Emma C. Defew
University of St Andrews
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Emma C. Defew.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Tasman P. Crowe; Mathieu Cusson; Fabio Bulleri; Dominique Davoult; Francisco Arenas; Rebecca J. Aspden; Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi; Stanislao Bevilacqua; Irvine Davidson; Emma C. Defew; Simonetta Fraschetti; Claire Golléty; John N. Griffin; Kristjan Herkül; Jonne Kotta; Aline Migné; Markus Molis; Sophie K. Nicol; Laure M.-L.J. Noël; Isabel Sousa Pinto; Nelson Valdivia; Stefano Vaselli; Stuart R. Jenkins
Ecosystems are under pressure from multiple human disturbances whose impact may vary depending on environmental context. We experimentally evaluated variation in the separate and combined effects of the loss of a key functional group (canopy algae) and physical disturbance on rocky shore ecosystems at nine locations across Europe. Multivariate community structure was initially affected (during the first three to six months) at six locations but after 18 months, effects were apparent at only three. Loss of canopy caused increases in cover of non-canopy algae in the three locations in southern Europe and decreases in some northern locations. Measures of ecosystem functioning (community respiration, gross primary productivity, net primary productivity) were affected by loss of canopy at five of the six locations for which data were available. Short-term effects on community respiration were widespread, but effects were rare after 18 months. Functional changes corresponded with changes in community structure and/or species richness at most locations and times sampled, but no single aspect of biodiversity was an effective predictor of longer-term functional changes. Most ecosystems studied were able to compensate in functional terms for impacts caused by indiscriminate physical disturbance. The only consistent effect of disturbance was to increase cover of non-canopy species. Loss of canopy algae temporarily reduced community resistance to disturbance at only two locations and at two locations actually increased resistance. Resistance to disturbance-induced changes in gross primary productivity was reduced by loss of canopy algae at four locations. Location-specific variation in the effects of the same stressors argues for flexible frameworks for the management of marine environments. These results also highlight the need to analyse how species loss and other stressors combine and interact in different environmental contexts.
Marine Pollution Bulletin | 2011
Keith M. Cooper; Matthew Curtis; Wan M.R. Wan Hussin; C.R.S. Barrio Froján; Emma C. Defew; V. Nye; David M. Paterson
A meta-analysis approach was used to assess the effect of dredging induced changes in sediment composition, under different conditions of natural physical disturbance, for the structure and function of marine benthic macrofaunal communities. Results showed the sensitivity of macrofaunal communities increased as both the proportion of gravel increased and the level of natural physical disturbance decreased. These findings may be explained by the close association of certain taxa with the gravel fraction, and the influence of natural physical disturbance which, as it increases, tends to restrict the colonisation by these species. We conclude that maintaining the gravel content of surface sediments after dredging and, where practicable, locating extraction sites in areas of higher natural disturbance will minimise the potential for long-term negative impacts on the macrofauna.
Aquatic Ecology | 2006
T.J. Tolhurst; Emma C. Defew; Rupert Gordon Perkins; A. Sharples; David M. Paterson
Accurate measurement of intertidal sediment erodibility is essential for the development of meaningful and accurate models of sediment dynamics. Despite considerable advances in technology and methodology, the measurement of cohesive intertidal sediment erosion remains problematic. Sediment erodibility varies according to both physical and biological properties and processes. These cannot be considered in isolation, as they can interact to create both positive and negative feedbacks, resulting in seemingly idiosyncratic responses in the system. If working models of estuarine sediment dynamics are to be made, it is essential that the influence of these processes on both the measurements and the system itself be considered. Recent developments in measurement technology enable rapid measurement of sediment stability allowing temporal and spatial variability to be measured on a time scale of minutes. This paper reports temporal variability in cohesive intertidal sediment erosion threshold related to immersion and emersion, and the concomitant responses in selected sediment properties (carbohydrates, water content and chlorophyll). Erosion threshold tended to increase over emersion and decrease over immersion, although the patterns of change varied depending upon local conditions, and in one case there was no temporal trend. Temporal changes resulted in a range of measured erosion threshold, dependant upon the erosion device used. Modifications to existing methodology, in order to account for this variation, are proposed and implications for modelling erosion processes are considered.
Hydrobiologia | 2010
T.J. Tolhurst; Emma C. Defew; A. Dye
This article describes the relationship between 10 selected properties of the sediments (chlorophyll a and b, colloidal and total carbohydrate, water concentration, sediment type, organic matter, erosion threshold and erosion rate) and meio- and macrofauna within and among three different habitats in an urbanized intertidal mudflat/mangrove forest in Tambourine Bay, Sydney Harbour, Australia. Many of the biogeochemical variables were significantly different among habitats, often grading from mudflat to mangrove canopy. In contrast to previous studies, patterns of distribution of macrofauna among habitats were weak. For the meiofauna, only copepods showed any significant difference among habitats, with the greatest numbers in the open mudflat habitat and least under the mangrove canopy. There was a gradient in fauna among the habitats; overall macrofauna abundances were greatest under the mangrove canopy and least on the mudflat, while meiofauna abundance was greatest in the pneumatophore habitat and least under the canopy. Correlations between fauna and properties of sediment were generally weak. When the habitats were analysed separately, some correlations were strengthened but relationships were inconsistent. Thus, while some taxa vary significantly among habitats there was not a strong relationship between biogeochemical properties and either macro- or meiofauna. This suggests that localised factors other than the measured properties of the sediments are driving patterns in fauna at these small scales, which requires further investigation to be unravelled.
Marine Ecology Progress Series | 2002
Scot E. Hagerthey; Emma C. Defew; David M. Paterson
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology | 2008
Keith M. Cooper; Christopher R.S. Barrio Froján; Emma C. Defew; Matthew Curtis; Annelise Fleddum; Lucy Brooks; David M. Paterson
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2002
Emma C. Defew; T.J. Tolhurst; David M. Paterson
Ecological Indicators | 2012
W.M. Rauhan Wan Hussin; Keith M. Cooper; Christopher R.S. Barrio Froján; Emma C. Defew; David M. Paterson
Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science | 2011
Christopher R.S. Barrio Froján; Keith M. Cooper; Julie Bremner; Emma C. Defew; Wan M.R. Wan Hussin; David M. Paterson
Marine Ecology Progress Series | 2002
Emma C. Defew; David M. Paterson; Scot E. Hagerthey