Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Emma J. Crosbie is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Emma J. Crosbie.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2010

Body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Emma J. Crosbie; Marcel Zwahlen; Henry C Kitchener; Matthias Egger; Andrew G. Renehan

Background: Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for endometrial cancer. We quantified the risk and investigated whether the association differed by use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), menopausal status, and histologic type. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to December 2009) to identify prospective studies of BMI and incident endometrial cancer. We did random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regressions, and generalized least square regressions for trend estimations assuming linear, and piecewise linear, relationships. Results: Twenty-four studies (17,710 cases) were analyzed; 9 studies contributed to analyses by HRT, menopausal status, or histologic type, all published since 2003. In the linear model, the overall risk ratio (RR) per 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was 1.60 (95% CI, 1.52–1.68), P < 0.0001. In the piecewise model, RRs compared with a normal BMI were 1.22 (1.19–1.24), 2.09 (1.94–2.26), 4.36 (3.75–5.10), and 9.11 (7.26–11.51) for BMIs of 27, 32, 37, and 42 kg/m2, respectively. The association was stronger in never HRT users than in ever users: RRs were 1.90 (1.57–2.31) and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.06–1.31) with P for interaction = 0.003. In the piecewise model, the RR in never users was 20.70 (8.28–51.84) at BMI 42 kg/m2, compared with never users at normal BMI. The association was not affected by menopausal status (P = 0.34) or histologic type (P = 0.26). Conclusions: HRT use modifies the BMI-endometrial cancer risk association. Impact: These findings support the hypothesis that hyperestrogenia is an important mechanism underlying the BMI-endometrial cancer association, whilst the presence of residual risk in HRT users points to the role of additional systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(12); 3119–30. ©2010 AACR.


The Lancet | 1987

Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Emma J. Crosbie; Mark H. Einstein; Silvia Franceschi; Henry C Kitchener

Cervical cancer is caused by human papillomavirus infection. Most human papillomavirus infection is harmless and clears spontaneously but persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (especially type 16) can cause cancer of the cervix, vulva, vagina, anus, penis, and oropharynx. The virus exclusively infects epithelium and produces new viral particles only in fully mature epithelial cells. Human papillomavirus disrupts normal cell-cycle control, promoting uncontrolled cell division and the accumulation of genetic damage. Two effective prophylactic vaccines composed of human papillomavirus type 16 and 18, and human papillomavirus type 16, 18, 6, and 11 virus-like particles have been introduced in many developed countries as a primary prevention strategy. Human papillomavirus testing is clinically valuable for secondary prevention in triaging low-grade cytology and as a test of cure after treatment. More sensitive than cytology, primary screening by human papillomavirus testing could enable screening intervals to be extended. If these prevention strategies can be implemented in developing countries, many thousands of lives could be saved.


Modern Pathology | 2015

Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative

Ellen Stelloo; Tjalling Bosse; Remi A. Nout; Helen Mackay; David N. Church; Hans W. Nijman; Alexandra Leary; Richard J. Edmondson; Melanie E Powell; Emma J. Crosbie; Henry C Kitchener; Linda Mileshkin; Pamela M. Pollock; Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit; Carien L. Creutzberg

This study aimed to investigate whether molecular analysis can be used to refine risk assessment, direct adjuvant therapy, and identify actionable alterations in high-risk endometrial cancer. TransPORTEC, an international consortium related to the PORTEC3 trial, was established for translational research in high-risk endometrial cancer. In this explorative study, routine molecular analyses were used to detect prognostic subgroups: p53 immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability and POLE proofreading mutation. Furthermore, DNA was analyzed for hotspot mutations in 13 additional genes (BRAF, CDKNA2, CTNNB1, FBXW7, FGFR2, FGFR3, FOXL2, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, and PTEN) and protein expression of ER, PR, PTEN, and ARID1a was analyzed. Rates of distant metastasis, recurrence-free, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. In total, samples of 116 high-risk endometrial cancer patients were included: 86 endometrioid; 12 serous; and 18 clear cell. For endometrioid, serous, and clear cell cancers, 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 68%, 27%, and 50% (P=0.014) and distant metastasis rates 23%, 64%, and 50% (P=0.001), respectively. Four prognostic subgroups were identified: (1) a group of p53-mutant tumors; (2) microsatellite instable tumors; (3) POLE proofreading-mutant tumors; and (4) a group with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). In group 3 (POLE-mutant; n=14) and group 2 (microsatellite instable; n=19) patients, no distant metastasis occurred, compared with 50% distant metastasis rate in group 1 (p53-mutant; n=36) and 39% in group 4 (NSMP; P<0.001). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 93% and 95% for group 3 (POLE-mutant) and group 2 (microsatellite instable) vs 42% (group 1, p53-mutant) and 52% (group 4, NSMP; P<0.001). Targetable FBXW7 and FGFR2 mutations (6%), alterations in the PI3K-AKT pathway (60%) and hormone receptor positivity (45%) were frequently found. In conclusion, molecular analysis of high-risk endometrial cancer identifies four distinct prognostic subgroups, with potential therapeutic implications. High frequencies of targetable alterations were identified and may serve as targets for individualized treatment.


