Emil Artin
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emil Artin.
Archive | 2008
Emil Artin; John Tate
This classic book, originally published in 1968, is based on notes of a year-long seminar the authors ran at Princeton University. The primary goal of the book was to give a rather complete presentation of algebraic aspects of global class field theory, and the authors accomplished this goal spectacularly: for more than 40 years since its first publication, the book has served as an ultimate source for many generations of mathematicians. In this revised edition, two mathematical additions complementing the exposition in the original text are made. The new edition also contains several new footnotes, additional references, and historical comments.
Abhandlungen Aus Dem Mathematischen Seminar Der Universitat Hamburg | 1927
Emil Artin
A continuous casting system provides with a foreign matter receiving gutter between two adjacent rolls to receive foreign matters dropping during the drawing operation of castings, and a foreign matter removing nozzle to wash away the foreign matter dropped on the gutter. An electromagnetic agitator of the continuous casting system is provided with a proximity switch at least at its inlet side to sense a magnetic substance approaching the agitator thereby to control the operation of the agitator, thus eliminating troubles caused by the vibration of the magnetic substance.
Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society | 1945
Emil Artin; George Whaples
Introduction. The theorems of class field theory are known to hold for two kinds of fields: algebraic extensions of the rational field and algebraic extensions of a field of functions of one variable over a field of constants. We shall refer to these fields as number fields and function fields, respectively. For class field theory, the function fields must indeed be restricted to those with a Galois field as field of constants; however, we make this restriction only in §5, and until then consider fields with an arbitrary field of constants. In proving these theorems, the product formula for valuations plays an important rôle. This formula states that, for a suitable set of inequivalent valuations | | p,
American Journal of Mathematics | 1943
Emil Artin; George Whaples
1. Vector spaces over rings. If R is a ring, we call a set V of elements an R-vector space if its elements form an abelian group under addition and if R is an operator domain on this abelian group, satisfying the usual axiomsnamely the distributive law and the condition that multiplication in the ring is the same as combination of operators. Usually R operates on the left side, and in that case the product of operators corresponds to the function-theoretic product (0-T (x) = o(r (x))) ; but occasionally we write the operators on the other side, and then this is not true. In the following, we shall usually assume that no non-zero vector is annihilated by every element of R. The only spaces we shall consider will be R-subspaces. A space is said to satisfy the minimal condition if any set of R-subspaces contains a smallest one. This is equivalent to the descending chain condition; that is, to the condition that every descending chain of subspaces must be finite. The minimal condition on spaces is occasionally easy to verify by the following:
Archive | 2008
Emil Artin; John Tate
EXPLICIT RECIPROCITY LAWS Ali ADALI M.S. in Mathematics Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Alexander Klyachko July, 2010 Quadratic reciprocity law was conjectured by Euler and Legendre, and proved by Gauss. Gauss made first generalizations of this relation to higher fields and derived cubic and biquadratic reciprocity laws. Eisenstein and Kummer proved similar relations for extension Q(ζp, n √ a) partially. Hilbert identified the power residue symbol by norm residue symbol, the symbol of which he noticed the analogy to residue of a differential of an algebraic function field. He derived the properties of the norm residue symbol and proved the most explicit form of reciprocity relation in Q(ζp, n √ a). He asked the most general form of explicit reciprocity laws as 9th question at his lecture in Paris 1900. Witt and Schmid solved this question for algebraic function fields. Hasse and Artin proved that the reciprocity law for algebraic number fields is equal to the product of the Hilbert symbol at certain primes. However, these symbols were not easy to calculate, and before Shafarevich, who gave explicit way to calculate the symbols, only some partial cases are treated. Shafarevich’s method later improved by Vostokov and Brukner, solving the 9th problem of Hilbert. In this thesis, we prove the reciprocity relation for algebraic function fields as wel as for algebraic function fields, and provide the explicit formulas to calculate the norm residue symbols.
Annals of Mathematics | 1947
Emil Artin
Abhandlungen Aus Dem Mathematischen Seminar Der Universitat Hamburg | 1925
Emil Artin
Archive | 1964
Emil Artin
Annals of Mathematics | 1948
Ralph H. Fox; Emil Artin
Archive | 1944
Emil Artin; Cecil James Nesbitt; Robert McDowell Thrall