Enayat A. Moallemi
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Enayat A. Moallemi.
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation | 2018
Jonathan Köhler; Fjalar Johannes de Haan; Georg Holtz; Klaus Kubeczko; Enayat A. Moallemi; George Papachristos; Emile J.L. Chappin
Transition modelling is an emerging but growing niche within the broader field of sustainability transitions research. The objective of this paper is to explore the characteristics of this niche in relation to a range of existing modelling approaches and literatures with which it shares commonalities or from which it could draw. We distil a number of key aspects we think a transitions model should be able to address, from a broadly acknowledged, empirical list of transition characteristics. We review some of the main strands in modelling of socio-technological change with regards to their ability to address these characteristics. These are: Eco-innovation literatures (energy-economy models and Integrated Assessment Models), evolutionary economics, complex systems models, computational social science simulations using agent based models, system dynamics models and socio-ecological systems models. The modelling approaches reviewed can address many of the features that differentiate sustainability transitions from other socio-economic dynamics or innovations. The most problematic features are the representation of qualitatively different system states and of the normative aspects of change. The comparison provides transition researchers with a starting point for their choice of a modelling approach, whose characteristics should correspond to the characteristics of the research question they face. A promising line of research is to develop innovative models of co-evolution of behaviours and technologies towards sustainability, involving change in the structure of the societal and technical systems.
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory | 2018
Enayat A. Moallemi; Sondoss Elsawah; Michael J. Ryan
Abstract Several approaches within the exploratory modelling literature—each with strengths and limitations—have been introduced to address the complexity and uncertainty of decision problems. Recent model-based approaches for decision making emphasise the advantage of mixing approaches from different areas in leveraging the strengths of each. This article shows how a multi-method lens to the design of decision-making approaches can better address different characteristics of multi-objective decision problems under deep uncertainty. The article focuses on interactions between two broad areas in model-based decision making: exploratory modelling and multi-objective optimisation. The article reviews this literature using a specific multi-method lens to analyse previous researches and to identify the knowledge gap. The article then addresses this gap by demonstrating a multi-method approach for designing adaptive robust solutions. The suggested approach uses a Pareto optimal search from multi-objective optimisation for enumerating alternative solutions. It also uses Robust Decision Making and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways approaches from exploratory modelling for analysing the robustness of enumerated solutions in the face of many future scenarios. A hypothetical case study is used to illustrate how the approach can be applied. The article concludes that a new lens from a multi-method design perspective is needed on exploratory modelling to provide practical guidance into how to combine exploratory modelling techniques, to shed light on exiting knowledge gaps and to open up a range of potential combinations of exiting approaches for leveraging the strengths of each.
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory | 2018
Enayat A. Moallemi; Sondoss Elsawah; Michael J. Ryan
Abstract Exploratory modelling is an approach for modelling under uncertainty based on the generation and analysis of computational experiments. The results of exploratory modelling are sensitive to the way that experiments are designed, such as the way that the uncertainty space is delineated. This article introduces an agent-monitored framework—i.e. a design metaphor of the interactions among modellers and stakeholders and the simulation process—for controlling the design of experiments based on monitoring model behaviour in the output space. To demonstrate the benefits of the suggested framework in the exploratory modelling process, the article shows how the use of the framework with an output-oriented approach informs the delineation of an appropriate uncertainty space with an illustrative example in the decision-making context. The article concludes that the design of experiments based on feedback from the output space can be a useful approach: to control simulations in exploratory modelling; to build more confidence in final results; and to inform the design of other aspects of experiments, such as selecting policy levers and sampling method.
Energy research and social science | 2017
Enayat A. Moallemi; Shirin Malekpour
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews | 2017
Enayat A. Moallemi; Lu Aye; John M. Webb; Fjalar Johannes de Haan; Biju George
Technological Forecasting and Social Change | 2017
Enayat A. Moallemi; Fjalar Johannes de Haan; John M. Webb; Biju George; Lu Aye
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2017
Enayat A. Moallemi; Lu Aye; Fjalar Johannes de Haan; John M. Webb
Energy Policy | 2017
Enayat A. Moallemi; Fjalar Johannes de Haan; Jan H. Kwakkel; Lu Aye
34th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society | 2016
Enayat A. Moallemi; Lu Aye; F de Haan; John M. Webb
The 5th International Conference on Sustainability Transitions: Impact and Institurions | 2014
Enayat A. Moallemi; Biju George; Lu Aye; John M. Webb
Collaboration
Dive into the Enayat A. Moallemi's collaboration.
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas
View shared research outputs