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

Body mass index does not influence post-treatment survival in early stage endometrial cancer: results from the MRC ASTEC trial.

Emma J. Crosbie; Chris Roberts; Wendi Qian; Ann Marie Swart; Henry C Kitchener; Andrew G. Renehan

Body mass index (BMI) is a major risk factor for endometrial cancer incidence but its impact on post-treatment survival is unclear. We investigated the relationships of BMI (categorised using the WHO definitions) with clinico-pathological characteristics and outcome in women treated within the MRC ASTEC randomised trial, which provides data from patients who received standardised allocated treatments and therefore reduces biases. The impact of BMI on both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed using the Cox regression models. An apriori framework of evaluating potential biases was explored. From 1408 participants, there were 1070 women with determinable BMI (median=29.1 kg/m(2)). Histological types were endometrioid (type 1) in 893 and non-endometrioid (type 2) in 146 women; the proportion of the latter decreasing with increasing BMI (8% versus 19% for obese III WHO category versus normal weight, p(trend)=0.003). For type 1 carcinomas, increasing BMI was associated with less aggressive histopathological features (depth of invasion, p=0.006; tumour grade, p=0.015). With a median follow-up of 34.3 months, there was no influence of BMI on RFS - adjusted HRs per 5 kg/m(2) were 0.98 (95% CI 0.86, 1.13) and 0.95 (0.74, 1.24), for type 1 and 2 carcinomas; and no influence on OS - adjusted HRs per 5 kg/m(2) were 0.96 (0.81, 1.14) and 0.92 (0.70, 1.23), respectively. These findings demonstrate an important principle: that an established link between an exposure (here, obesity) and increased incident cancer risk, does not necessarily translate into an inferior outcome following treatment for that cancer.


Cancer Treatment Reviews | 2009

The management of vulval cancer.

Emma J. Crosbie; Richard J Slade; Ahmed S. Ahmed

Referral of women with vulval carcinoma to tertiary centres is now established practise in the UK. The centralisation of care for these women promotes the development of specialist teams of gynaecological oncologists, clinical oncologists, pathologists and clinical nurse specialists with expertise in the management of this relatively rare tumour. The primary care physician plays an essential role in the early detection and subsequent urgent referral of women with suspicious vulval lesions. Improved education and awareness campaigns may encourage women to report vulval symptoms early. Where vulval carcinoma is diagnosed at an early stage, surgical excision is likely to be curative. There is, however, a move away from radical surgery for all patients irrespective of stage of disease towards an individualised approach, which takes into account the size and position of the tumour. The challenge is to reduce morbidity associated with treatment without compromising on cure rates. Restricting groin lymphadenectomy to women with lymph node metastases may be possible with the advent of sentinel node technology and it is anticipated that expertise in this area will show significant advances over the coming years. There is still a place for radical surgery, often in combination with other treatment modalities, in the management of advanced or recurrent disease. This article will review the evidence for the current management of vulval carcinoma.


British Journal of Cancer | 2016

Measuring the biological effect of presurgical metformin treatment in endometrial cancer

Vanitha N. Sivalingam; Sarah Kitson; Rhona J McVey; Chris Roberts; P Pemberton; K Gilmour; S. Ali; Andrew G. Renehan; Henry C Kitchener; Emma J. Crosbie

Background:Preclinical studies in endometrial cancer (EC) show that metformin reduces cellular proliferation by PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibition. We tested the hypothesis that short-term presurgical metformin reduces cellular proliferation in atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrioid EC, and assessed the feasibility of using phosphorylated PI3K-AKT-mTOR proteins as tissue end points.Methods:Women with AEH or EC received metformin 850 mg twice a day or no drug in the presurgical window between diagnosis and hysterectomy. Before and after the window, tissue samples were obtained; serum markers of insulin resistance (e.g. homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance index) were determined; and anthropometrics measured (e.g. BMI). Cell proliferation (Ki-67) and PI3K-AKT-mTOR phosphostatus were assessed by immunohistochemistry and scored blinded to treatment.Results:Twenty-eight metformin-treated and 12 untreated patients, well matched for age and BMI, completed the study. Metformin treatment (median 20 days, range 7–34) was associated with a 17.2% reduction in tumour Ki-67 (95% CI −27.4, −7.0, P=0.002), in a dose-dependent manner. Tumour PI3K-AKT-mTOR protein phosphostatus varied but the effects were not significant after adjusting for changes in controls.Conclusions:Short-term metformin was associated with reduced Ki-67 expression in EC. Changes in tumour PI3K-AKT-mTOR protein phosphostatus were seen in both groups. Future studies should address the variability attributed to different sampling techniques including devascularisation of the uterus at hysterectomy.


