Enrico Citterio

Reoperation for Aortic False Aneurysms: Our Experience and Strategy for Safe Resternotomy

Abstract  Background and aim of the study: To review our experience with reoperation for aortic false aneurysms (FA) and to present an analysis of the relevant surgical approaches and risks. Methods: From May 1999 to June 2006, 11 patients underwent a total of 13 reoperations due to aortic false aneurysms, with an incidence of 3% of all thoracic aortic cases. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cooling were started before sternotomy in all cases. Three different strategies were adopted for patients depending on the position of the FA in the mediastinum as indicated by a preoperative CT scan. These included: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (18°C), moderate hypothermia (28°C), and mild hypothermia (32°C). In two patients, the sternotomy ruptured the FA causing profuse hemorrhaging. In all the other cases sternotomy was performed without complication. The repair consisted in simple repair by direct suture (10 cases) or extensive repair by refashioning the anastomosis (three cases). Results: Two hospital deaths occurred with a hospital mortality rate of 16.7%. Permanent neurological deficit developed in one patient. Transient neurological deficit in the form of left lower limb weakness was observed in one patient. False aneurysm recurrence developed in two cases. Among patients present at follow‐up (nine survivors), four are in NYHA class I and five in class II. Conclusions: Aortic false aneurysms carry a high mortality and morbidity rate. Nevertheless, we believe that selecting the right strategy according to the position of the FA in the chest can reduce surgical risk, thus permitting relatively safe resternotomy.

Compliance of the valsalva graft's pseudosinuses at midterm follow-up with cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND In previous studies, the Valsalva grafts compliance at the level of the Dacron pseudosinuses was found similar to that of normal sinuses shortly (2±1 months) after the operation. We sought to investigate with cardiac magnetic resonance the compliance of the Valsalva graft pseudosinuses at midterm follow-up. METHODS Seven patients (group A) and 7 age-matched controls (group B) were studied with steady-state free precession and phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance for aortic root and ascending aorta evaluation. Blood pressure was measured during phase-contrast acquisition to derive the following mechanical properties of the vascular prosthesis: pulsatility, compliance, distensibility, and elastic modulus. RESULTS Mean postoperative follow-up was 55±9.84 months. Mean age was 69.2±4.98 years in group A, and 65.7±7.16 years in group B. All the studied variables were coherent in showing a significant difference between the two groups, and between aortic root (skirt portion of the graft) and ascending aorta (tubular part of the graft) in group A. The presence of periaortic fibrosis did not show any correlation with the ascending aortas mechanical properties. CONCLUSIONS At midterm follow-up, the pseudosinuses compliance of the Valsalva graft is still appreciable and significantly greater than the tubular portion.

6 Months of “Temporary” Support by Levitronix Left Ventricular Assist Device

An otherwise healthy 47-year-old man presented to the emergency department in cardiogenic shock after suffering a massive myocardial infarction due to left main occlusion. He was initially supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and subsequently was converted to paracorporeal support with a Levitronix left ventricular assist device. He experienced multiple postoperative complications including renal failure, respiratory failure, retroperitoneal hematoma requiring suspension of anticoagulation, and fungal bloodstream infection precluding transition to an implantable device. He was reconditioned and successfully underwent orthotopic heart transplant 183 days after presentation. A discussion of the relevant issues is included.

Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Valsalva graft: what have we learnt after 100 cases?

