Emanuele Cassarà

Psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review.

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory rheumatic disorder of unknown etiology occurring in patients with psoriasis. The Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis study group has recently developed a validated set of classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis with a sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 98.7%. Three main clinical patterns have been identified: oligoarticular (≤ 4 involved joints) or polyarticular (≥ 5 involved joints) peripheral disease and axial disease with or without associated peripheral arthritis. In this context distal interphalangeal arthritis and arthritis mutilans may occur. According to other reports, also in our centre, asymmetric oligoarthritis is the most frequent pattern at onset. Axial disease has been estimated between 5% and 36% of patients. It is characterized by an irregular involvement of the axial skeleton with a predilection for the cervical spine. Recurrent episodes of enthesitis and dactylitis represent a hallmark of psoriatic arthritis. In around 20% of cases distal extremity swelling with pitting edema of the hands or feet is observed. Unilateral acute iridocyclitis, usually recurrent in alternate fashion, is the most frequent extra‐articular manifestation, and accelerated atherosclerosis is the prominent comorbidity. The clinical course of peripheral and axial psoriatic arthritis is usually less severe than rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, respectively. Local corticosteroid injections and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs are recommended in milder forms. Sulphasalazine and methotrexate are effective in peripheral psoriatic arthritis. Recent studies have provided evidence on the efficacy of anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drugs to control symptoms and to slow or arrest radiological disease progression.

Frequency and duration of clinical remission in patients with peripheral psoriatic arthritis requiring second-line drugs

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the frequency and duration of clinical remission in patients with PsA. METHODS All consecutive new outpatients with peripheral PsA requiring second-line drugs and RA observed between January 2000 and December 2005 were included in a prospective, case-control study. Primary end point was to assess the frequency of remission in peripheral PsA compared with RA. Secondary end points were to compare the duration of clinical remission during treatment and after therapy interruption, ACR 20, 50, 70 response rates and to detect any remission predictor at diagnosis. Treatment regimen was standardized in both groups. From January 2003 to December 2005, therapy was suspended in PsA patients and controls if achieving remission. RESULTS One or more episodes of remission occurred in 57/236 (24.1%) PsA patients and in 20/268 (7.5%) controls (P < 0.001). The mean duration of remission was of 13 +/- 9.4 months in PsA patients and 4 +/- 3.7 in controls (P > 0.001). Remission episodes were more frequent in PsA patients treated with anti-TNF compared with those receiving traditional DMARDs (P > 0.001), with no differences regarding the duration. After therapy interruption, the remission duration was 12 +/- 2.4 months in PsA and 3 +/- 1.5 in RA (P < 0.001). No remission predictor at diagnosis resulted by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Remission is possible in up to 24% of patients with peripheral PsA. It is significantly more frequent, but not longer, in patients receiving anti-TNF drugs compared with those treated with traditional DMARDs. Patients remain in remission for a long period after therapy interruption, thus suggesting an intermittent therapeutic strategy.

Familial autoimmunity as a risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus and vice versa: A case-control study

The objective of this multicentric case-control study was to investigate if a history of autoimmune disease (AD) in first-degree relatives (FDR) is a risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to evaluate the risk of AD among FDR of SLE patients. Cases were Italian SLE patients consecutively enrolled. Controls were orthopaedic inpatients without any autoimmune diseases.The strength of the association between family history of AD and SLE was measured as an odds ratio (OR) calculated from the coefficient of an unconditional regression model. To calculate the risk of AD among FDR of SLE patients, the extended generalized estimating equation technique was used. In total, 154 SLE cases and 140 controls were enrolled. A family history of AD was reported by 22.7% of SLE patients and by 5.7% of the controls. The risk of SLE increased with the number of FDR with AD (one FDR affected, OR 4.1; two or more, OR 11.3). The probability of having AD was higher among FDR of SLE cases in comparison to FDR of controls (RR 4.6; 95%CI 1.9-11.1). A female SLE patient conferred an increased risk of AD to her FDR; this risk is doubled in females (OR 10.3; 95% CI 3.1-34.4).

Single-center series and systematic review of randomized controlled trials of malignancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis receiving anti–tumor necrosis factor α therapy: Is there a need for more comprehensive screening procedures?

