Fiorenzo Gaita

Mid-term prognostic value of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of adjusted observational results.

AIMSnCoronary artery disease (CAD) negatively affects prognosis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, being currently evaluated in the most common used risk score. Our meta-analysis aims to clarify the prognostic role of CAD on mid-term survival in patients undergoing TAVI.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnStudies reporting multivariate predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI were systematically searched for and pooled, when appropriate, using a random-effect method. 960 citations were first screened and finally 7 studies (2472 patients) were included. Diagnosis of CAD was reported in 52%(42-65) of patients and 1169 Edwards SAPIEN and 1303 CoreValve prostheses were implanted. After a median follow up of 452 days (357-585) 24% of patients (19-33) died, and 23 (14-32) for cardiovascular death. At pooled analysis of multivariate approach, diagnosis of coronary artery disease did not increase risk of death (OR 1.0, 95% CI, confidence interval, 0.67-1.50 I(2) 0%).nnnCONCLUSIONnCAD does not affect mid-term TAVI outcome: this finding should be weighted to accurately evaluate risk and strategies for patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Meta-Analysis of Predictors of All-Cause Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of 30-day and midterm mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by means of a systemic review. TAVI was demonstrated to be safe and efficacious in patients with severe aortic stenosis. An accurate estimation of procedural risk of these patients represents an actual challenge. The PubMed and Cochrane Collaboration databases were systematically searched for studies reporting on the incidence and independent predictors of 30-day and midterm mortality. Adverse events were pooled with random effect, whereas independent predictors are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 25 studies with 8,874 patients were included (median age 82.5 ± 1.5 years, 54.6% women). At 30 days, 7.5% of patients (nxa0= 663) died. At midterm follow-up (median 365xa0days, interquartile range 267 to 365 days), the cumulative mortality rate was 21.6% (nxa0= 1,917). Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage ≥2 (OR 18.0, 95% CI 6.3 to 52), preprocedural hospitalization for heart failure (OR 9.4, 95% CI 2.6 to 35), periprocedural acute myocardial infarction (OR 8.5, 95% CI 2.6 to 33.5), and increased pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) levels (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 16.5) were the most important independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Increased pro-BNP levels (OR 11, 95% CI 1.5 to 81), AKI stage 3 (OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 15.7), left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.5 to 12.7), and periprocedural acute myocardial infarction (OR 6.5, 95% CI 2.3 to 18.1) represented the predictors of midterm mortality. In conclusion, in this large meta-analysis of patients undergoing TAVI, we found that high pro-BNP levels and postprocedural AKI were the strongest independent predictors of both 30-day and 1-year mortality. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the risk assessment process of patients undergoing TAVI.

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Adjusted Observational Results of Use of Clopidogrel, Aspirin, and Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The optimal antiaggregant therapy after coronary stenting in patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) is currently debated. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting outcomes of patients who underwent PCI and who were on triple therapy (TT) or dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel or dual therapy (DT) with OAC and clopidogrel. Major bleeding was the primary end point, whereas all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and stroke were secondary ones. Results were reported for all studies and separately for those deriving from randomized controlled trials or multivariate analysis. In 9 studies, 1,317 patients were treated with DAPT and 1,547 with TT. DAPT offered a significant reduction of major bleeding at 1 year for overall studies and for the subset of observational works providing adjusted data (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.68, I2 60% and OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.46) compared to TT. No increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, stroke, and stent thrombosis) was reported (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.08), although not deriving from randomized controlled trials or multivariate analysis. Six studies tested OAC and clopidogrel (1,263 patients) versus OAC, aspirin, and clopidogrel (3,055 patients) with a significant reduction of bleeding (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98), without affecting rates of death, MI, stroke, and stent thrombosis (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.23) also when including clinical data from randomized controlled trials or multivariate analysis. In conclusion, compared to TT, both aspirin and clopidogrel and clopidogrel and OAC reduce bleeding. No difference in major adverse cardiac events is present for clopidogrel and OAC, whereas only low-grade evidence is present for aspirin and clopidogrel.

