Elliott M. Ross
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Elliott M. Ross.
Cell | 1992
Gabriel Berstein; Jonathan L. Blank; Deok Young Jhon; John H. Exton; Sue Goo Rhee; Elliott M. Ross
Purified M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor and Gq/11 were coreconstituted in lipid vesicles. Addition of purified phospholipase C-beta 1 (PLC-beta 1) further stimulated the receptor-promoted steady-state GTPase activity of Gq/11 up to 20-fold. Stimulation depended upon receptor-mediated GTP-GDP exchange. Addition of PLC-beta 1 caused a rapid burst of hydrolysis of Gq/11-bound GTP that was at least 50-fold faster than in its absence. Thus, PLC-beta 1 stimulates hydrolysis of Gq/11-bound GTP and acts as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for its physiologic regulator, Gq/11. GTPase-stimulating activity was specific both for PLC-beta 1 and Gq/11. Such GAP activity by an effector coupled to a trimeric G protein can reconcile slow GTP hydrolysis by pure G proteins in vitro with fast physiologic deactivation of G protein-mediated signaling.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1996
Gloria H. Biddlecome; Gabriel Berstein; Elliott M. Ross
The phospholipase C-β1 (PLC-β1) signaling pathway was reconstituted by addition of purified PLC to phospholipid vesicles that contained purified recombinant m1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor, G, and 2-4 mol % [3H]phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. In this system, the muscarinic agonist carbachol stimulated steady-state PLC activity up to 90-fold in the presence of GTP. Both GTP and agonist were required for PLC activation, which was observed at physiological levels of Ca (10-100 nM). PLC-β1 is also a GTPase-activating protein for G. It accelerated steady-state GTPase activity up to 60-fold in the presence of carbachol, which alone stimulated activity 6-10-fold, and increased the rate of hydrolysis of G-bound GTP by at least 100-fold. Despite this rapid hydrolysis of G-bound GTP, the receptor maintained >10% of the total G in the active GTP-bound form by catalyzing GTP binding at a rate of at least 20-25 min, 10-fold faster than previously described. These and other kinetic data indicate that the receptor and PLC-β1 coordinately regulate the amplitude of the PLC signal and the rates of signal initiation and termination. They also suggest a mechanism in which the receptor, G, and PLC form a three-protein complex in the presence of agonist and GTP (stable over multiple GTPase cycles) that is responsible for PLC signaling.
Annual Review of Physiology | 2013
Ganesh Kadamur; Elliott M. Ross
Phospholipase C (PLC) converts phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) and diacylglycerol (DAG). DAG and IP(3) each control diverse cellular processes and are also substrates for synthesis of other important signaling molecules. PLC is thus central to many important interlocking regulatory networks. Mammals express six families of PLCs, each with both unique and overlapping controls over expression and subcellular distribution. Each PLC also responds acutely to its own spectrum of activators that includes heterotrimeric G protein subunits, protein tyrosine kinases, small G proteins, Ca(2+), and phospholipids. Mammalian PLCs are autoinhibited by a region in the catalytic TIM barrel domain that is the target of much of their acute regulation. In combination, the PLCs act as a signaling nexus that integrates numerous signaling inputs, critically governs PIP(2) levels, and regulates production of important second messengers to determine cell behavior over the millisecond to hour timescale.
Current Biology | 1997
Rama Ranganathan; Elliott M. Ross
InaD, a Drosophila photoreceptor scaffolding protein, assembles multiple signal-transducing proteins at the membrane via its five PDZ domains, enhancing speed and efficiency of vision. Extensive conservation of PDZ domains suggests that these motifs have a general role in organizing diverse signaling complexes.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2007
Lily I. Jiang; Julie Collins; Richard Davis; Keng Mean Lin; Dianne L. DeCamp; Tamara I. A. Roach; Robert Hsueh; Robert A. Rebres; Elliott M. Ross; Ronald Taussig; Iain D. C. Fraser; Paul C. Sternweis
Regulation of intracellular cyclic adenosine 3 ′,5 ′-monophosphate (cAMP) is integral in mediating cell growth, cell differentiation, and immune responses in hematopoietic cells. To facilitate studies of cAMP regulation we developed a BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) sensor for cAMP, CAMYEL (cAMP sensor using YFP-Epac-RLuc), which can quantitatively and rapidly monitor intracellular concentrations of cAMP in vivo. This sensor was used to characterize three distinct pathways for modulation of cAMP synthesis stimulated by presumed Gs-dependent receptors for isoproterenol and prostaglandin E2. Whereas two ligands, uridine 5 ′-diphosphate and complement C5a, appear to use known mechanisms for augmentation of cAMP via Gq/calcium and Gi, the action of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is novel. In these cells, S1P, a biologically active lysophospholipid, greatly enhances increases in intracellular cAMP triggered by the ligands for Gs-coupled receptors while having only a minimal effect by itself. The enhancement of cAMP by S1P is resistant to pertussis toxin and independent of intracellular calcium. Studies with RNAi and chemical perturbations demonstrate that the effect of S1P is mediated by the S1P2 receptor and the heterotrimeric G13 protein. Thus in these macrophage cells, all four major classes of G proteins can regulate intracellular cAMP.
