Keith M. Cooper

Preliminary observations of the effects of dredging intensity on the re-colonisation of dredged sediments off the southeast coast of England (Area 222)

The re-colonisation of a site used for the extraction of sand and gravel for ca. 25 years off the southeast coast of the UK was examined 4 years after the cessation of dredging. Effects of different levels of dredging intensity on the rate of macrofaunal re-colonisation were investigated. Values of abundance and total numbers of species were significantly lower (p<0.05) in an area most recently exposed to the highest level of dredging intensity compared with samples taken from an area of low intensity, and those from a reference site. Differences between previously dredged sediments and the reference location were due to the reduced abundance of a range of macrofaunal species characterising nearby sediments. Multivariate measures of community structure also indicated that there were significant differences (p<0.01) between the macrofaunal assemblages in the areas exposed to different dredging intensities. Sediment from the area exposed to the highest dredging intensity contained proportionally more sand than other sampled sediments. The extent to which dredging intensity contributed to these differences was difficult to determine owing to the absence of any baseline data. Despite this, univariate and multivariate analyses indicated a strong relationship between macrofaunal community structure and dredging intensity at this site. Correlation analyses also demonstrated that the predominant influence on the macrofaunal community was that of the level of dredging that took place in 1995, the last year that the licensed site was dredged heavily. Preliminary observations indicated that the fauna remained in a perturbed state some 4 years after cessation of dredging. Therefore, relatively rapid ‘recovery’ rates, commonly cited as 2–3 years for European coastal gravelly areas, should not be assumed to be universally applicable. Implications for the future management and scientific study of marine aggregate extraction arising from preliminary observations on the physical and biological status of this site are discussed together with the options for selecting a reference site in the absence of baseline information.

Implications of dredging induced changes in sediment particle size composition for the structure and function of marine benthic macrofaunal communities

A meta-analysis approach was used to assess the effect of dredging induced changes in sediment composition, under different conditions of natural physical disturbance, for the structure and function of marine benthic macrofaunal communities. Results showed the sensitivity of macrofaunal communities increased as both the proportion of gravel increased and the level of natural physical disturbance decreased. These findings may be explained by the close association of certain taxa with the gravel fraction, and the influence of natural physical disturbance which, as it increases, tends to restrict the colonisation by these species. We conclude that maintaining the gravel content of surface sediments after dredging and, where practicable, locating extraction sites in areas of higher natural disturbance will minimise the potential for long-term negative impacts on the macrofauna.

Can the benefits of physical seabed restoration justify the costs? An assessment of a disused aggregate extraction site off the Thames Estuary UK

Physical and biological seabed impacts can persist long after the cessation of marine aggregate dredging. Whilst small-scale experimental studies have shown that it may be possible to mitigate such impacts, it is unclear whether the costs of restoration are justified on an industrial scale. Here we explore this question using a case study off the Thames Estuary, UK. By understanding the nature and scale of persistent impacts, we identify possible techniques to restore the physical properties of the seabed, and the costs and the likelihood of success. An analysis of the ecosystem services and goods/benefits produced by the site is used to determine whether intervention is justified. Whilst a comparison of costs and benefits at this site suggests restoration would not be warranted, the analysis is site-specific. We emphasise the need to better define what is, and is not, an acceptable seabed condition post-dredging.

Towards an integrated approach to marine benthic monitoring.

In the UK, most marine benthic monitoring is carried out in a piecemeal fashion, funded by different sectors of industry that utilise the marine environment under licence. Monitoring requirements are imposed by licence conditions, which can vary considerably between licences. The UK Government also conducts marine environmental surveys in support of its legislative commitments. The present investigation reviews these different monitoring approaches to highlight whether synergies between them could be developed into an integrated approach to marine benthic monitoring. An integrated approach would have ecological benefits, as greater consistency in sampling and analytical protocols would reduce uncertainty in the predictions of impact, and facilitate the assessment of Good Environmental Status under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The same approach would also be of financial benefit, as spatio-temporal duplication in sampling would be reduced, and the value of acquired data would be maximised, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective approach.

Setting limits for acceptable change in sediment particle size composition: testing a new approach to managing marine aggregate dredging.

A baseline dataset from 2005 was used to identify the spatial distribution of macrofaunal assemblages across the eastern English Channel. The range of sediment composition found in association with each assemblage was used to define limits for acceptable change at ten licensed marine aggregate extraction areas. Sediment data acquired in 2010, 4 years after the onset of dredging, were used to assess whether conditions remained within the acceptable limits. Despite the observed changes in sediment composition, the composition of sediments in and around nine extraction areas remained within pre-defined acceptable limits. At the tenth site, some of the observed changes within the licence area were judged to have gone beyond the acceptable limits. Implications of the changes are discussed, and appropriate management measures identified. The approach taken in this study offers a simple, objective and cost-effective method for assessing the significance of change, and could simplify the existing monitoring regime.

The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the sediment composition and macrofaunal community of a commercial dredging site (15 years post-dredging)

A prediction that faunal recovery of a marine aggregate extraction site subjected to high dredging intensity was likely to take 15-20 years was investigated. Samples were collected at the high dredging intensity site and two reference sites in 2011 (15 years post-dredging). Results indicated that the high site had similar sediment characteristics to the reference sites by 2011. Macrofaunal data analyses showed no difference between the values of all calculated univariate measures (abundance, number of taxa, biomass and evenness) between the high and reference sites. Multivariate analyses found that the macrofaunal community at the high site was comparable to those of the reference sites by 2011. Overall, the results supported the predicted recovery time. The findings of the study suggest that persistent physical impacts prolonged the biological recovery of the high site.