Enrico Heffler

Causes of food-induced anaphylaxis in Italian adults: a multi-centre study.

Background: Data about food-induced anaphylaxis in Italy are missing. Objective: It was the aim of this study to detect the main foods/food allergens causing anaphylaxis in Italy. Methods: The frequency of anaphylaxis and the relative importance of many offending foods were assessed in 1,110 adult patients with food allergy diagnosed by common criteria at 19 allergy centres scattered throughout Italy from 1 January to 31 December 2007. Results: Fifty-eight of 1,110 (5%) food-allergic patients experienced at least 1 episode of anaphylaxis. On average, they were older than other food-allergic patients (34 vs. 31 years; p < 0.05). The majority of anaphylactic episodes occurred in patients sensitized to lipid transfer protein (LTP; n = 19), followed by shrimp (n = 10), tree nuts (n = 9), legumes other than peanut (n = 4), and seeds (n = 2); peanut, spinach, celery, buckwheat, wheat, avocado, tomato, fish, meat, and Anisakis caused an anaphylactic reaction in single patients. Among LTP-hypersensitive patients, peach caused 13/19 anaphylactic episodes. Shrimp-allergic patients were significantly older than other patients with food-induced anaphylaxis (p < 0.05), whereas patients allergic to LTP experienced their anaphylactic episodes at a younger age (p < 0.001). The frequency of anaphylaxis among patients sensitized to LTP, shrimp or tree nuts did not differ between northern and central/southern Italy. Conclusion: LTP is the most important allergen causing food-induced anaphylaxis in Italy, peach being the most frequently offending food. Peanut-induced anaphylaxis seems very uncommon. Geographic and environmental differences both between Italy and other countries and within Italy seem to play a relevant role in the pattern of sensitization to foods.

EpidemAAITO: features of food allergy in Italian adults attending allergy clinics: a multi-centre study.

Background Studies of the prevalence of different types of food allergy in adults are lacking.

Interleukin-5 pathway inhibition in the treatment of eosinophilic respiratory disorders: evidence and unmet needs

Purpose of reviewHuman eosinophils were first identified and named by Paul Ehrlich in 1879 on the basis of the cells granular uptake of eosin. Although eosinophils represent approximately 1% of peripheral blood leukocytes, they have the propensity to leave the blood stream and migrate into inflamed tissues. Eosinophils and their mediators are critical effectors to asthma and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Eosinophils are equipped with a large number of cell-surface receptors and produce specific cytokines and chemokines. Recent findingsEosinophils are the major source of interleukin-5 and highly express the interleukin-5R&agr; on their surface. Clinical trials evaluating monoclonal antibodies to interleukin-5 (mepolizumab and reslizumab) and its receptor interleukin-5R&agr; (benralizumab) have been or are underway in patients with eosinophilic asthma, EGPA and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Overall, targeting interleukin-5/interleukin-5R&agr; is associated with a marked decrease in blood and sputum eosinophilia, the number of exacerbations and improvement of some clinical parameters in adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Pilot studies suggest that mepolizumab might be a glucocorticoid-sparing treatment in patients with EGPA. A preliminary study found that benralizumab did not reduce the exacerbations and did modify lung function in patients with eosinophilic COPD. SummaryThe review examines recent advances in the biology of eosinophils and how targeting the interleukin-5 pathway might offer benefit to some patients with severe asthma, EGPA, and COPD. Interleukin-5/interleukin-5R&agr;-targeted treatments offer promises to patients with eosinophilic respiratory disorders.

EAACI consensus statement for investigation of work‐related asthma in non‐specialized centres

Work‐related asthma (WRA) is a relevant problem in several countries, is cause of disability and socioeconomic consequences for both the patient and the society and is probably still underdiagnosed. A correct diagnosis is extremely important to reduce or limit the consequences of the disease. This consensus document was prepared by a EAACI Task Force consisting of an expert panel of allergologists, pneumologists and occupational physicians from different European countries. This document is not intended to address in detail the full diagnostic work‐up of WRA, nor to be a formal evidence‐based guideline. It is written to provide an operative protocol to allergologists and physicians dealing with asthma useful for identifying the subjects suspected of having WRA to address them to in‐depth investigations in a specialized centre. No evidence‐based system could be used because of the low grade of evidence of published studies in this area, and instead, ‘key messages’ or ‘suggestions’ are provided based on consensus of the expert panel members.

Clinical manifestations, co‐sensitizations, and immunoblotting profiles of buckwheat‐allergic patients

To cite this article: Heffler E, Nebiolo F, Asero R, Guida G, Badiu I, Pizzimenti S, Marchese C, Amato S, Mistrello G, Canaletti F, Rolla G. Clinical manifestations, co‐sensitizations, and immunoblotting profiles of buckwheat‐allergic patients. Allergy 2011; 66: 264–270.

Oxidative stress and airway inflammation after allergen challenge evaluated by exhaled breath condensate analysis.

Background Allergen exposure may increase airway oxidative stress, which causes lipid membrane peroxidation and an increased formation of 8‐isoprostane.

Nasal nitric oxide concentration in suspected chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND The role that nasal nitric oxide (nNO) plays in sinonasal diseases is increasingly appreciated. OBJECTIVE To test the diagnostic value of measuring nNO levels in a symptomatic population undergoing evaluation for potential chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS Of the patients referred to an outpatient allergy clinic for persistent nasal symptoms, those reporting nasal blockage plus 1 or more additional symptoms (discolored discharge, anterior or postnasal drip, facial pain or pressure, and reduction or loss of smell) were categorized as having CRS according to sinus computed tomography scores, with (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps on the basis of endoscopic signs. All the included patients underwent nNO measurement and skin prick tests for common inhalant allergens. Healthy individuals served as controls for nNO measurement. RESULTS Levels of nNO were significantly lower in patients with CRSwNP (median, 340 ppb; 25th-75th percentile, 145-390 ppb) compared with patients with CRSsNP (762 ppb; 620-1,013 ppb), patients without CRS (917 ppb; 647-1,159 ppb), and controls (843 ppb; 762-962 ppb) (P < .001). Low values of nNO separated very well patients with CRSwNP, and the nNO cutoff value of less than 442 ppb was associated with the best combination of specificity (91%) and sensitivity (87%), resulting in a negative predictive value of 91% and a positive predictive value of 87%. A significant inverse relationship was observed between nNO level and sinus computed tomography score (r2 = -0.39, P < .001). CONCLUSION Testing for nNO is highly predictive of CRSwNP in a selected population of patients with symptoms suggestive of CRS.

Breath analysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: effect of haemodialysis.

Background  There is no agreement about exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and its change after haemodialysis (HD) in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

Determinants of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been reported to be associated with increased values of exhaled nitric oxide (ENO), which could not be entirely explained by the association between CRS and asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the variables associated with increased ENO in patients with CRS. METHODS This was a prospective cross-sectional descriptive study of 93 consecutive patients with CRS. The effect on ENO of age, gender, atopy, asthma, respiratory symptoms without bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and nasal polyps was evaluated by multiple regression analysis. RESULTS Nasal polyps (P = .01), asthma (P < .001), and respiratory symptoms without BHR (P = .01) were the only independent variables associated with increased ENO. The prevalence of asthma was significantly higher in subjects with nasal polyps (61% vs 29.4%), P = .005, whereas the prevalence of respiratory symptoms without BHR was higher in those without nasal polyps (44.1% vs 15.3%, P = .003). Respiratory symptoms without BHR were associated with significantly higher ENO and prevalence of sputum eosinophilia (eosinophils > 3%) in patients with nasal polyps compared with those without nasal polyps (68.2 vs 24.0 ppb, P = .001; 60% vs 8.3%, P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The presence of nasal polyps in patients with CRS was associated with increased asthma prevalence as well as increased ENO levels. Respiratory symptoms without BHR were associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation and increased ENO only in patients with nasal polyps. These findings suggest important clinical and biologic differences between the two types of CRS, with and without nasal polyps.

Chronic cough and irritable larynx.

BACKGROUND Perennial rhinitis (PR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), or both, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are the most frequent triggers of chronic cough (CC). Extrathoracic airway receptors might be involved in all 3 conditions because asthma is often associated with PR/CRS and gastroesophageal refluxate might reach the upper airway. We previously found that most patients with rhinosinusitis, postnasal drip, and pharyngolaryngitis show laryngeal hyperresponsiveness (LHR; ie, vocal cord adduction on histamine challenge) that is consistent with an irritable larynx. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the role of LHR in patients with CC. METHODS LHR and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine were assessed in 372 patients with CC and in 52 asthmatic control subjects without cough (asthma/CC-). In 172 patients the challenge was repeated after treatment for the underlying cause of cough. RESULTS The primary trigger of CC was PR/CRS in 208 (56%) patients, asthma in 41 (11%) patients (asthma/CC+), GERD in 62 (17%) patients, and unexplained chronic cough (UNEX) in 61 (16%) patients. LHR prevalence was 76% in patients with PR/CRS, 77% in patients with GERD, 66% in patients with UNEX, 93% in asthma/CC+ patients, and 11% in asthma/CC- patients. Upper airway disease was found in most (95%) asthma/CC+ patients and in 6% of asthma/CC- patients. BHR discriminated asthmatic patients and atopy discriminated patients with PR/CRS from patients with GERD and UNEX. Absence of LHR discriminated asthmatic patients without cough. After treatment, LHR resolved in 63% of the patients and improved in 11%, and BHR resolved in 57% and improved in 18%. CONCLUSIONS An irritable larynx is common in patients with CC and indicates upper airway involvement, whether from rhinitis/sinusitis, gastric reflux, or idiopathic sensory neuropathy.