Nature Cell Biology | 2005
Xinhua Wang; Weizhong Zeng; Abigail A. Soyombo; Wei Tang; Elliott M. Ross; Anthony P. Barnes; Sharon L. Milgram; Josef M. Penninger; Patrick B. Allen; Paul Greengard; Shmuel Muallem
Signalling by G proteins is controlled by the regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins that accelerate the GTPase activity of Gα subunits and act in a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-specific manner. The conserved RGS domain accelerates the G subunit GTPase activity, whereas the variable amino-terminal domain participates in GPCR recognition. How receptor recognition is achieved is not known. Here, we show that the scaffold protein spinophilin (SPL), which binds the third intracellualar loop (3iL) of several GPCRs, binds the N-terminal domain of RGS2. SPL also binds RGS1, RGS4, RGS16 and GAIP. When expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, SPL markedly increased inhibition of α-adrenergic receptor (αAR) Ca2+ signalling by RGS2. Notably, the constitutively active mutant αARA293E (the mutation being in the 3iL) did not bind SPL and was relatively resistant to inhibition by RGS2. Use of βAR–αAR chimaeras identified the 288REKKAA293 sequence as essential for the binding of SPL and inhibition of Ca2+ signalling by RGS2. Furthermore, αAR-evoked Ca2+ signalling is less sensitive to inhibition by SPL in rgs2−/− cells and less sensitive to inhibition by RGS2 in spl−/− cells. These findings provide a general mechanism by which RGS proteins recognize GPCRs to confer signalling specificity.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1998
Jun Wang; Axel Ducret; Yaping Tu; Tohru Kozasa; Ruedi Aebersold; Elliott M. Ross
We cloned the cDNA for human RGSZ1, the major Gz-selective GTPase-activating protein (GAP) in brain (Wang, J., Tu, Y., Woodson, J., Song, X., and Ross, E. M. (1997)J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5732–5740) and a member of the RGS family of G protein GAPs. Its sequence is 83% identical to RET-RGS1 (except its N-terminal extension) and 56% identical to GAIP. Purified, recombinant RGSZ1, RET-RGS1, and GAIP each accelerated the hydrolysis of Gαz-GTP over 400-fold withK m values of ∼2 nm. RGSZ1 was 100-fold selective for Gαz over Gαi, unusually specific among RGS proteins. Other enzymological properties of RGSZ1, brain Gz GAP, and RET-RGS1 were identical; GAIP differed only in Mg2+ dependence and in its slightly lower selectivity for Gαz. RGSZ1, RET-RGS1, and GAIP thus define a subfamily of Gz GAPs within the RGS proteins. RGSZ1 has no obvious membrane-spanning region but is tightly membrane-bound in brain. Its regulatory activity in membranes depends on stable bilayer association. When co-reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles with Gz and m2 muscarinic receptors, RGSZ1 increased agonist-stimulated GTPase >15-fold with EC50<12 nm, but RGSZ1 added to the vesicle suspension was <0.1% as active. RGSZ1, RET-RGS1, and GAIP share a cysteine string sequence, perhaps targeting them to secretory vesicles and allowing them to participate in the proposed control of secretion by Gz. Phosphorylation of Gαz by protein kinase C inhibited the GAP activity of RGSZ1 and other RGS proteins, providing a mechanism for potentiation of Gz signaling by protein kinase C.