A Gender Based Analysis of Predictors of All Cause Death After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The impact of gender-related pathophysiologic features of severe aortic stenosis on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes remains to be determined, as does the consistency of predictors of mortality between the genders. All consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at 6 institutions were enrolled in this study and stratified according to gender. Midterm all-cause mortality was the primary end point, with events at 30 days and at midterm as secondary end points. All events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. Eight hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled, 464 (55.5%) of whom were female. At midterm follow-up (median 365 days, interquartile range 100 to 516) women had similar rates of all-cause mortality compared with men (18.1% vs 22.6%, p = 0.11) and similar incidence of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident. Gender did not affect mortality also on multivariate analysis. Among clinical and procedural features, glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36 to 4.79) and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure >50 mm Hg (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.02) independently predicted mortality in women, while insulin-treated diabetes (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.47 to 8.09), previous stroke (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.43 to 8.18), and an ejection fraction <30% (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.41 to 10.37) were related to mortality in men. Postprocedural aortic regurgitation was independently related to midterm mortality in the 2 groups (HR 11.19, 95% CI 3.3 to 37.9). In conclusion, women and men had the same life expectancy after TAVI, but different predictors of adverse events stratified by gender were demonstrated. These findings underline the importance of a gender-tailored clinical risk assessment in TAVI patients.

Gender differences in patients undergoing TAVI: a multicentre study.

AIMSnIn patients undergoing surgical valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, female gender was associated with worse outcomes, not persisting after multivariable adjustment for baseline clinical differences, while contrasting data are reported about TAVI.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnFrom January 2007 to December 2011 all patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI at our institutions were included in the present study, and were divided into two cohorts according to their gender. All endpoints were adjudicated according to VARC definition. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were included: 161 male and 216 female. Male patients reported higher rates of previous coronary revascularisation, while both ejection fraction and mean aortic gradient were higher in female patients. At 30 days, rates of cardiovascular death were similar (6.0% vs. 8.1%; p=0.793), while overall bleedings (44% vs. 25%; p=0.024) and life-threatening bleedings (21.1% vs. 12.7%, p=0.016) were higher in female patients, also after multivariate analysis (OR 3.44; 1.23-9.22, and OR 2.1; 1.1-4.0, CI: 95%, respectively). Major vascular complications showed a tendency to be higher in female patients (12.9% vs. 9.8%, p=0.449). At a mean follow-up of 490 ± 250 days, no significant difference was reported between men and women for all endpoints, and after multivariate adjustment only life-threatening bleeding was reported as a predictor of death (OR 8.2:3.8-17, CI: 95%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnTAVI can be an effective and safe strategy in high surgical risk patients, regardless of the gender; life-threatening bleedings were reported more frequently in female patients, being the only independent predictor of death.

Provisional vs. two-stent technique for unprotected left main coronary artery disease after ten years follow up: A propensity matched analysis

AIMSnThere is uncertainty on which stenting approach confers the best long-term outlook for unprotected left main (ULM) bifurcation disease.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThis is a non-randomized, retrospective study including all consecutive patients with 50% stenosis of the left main involving at least 1 of the arteries stemming from the left main treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 9 European centers between 2002 and 2004. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with provisional stentings vs. those treated with two stent strategy. The outcomes of interest were 10-year rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and their components (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], or repeat revascularization), along with stent thrombosis (ST). A total of 285 patients were included, 178 (62.5%) in the provisional stenting group and 87 (37.5%) in the two stent group. After 10 years, no differences in TLR were found at unadjusted analysis (19% vs 25%, p>0.05) nor after propensity score matching (25% vs 28%, p>0.05). Similar rates of MACE (60% vs 66%, p>0.05), death (34% vs 43%, p>0.05), MI (9% vs 14%, p>0.05) and ST were also disclosed at propensity-based analysis.nnnCONCLUSIONnEven after 10 year follow-up, patients treated with provisional stenting on left main showed comparable rates of target lesion revascularization compared to two stent strategy.

Thirty-day readmission rates after PCI in a metropolitan center in Europe: incidence and impact on prognosis.

Introduction Thirty-day readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been related to adverse prognosis, and represent one of the most investigated indicators of quality of care. These data, however, derive from non-European centers evaluating all-cause readmissions, without stratification for diagnosis. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing PCI at our center from January 2009 to December 2011 were enrolled. Thirty-day readmissions related to postinfarction angina, myocardial infarction, unstable angina or heart failure were defined as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure rehospitalizations. Major cardiac adverse event (MACE) was the primary outcome, and its single components (death, myocardial infarction and repeated revascularization) the secondary ones. Results A total of 1192 patients were included; among them, 53 (4.7%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 25 (2.1%) were classified as ACS/heart failure related. During hospitalization, patients with ACS/heart failure readmissions were more likely to suffer a periprocedural myocardial infarction (22 vs. 4%; Pu200a=u200a0.012), and to undergo PCI at 30 days (52 vs. 0.5%; Pu200a<u200a0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that periprocedural myocardial infarction represented the only independent predictor of an ACS/heart failure readmission [odds ratio (OR) 4.5; 1.1–16.8; Pu200a=u200a0.047]. After a median follow-up of 787 days (434–1027; first and third quartiles), patients with a 30-day ACS/heart failure readmission experienced higher rates of MACE, all-cause death and myocardial infarction (64 vs. 21%, Pu200a<u200a0.001; 28 vs. 6%, Pu200a=u200a0.017; and 20 vs. 2.7%, Pu200a<u200a0.001, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that ACS/heart failure 30-day readmissions were independently related to an increased risk of all-cause death (OR 3.3; 1.1–8.8; Pu200a=u200a0.02), differently from 30-day non-ACS/heart failure readmissions (OR 3.1; 0.7–12.9; Pu200a=u200a0.12). Conclusion Thirty-day readmissions after PCI in an Italian center are infrequent, and only those patients with ACS/heart failure show a detrimental impact on prognosis who have periprocedural myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor.

Meta-analysis of comparison between self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves for patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Two different devices, 1 self-expanding and 1 balloon-expandable, have been developed for patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with contrasting data about efficacy and safety. Pubmed, Medline, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies of these different devices, with data derived from randomized controlled trial or registries with multivariate analysis. All-cause death at 30xa0days and at follow-up were the primary end points, whereas postprocedural moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR), stroke, major vascular complications, bleedings, and pacemaker implantation the secondary ones. Six studies with 957 self-expanding and 947 balloon-expandable valves were included: 1 randomized controlled trial and 5 observational studies. At 30xa0days follow-up, rates of death did not differ between self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47 to 1.17), whereas balloon expandable reduced rates of moderate or severe AR (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99) and of pacemaker implantation (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.47). After a follow-up of 360xa0days (300 to 390), rates of all-cause death did not differ between the 2 groups. In conclusion, risks of moderate or severe AR and pacemaker implantation were lower with the balloon-expandable devices without an impact on 30xa0days and midterm mortality.

Beta blocker for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A single center experience.

a Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Citta Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy b Division of Cardiology, Citta Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy c Division of Pneumology, Department of Internal Medicine, Citta Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy d Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Citta Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy e Department of Cardiology, Njang, China

Mid-term prognostic value of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMSnCoronary artery disease (CAD) negatively affects prognosis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, being currently evaluated in the most common used risk score. Our meta-analysis aims to clarify the prognostic role of CAD on mid-term survival in patients undergoing TAVI.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnStudies reporting multivariate predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI were systematically searched for and pooled, when appropriate, using a random-effect method. 960 citations were first screened and finally 7 studies (2472 patients) were included. Diagnosis of CAD was reported in 52%(42-65) of patients and 1169 Edwards SAPIEN and 1303 CoreValve prostheses were implanted. After a median follow up of 452 days (357-585) 24% of patients (19-33) died, and 23 (14-32) for cardiovascular death. At pooled analysis of multivariate approach, diagnosis of coronary artery disease did not increase risk of death (OR 1.0, 95% CI, confidence interval, 0.67-1.50 I(2) 0%).nnnCONCLUSIONnCAD does not affect mid-term TAVI outcome: this finding should be weighted to accurately evaluate risk and strategies for patients with severe aortic stenosis.