OBJECTIVES Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement has been increasingly performed with improving perioperative and mid-term results. The success of this operation primarily depends on preserving the highly sophisticated dynamic function of the aortic valve by recreating an anatomical three-dimensional configuration similar to the normal aortic root, thus minimizing the mechanical stress and strain on the cusps. Over the years several techniques have been proposed to reproduce the sinuses of Valsalva. We reviewed our experience with aortic valve reimplantation by means of a modified Dacron graft that incorporates sinuses of Valsalva, in a series of 100 consecutive patients. METHODS During a 60-month period, 100 patients with aortic root aneurysm underwent aortic valve reimplantation using the Gelweave Valsalva prosthesis. There were 74 males and the mean age was 60+/-12 years (range 28-83 years). Five patients had the Marfans syndrome, 15 had a bicuspid aortic valve. Cusp repair was performed in five patients. The mean follow-up time was 28.6 months (range 1-60). Transesophageal echocardiogram was performed at the end of each procedure to assess the aortic valve in terms of competence, dynamic motion and level of coaptation within the graft. RESULTS There was one hospital death and two late deaths. Overall survival at 60 months was 91.7+/-5.1%. Five patients developed severe aortic incompetence (AI) during follow-up requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR). The 60 months freedom from re-operation due to AI was 90.9+/-4.4%. One patient had moderate AI at latest echocardiographic study. The 60 months freedom from AI>2+ was 91.6+/-7.9%. Cox regression identified cusps repair as independent risk factor (P=0.001) for late reimplantation failure (AVR or AI>2+). There were no episodes of endocarditis and the majority of the patients (88%) were in New York Heart Association functional class I. CONCLUSIONS The aortic valve reimplantation with the Gelweave Valsalva prosthesis provided satisfactory mid-term results. An accurate assessment of the level of coaptation of the aortic cusps in respect to the lower rim of the Dacron graft by means of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram at the end of each procedure is mandatory in order to avoid early reimplantation failure. Cusps repair may play an important role in the development of late AI. However, long-term results are needed in order to define the durability of this technique.

Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation

Aortic valve reimplantation has been shown to be a safe procedure. However, evidences of durability in bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) are limited in the literature. Between 2002 and 2011, 132 patients (mean age 61 ± 12 years) underwent aortic valve reimplantation. In 24 patients (18%), aortic valve was bicuspid. Mean follow-up was 50 ± 26 months (range 1-102 months) and was 99% complete. In-hospital mortality was 0.8% (1 patient). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 99 and 94%, respectively. Overall freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 1 and 5 years was 96 and 90%, respectively, without significant difference between patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Freedom from aortic valve regurgitation >2+/4+, excluding patients reoperated, was at 1 and 5 years of 100 and 99%, respectively. Patients with valve cusp repair showed a higher rate of aortic valve reoperation; however, only postoperative aortic regurgitation >2+/4+ was significant risk factor for redo procedure at multivariate analysis. Aortic valve reimplantation in BAV without cusp repair provides excellent mid-term results. Further observations and longer follow-up are necessary to determine if BAV sparing, even in the presence of cusps alterations, could allow satisfying durability.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aim Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) allows revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary (LAD) artery through a less traumatic surgical approach. However, the procedure is technically challenging and concern still exists, mainly based on graft patency. The purpose of this study is to critically evaluate short and long-term benefits of this surgical treatment. Methods Between June 1997 and July 2012, 306 patients underwent MIDCAB on LAD. The mean age was 62 ± 10 years (range, 32–87 years) and 264 patients (86.3%) were men. Mean ejection fraction was 54%. Eighty-nine procedures (29.1%) were performed using a hybrid approach by means of MIDCAB and postoperative (60 patients, 67.4%) or preoperative (29 patients, 32.6%) percutaneous interventions on non-LAD vessels. A EuroScore more than 6 was found in 43 (14%) patients. The average follow-up time was 9.5 ± 3.2 years and was 89% complete. Results Six patients (1.9%) required intraoperative conversion to sternotomy, whereas cardiopulmonary bypass institution after the sternotomy was necessary in one. Postoperative acute myocardial infarction occurring nine patients (2.9%), low output syndrome in four (1.3%). Postoperative mortality was 1.6% (n = 5), and perioperative stroke rate 0.6% (n = 2). Five and 10-year survival were 94.1 and 86.9%, respectively. Freedom from death due to cardiac events and major cardiac and cerebral events at 10 years was, respectively, 97.1 and 92.1%. Conclusions The results confirm the favorable short and long-term results of the MIDCAB procedure. MIDCAB, in experienced centers, can represent an alternative treatment option for LAD disease.