Nature | 2002
Alfred G. Gilman; Melvin I. Simon; Henry R. Bourne; Bruce A. Harris; Rochelle Long; Elliott M. Ross; James T. Stull; Ronald Taussig; Adam P. Arkin; Melanie H. Cobb; Jason G. Cyster; Peter N. Devreotes; James E. Ferrell; David A. Fruman; Michael Gold; Arthur Weiss; Michael J. Berridge; Lewis C. Cantley; William A. Catterall; Shaun R. Coughlin; Eric N. Olson; Temple F. Smith; Joan S. Brugge; David Botstein; Jack E. Dixon; Tony Hunter; Robert J. Lefkowitz; Anthony J. Pawson; Paul W. Sternberg; Harold E. Varmus
The Alliance for Cellular Signaling is a large-scale collaboration designed to answer global questions about signalling networks. Pathways will be studied intensively in two cells — B lymphocytes (the cells of the immune system) and cardiac myocytes — to facilitate quantitative modelling. One goal is to catalyse complementary research in individual laboratories; to facilitate this, all alliance data are freely available for use by the entire research community.The Alliance for Cellular Signaling is a large-scale collaboration designed to answer global questions about signalling networks. Pathways will be studied intensively in two cells — B lymphocytes (the cells of the immune system) and cardiac myocytes — to facilitate quantitative modelling. One goal is to catalyse complementary research in individual laboratories; to facilitate this, all alliance data are freely available for use by the entire research community.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 1999
Yaping Tu; Sergei Popov; Clive A. Slaughter; Elliott M. Ross
RGS4 and RGS10 expressed in Sf9 cells are palmitoylated at a conserved Cys residue (Cys95 in RGS4, Cys66 in RGS10) in the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domain that is also autopalmitoylated when the purified proteins are incubated with palmitoyl-CoA. RGS4 also autopalmitoylates at a previously identified cellular palmitoylation site, either Cys2 or Cys12. The C2A/C12A mutation essentially eliminates both autopalmitoylation and cellular [3H]palmitate labeling of Cys95. Membrane-bound RGS4 is palmitoylated both at Cys95 and Cys2/12, but cytosolic RGS4 is not palmitoylated. RGS4 and RGS10 are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for the Gi and Gq families of G proteins. Palmitoylation of Cys95 on RGS4 or Cys66 on RGS10 inhibits GAP activity 80–100% toward either Gαi or Gαzin a single-turnover, solution-based assay. In contrast, when GAP activity was assayed as acceleration of steady-state GTPase in receptor-G protein proteoliposomes, palmitoylation of RGS10 potentiated GAP activity ≥20-fold. Palmitoylation near the N terminus of C95V RGS4 did not alter GAP activity toward soluble Gαz and increased Gz GAP activity about 2-fold in the vesicle-based assay. Dual palmitoylation of wild-type RGS4 remained inhibitory. RGS protein palmitoylation is thus multi-site, complex in its control, and either inhibitory or stimulatory depending on the RGS protein and its sites of palmitoylation.
Journal of Cell Biology | 2003
Dong Min Shin; Marlin H. Dehoff; Xiang Luo; Shin Hyeok Kang; Jiangchen Tu; Surendra K. Nayak; Elliott M. Ross; Paul F. Worley; Shmuel Muallem
Homers are scaffolding proteins that bind G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptors (IP3Rs), ryanodine receptors, and TRP channels. However, their role in Ca2+ signaling in vivo is not known. Characterization of Ca2+ signaling in pancreatic acinar cells from Homer2−/− and Homer3−/− mice showed that Homer 3 has no discernible role in Ca2+ signaling in these cells. In contrast, we found that Homer 2 tunes intensity of Ca2+ signaling by GPCRs to regulate the frequency of [Ca2+]i oscillations. Thus, deletion of Homer 2 increased stimulus intensity by increasing the potency for agonists acting on various GPCRs to activate PLCβ and evoke Ca2+ release and oscillations. This was not due to aberrant localization of IP3Rs in cellular microdomains or IP3R channel activity. Rather, deletion of Homer 2 reduced the effectiveness of exogenous regulators of G proteins signaling proteins (RGS) to inhibit Ca2+ signaling in vivo. Moreover, Homer 2 preferentially bound to PLCβ in pancreatic acini and brain extracts and stimulated GAP activity of RGS4 and of PLCβ in an in vitro reconstitution system, with minimal effect on PLCβ-mediated PIP2 hydrolysis. These findings describe a novel, unexpected function of Homer proteins, demonstrate that RGS proteins and PLCβ GAP activities are regulated functions, and provide a molecular mechanism for tuning signal intensity generated by GPCRs and, thus, the characteristics of [Ca2+]i oscillations.