Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Emanuele Asti is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Emanuele Asti.


Obesity Surgery | 2004

Plasma cholecystokinin levels after vertical banded gastroplasty: Effects of an acidified meal

D. Foschi; Fabio Corsi; Laura Pisoni; Tarcisio Vago; Maurizio Bevilacqua; Emanuele Asti; Ilaria Righi; E. Trabucchi

Background: Although cholecystokinin (CCK) is involved in the short-term regulation of satiety, it has not been investigated in obese patients subjected to bariatric restrictive operations. Methods: 8 morbidly obese patients (BMI 49.1 ± 6.9), 7F and 1M, were investigated before and after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). 6 healthy lean volunteers served as the control group. CCK was determined (RIA) after an overnight fast and after the administration of an acidified (pH 3) liquid meal. Blood samples were taken 45 min before the meal, 5 min after it and then every 30 min for 3 hours. Results: There were no differences between groups in basal CCK levels. However, the peak of CCK after the meal was significantly higher (P <0.01) in obese patients after VBG (24.9 ± 18 pmol/l) than before VBG (9.8 ± 6.7 pmol/l) and when compared with the control group (8.0 ± 6.3 pmol/l).The time needed to reach the peak was longer in healthy volunteers (105 ± 24.9 min) than in obese patients before VBG (45 ± 40 min) and after VBG (7.5± 12 min) (P<0.01). Conclusions: VBG increases the peak of CCK secretion and shortens the time to reach it. These changes could contribute to the satiety effects of gastric restrictive operations.


Annals of Surgery | 2017

Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-Center Cohort Study.

Emanuele Asti; Stefano Siboni; Veronica Lazzari; Gianluca Bonitta; Andrea Sironi; Luigi Bonavina

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify patients’ characteristics that may predict failure and removal of the Linx sphincter augmentation device, and to report the results of 1-stage laparoscopic removal and fundoplication. Background: The Linx device is a long-term magnetic implant that was developed as a less disruptive and more reproducible surgical option for patients with early-stage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Removal of the device has been shown to be feasible, but no long-term results of this procedure have been reported yet. Methods: A review of the prospectively collected research database of antireflux surgery was performed to identify all patients who underwent a Linx implant between 2007 and 2015 in our Institution. Demographics, duration of symptoms and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, GERD-Health Related Quality of Life scores, esophageal acid exposure, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, number of beads (size) of the implanted device, concurrent crura repair, angle of inclination of the device at postoperative chest film, operative time, postoperative complications, and length of stay were recorded. Data of the explanted patients were compared with those with the device in situ in an attempt to identify factors associated with Linx removal. Results: Over the study period, 164 patients underwent a laparoscopic Linx implant and had a median follow-up of 48 months [interquartile range (IQR) 36]. Eleven (6.7%) of these patients were explanted at a later date. The estimated removal-free probability at 80 months was 0.91 [confidence interval (CI) 0.86–0.96]. Supine esophageal acid exposure before the index operation was associated with Linx removal (odds ratio 1.05, CI 1.01–1.11, P = 0.037). The main presenting symptom requiring device removal was recurrence of heartburn or regurgitation in 5 patients (46%), followed by dysphagia (n = 4, 37%) and chest pain (n = 2, 18%). In 2 patients, full-thickness erosion of the esophageal wall with partial endoluminal penetration of the device occurred. The median implant duration was 20 months, with 82% of the patients being explanted between 12 and 24 months after the implant. Device removal was most commonly combined with partial fundoplication. There were no conversions to laparotomy and the postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. At the latest follow-up, ranging from 12 to 58 months, the GERD-HRQL score was within normal limits in all patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic removal of the Linx device can be safely performed as a 1-stage procedure and in conjunction with fundoplication even in patients presenting with device erosion.


Obesity Surgery | 2005

Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Modifies Plasma Ghrelin Secretion In Obese Patients

D. Foschi; Fabio Corsi; A Rizzi; Emanuele Asti; V Carsenzuola; Tarcisio Vago; Maurizio Bevilacqua; P Riva; E. Trabucchi

Background: Restrictive bariatric surgery causes weight loss through substantial decline of appetite with satiety after meals. Reduction of plasma ghrelin levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding could contribute to these effects, although contradictory results have been reported. The only restrictive operation still not yet investigated is vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). We studied the effects of VBG on basal plasma ghrelin levels and meal-mediated inhibition. Methods: 12 morbidly obese patients, 11 female and 1 male, were studied before and after VBG, when the BMI fell by 20%. The control group consisted of 6 lean volunteers. Active ghrelin was determined by RIA after overnight fasting and after the administration of a liquid meal. Results: Obese patients preoperatively had significantly lower basal plasma ghrelin levels than lean volunteers, and the meal did not inhibit ghrelin secretion. After VBG and 20% BMI loss, basal plasma ghrelin levels increased and the reduction caused by a meal recovered. Conclusions: Weight loss caused by VBG is associated with higher plasma ghrelin levels in obese patients. The operation restores the normal adaptation of the A- cells of the stomach to a meal.


