED Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) can provide support and improve walking ability in individuals with plantarflexor weakness. Passive-dynamic AFO stiffness can be optimized for over-ground walking, however little research exists for uphill walking, when plantarflexor contributions are key. PURPOSE Compare uphill walking biomechanics (1) between dynamic AFO users and able-bodied control subjects. (2) between injured and sound limbs (3) across different AFO stiffnesses. METHODS Twelve patients with unilateral limb-salvage and twelve matched, able-bodied controls underwent biomechanical gait analysis when walking up a 10° incline. Three AFO stiffnesses were tested in the patient group: Nominal (clinically prescribed), Compliant (20% less stiff), and Stiff (20% more stiff). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION AFO users experienced less ankle motion and power generation, lower knee extensor moments, and greater hip flexion and power generation than controls during uphill walking. Despite these deviations, they walked at equivalent self-selected velocities and stride lengths. Asymmetries were present at the ankle and knee with decreased ankle motion and power, and lower knee extensor moments on the AFO limb. Stiffer AFOs increased knee joint flexion but a 40% range in AFO stiffness had few other effects on gait. Therefore, a wide range of clinically prescribed AFO stiffnesses may adequately assist uphill walking.

The influence of passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis bending axis location on gait performance in individuals with lower-limb impairments.

BACKGROUND Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses are commonly prescribed to augment impaired ankle muscle function, however their design and prescription are largely qualitative. One design includes a footplate and cuff, and flexible strut connecting the two. During gait, deflection occurs along the strut, with the greatest deflection at a central bending axis. The vertical location of the axis can affect lower extremity biomechanics. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of bending axis location on gait performance. METHODS For thirteen participants with unilateral ankle muscle weakness, an additive manufacturing framework was used to fabricate passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis struts with central and off-center bending axes. Participants walked overground while electromyographic, kinetic and kinematic data were collected for three different bending axes: proximal (high), central (middle) and distal (low), and the participants indicated their order of bending axis preference after testing. Gait measures and preference effect sizes were examined during six regions of the gait cycle. FINDINGS A few differences between bending axes were observed: in the first double-leg support peak plantarflexion angle, peak dorsiflexion moment and positive hip work, in the early single-leg support peak knee extension moment and positive ankle and knee work, and in the late single-leg support gastrocnemius activity and vertical ground reaction force impulse. In addition, preference was strongly related to various gait measures. INTERPRETATION Despite the observed statistical differences, altering bending axis location did not produce large and consistent changes in gait performance. Thus, individual preference and comfort may be more important factors guiding prescription.

Sound limb loading in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation across a range of walking velocities

BACKGROUND Individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation demonstrate significantly increased rates of osteoarthritis in their sound knee. This increased risk is likely the result of altered knee mechanical loading and gait compensations resulting from limited function in the prosthetic limb. Altered knee loading as calculated using loading rates and peak external knee adduction moments and impulses have been associated with both the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis in other populations. The purpose of this study was to determine if young individuals with transfemoral amputation demonstrate biomechanical indicators of increased knee osteoarthritis risk. METHODS Fourteen young male Service Members with unilateral transfemoral amputation and 14 able-bodied service members underwent biomechanical gait analysis at three standardized walking velocities. A two-way ANOVA (group × speed) with unpaired comparisons with Bonferroni-Holm post-hoc corrections assessed statistical significance and effect sizes (d) were calculated. FINDINGS Normalized peak external knee adduction moments and impulses were 25.7% (P < 0.014, d > 0.994) and 27.1% (P < 0.012, d > 1.019) lower, respectively, in individuals with trans-femoral amputation than controls when averaged across speeds, and effect sizes were large. External knee flexor moments were not, however, different between groups and effect sizes were generally small (P > 0.380, d < 0.338). Maximal loading rates were significantly greater in individuals with amputation and effect sizes were large (P < 0.001, d > 1.644). INTERPRETATION Individuals with transfemoral amputation did not demonstrate biomechanical risk factors for high medial compartment knee joint loads, but the increased loading rates could place the sound knee at greater risk for cartilage or other tissue damage, even if not localized to the medial compartment.