Giorgio Walter Canonica

Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in pediatric patients 3 to 18 years of age: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children. DATA SOURCES A comprehensive search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, LILACS, and CINAHL databases from January 1966 to February 10, 2006, was performed. STUDY SELECTION Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of SLIT in the treatment of allergic rhinitis in patients 18 years or younger were selected. Outcomes measured were symptom scores and rescue medication use. Analysis was performed with standardized mean differences (SMDs) and a random-effects model. RESULTS Seventy articles were identified and reviewed. Ten studies, published between 1990 and 2004, fulfilled the selection criteria. Five hundred seventy-seven patients were initially included in the studies. Of these patients, 484 (245 SLIT and 239 placebo) had a final clinical evaluation and could be evaluated. A relevant heterogeneity due to widely differing scoring systems was found. Overall, there was a significant reduction in both symptoms (SMD, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-0.10; P = .02) and medication use (SMD, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-0.06; P = .03) after immunotherapy. The subanalyses performed for treatment duration and type of allergen showed that SLIT for more than 18 months and with pollen extracts was effective compared with SLIT courses shorter than 18 months and with mites. CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis showed that,compared with placebo, SLIT with standardized extracts is effective in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis.

A WAO - ARIA - GA²LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnostics

Molecular-based allergy (MA) diagnostics is an approach used to map the allergen sensitization of a patient at a molecular level, using purified natural or recombinant allergenic molecules (allergen components) instead of allergen extracts. Since its introduction, MA diagnostics has increasingly entered routine care, with currently more than 130 allergenic molecules commercially available for in vitro specific IgE (sIgE) testing.MA diagnostics allows for an increased accuracy in allergy diagnosis and prognosis and plays an important role in three key aspects of allergy diagnosis: (1) resolving genuine versus cross-reactive sensitization in poly-sensitized patients, thereby improving the understanding of triggering allergens; (2) assessing, in selected cases, the risk of severe, systemic versus mild, local reactions in food allergy, thereby reducing unnecessary anxiety for the patient and the need for food challenge testing; and (3) identifying patients and triggering allergens for specific immunotherapy (SIT).Singleplex and multiplex measurement platforms are available for MA diagnostics. The Immuno-Solid phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) is the most comprehensive platform currently available, which involves a biochip technology to measure sIgE antibodies against more than one hundred allergenic molecules in a single assay. As the field of MA diagnostics advances, future work needs to focus on large-scale, population-based studies involving practical applications, elucidation and expansion of additional allergenic molecules, and support for appropriate test interpretation. With the rapidly expanding evidence-base for MA diagnosis, there is a need for allergists to keep abreast of the latest information. The aim of this consensus document is to provide a practical guide for the indications, determination, and interpretation of MA diagnostics for clinicians trained in allergology.

Long-lasting effects of sublingual immunotherapy according to its duration: A 15-year prospective study

BACKGROUND Data on the long-term effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are sparse, and the optimal duration of treatment is a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE We sought to prospectively evaluate the long-term effect of SLIT given for 3, 4, or 5 years and to compare the effect of those different durations. METHODS In this prospective open controlled study we followed up patients with respiratory allergy who were monosensitized to mites for 15 years. The subjects were divided in 4 groups receiving drug therapy alone or SLIT for 3, 4, or 5 years. Clinical scores, skin sensitizations, methacholine reactivity, and nasal eosinophil counts were evaluated every year during the winter months. The clinical effect was considered to persist until clinical scores remained at less than 50% of the baseline value, and then patients underwent another course of SLIT. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, and 59 completed the study. In the 12 control subjects no relevant change in clinical scores was seen throughout the study. In the patients receiving SLIT for 3 years, the clinical benefit persisted for 7 years. In those receiving immunotherapy for 4 or 5 years, the clinical benefit persisted for 8 years. New sensitizations occurred in all the control subjects over 15 years and in less than a quarter of the patients receiving SLIT (21%, 12%, and 11%, respectively). The second course of vaccination induced a benefit more rapidly than the first course. The behavior of bronchial hyperreactivity and nasal eosinophils paralleled the clinical score. CONCLUSION Under the present conditions, it can be suggested that a 4-year duration of SLIT is the optimal choice because it induces a long-lasting clinical improvement similar to that seen with a 5-year course and greater than that of a 3-year vaccination.

Minimal persistent inflammation is present at mucosal level in patients with asymptomatic rhinitis and mite allergy

The natural exposure to house dust mites causes sensitization in genetically susceptible patients. Persistent exposure of sensitized patients causes chronic inflammation, and consequently, hyperreactivity, thus promoting the development of clinical features. Recently, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)/CD54 expression on epithelial cells triggered by allergen has been demonstrated and related to the inflammation caused by the allergic reaction. Therefore we evaluated the possible presence of inflammation (i.e., inflammatory cell infiltrate and ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelium) at conjunctival and nasal levels in patients with asymptomatic allergic rhinitis caused by mites, in their relatives living in the same environment, and in healthy volunteers. In addition, the possible relationship between inflammation and house dust mite allergen exposure was evaluated. Conjunctival and nasal scrapings of allergic subjects enrolled in the study showed many inflammatory cells. A mild ICAM-1/CD54 expression on conjunctival and nasal epithelium was detectable in allergic subjects, whereas relatives and healthy volunteers showed few inflammatory cells and no ICAM-1/CD54 expression on epithelial cells. A detectable level of house dust mite, sufficient to cause sensitization, was found in all houses. This study demonstrates a minimal persistent inflammation at conjunctival and nasal levels constantly detectable in patients without symptoms who are sensitized to mites and continuously exposed to the natural allergens.

Studies on the relationship between the level of specific IgE antibodies and the clinical expression of allergy: I. Definition of levels distinguishing patients with symptomatic from patients with asymptomatic allergy to common aeroallergens

BACKGROUND The detection of specific IgE antibodies to environmental allergens does not always coincide with a diagnosis of clinically evident allergic disease, because some patients with positive skin and/or in vitro test results have no symptoms related to the allergen or allergens that induced the antibodies. OBJECTIVE In a multicenter study the optimal cutoff values for specific IgE antibody levels and skin test results that could discriminate between patients with symptomatic and those with asymptomatic allergy were determined. METHODS IgE antibodies specific for a panel of common aeroallergens were assayed with the Pharmacia CAP System (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) in two groups of patients, a group of 267 patients with symptomatic allergy and a group of 232 with asymptomatic allergy--both with positive skin prick test results--and in a group of 243 healthy, nonallergic control subjects. The cutoff values were established by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS A significantly higher mean specific IgE antibody value was found in patients with symptomatic allergy compared with patients with asymptomatic allergy (p < 0.001) and in patients with symptomatic allergy compared with healthy control subjects (p < 0.001). The optimal CAP System cutoff value between patients with symptomatic and those with asymptomatic allergy was 11.7 kU/L, and when seasonal allergens were compared with perennial allergens, the cutoffs were 10.7 kU/L and 8.4 kU/L, respectively. The optimal cutoff value for the skin prick test was a wheel area of 32 mm2 for seasonal allergens and 31 mm2 for perennial allergens. The skin test had a lower diagnostic value (sum of sensitivity and specificity) than the CAP System. CONCLUSIONS Cutoff values for specific serum IgE antibody levels are likely to be useful in clinical practice to distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic allergy in patients with positive skin test results.

Preventive effects of sublingual immunotherapy in childhood: an open randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proved to be effective in allergic rhinitis and asthma, but there are few data on its preventive effects, especially in children. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical and preventive effects of SLIT in children by assessing onset of persistent asthma and new sensitizations, clinical symptoms, and bronchial hyperreactivity. METHODS A total of 216 children with allergic rhinitis, with or without intermittent asthma, were evaluated and then randomized to receive drugs alone or drugs plus SLIT openly for 3 years. The clinical score was assessed yearly during allergen exposure. Pulmonary function testing, methacholine challenge, and skin prick testing were performed at the beginning and end of the study. RESULTS One hundred forty-four children received SLIT and 72 received drugs only. Dropouts were 9.7% in the SLIT group and 8.3% in the controls. New sensitizations appeared in 34.8% of controls and in 3.1% of SLIT patients (odds ratio, 16.85; 95% confidence interval, 5.73-49.13). Mild persistent asthma was less frequent in SLIT patients (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.17). There was a significant decrease in clinical scores in the SLIT group vs the control group since the first year. The number of children with a positive methacholine challenge result decreased significantly after 3 years only in the SLIT group. Adherence was 80% or higher in 73.8% of patients. Only 1 patient reported systemic itching. CONCLUSIONS In everyday clinical practice, SLIT reduced the onset of new sensitizations and mild persistent asthma and decreased bronchial hyperreactivity in children with respiratory allergy.

Clinical and immunologic effects of a rush sublingual immunotherapy to Parietaria species: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND The local (noninjection) routes of immunotherapy are presently regarded as viable therapeutic options for respiratory allergy, and their mechanisms of action are currently undergoing investigation. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the clinical efficacy of a preseasonal rush sublingual-swallow immunotherapy and its effects on allergic inflammation in patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria species. METHODS Thirty patients with Parietaria species-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (13 with mild intermittent asthma) were randomly assigned sublingual-swallow immunotherapy or placebo in a rush preseasonal course. We assessed the seasonal symptom-drug intake score by diary card and the inflammatory infiltration and the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression on nasal epithelium after specific allergenic challenge before and after treatment. RESULTS The investigated immunotherapy was well tolerated, and no side effects were recorded. A significant reduction of the symptom score (P =.016) and drug intake score (P =. 008) after immunotherapy was observed only in the active group. A decrease of the cumulative score was observed also in the placebo group (P =.046), but the significance was clearly higher (P =.006) in the active group. In the active group a reduction of neutrophils (P =.001), eosinophils (P =.01), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression (P =.04) after specific nasal challenge was also detected. CONCLUSION The present results suggest that this sublingual-swallow immunotherapy administered through a rush schedule is clinically effective and safe and that it decreases the immune-mediated inflammatory responses to the allergen.

Randomized controlled open study of sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergy in real-life: clinical efficacy and more.

Background:  Some aspects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) still need to be addressed: magnitude of the clinical efficacy, effect on the bronchial hyperreactivity adherence to treatment, preventive effect. We attempted to clarify these points in a randomized open, controlled, two parallel group study in a real‐life setting.

World Allergy Organization-McMaster University Guidelines for Allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P): Probiotics

BackgroundPrevalence of allergic diseases in infants, whose parents and siblings do not have allergy, is approximately 10% and reaches 20–30% in those with an allergic first-degree relative. Intestinal microbiota may modulate immunologic and inflammatory systemic responses and, thus, influence development of sensitization and allergy. Probiotics have been reported to modulate immune responses and their supplementation has been proposed as a preventive intervention.ObjectiveThe World Allergy Organization (WAO) convened a guideline panel to develop evidence-based recommendations about the use of probiotics in the prevention of allergy.MethodsWe identified the most relevant clinical questions and performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the prevention of allergy. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations. We searched for and reviewed the evidence about health effects, patient values and preferences, and resource use (up to November 2014). We followed the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations.ResultsCurrently available evidence does not indicate that probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of developing allergy in children. However, considering all critical outcomes in this context, the WAO guideline panel determined that there is a likely net benefit from using probiotics resulting primarily from prevention of eczema. The WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using probiotics in pregnant women at high risk for having an allergic child; b) using probiotics in women who breastfeed infants at high risk of developing allergy; and c) using probiotics in infants at high risk of developing allergy. All recommendations are conditional and supported by very low quality evidence.ConclusionsWAO recommendations about probiotic supplementation for prevention of allergy are intended to support parents, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions whether to use probiotics in pregnancy and during breastfeeding, and whether to give them to infants.

Unmet needs in severe chronic upper airway disease (SCUAD).

Although the majority of patients with chronic upper airway diseases have controlled symptoms during treatment, many patients have severe chronic upper airway diseases (SCUADs). SCUAD defines those patients whose symptoms are inadequately controlled despite adequate (ie, effective, safe, and acceptable) pharmacologic treatment based on guidelines. These patients have impaired quality of life, social functioning, sleep, and school/work performance. Severe uncontrolled allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory diseases, or occupational airway diseases are defined as SCUADs. Pediatric SCUADs are still unclear. In developing countries SCUADs exist, but risk factors can differ from those seen in developed countries. Comorbidities are common in patients with SCUADs and might increase their severity. The present document is the position of a group of experts considering that SCUADs should be considered differently from mild chronic upper airway diseases. It reviews the state of the art, highlighting gaps in our knowledge, and proposes several areas for a better understanding, prevention, and management of SCUADs. This document can also serve to optimize the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of SCUADs by means of comparison with mild chronic upper airway diseases.