BMJ | 2013

Developing role of HPV in cervical cancer prevention

Henry C Kitchener; Karin Denton; Kate Soldan; Emma J. Crosbie

#### Summary points Since the Cervical Screening Programme was introduced in England, the incidence of cervical cancer has fallen by 44% and number of deaths from the disease by 70% (fig 1⇓). This effect has also been seen in other countries.1 2 The discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical cancer and in subsequent molecular biology and epidemiological studies shows that persistent cervical infection with “high risk” HPV types is a necessary cause of cervical cancer. This finding has led to two major developments in cervical cancer control: immunisation as a means of primary prevention and HPV testing in cervical screening, which is poised to replace cytology as the primary screening modality. This article reviews the evidence base for evolving from exfoliative cytology alone to a dual approach of HPV vaccination and HPV based cervical screening. …


AIDS | 2016

A prospective study of anal cancer screening in HIV-positive and negative MSM

Alice M. Schofield; Laura Sadler; Linsey Nelson; Matthew Gittins; Mina Desai; Alex Sargent; Raymond Mcmahon; James Hill; Emma J. Crosbie; Julietta Patnick; Henry C Kitchener

Objective:The study sought to establish the feasibility and acceptability of anal screening among men MSM. Design:Prospective cohort study. Setting:Sexual health clinics in tertiary care. Patients:Known HIV-positive and negative MSM who have anoreceptive intercourse. Intervention:Anal screening with human papilloma virus (HPV) testing, liquid-based cytology and high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy of anoscopic abnormalities. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and at 6 months. Results:Anal HPV was highly prevalent in MSM (HIV-positive, 88% and HIV-negative, 78%). Despite the high prevalence of cytological abnormality in both HIV-positive (46.2%) and negative (35.0%) MSM, almost half of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) of all grades were associated with negative cytology. Anoscopically directed biopsies detected AIN3 or worse (AIN3+) in 14 of 203 (6.9%) of HIV-positive MSM and three of 81 (3.7%) HIV-negative MSM. The corresponding prevalence of AIN2+ was 26.6 and 20.9%, respectively. One case of AIN3 was detected at the second visit. Screening was considered to be highly acceptable by participants. Conclusion:The high prevalence of high-risk-HPV and frequency of false negative cytology in this study suggest that high-resolution anoscopy would have most clinical utility, as a primary screening tool for anal cancer in a high-risk group. The prevalence of AIN3+ in HIV-positive MSM lends support for a policy of screening this group, but the high prevalence of lower grade lesions which do not warrant immediate treatment and the limitations of treating high-grade lesions requires careful consideration in terms of a screening policy.


Clinical Science | 2006

Human papillomavirus in cervical screening and vaccination

Emma J. Crosbie; Henry C Kitchener

Recent decades have witnessed a reduction in the incidence of cervical cancer in countries where screening programmes have achieved broad coverage. The recognized importance of high-risk HPV (human papillomavirus) infection in the aetiology of cervical cancer may introduce a role for HPV DNA testing in cervical screening programmes. Positive HPV DNA tests indicate women at risk of cervical cancer with greater sensitivity, but reduced specificity, compared with exfoliative cytology. Combining HPV testing with cytology may be useful in the triage of minor cytological abnormalities into those requiring referral to colposcopy (HPV positive) compared with those who can be safely managed by cytological surveillance (HPV negative). With its high sensitivity and high-negative-predictive value, HPV testing may also be useful for predicting treatment failure, since residual disease is very unlikely in the event of a negative HPV test. Ultimately, prevention is better than cure, and the advent of HPV prophylactic vaccines may obviate the need for population-based cervical screening programmes in the future. A multivalent vaccine administered to adolescents prior to the onset of sexual activity and boosted at regular intervals throughout their sexually active life may provide protection against type-specific HPV infection, malignant precursors and invasive cervical disease. Several large randomized placebo-controlled trials have been conducted with promising results. For those generations of women already exposed to high-risk HPV infection, therapeutic vaccines may offer advantages over conventional treatment, although much work still needs to be done.


British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2013

Obesity-driven endometrial cancer: is weight loss the answer?

Ml MacKintosh; Emma J. Crosbie

Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer affecting British women, behind breast, lung and colon cancer. Over the past 20 years, the incidence of endometrial cancer has risen by 40%, and deaths by 20%, despite improved overall survival rates. Currently more than 1900 British women die from endometrial cancer each year, compared with fewer than 1500 at the turn of the century. The aging population, uterinesparing treatments for menstrual dysfunction and tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer have all contributed to this rise, but escalating obesity rates appear to be the major culprit. Endometrial cancer ranks highest amongst all cancers in its association with obesity. Every 5 kg/m increase in body mass index (BMI) confers a 1.6-fold increased risk of endometrial cancer. At a BMI of 42, a woman has an almost ten-fold increased risk of endometrial cancer than women of normal weight.Rates of obesity in England and Wales have trebled over the last two decades, and they are still on the increase. Currently, two-thirds of British women are overweight and nearly one-quarter obese. In Europe, excess weight has been estimated to account for 60% of all new endometrial cancer cases per year. Indeed, in the ASTEC trial, a European study of more than 1400 women with earlystage endometrial cancer, 80% of women with type-1 endometrial cancer were overweight (BMI > 25) and 50% were obese (BMI > 30). Thus, although an average woman has a 3% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer, an obese woman has a risk of 9–10%, and for morbidly obese women the risk may be even higher.

Collaboration


Dive into the Emma J. Crosbie's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Kitson

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Roberts

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Loretta Brabin

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexandra Sargent

Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge