Stefano Siboni

Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device: Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-Center Cohort Study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify patients’ characteristics that may predict failure and removal of the Linx sphincter augmentation device, and to report the results of 1-stage laparoscopic removal and fundoplication. Background: The Linx device is a long-term magnetic implant that was developed as a less disruptive and more reproducible surgical option for patients with early-stage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Removal of the device has been shown to be feasible, but no long-term results of this procedure have been reported yet. Methods: A review of the prospectively collected research database of antireflux surgery was performed to identify all patients who underwent a Linx implant between 2007 and 2015 in our Institution. Demographics, duration of symptoms and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, GERD-Health Related Quality of Life scores, esophageal acid exposure, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, number of beads (size) of the implanted device, concurrent crura repair, angle of inclination of the device at postoperative chest film, operative time, postoperative complications, and length of stay were recorded. Data of the explanted patients were compared with those with the device in situ in an attempt to identify factors associated with Linx removal. Results: Over the study period, 164 patients underwent a laparoscopic Linx implant and had a median follow-up of 48 months [interquartile range (IQR) 36]. Eleven (6.7%) of these patients were explanted at a later date. The estimated removal-free probability at 80 months was 0.91 [confidence interval (CI) 0.86–0.96]. Supine esophageal acid exposure before the index operation was associated with Linx removal (odds ratio 1.05, CI 1.01–1.11, P = 0.037). The main presenting symptom requiring device removal was recurrence of heartburn or regurgitation in 5 patients (46%), followed by dysphagia (n = 4, 37%) and chest pain (n = 2, 18%). In 2 patients, full-thickness erosion of the esophageal wall with partial endoluminal penetration of the device occurred. The median implant duration was 20 months, with 82% of the patients being explanted between 12 and 24 months after the implant. Device removal was most commonly combined with partial fundoplication. There were no conversions to laparotomy and the postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. At the latest follow-up, ranging from 12 to 58 months, the GERD-HRQL score was within normal limits in all patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic removal of the Linx device can be safely performed as a 1-stage procedure and in conjunction with fundoplication even in patients presenting with device erosion.

Giant leiomyoma of the gastroesophageal junction: technique and results of endoscopic full-thickness resection.

Four consecutive patients with a giant leiomyoma originating from the posterior aspect of the gastroesophageal junction were treated with full-thickness endoscopic retroflex dissection. A complete removal of the lesion was obtained in all cases. No complications were observed except for some degree of air filtration causing symptomatic pneumoperitoneum in one patient. Retroflex endoscopic full-thickness resection of giant leiomyoma at the gastroesophageal junction is feasible and safe.

Proposal of a Punch Biopsy Protocol as a Pre-requisite for the Establishment of a Tissue Bank from Resected Esophageal Tumors

With the development of tissue banking, a need for homogeneous methods of collection, processing, and storage of tissue has emerged. We describe the implementation of a biological bank in a high-volume, tertiary care University referral center for esophageal cancer surgery. We also propose an original punch biopsy technique of the surgical specimen. The method proved to be simple, reproducible, and not expensive. Unified standards for specimen collection are necessary to improve results of specimen-based diagnostic testing and research in surgical oncology.

Thoracoscopic removal of dental prosthesis impacted in the upper thoracic esophagus

Dental appliances are the most common cause of accidental foreign body esophageal impaction, especially in the elderly population with decreased oral sensory perception. A 47-year-old man with history of oligophrenia and recurrent epileptic seizures was referred to our hospital following dislocation and ingestion of his upper dental prosthesis. Endoscopic removal and clipping of an esophageal tear had been unsuccessfully attempted. A chest CT scan confirmed entrapment of the dental prosthesis in the upper thoracic esophagus, the presence of pneumomediastinum, and the close proximity of one of the metal clasps of the prosthesis to the left subclavian artery. A video-assisted right thoracoscopy in the left lateral decubitus position was performed and the foreign body was successfully removed. The patient was then allowed to wear the retrieved prosthesis after dentistry consultation and repair of the wire clasps by a dental technician. At the 6-month follow-up visit the patient was doing very well without any trouble in swallowing.

Cricopharyngeal myotomy with thulium laser through flexible endoscopy: proof-of-concept study

Background and study aims  Endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum has proven feasible, but electrocautery and CO 2 laser technology carry the risk of collateral thermal injury. Thulium laser septum incision may overcome this limitation. We describe for the first time the use of thulium laser through flexible endoscopy in a small cohort of patients with Zenker diverticulum. Patients and methods  Thulium laser septum division was performed via flexible endoscopy under general anesthesia in consecutive symptomatic patients with primary or recurrent Zenker diverticulum. Primary study outcomes were feasibility and safety of the procedure. A 1.9-μm laser fiber was used with an emission power of 10 – 16 W. Results  Five patients were treated between May and June 2017. Two patients presented with recurrent symptomatic diverticulum after previous transoral septum stapling. Complete division of the septum was achieved in all patients. There was no bleeding nor need of adjunctive electrocautery devices to complete the procedure. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients; the chest film and gastrographin swallow study on postoperative Day 1 were negative for pneumomediastinum, leaks or residual pouch. All patients were discharged within 48 hours on a soft diet. At the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, all patients were satisfied with the procedure and reported improved swallowing and absence of regurgitation and cough. Conclusions  Division of Zenker’s septum with thulium laser is feasible and safe through flexible endoscopy. Longer-term follow-up is required to establish efficacy and effectiveness of this novel procedure.

Unusual foreign body impacted in the upper oesophagus: original technique for transoral extraction

Foreign body ingestion is a common event; in the adult population, most ingestions occur in patients with mental disability, psychiatric disorders, alcohol intoxication or in prisoners seeking secondary gain. Removal through flexible endoscopy is generally the first-line approach but rescue oesophagotomy may be necessary for foreign bodies impacted in the upper oesophagus. A 27-year-old man was admitted in the emergency room after intentional ingestion of a wooden spherical object with a central hole. A total body CT scan showed that the object was completely obstructing the upper oesophageal lumen but there were no signs of perforation. In the operating room, a Weerda diverticuloscope and a 5 mm 0° telescope were used to visualise the foreign body under general anaesthesia. A standard endoscopic biopsy forceps was passed through the hole of the sphere and was retracted with the jaws open allowing transoral extraction without complications.

Outcomes of esophageal surgery, especially of the lower esophageal sphincter

This paper includes commentaries on outcomes of esophageal surgery, including the mechanisms by which fundoduplication improves lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure; the efficacy of the Linx™ management system in improving LES function; the utility of radiologic characterization of antireflux valves following surgery; the correlation between endoscopic findings and reported symptoms following antireflux surgery; the links between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and decreased LES pressure, endoscopic esophagitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); the less favorable outcomes following fundoduplication among obese patients; the application of bioprosthetic meshes to reinforce hiatal repair and decrease the incidence of paraesophageal hernia; the efficacy of endoluminal antireflux procedures, and the limited efficacy of revisional antireflux operations, underscoring the importance of good primary surgery and diligent work‐up to prevent the necessity of revisional procedures.

Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundForeign body (FB) impaction accounts for 4% of emergency endoscopies in clinical practice. Flexible endoscopy (FE) is recommended as the first-line therapeutic option because it can be performed under sedation, is cost-effective, and is well tolerated. Rigid endoscopy (RE) under general anesthesia is less used but may be advantageous in some circumstances. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FE and RE in esophageal FB removal.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were consulted matching the terms “Rigid endoscopy AND Flexible endoscopy AND foreign bod*”. Pooled effect measures were calculated using an inverse-variance weighted or Mantel-Haenszel in random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 index and Cochrane Q test.ResultsFive observational cohort studies, published between 1993 and 2015, matched the inclusion criteria. One thousand four hundred and two patients were included; FE was performed in 736 patients and RE in 666. Overall, 101 (7.2%) complications occurred. The most frequent complications were mucosal erosion (26.7%), mucosal edema (18.8%), and iatrogenic esophageal perforations (10.9%). Compared to FE, the estimated RE pooled success OR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.48–2.06; p = 1.00). The pooled OR of iatrogenic perforation, other complications, and overall complications were 2.87 (95% CI 0.96–8.61; p = 0.06), 1.09 (95% CI 0.38–3.18; p = 0.87), and 1.50 (95% CI 0.53–4.25; p = 0.44), respectively. There was no mortality.ConclusionsFE and RE are equally safe and effective for the removal of esophageal FB. To provide a tailored or crossover approach, patients should be managed in multidisciplinary centers where expertise in RE is also available. Formal training and certification in RE should probably be re-evaluated.

Benign Esophageal Tumors

The focus of this review is on leiomyoma, GIST, and extramural cysts of the esophagus. Over the last decades there has been an increasing trend in the prevalence of these lesions, mostly due to improved diagnostic accuracy. We outline the clinical presentation, the indications for treatment, and the minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Impact of Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatus Hernia on Quality of Life: Observational Cohort Study

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has proven safe and effective in the treatment of large hiatus hernia. Differences may exist between objectively assessed surgical outcomes, symptomatic scores, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: An observational, single-arm cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing primary laparoscopic repair with crura mesh augmentation and Toupet fundoplication for large (> 50% of intrathoracic stomach) type III–IV hiatus hernia. Data were extracted from hospital charts and a prospectively updated research database. The main study outcome was quality of life assessed by the Gastroesophageal reflux disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score and the Short-form 36 (SF-36). Results: Between 2013 and 2016, 37 out of 49 operated patients completed the comprehensive quality-of-life evaluation at the 2-year follow-up. The GERD-HRQL score significantly decreased compared to baseline (p < 0.001). All items of the SF-36 significantly improved compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Both Physical and Mental Component Summary scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores, with a medium Cohen’s effect size (–0.77 and 0.56, respectively). At the 2-year follow-up, symptoms had disappeared in the majority of patients. The use of proton-pump inhibitors significantly decreased compared to baseline (13.5 vs. 86.4%, p < 0.001). Also, the use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines significantly decreased after surgery (8.1 vs. 32.4%, p < 0.001). The overall alimentary satisfaction score was > 8 in 92% of patients. There were no safety issues related to the use of the absorbable synthetic mesh. The incidence of anatomical hernia recurrence was 5.4%, but no patient with recurrent hernia required surgical revision. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of large hiatus hernia with mesh and partial fundoplication is associated with symptomatic relief, no side-effects, and a significant improvement in disease-specific and generic quality of life at 2-year follow-up.