OBJECTIVE To systematically review the occurrence of malignancies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to report a retrospective personal case series evaluating the frequency of malignancies in patients with RA, PsA, and AS requiring anti-TNF therapy selected with more comprehensive cancer screening procedures compared with patients screened according to previously published procedures. METHODS The primary outcome was the report of frequency of malignancies in RCTs and the latency between the therapy introduction and the occurrence of the neoplasm. A total of 363 consecutive RA, PsA, and AS patients requiring anti-TNF therapy from 2002 to 2006 observed at the Rheumatology Unit in Prato, Italy, underwent extensive cancer screening procedures. An historical controlled group of 73 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2001 underwent the screening procedures accepted for the RCT procedures. RESULTS Thirty-six RCTs were included for analysis. Malignancies occurred in 60 (0.75%) of 8,015 patients randomized to the active treatment arm and in 21 (0.52%) of 3,991 patients in the placebo arms (P = 0.15). In the personal retrospective case series, 1 study patient (0.27%) and 3 controls (4.1%) developed cancer over the followup period (P = 0.017). Mean +/- SD followup duration was 40.9 +/- 16.7 months in study patients and 50.6 +/- 18.1 months in controls. CONCLUSION The results of RCTs and our data showing 26% of malignancies occurring within 12 weeks from enrollment suggest the need for a revision of current cancer screening procedures in RCTs and in clinical practice.

Sustained maintenance of clinical remission after adalimumab dose reduction in patients with early psoriatic arthritis: a long-term follow-up study

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the proportion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients maintaining clinical remission after adalimumab (ADA) dose reduction compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary purposes include evaluating the proportion of PsA patients who achieve remission, the duration of remission after ADA dose reduction, time to relapse, psoriasis course, and the frequency of adverse events at the end of follow-up. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, follow-up, case-control study of 76 consecutive patients (35 females, 41 males; mean age 46 ± 10.2 years) who met the classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis and required anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy according to Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis recommendations. The 76 patients were compared with 55 patients (40 females, 15 males; mean age 50 ± 11.6 years) who satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and received the same treatment. Case patients and controls were recruited from January 2008 to December 2010. At baseline, PsA patients and controls received 40 mg of ADA every other week, usually with methotrexate (10 to 20 mg/weekly). In the presence of clinical remission, ADA dose was reduced to 40 mg every 4 weeks in both groups. Results: Fifty-three of the 76 (69.7%) PsA patients and 17 of the 55 (30.9%) rheumatoid arthritis (P < 0.019) controls achieved remission after a mean time of 5.1 ± 1.2 and 6.3 ± 1.6 months, respectively (P = nonsignificant). After halving the dose of ADA, 47 of the 53 (88.6%) PsA patients and three of the 17 (17.6%) controls maintained remission (P = 0.016) over a mean follow-up period of 28.9 ± 8.4 and 24.2 ± 6.4 months, respectively. No significant changes in Psoriatic Arthritis Severity Index scores were observed. The mean time to relapse was 8.3 ± 3.4 months in six case patients and 7.2 ± 4.2 in 14 controls (P = not significant). No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Conclusion: Clinical remission is possible in a high percentage of patients with early PsA receiving ADA. Such remission is maintained in a high proportion of subjects after ADA dose halving, with relevant advantages in terms of patient compliance, drug-exposure risk, and economic burden.

Efficacy of infliximab in refractory Behçet’s disease-associated and idiopathic posterior segment uveitis: a prospective, follow-up study of 50 patients

Purpose To evaluate the long-term efficacy of infliximab in patients with refractory Behçet’s disease (BD)-associated and idiopathic posterior uveitis (PU). Methods Single center, prospective, 6-year duration, follow-up study on 50 consecutive patients (20 [40%] males and 30 [60%] females with a mean age of 37.5 ± 12.3 years) with refractory BD-associated PU (36 patients) and idiopathic PU (14 patients) who had failed at least one immunosuppressive drug. At baseline, patients received prednisone 1 mg/kg/day with rapid tapering and infliximab infusions (5 mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Nonresponders after the third infusion withdrew from the study. Primary outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) value improvement compared to baseline. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of patients with VA improvement from baseline; proportion of patients achieving disease remission; number of PU flare-ups; and incidence of adverse events. Results At the final follow-up, mean right and left eye VA respectively increased from 0.57 ± 0.31 at baseline to 0.68 ± 0.33 (P = 0.048) and from 0.67 ± 0.28 to 0.76 ± 0.27 (P = 0.047). None of the patients had VA worsening and new onset ocular complications. A complete response of PU was recorded in 34/50 (68%) patients and partial response in 11/50 (22%). Five patients were nonresponders and withdrew from the study after the third infusion. A significant reduction of ocular attacks and of the proportion of patients with cystoid macular edema was observed. No differences in infliximab efficacy was recorded between patients with BD-associated and idiopathic PU. No serious adverse events occurred. The mean follow-up duration was 36.8 months. Conclusion Long-term infliximab therapy was equally effective and safe with a significant VA gain in refractory BD-associated and idiopathic PU.

Frequency of iridocyclitis in patients with early psoriatic arthritis: a prospective, follow up study

The occurrence of iridocyclitis (IC) in early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been rarely assessed. The primary end‐point of this study was to evaluate the frequency of IC at onset in patients with early PsA.

Duration of remission after halving of the etanercept dose in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, prospective, long-term, follow-up study

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients with ankylosing spondylitis maintaining clinical remission after reduction of their subcutaneous etanercept dose to 50 mg every other week compared with that in patients receiving etanercept 50 mg weekly. Methods In the first phase of this randomized, prospective, follow-up study, all biologic-naïve patients identified between January 2005 and December 2009 as satisfying the modified New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept 50 mg weekly were evaluated for disease remission in January 2010. In the second phase, patients meeting the criteria for remission were randomized to receive subcutaneous etanercept as either 50 mg weekly or 50 mg every other week. The randomization allocation was 1:1. Remission was defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index < 4, no extra-axial manifestations of peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, tenosynovitis, or iridocyclitis, and normal acute-phase reactants. The patients were assessed at baseline, at weeks 4 and 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The last visit constituted the end of the follow-up. Results During the first phase, 78 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (57 males and 21 females, median age 38 years, median disease duration 12 years) were recruited. In January 2010, after a mean follow-up of 25 ± 11 months, 43 (55.1%) patients achieving clinical remission were randomized to one of the two treatment arms. Twenty-two patients received etanercept 50 mg every other week (group 1) and 21 received etanercept 50 mg weekly (group 2). At the end of follow-up, 19 of 22 (86.3%) subjects in group 1 and 19 of 21 (90.4%) in group 2 were still in remission, with no significant difference between the two groups. The mean follow-up duration in group 1 and group 2 was 22 ± 1 months and 21 ± 1.6 months, respectively. Conclusion Remission of ankylosing spondylitis is possible in at least 50% of patients treated with etanercept 50 mg weekly. After halving of the etanercept dose, remission is maintained in a high percentage of patients during long-term follow-up, with important economic implications.

Criteria, Frequency, and Duration of Clinical Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients with Peripheral Involvement Requiring Second-line Drugs

This article outlines our case-control, prospective, 6-year followup study to evaluate the frequency of clinical remission and duration of remission episodes in patients with peripheral psoriatic arthritis (PsA). All case patients were consecutive new outpatients with peripheral PsA requiring second-line drugs. Controls were consecutive new outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Modified American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA were used to assess the remission in patients with PsA. One or more episodes of remission occurred in 57/236 (24.1%) PsA patients and in 20/268 (7.5%) controls (p < 0.001). No significant difference was recorded for duration of remissions between the group receiving traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and the anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) group: 11 ± 7.2 and 13.3 ± 8.1 months, respectively (p = NS). The duration of remission after interruption of therapy was 12 ± 2.4 months for the PsA group and 3 ± 1.5 months for patients with RA (p < 0.001). No predictor of remission at diagnosis could be determined by multivariate analysis. Based on our findings, remission is possible in up to 24% of patients with peripheral PsA. It is significantly more frequent, but not longer, in patients receiving anti-TNF drugs compared to those treated with traditional DMARD.

Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE The Italian board for the TAilored BIOlogic therapy (ITABIO) reviewed the most consistent literature to indicate the best strategy for the second-line biologic choice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS Systematic review of the literature to identify English-language articles on efficacy of second-line biologic choice in RA, PsA, and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data were extracted from available randomized, controlled trials, national biologic registries, national healthcare databases, post-marketing surveys, and open-label observational studies. RESULTS Some previously stated variables, including the patients׳ preference, the indication for anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy in potential childbearing women, and the intravenous route with dose titration in obese subjects resulted valid for all the three rheumatic conditions. In RA, golimumab as second-line biologic has the highest level of evidence in anti-TNF failure. The switching strategy is preferable for responder patients who experience an adverse event, whereas serious or class-specific side effects should be managed by the choice of a differently targeted drug. Secondary inadequate response to etanercept (ETN) should be treated with a biologic agent other than anti-TNF. After two or more anti-TNF failures, the swapping to a different mode of action is recommended. Among non-anti-TNF targeted biologics, to date rituximab (RTX) and tocilizumab (TCZ) have the strongest evidence of efficacy in the treatment of anti-TNF failures. In PsA and AS patients failing the first anti-TNF, the switch strategy to a second is advisable, taking in account the evidence of adalimumab efficacy in patients with uveitis. The severity of psoriasis, of articular involvement, and the predominance of enthesitis and/or dactylitis may drive the choice toward ustekinumab or secukinumab in PsA, and the latter in AS. CONCLUSION Taking in account the paucity of controlled trials, second-line biologic therapy may be reasonably optimized in patients with RA, SpA, and PsA.