Cusp repair during aortic valve-sparing operation: technical aspects and impact on results.

Aims Aortic valve-sparing operations are nowadays considered safe and reliable procedures in terms of mid-term and long-term results. Although surgical techniques regarding the modality of grafts’ implantation have been properly addressed, the modality of cusp repair, when needed, is still open to debate. We sought to review the literature to try to shed light on when the cusp repair is required and how it should be performed. Methods We searched the PubMed database using the keywords aortic valve-sparing operation, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation, valve-sparing aortic root replacement, aortic valve repair, and aortic cusp repair. Only studies that included and described in detail the technique of cusp repairs in adjunct to aortic valve-sparing operation were considered. Results Bicuspid aortic valve more often requires correction when compared with tricuspid valve. The range of the techniques varies from the ‘simple’ free margin plication to the more complex triangular resection with patch repair. Results in the literature seem to be encouraging, showing that, in most of the cases, cusp repair does not affect valve competence in the mid-term and long-term. Conclusion Correction of the cusp is a delicate balance between undercorrection that could lead to residual prolapse and overcorrection that could lead to cusp restriction. Although complex repair of the aortic valve in addition to root replacement provided satisfactory results, it should be reserved for experienced centers with a large volume of patients.

Hybrid Versus Conventional Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

To determine whether the hybrid approach to acute type A aortic dissection results in improved outcomes in terms of mortality, neurologic complications, need for distal aortic reintervention, and false lumen thrombosis compared with the conventional approach.

Sistema di assistenza ventricolare CircuLite Synergy: un nuovo approccio all'insufficienza cardiaca terminale

BACKGROUND: The Synergy system, a miniature partial circulatory support device, is implanted by an off-pump, minimally invasive surgical approach. The system has been optimized to improve performance in an EU clinical trial for chronic ambulatory heart failure. This therefore offers the possibility of treating elderly chronic heart failure patients who might not usually be considered for long-term circulatory support. METHODS: From June 2007 to December 2012, 63 patients were implanted with the Synergy system (12 patients ≥70 years) using four different releases of the device. Briefly, the system draws blood through the inflow cannula from the left atrium into the micro-pump (placed in a right subclavicular pocket) and pumps it through an outflow graft to the right subclavian artery. In this paper, we present an intermediate analysis of the clinical trial as performed on April 30, 2013, leading to the placing of the CE mark. RESULTS: Mean duration of support is ongoing at 230 days (range 23-1387). Follow-up showed improved hemodynamic response, with additional improvements in 6-min walk distance (299 ± 144 to 420 ± 119 m) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (69.5 ± 20.4 to 49.2 ± 24.3). Older patients had longer mean durations of support (337 vs 188 days). On average, elderly and younger patients showed similar improvements in hemodynamics and 6-min walk distance (107 ± 120 vs 130 ± 121 m). Major adverse cardiac events included bleeding (n=4) with one bleeding related to renal failure resulting in death. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical use of the Synergy device was associated with a significant functional improvement. Very low adverse event rates were reported with the latest device release. Older patients had smaller body sizes and worse renal function than younger patients. Both groups experienced similar hemodynamic benefits and functional improvements. The risk of bleeding and renal dysfunction appears to be increased in the elderly, though still within acceptable ranges compared to other full support devices. Minimally invasive long-term circulatory support devices, like Synergy, offer a new treatment option that might be available even for the elderly chronic heart failure population.

Unusable Radial Artery for Severe Atherosclerosis in a Young Patient

We report a young diabetic patient who was found to have an unusable radial artery (RA) for coronary bypass grafting because of severe and diffuse atherosclerosis. Techniques to diagnose RA conduits, which are not usable for coronary surgery, are reviewed. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12356 (J Card Surg 2015;30:263–264)