World Journal of Emergency Surgery | 2015

Foregut caustic injuries: results of the world society of emergency surgery consensus conference

Luigi Bonavina; Mircéa Chirica; Ognjan M. Skrobić; Yoram Kluger; Nelson Adami Andreollo; Sandro Contini; Aleksander Simic; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Carlo Locatelli; Osvaldo Chiara; Jeffry L. Kashuk; Federico Coccolini; Yuri Macchitella; Massimiliano Mutignani; Cesare Cutrone; Marco Dei Poli; Tino Martino Valetti; Emanuele Asti; Michael A. Kelly; Pesko P

IntroductionLesions of the upper digestive tract due to ingestion of caustic agents still represent a major medical and surgical emergency worldwide. The work-up of these patients is poorly defined and no clear therapeutic guidelines are available.Purpose of the studyThe aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based international consensus on primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of this life-threatening and potentially disabling condition.MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed by an international panel of experts under the auspices of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The level of evidence of the screened publications was graded using the Oxford 2011 criteria. The level of evidence of the literature and the main topics regarding foregut caustic injuries were discussed during a dedicated meeting in Milan, Italy (April 2015), and during the 3rd Annual Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery in Jerusalem, Israel (July 2015).ResultsOne-hundred-forty-seven full papers which addressed the relevant clinical questions of the research were admitted to the consensus conference. There was an unanimous consensus on the fact that the current literature on foregut caustic injuries lacks homogeneous classification systems and prospective methodology. Moreover, the non-standardized definition of technical and clinical success precludes any accurate comparison of therapeutic modalities. Key recommendations and algorithms based on expert opinions, retrospective studies and literature reviews were proposed and approved during the final consensus conference. The clinical practice guidelines resulting from the consensus conference were approved by the WSES council.ConclusionsThe recommendations emerging from this consensus conference, although based on a low level of evidence, have important clinical implications. A world registry of foregut caustic injuries could be useful to collect a homogeneous data-base for prospective clinical studies that may help improving the current clinical practice guidelines.


Surgery | 2016

Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis

Luigi Bonavina; Federica Scolari; Alberto Aiolfi; Gianluca Bonitta; Andrea Sironi; Greta Saino; Emanuele Asti

BACKGROUND Transthoracic esophagectomy remains the current therapeutic standard for localized esophageal carcinoma. Minimally invasive surgery has proven at least equivalent to open surgery regarding the early outcomes, but only 1 randomized study has compared the thoracoscopic with the thoracotomy approach. The primary objective of this study was to assess the early outcome of the thoracoscopic prone esophagectomy (TPE) and the hybrid Ivor Lewis (HIL) esophagectomy in 2 concurrent patient cohorts. METHODS We compared the 1-year outcome of 3-stage TPE and 2-stage HIL done over the same time period in a single center. The propensity score matching method was used to reduce selection bias by creating 2 groups of patients similarly likely to receive a treatment on the basis of measured baseline characteristics. After generating propensity scores using the covariates of age, sex, body mass index, forced expiration volume at 1 second, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histologic tumor type, tumor site, pTNM stage, and neoadjuvant therapy, 93 TPE patients were matched with 197 HIL patients using a 1:1 ratio and the nearest-neighbor score matching. Main outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS Operative time was longer in TPE patients (P < .01). All postoperative outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, nodal harvest, R0 resection rate, and 1-year survival rates were similar in the 2 matched groups. CONCLUSION Both operative approaches are safe and effective; using 1 or the other depends on the tumor site, surgeon experience and preference, and patient expectations.


Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | 2016

Importance of Esophageal Manometry and pH Monitoring in the Evaluation of Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Study.

Ciro Andolfi; Luigi Bonavina; Robert T. Kavitt; Vani J. Konda; Emanuele Asti; Marco G. Patti

BACKGROUND Patients who have heartburn are treated with acid-reducing medications on the assumption that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is causing the symptom. In the absence of a response to therapy, patients are often assumed to have refractory GERD, and they are referred for laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), often without further diagnostic evaluation. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that (1) in some patients with refractory GERD, the heartburn is not secondary to reflux, but rather to stasis and fermentation of food in the presence of achalasia and (2) esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are essential to establish proper diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five hundred twenty-four patients, whose final diagnosis was achalasia, were referred to two quaternary care centers. Symptomatic evaluation, barium swallow, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring were performed in all patients. RESULTS One hundred fifty-two patients (29%) had been treated with acid-reducing medications for an average of 29.3 months, and were referred for LARS because of lack of response to medical therapy. One patient had already been treated with a Nissen fundoplication. All patients were diagnosed with achalasia and underwent Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study showed that (1) one-third of achalasia patients complained of heartburn and (2) patients with heartburn not responding to medical treatment must be carefully evaluated before referral to surgery. These data confirm the importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring in any patient considered for LARS.


Medicine | 2016

Longitudinal comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication versus magnetic sphincter augmentation: Observational cohort study with propensity score analysis.

Emanuele Asti; Gianluca Bonitta; Andrea Lovece; Veronica Lazzari; Luigi Bonavina

AbstractOnly a minority of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) are offered a surgical option. This is mostly due to the fear of potential side effects, the variable success rate, and the extreme alteration of gastric anatomy with the current gold standard, the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. It has been reported that laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) and laparoscopic sphincter augmentation using a magnetic device (LINX) can treat reflux more physiologically and with a lower incidence of side-effects and reoperation rate. We present the first comparing quality of life in patients undergoing LTF versus LINX.Observational cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing LTF or LINX over the same time period were compared by using the propensity score full matching method and generalized estimating equation. Criteria of exclusion were >3 cm hiatal hernia, grade C–D esophagitis, ineffective esophageal motility, body mass index >35, and previous upper abdominal surgery. The primary study outcome was quality of life measured with the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, presence of gas-related symptoms or dysphagia, and reoperation-free probability.Between March 2007 and July 2014, 238 patients with GERD met the criteria of inclusion in the study. Of these, 103 underwent an LTF and 135 a LINX procedure. All patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Over time, patients in both groups had similar GERD-HRQL scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 0.89–1.27; P = 0.578), PPI use (OR 1.18, CI 0.81–1.70; P = 0.388), gas-related symptoms (OR 0.69, CI 0.21–2.28; P = 0.542), dysphagia (OR 0.62, CI 0.26–1.30; P = 0.241), and reoperation-free probability (stratified log-rank test = 0.556).In 2 concurrent cohorts of patients with early stage GERD undergoing LTF or LINX and matched by propensity score analysis, health-related quality of life significantly improved and GERD-HRQL scores had a similar decreasing trend over time up to 7 years of follow-up. We conclude that LTF and LINX provide similar disease-specific quality of life over time in patients with early stage GERD.


Annals of Surgery | 2017

Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients

Henner Schmidt; Susanne S. Gisbertz; Johnny Moons; Ioannis Rouvelas; Juha Kauppi; Andrew K. Brown; Emanuele Asti; Misha D. Luyer; Sjoerd M. Lagarde; Felix Berlth; Annouck Philippron; Christiane J. Bruns; Arnulf H. Hölscher; Paul M. Schneider; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen; Philippe Nafteux; Magnus Nilsson; Jari V. Räsänen; Francesco Palazzo; Ernest L. Rosato; Stuart Mercer; Luigi Bonavina; G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen; Bas P. L. Wijnhoven; W. Schröder; Piet Pattyn; Peter P. Grimminger; C. Gutschow

Objective: To define “best possible” outcomes in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (ttMIE). Background: TtMIE, performed by experts in patients with low comorbidity, may serve as a benchmark procedure for esophagectomy. Patients and Methods: From a cohort of 1057 ttMIE, performed over a 5-year period in 13 high-volume centers for esophageal surgery, we selected a study group of 334 patients (31.6%) that fulfilled criteria of low comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ⩽2, WHO/ECOG score ⩽1, age ⩽65 years, body mass index 19–29 kg/m2). Endpoints included postoperative morbidity measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification and the comprehensive complication index. Benchmark values were defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome parameters of the participating centers to represent best achievable results. Results: Benchmark patients were predominantly male (82.9%) with a median age of 58 years (53–62). High intrathoracic (Ivor Lewis) and cervical esophagogastrostomy (McKeown) were performed in 188 (56.3%) and 146 (43.7%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) ICU and hospital stay was 0 (0–2) and 12 (9–18) days, respectively. 56.0% of patients developed at least 1 complication, and 26.9% experienced major morbidity (≥grade III), mostly related to pulmonary complications (25.7%), anastomotic leakage (15.9%), and cardiac events (13.5%). Benchmark values at 30 days after hospital discharge were ⩽55.7% and ⩽30.8% for overall and major complications, ⩽18.0% for readmission, ⩽3.1% for positive resection margins, and ≥23 for lymph node yield. Benchmarks at 30 and 90 days were ⩽1.0% and ⩽4.6% for mortality, and ⩽40.8 and ⩽42.8 for the comprehensive complication index, respectively. Conclusion: This outcome analysis of patients with low comorbidity undergoing ttMIE may serve as a reference to evaluate surgical performance in major esophageal resection.


Surgery | 2017

Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia

Emanuele Asti; Andrea Sironi; Andrea Lovece; Giulia Bonavina; Melania Fanelli; Gianluca Bonitta; Luigi Bonavina

Background. In addition to symptom scores, a persons perception of health and quality of life assessment is an important indicator of quality of treatment and can provide an efficient index to compare different therapeutic modalities in chronic disease states. Only a few studies have investigated quality of life comprehensively in patients with achalasia, and therefore the controversy regarding the best treatment algorithm continues. The primary study outcome was pre‐ and postoperative quality of life in patients with achalasia undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. Methods. The study is a retrospective, observational cohort. The hospital registry and the updated research database were reviewed to identify all patients who were treated for achalasia between 2010 and 2015. Patients were eligible for the study if they had a minimum 1‐year follow‐up and had pre‐and postoperative Eckardt, Short Form‐36, and Gastro‐Esophageal Reflux Disease Health‐Related Quality of Life scores. Patients with previous operative and/or endoscopic treatments for achalasia were excluded. Results. One‐hundred and eighteen patients were identified. The median follow‐up was 40 months (interquartile range 27). The proportion of patients with Eckardt stage II–III decreased from 94.9–13% (P < .001). The mean Eckardt score decreased from 6.9 ± 1.9 to 1.7 ± 1.2 (P < .001); the mean Short Form‐36 scores significantly increased in all 8 domains; the mean Gastro‐Esophageal Reflux Disease Health‐Related Quality of Life score decreased from 13.9 ± 5.7 to 5.5 ± 5.4 (P < .001). Finally, 88% (confidence interval 81–93) of patients were satisfied regarding their present condition. Conclusion. Quality of life assessed with generic and disease‐specific validated instruments significantly improved after laparoscopic Heller myotomy combined with Dor fundoplication.


Journal of Pain Research | 2017

Serratus anterior plane block for hybrid transthoracic esophagectomy: a pilot study

Cinzia Barbera; Pamela Milito; Michele Punturieri; Emanuele Asti; Luigi Bonavina

Background Pain is a major limiting factor in patient’s recovery from major thoracic surgical procedures. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), the current gold standard of perioperative management, has contraindications, can technically fail, and carries a risk of complications such as epidural abscess and spinal hematoma. The ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a promising regional analgesia technique. Objectives Since the anatomic space involved in the SAP block corresponds to the area exposed by the surgeon during right posterolateral thoracotomy, we investigated the feasibility of a “surgically guided” continuous SAP block as an alternative to TEA in selected esophagectomy patients. Study design This was a pilot case-series study. Setting This study was carried out in a tertiary-care university hospital. Methods The demographic and clinical data of patients in whom the continuous SAP block was performed were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database of hybrid (laparoscopy plus right thoracotomy) Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The SAP block was performed upon closure of the thoracotomy incision using a 19-gauge catheter tunnelized subcutaneously and positioned in the deep plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the ribs. A bolus dose of 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% was injected, followed by a continuous infusion of the 0.125% solution at 7 mL/h until postoperative day 4. Results Between January 2016 and July 2016, seven (20%) out of 37 esophagectomy patients underwent a SAP block rather than TEA for the following reasons: inability to insert the epidural catheter, antiaggregation or anticoagulant therapy, or unplanned thoracotomy. The procedure was uneventful in all patients. Only two patients required rescue analgesia on day 1. Conclusion Continuous SAP block under direct vision is feasible and safe. This novel “surgically guided” application of the SAP block may be useful in case of failure or contraindications to TEA.

Collaboration


Dive into the Emanuele Asti's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge