Elzbieta Grebski

Densitometry for assessment of effect of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.

To explore if change in the extent of emphysema correlated with change in lung function, the effect of resection of emphysematous tissue was studied by computed tomography (CT) densitometry. In addition, the current authors studied how surgery-induced change in emphysema related to lung density in control subjects. In total, 30 patients (14 females; mean±sd age 59±10 yrs) with severe emphysema before and 3 months after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), 48 patients with moderate emphysema and 76 control subjects were investigated. Lung density (15th percentile point) of both lungs and heterogeneity of lung density between 12 isovolumetric partitions in each lung were calculated from chest CT images. The 15th percentile point and its heterogeneity could distinguish controls from subjects with moderate emphysema with a sensitivity and specificity of >95%. LVRS significantly increased lung density by 5.0±10.9 g·L−1 (n = 30). Improvement in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and in residual volume significantly correlated with an increase in lung density (n = 20 and 28, respectively). Change in forced expiratory volume in one second did not correlate with change in lung density. In conclusion, lung density 15th percentile point is a valuable surrogate marker for detection of both the extent of and reduction in emphysema.

Low specificity of the bacterial index for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by bronchoalveolar lavage.

The bacterial index (BI) as defined by the sum of log10 colony-forming units (cfu) of microorganisms per milliliter of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, i.e., a multiplication of the single cfu/ml, has been used to distinguish between polymicrobial pneumonia (BI≥5) and colonization (BI<5). Since many false-positive results are to be expected using this parameter, the diagnostic value of the BI was studied prospectively by obtaining bacteriologic cultures of BAL fluid in 165 consecutive unselected patients. In 27 cases the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was established on clinical criteria. In 133 patients pneumonia could be excluded, and in five patients the diagnosis remained unclear. Using a cut-off of ≥105 cfu/ml BAL fluid, sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pneumonia were 33% (9/27) and 99% (132/133), respectively. Sensitivity was mainly influenced by prior treatment with antibiotics, being 70% (7/10) in untreated and 12% (2/17) in treated patients. Applying the BI methodology at a cut-off of ≥ 5, however, resulted in an unacceptably high rate of 16 additional false-positive results, thus lowering the specificity to 87% (116/133;P<0.0001) while increasing the sensitivity to only 41% (11/27;P=0.77). In conclusion, given the high rate of false-positive results, the methodology of the BI is of doubtful value for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by BAL in an unselected patient group. By applying the absolute number of cfu/ml BAL fluid, however, positive bacteriologic cultures of BAL fluid are highly specific for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Their sensitivity is limited by previous antibiotic therapy.